Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
DOUBLE YOUR DONATION!
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

In Search of Peace in Syria: From Obama to Putin

Few issues have been more polarizing for lefties in recent years than the ongoing crisis in Syria. The beginning of the conflict was indeed fueled by US imperial machinations, in addition to President Bashar Assad’s obscene violence in response to the initial uprising. The CIA’s long-standing Syrian meddling certainly did not help matters, nor did the US war on Iraq, which gave rise to the ruthless Islamic State. It’s been an ugly affair, with over 220,000 deaths according to UN estimates and another 4.1 million refugees fleeing their homeland in search of safety. Perhaps the only real winners thus far have been Israel and ISIS.

Many on the left have cheered Russia’s recent entrance into the battlefield, believing it is a direct blow to US interests in the region. No doubt it’s been a geopolitical gamble for Russia to make with its own economy on the fritz. Publicly, the Russians have stated their targets in Syria are Islamic State, but on the ground they’ve largely bombed US-backed rebels. Yet, that may soon be changing if we are to believe the rhetoric coming out of the Kremlin. Here’s why.

Shortly after Russia began dropping bombs on Syria, Obama was already backing off his calls to get rid of Assad through the use of force.

“We are prepared to work both diplomatically and where we can to support moderate opposition that can help convince the Russians and Iranians to put pressure on Assad for a transition,” Obama told 60 Minutes in the interview in early October. “But … what we are not going to do is to try to reinsert ourselves in a military campaign inside of Syria.”

In other words, Obama’s plan for Syria had already failed and he was reluctant to get more involved in another Middle East catastrophe as he had caused in Libya and is prolonging in Afghanistan. Indeed, Obama implied his administration was ready to sit down with Russia and Iran to discuss how they could put an end to the Syrian war.

It is now three weeks later and that’s exactly what is happening. First the US and Russia signed a deal that would help avoid clashes in Syrian airspace. What this entailed was simple: sharing of flight patterns, types of aircraft being utilized, and precise regions where operations were taking place. In other words, both sides are now openly discussing details of their operations with one another as well as a strict protocol in case of mishaps.

While many have seen Russia’s bombing as a direct blow to Obama’s prowess (indeed many see the two as arch-enemies), it’s clear their relationship and intentions in Syria are complex and nuanced.

Last week, shortly after John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke on the phone about the Syria, Lavrov claimed Russia was ready to help US-backed Free Syrian Army fighters. This, of course, must have come as a great surprise to many who believed Russia’s sole purpose in Syria was to beat back the bloody Americans. How could the Russians now possibly say they want to help them? Aren’t all Syrian opposition forces extremists?

“External players can not decide anything for the Syrians. We must force them to come up with a plan for their country where the interests of every religious, ethnic and political group will be well protected,” Lavrov told Russian state TV. “They need to prepare for both parliamentary and presidential elections.”

Now Syrian talks in Vienna are to begin on Friday between the US, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon, Qatar, the European Union and France. What comes out of these meetings remains to be seen, but one thing is for certain, Obama appears to be ready to agree on ways in which Assad can remain in power for the short-term, but must exit after the opposition has a seat at the table.

Regardless if such an agreement will ever transpire (can any of these countries be trusted?), it’s obvious that Russia’s role in Syria is not solely to embarrass the United States. If anything, Putin doesn’t want to get bogged down in a conflict that could become another Soviet war in Afghanistan, and sitting down with various interests may well be his best strategy.

What if Russia does agree to help US-backed FSA fight ISIS? Despite the claims that most FSA fighters are in cahoots with IS or al-Nusra, reports on the ground suggest this is not entirely the case — a reality even Russia appears to acknowledge. FSA is most certainly not a united front, but more of band of individual brigades with varying allegiances and interests. Will Russia aid the units that are fighting IS, even if they’ve been backed by the US? Time will tell, but if we are to believe Lavrov, it appears to be a strong possibility.

Of course, if things do get even more out of hand it could get far worse, not better for Syria. As of this writing Obama is set to deploy 50 Special Operations commandos into Northern Syria to aid rebel factions. It’s likely Obama’s new maneuver wouldn’t have occurred had Russia not joined the fray. This, after Obama repeatedly stated he was against putting boots on the ground. It’s also clear NATO is ready to patrol Turkish borders, and in instances where Obama may back down, war-hawks like Hillary Clinton are ready to escalate the conflict — she’s already calling for a no-fly zone that would be enforced by military means, likely with US troops. None of these scenarios would be good for Syrians.

Speaking of Syrians, much that is missing in the left-wing debate on Syria are the very real impacts on those who experience the brunt of the violence, no matter who’s behind it. The UN recently reported that since Russia began its air assault that at least 120,000 people were uprooted. Areas that had largely escaped the war are now in the middle of new battles. Additionally, reports that Russian missiles struck four hospitals has been virtually ignored by the pro-Russian interventionists, and that must change – or we risk becoming as sinister as our adversaries.

Let’s hope, whatever happens, that Syrians have a stake in their own destiny, free of the confines and violence inflicted upon them by their own government, the United States, ISIS and yes, now the Russians.

More articles by:

JOSHUA FRANK is managing editor of CounterPunch. His most recent book, co-authored with Jeffrey St. Clair, is Big Heat: Earth on the Brink, to be published by AK Press next month. He can be reached at joshua@counterpunch.org. You can troll him on Twitter @joshua__frank

October 23, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
The Middle East, Not Russia, Will Prove Trump’s Downfall
Ipek S. Burnett
The Assault on The New Colossus: Trump’s Threat to Close the U.S.-Mexican Border
Mary Troy Johnston
The War on Terror is the Reign of Terror
Maximilian Werner
The Rhetoric and Reality of Death by Grizzly
David Macaray
Teamsters, Hells Angels, and Self-Determination
Jeffrey Sommers
“No People, Big Problem”: Democracy and Its Discontents In Latvia
Dean Baker
Looking for the Next Crisis: the Not Very Scary World of CLOs
Binoy Kampmark
Leaking for Change: ASIO, Jakarta, and Australia’s Jerusalem Problem
Chris Wright
The Necessity of “Lesser-Evil” Voting
Muhammad Othman
Daunting Challenge for Activists: The Cook Customer “Connection”
Don Fitz
A Debate for Auditor: What the Papers Wouldn’t Say
October 22, 2018
Henry Giroux
Neoliberalism in the Age of Pedagogical Terrorism
Melvin Goodman
Washington’s Latest Cold War Maneuver: Pulling Out of the INF
David Mattson
Basket of Deplorables Revisited: Grizzly Bears at the Mercy of Wyoming
Michelle Renee Matisons
Hurricane War Zone Further Immiserates Florida Panhandle, Panama City
Tom Gill
A Storm is Brewing in Europe: Italy and Its Public Finances Are at the Center of It
Suyapa Portillo Villeda
An Illegitimate, US-Backed Regime is Fueling the Honduran Refugee Crisis
Christopher Brauchli
The Liars’ Bench
Gary Leupp
Will Trump Split the World by Endorsing a Bold-Faced Lie?
Michael Howard
The New York Times’ Animal Cruelty Fetish
Alice Slater
Time Out for Nukes!
Geoff Dutton
Yes, Virginia, There are Conspiracies—I Think
Daniel Warner
Davos in the Desert: To Attend or Not, That is Not the Question
Priti Gulati Cox – Stan Cox
Mothers of Exiles: For Many, the Child-Separation Ordeal May Never End
Manuel E. Yepe
Pence v. China: Cold War 2.0 May Have Just Begun
Raouf Halaby
Of Pith Helmets and Sartorial Colonialism
Dan Carey
Aspirational Goals  
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail