I’m Not a Scientologist, But I Wish TV Shrinks Would Just Shut Up

“He would get mad if things weren’t his way.  But (his mother) always had him in control.”

— a neighbor about the Umpqua, Oregon assassin

I’m not a Scientologist but there are times when I wish all the TV shrinks would zip it up whenever a “mass casualty” incident happens like Roseburg, Oregon’s Umpqua community college massacre.  The therapeutic clichés keep pouring out of their ever-ready mouths, muddying the waters and piling up nonsense.

Here they come so easily spouted: “psychopath”, “sociopath”, “lack of empathy”, “abusive childhood”, “mental health disorder”, “schizophrenic”, “social and sexual reject”, “anxiety and depressive disorder”, “bipolar”, “dissociative disorder”, Donald Trump’s all-purpose “mental illness”, and my own favorite, “sick and twisted”.

Or we can relax with the brilliant diagnosis of forensic psychiatrist on TV Dr. Louis Schlesinger,  “People who commit mass murder are obviously not doing well.”  Thanks, doc.

The above pseudo-medical labels cover about half the U.S. population who at one time in our lives will deserve a psychiatric diagnosis.

The Archie Bunker in me, never far from the surface, says: the gunman in these school shootings is a frustrated punk who got his hands on a weapon.  That’s it.  Nothing fancy.  Chris Harper-Mercer, the Oregon shooter, strolls into a gun shop and slaps down his credit card and in no time, because he doesn’t have a rap sheet and probably it wouldn’t matter, at least 18 people get slammed with Glock or AR15 bullets, and nine die.  Easy as pie.

Once you’re in charge of a weapon reason flies out the window.  I became a different, swaggering person when I carried a military .45 on my hip.  After yet another school massacre the “why?” is almost irrelevant.  Elliott Rodger in Santa Barbara can’t find a date, Robert Flores in Arizona is depressed over flunking out, Seung-Hui Cho shoots 32 people at Virginia Tech because he doesn’t like “rich people”, Dylann Roof  at the Charlestown church massacre out of 100% pure race hatred, Fred Davis at San Diego State fears his professors will reject his graduate thesis, and so on.

Two years ago John Zawahri, “troubled by mental health challenges”, kills five people with a self-made AR15 in and around the Santa Monica school my son attended; Zawahri leaves a long letter nobody can interpret.  They love writing suicide notes that would get them an ‘F’ in class.

Looking for a pattern?  Many multiple school assassins are from “broken” homes, which is easy to do since half of all American marriages end up in divorce, and about a quarter of families are single parent like Laurel Mercer’s.

As night follows day the next cliché rolls out: “gun control”.  A platitude without teeth.  How about making high capacity mags illegal, prison time without parole for gunshop owners, bullet rationing, gun shows banned, a few little things like that?

If Jonathan Swift, the 18th century clergyman-satirist, was alive today he’d also insist on “parent control”, to burn enablers at the stake.  Or at least make them suffer the torment of yet another pseudo-psychological diagnosis.  Who was minding the store when Chris Mercer assembled 14 weapons, including a $700 rifle, plus body armor and high capacity magazines?  Not Laurel Mercer whose Facebook page supports “open carry” laws.   “And when the mood strikes…I sling an AR, Tek-9 or AK over my shoulder, or holster a Glock 21 (not 22), or one of my other handguns, like the Sig Sauer P226, and walk out the door. I find the shotguns are a little too cumbersome to open carry.”  Some mama.

And what about “media control”?  It’s a dead cert that some killings are copycat absorbed from over-the-top televised coverage.  (We know this is true from Mercer’s website.)  Unconstitutionally, why not limit reporting a major incident only to local media but censor to zero national coverage with its inflammatory images.  Whoops, there go the network ratings.

Best of all, the “Australian option”.  After a series of 1980s massacres, the federal government, led by Liberal (i.e. conservative) John Howard and backed by public opinion, cajoled each Australian state government to abide by the 1996 NATIONAL FIREARMS AGREEMENT that restricted almost all civilian guns, including imitations, as “prohibited weapons”.   Licensed guns may hold a maximum of 10 rounds only.  Air pistols were as hard to get as prohibited guns.  All semi-automatics and pump action shotguns were banned.  The laws were accompanied by a buy-back scheme which CUT THE RISK OF DYING BY GUNSHOT BY OVER 50%.   Introducing uniform gun laws, prime minister Howard said, “We do not want the American disease imported into Australia.”

Australia like us has its violent, gun-riddled “wild west” frontier history.   It’s definitely not a non violent nation.  Ever watched a riotous game of “Australian Rules Football”?  No player leaves the ground unless they’re bleeding to death.

Australians still kill one another.  But, mercifully, fewer.

P.S. Want to know exactly how American assassins get their weapons?  Slate’s Christine Cauterucci and Greta Weber did the legwork.

More articles by:

Clancy Sigal is a screenwriter and novelist. His latest book is Black Sunset

Weekend Edition
March 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Roberto J. González
The Mind-Benders: How to Harvest Facebook Data, Brainwash Voters, and Swing Elections
Paul Street
Deplorables II: The Dismal Dems in Stormy Times
Nick Pemberton
The Ghost of Hillary
Andrew Levine
Light at the End of the Tunnel?
Paul de Rooij
Amnesty International: Trumpeting for War… Again
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Coming in Hot
Chuck Gerhart
Sessions Exploits a Flaw to Pursue Execution of Meth Addicts
Robert Fantina
Distractions, Thought Control and Palestine
Hiroyuki Hamada
The Eyes of “Others” for Us All
Robert Hunziker
Is the EPA Hazardous to Your Health?
Stephanie Savell
15 Years After the Iraq Invasion, What Are the Costs?
Aidan O'Brien
Europe is Pregnant 
John Eskow
How Can We Live With All of This Rage?
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: Was Khe Sanh a Win or a Loss?
Dan Corjescu
The Man Who Should Be Dead
Howard Lisnoff
The Bone Spur in Chief
Brian Cloughley
Hitler and the Poisoning of the British Public
Brett Wilkins
Trump Touts $12.5B Saudi Arms Sale as US Support for Yemen War Literally Fuels Atrocities
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Iraqi Landscapes: the Path of Martyrs
Brian Saady
The War On Drugs Is Far Deadlier Than Most People Realize
Stephen Cooper
Battling the Death Penalty With James Baldwin
CJ Hopkins
Then They Came for the Globalists
Philip Doe
In Colorado, See How They Run After the Fracking Dollars
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Armed Propaganda
Binoy Kampmark
John Brennan’s Trump Problem
Nate Terani
Donald Trump’s America: Already Hell Enough for This Muslim-American
Steve Early
From Jackson to Richmond: Radical Mayors Leave Their Mark
Jill Richardson
To Believe in Science, You Have to Know How It’s Done
Ralph Nader
Ten Million Americans Could Bring H.R. 676 into Reality Land—Relief for Anxiety, Dread and Fear
Sam Pizzigati
Billionaires Won’t Save the World, Just Look at Elon Musk
Sergio Avila
Don’t Make the Border a Wasteland
Daryan Rezazad
Denial of Climate Change is Not the Problem
Ron Jacobs
Flashing for the Refugees on the Unarmed Road of Flight
Missy Comley Beattie
The Age of Absurdities and Atrocities
George Wuerthner
Isle Royale: Manage for Wilderness Not Wolves
George Payne
Pompeo Should Call the Dogs Off of WikiLeaks
Russell Mokhiber
Study Finds Single Payer Viable in 2018 Elections
Franklin Lamb
Despite Claims, Israel-Hezbollah War is Unlikely
Montana Wilderness Association Dishonors Its Past
Elizabeth “Liz” Hawkins, RN
Nurses Are Calling #TimesUp on Domestic Abuse
Paul Buhle
A Caribbean Giant Passes: Wilson Harris, RIP
Mel Gurtov
A Blank Check for Repression? A Saudi Leader Visits Washington
Seth Sandronsky
Hoop schemes: Sacramento’s corporate bid for an NBA All-Star Game
Louis Proyect
The French Malaise, Now and Then
David Yearsley
Bach and the Erotics of Spring