FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

But What Kind of Muslim President?

Within the past week, Republican Presidential candidates Ben Carson and Donald Trump have expressed a repellent form of bigotry regarding Muslims that is generating a great deal of reaction. However, this line of discussion simply lacks the nuance and historical insight necessary to properly turn this instance of publicly-praised prejudice into a teachable moment.

Carson’s words are especially interesting and deserve far more effort than those of Mr. Trump. He recently told Chuck Todd that he would oppose the selection of a Muslim as Chief Executive. The fact is that Carson would not be in the position he is now if it were not for Muslims.

The first Africans to come to America, held in bondage under the decks of slave ships, were both sub-Nilotic animists and Islamic religionists. There is no doubt that Carson carries within him at least some parentage that, at some point or another, prayed facing Mecca and recited Quranic verses in worship of Allah. The failure of the mainstream media to point out that basic historical fact is blatantly indicative of their own culpability in the continued demonization of Islam and Muslims, necessitated by our imperial adventures in Muslim lands.

It would also behoove Carson to remember he only got to where he is today in part because of a Muslim, el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz, Malcolm X. The gains made for African Americans in the last century included the contribution of he and many other Muslims who opposed northern bigotry while Martin Luther King, Jr. took on southern Jim Crow. This gap speaks to Carson’s lack of seriousness when he talks about ‘Biblical values’, such as respecting one’s elders.

The New Atheist crowd, when challenged for their anti-Muslim bigotry, lamely argues that one cannot be racist against Muslims because Islam is not an ethnicity. That is true, but when a major section of the American Muslim population is African and either converted to the faith through the Nation of Islam or migrated to these shores from the continent as practitioners, it does not take long for the racial animus to take form. When we hear typical New Atheist arguments about Islam and its abuse of women, the dominant image is not one of a white man from France, it is a brown person from Africa or Asia. That kind of thinking plays directly to the fear of black and brown male sexuality, triggering a series of reactions within the population.

But besides these points, one is forced to ask just what kind of Muslim would potentially be a serious Presidential contender. Would the American power structure and its farcical two-party system allow for a Malcolm X, someone dedicated to genuine liberation theology? Would a Muslim who follows the model of Islamic socialism so beautifully described in Andre Vltchek’s recent piece Iran is Standing (https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/18/iran-is-standing/) or even the Baathist model of governance in Syria be allowed near the nuclear football?

Perhaps the current President, who has falsely been accused of being a Muslim, offers some instruction. Has Obama made things better for African and Asian Muslims? Did he do Libya, Palestine, and Syria any favors? Has he challenged the Saudis for their lunatic Wahabbi praxis? Did he support the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt? Has he cut back on the state-sponsored surveillance and persecution of Muslims that have birthed ISIS and similar ideologies of despair? No, he has done the opposite. Despite the fact that he too only got to where he is because of Muslims, including his father, President Obama has been no friend of Muslims unless they are reactionary, petty, and capitalist stooges willing to bow before the whims of the empire. The Muslims America accepts are the ones who pray towards the American mint, not Mecca. Their jihad is one carried out in the name of petro-dollar hegemony. When they refuse to follow this blasphemous strain of Islam, they are knocked off, as was the case with Ghadaffi. Even if they are able to avoid violence, as in the case of Iran’s nuclear deal, they still must submit not to Allah but to capital. In the recent interview with CBS’s 60 Minutes, Iranian President Rouhani did not fail to mention that part of the nuclear agreement regarding soon-to-be-unfrozen assets will require they privatized. That is a clue to the real issue at stake, it has never been about Israel’s safety, it was always about subverting Iranian state assets to Western capital.

I have recently come across a 1988 paper by one William Pietz titled THE “POST-COLONIALISM” OF COLD WAR DISCOURSE (https://archive.org/details/pdfy-llWfc0Y5NKFMfEtO). Pietz makes a compelling argument that borrows from both the scholarship of the late Edward Said, comparative literature, and the praxis, the challenging Orientalism in its various demented forms. He opens the paper with the following:

The idea of totalitarianism and the discourse of the cold war would seem to bear at most a negative relation to colonial discourse. By translating all political events and social struggle anywhere in the world into the master code of U.S./Soviet confrontation, there remains neither room nor need for the sort of colonial discourse so heavily relied on by Western states during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While I am overstating the case-obviously colonial dis- course did not vanish after 1940-the function of cold war language as a substitute for the language of colonialism raises the question of the comparability and actual continuity of colonial and cold war discursive structures. Can the almost immediate recognition and acceptance of cold war discourse after the war be explained in part by its appropriation of ideologically familiar elements from the earlier discourse of Western colonialism? An examination of four of the most important contributors to the intellectual legitimacy of cold war thinking-George Kennan, George Orwell, Arthur Koestler, and Hannah Arendt-suggests that this is the case.

There you have it plainly. For years, Leftists have described the so-called “War on Terror” an eerie mirror of the Cold War in both pathos and discourse. Now we can say with certainty that this was not an accident, it was a calculated and logical extension of a monologue dating back not to 1945 and Potsdam but the beginning of the European colonial epoch. And throughout that epoch, the quislings in various Muslim countries have collaborated with the Western hegemonic project in order to preserve their own status at the expense of their subjects.

Ben Carson and Donald Trump are both foolish men who speak from places of fear and calculated bigotry intended to cater to American xenophobia. They have done damage with their statements and set backwards progress to some degree. But on the same token, one must contemplate what they are saying with some seriousness. The Tea Party has made a field day out of accusations that Obama became a Muslim while attending a school in Indonesia. They forget to mention why Suharto was allowing for such a culture in the first place

More articles by:

Andrew Stewart is a documentary film maker and reporter who lives outside Providence.  His film, AARON BRIGGS AND THE HMS GASPEE, about the historical role of Brown University in the slave trade, is available for purchase on Amazon Instant Video or on DVD.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
September 19, 2019
Richard Falk
Burning Amazonia, Denying Climate Change, Devastating Syria, Starving Yemen, and Ignoring Kashmir
Charles Pierson
With Enemies Like These, Trump Doesn’t Need Friends
Lawrence Davidson
The Sorry State of the Nobel Peace Prize
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Scourge in the White House
Urvashi Sarkar
“Not a Blade of Grass Grew:” Living on the Edge of the Climate Crisis in the Sandarbans of West Bengal.
Thomas Knapp
Trump and Netanyahu: “Mutual Defense” or Just Mutual Political Back-Scratching?
Dean Baker
Is There Any Lesser Authority Than Alan Greenspan?
Gary Leupp
Warren’s Ethnic Issue Should Not Go Away
George Ochenski
Memo to Trump: Water Runs Downhill
Jeff Cohen
What George Carlin Taught Us about Media Propaganda by Omission
Stephen Martin
The Perspicacity of Mcluhan and Panopticonic Plans of the MIC
September 18, 2019
Kenneth Surin
An Excellent Study Of The Manufactured Labour “Antisemitism Crisis”
Patrick Cockburn
The Saudi Crown Prince Plans to Make Us Forget About the Murder of Jamal Khashoggi Before the US Election
W. T. Whitney
Political Struggle and Fixing Cuba’s Economy
Ron Jacobs
Support the Climate Strike, Not a Military Strike
John Kendall Hawkins
Slouching Toward “Bethlehem”
Ted Rall
Once Again in Afghanistan, the U.S. Proves It Can’t Be Trusted
William Astore
The Ultra-Costly, Underwhelming F-35 Fighter
Dave Lindorff
Why on Earth Would the US Go to War with Iran over an Attack on Saudi Oil Refineries?
Binoy Kampmark
Doctored Admissions: the University Admissions Scandal as a Global Problem
Jeremy Corbyn
Creating a Society of Hope and Inclusion: Speech to the TUC
Zhivko Illeieff
Why You Should Care About #ShutDownDC and the Global Climate Strike  
Catherine Tumber
Land Without Bread: the Green New Deal Forsakes America’s Countryside
Liam Kennedy
Boris Johnson: Elitist Defender of Britain’s Big Banks
September 17, 2019
Mario Barrera
The Southern Strategy and Donald Trump
Robert Jensen
The Danger of Inspiration in a Time of Ecological Crisis
Dean Baker
Health Care: Premiums and Taxes
Dave Lindorff
Recalling the Hundreds of Thousands of Civilian Victims of America’s Endless ‘War on Terror’
Binoy Kampmark
Oiling for War: The Houthi Attack on Abqaiq
Susie Day
You Say You Want a Revolution: a Prison Letter to Yoko Ono
Rich Gibson
Seize Solidarity House
Laura Flanders
From Voice of America to NPR: New CEO Lansing’s Glass House
Don Fitz
What is Energy Denial?
Dan Bacher
Governor Newsom Says He Will Veto Bill Blocking Trump Rollback of Endangered Fish Species Protections
Thomas Knapp
Election 2020: Time to Stop Pretending and Start Over
W. Alejandro Sanchez
Inside the Syrian Peace Talks
Elliot Sperber
Mickey Mouse Networks
September 16, 2019
Sam Husseini
Biden Taking Iraq Lies to the Max
Paul Street
Joe Biden’s Answer to Slavery’s Legacy: Phonographs for the Poor
Paul Atwood
Why Mattis is No Hero
Jonathan Cook
Brexit Reveals Jeremy Corbyn to be the True Moderate
Jeff Mackler
Trump, Trade and China
Robert Hunziker
Fukushima’s Radioactive Water Crisis
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Democrats and the Climate Crisis
Michael Doliner
Hot Stuff on the Afghan Peace Deal Snafu
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail