• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

CounterPunch needs you. piggybank-icon You need us. The cost of keeping the site alive and running is growing fast, as more and more readers visit. We want you to stick around, but it eats up bandwidth and costs us a bundle. Help us reach our modest goal (we are half way there!) so we can keep CounterPunch going. Donate today!

The IPCC Caught in a Pressure Cooker

“Paris 2015” designates the 21st Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“COP21”) to be held November 30th to December 11th. The participants will be seeking a new international agreement on climate with a goal of holding global warming below 2°C (3.6°F) relative to pre-industrial temps. Can they do it? Yes, but will they?

If history is a guide, the odds are 50/50, maybe 25/75. However, this time history may be a poor guide because the pressure to accomplish an agreement has never been more pronounced, more eagerly sought, or more crucial. It’s almost a given that “something must be done fast.” Just ask any legitimate climate scientist.

“We are the first generation to really become aware of the problem and yet the last generation that can deal with it,” Laurent Fabius, President COP21 and minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development, France.

However, “the world is always perceived as dual between rich and developing countries. The latter perceive the climate issue as an obstacle to their development [nevertheless] simply put, if no action is taken the temperature can rise up to 4.8C by 2100, according to the IPCC,” The COPO21 in Paris: Will it be a Success or a Failure? One Europe, Feb. 14, 2015.

If such is the case, i.e., no action, over time the world will never be the same as it is likely hordes of people crowd together at higher latitudes, warmongering is almost guaranteed.

As for a preview of COP21, here’s the perceived result of COP20, which was held in Lima in December 2014: “As COP20 comes to a close, the members of the UNFCCC (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Women and Gender Constituency), representing hundreds of thousands of women and men from around the world, respond to the failure of the Lima outcome to reflect the urgency of the climate crisis… COP failed to move substantially forward towards the ultimate goal of agreeing on a plan to avert climate catastrophe,” Global Education Magazine, Dec. 20, 2014.

So it goes, “COP21 will be remembered either as a global turning point in the transition towards a low-carbon civilization or a tipping point towards runaway climate change,” Energy Studies Institute, Policy Brief, April 21, 2015.

Furthermore, according to Energy Studies Institute, if COP21 fails to deliver, the already declining faith of the general public in international negotiations will be dealt a severe blow. In that regard, the biggest challenge as of today is “the architecture for an agreement remains to be determined.” Exhale: Purportedly, it is starting to come into focus.

To gain insight into the upcoming COP21 proceedings, one of the best sources is New Climate Institute/Germany, an internationally recognized organization that provides flagship projects to track and analyze climate change efforts.

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change funded New Climate Institute to track progress of preparation of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) of countries worldwide.

As of August 1, 2015 twenty-two countries have submitted INDCs. Of those countries, which have not yet filed, the biggest challenges are “difficulty with engaging relevant stakeholders,” followed by “lack of internal agreement on desired ambition level.”

All of this background work aims to produce a climate agreement to limit temperature increases below 2°C based upon pre-industrial levels. Anything above 2°C will ring all kinds of nasty bells and toot hideous whistles. Nevertheless, in point of fact, the ecosystem is already demonstrating a preview of numerous awful events whilst temps are not even one-half way to the 2°C limit.

In that regard, as recently as 2011 the European Commission requested scientific papers about the impact of a 2°C rise in temps. Lo and behold, a couple of years later they requested papers about the impact of a greater than 2°C rise in temps. The message is clear.

But, is 2°C itself too high of a limit? If so, then “lights out” is about to take on a whole new connotation, kind of like the double entendre of climate change as the risqué aspect becomes truly bawdy. If that does not sound too good, it is not!

In April 2014, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that in order to stay below the 2°C limit, global greenhouse-gas emissions (“GHG”) would have to decline between 1.3% and 3.1% each year, on average, between 2010 and 2050.

Decline? The opposite is occurring. Global emissions increased by 1.5%/yr. from 1973-2000. Since then, emissions have increased by 2.6%/yr. from 2000-2014 (Hansen), an increase of 73% over the prior decades. This is going in the wrong direction. Who knows, the emissions decline may end up as a practical joke, but it must be done, or the situation is going to heat up real fast.

After all, well before hitting the diabolical 2°C level, the ecosystem, in many respects, is nearly on its back. Lots of noise is coming from everywhere nobody goes.

The Arctic is already in a massive meltdown stage, risking rapid-fire methane release followed by runaway global warming, and the warming Arctic alters atmospheric jet streams which, in turn, alter Northern Hemispheric weather patterns for the worse, way worse, like huge prolonged droughts, like bitter cold winters. These events are already here today. Interestingly, people recognize this changing climate in contrast to their childhood days.

Mass Mortality Events, dead animals found worldwide, especially in the seas, are nearly at an epidemic stage (ABC News, “Mysterious Mass Animal Deaths All Over the World,” May 19, 2014,).

The oceans absorb 90% of planetary heat and 30% of the CO2. Can marine animals handle it? Maybe not. Again, ecosystem collapse is happening where nobody goes, meanwhile ocean acidification is rampantly 10 times faster than ever, and as a result, pteropods at the very base of the marine food chain are just now starting to struggle to reproduce and mature. Yes, the base of the food chain.

Rising sea levels are already impacting America. The Outer Banks, North Carolina is down to 25% its original width in some areas of the 200-mile long string of narrow barrier islands, and the famous Highway 12, a National Scenic Byway, buckles and washes away all too often. More than fifty thousand people reside there.

According to a new study, as of August 27th, 2015, “NASA Zeroes in on Ocean Rise: How Much? How Soon? It’s pretty certain we are locked into at least 3 feet of sea level rise, and probably more.” However, they do not yet know the timing. Really, how could they? But, “locked in” doesn’t sound too good. NYC? Outer Banks?

At present “effects that scientists had predicted in the past would result from global climate change are now occurring,” NASA, Global Climate Change, Vital Signs of the Planet. No surprise here as the hottest years on record have occurred since 2000.

Here’s the bigger uglier picture: According to reputable sources, there’s probably no way to stay under 2°C. In fact lamentably, the paleoclimate record indicates Earth once experienced a 5°C increase within a couple of decades, but nobody knows exactly why. Something earthshattering must have occurred. Today’s anthropogenic forces on the climate, like CO2, may also be earthshattering. Time will tell soon enough, maybe too soon. Nobody really knows for sure because global warming is brand new to humankind.

Beyond that, with GHGs turbocharging 135% faster than 40 years ago at a rate of 2.0ppm/yr. (Hansen), simple math says big trouble will likely hit by, or before 2040-50. After all, emissions and GHGs are growing exponentially.

Dr. James Hansen claims, in a court filed document, the paleoclimate record indicates enough warming occurs at 450ppm that it could melt most of Antarctica, containing 85-90% of the world’s ice, but it would take a long, long time. Meanwhile, along the way, the incoming would destroy coastlines and flood coastal cities. CO2 at 400ppm now is increasing 2.0ppm/yr. times 25 equals 450ppm in 2040.

Will COP21 save the ecosystem soon enough? Will the COP21 come to agreement?

By all appearances, and according to factual record, years and years of COP meetings have yet to meld countries together into one unified blend of “let’s fight this.” Considering the enormous challenge in organizing 190 countries around one single goal, the competing interests are beyond the scope of this article and beyond the imagination of even the sharpest diplomat.

Yet already, whilst still below the 2°C marker, a bevy of horrid things are already starting to appear that could make life brutally miserable well before many of the COP21 delegates celebrate retirement and try to find a nice sandy beach that hasn’t already washed away.

More articles by:

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.


May 21, 2019
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Locked in a Cold War Time Warp
Roger Harris
Venezuela: Amnesty International in Service of Empire
Patrick Cockburn
Trump is Making the Same Mistakes in the Middle East the US Always Makes
Robert Hunziker
Custer’s Last Stand Meets Global Warming
Lance Olsen
Renewable Energy: the Switch From Drill, Baby, Drill to Mine, Baby, Mine
Dean Baker
Ady Barkan, the Fed and the Liberal Funder Industry
Manuel E. Yepe
Maduro Gives Trump a Lesson in Ethics and Morality
Jan Oberg
Trump’s Iran Trap
David D’Amato
What is Anarchism?
Nicky Reid
Trump’s War In Venezuela Could Be Che’s Revenge
Elliot Sperber
Springtime in New York
May 20, 2019
Richard Greeman
The Yellow Vests of France: Six Months of Struggle
Manuel García, Jr.
Abortion: White Panic Over Demographic Dilution?
Robert Fisk
From the Middle East to Northern Ireland, Western States are All Too Happy to Avoid Culpability for War Crimes
Tom Clifford
From the Gulf of Tonkin to the Persian Gulf
Chandra Muzaffar
Targeting Iran
Valerie Reynoso
The Violent History of the Venezuelan Opposition
Howard Lisnoff
They’re Just About Ready to Destroy Roe v. Wade
Eileen Appelbaum
Private Equity is a Driving Force Behind Devious Surprise Billings
Binoy Kampmark
Bob Hawke: Misunderstood in Memoriam
J.P. Linstroth
End of an era for ETA?: May Basque Peace Continue
Weekend Edition
May 17, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Melvin Goodman
Trump and the Middle East: a Long Record of Personal Failure
Joan Roelofs
“Get Your Endangered Species Off My Bombing Range!”
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Slouching Towards Tehran
Paul Street
It’s Even More Terrible Than You Thought
Rob Urie
Grabby Joe and the Problem of Environmental Decline
Ajamu Baraka
2020 Elections: It’s Militarism and the Military Budget Stupid!
Andrew Levine
Springtime for Biden and Democrats
Richard Moser
The Interlocking Crises: War and Climate Chaos
Ron Jacobs
Uncle Sam Needs Our Help Again?
Eric Draitser
Elizabeth Warren Was Smart to Tell FOX to Go to Hell
Peter Bolton
The Washington Post’s “Cartel of the Suns” Theory is the Latest Desperate Excuse for Why the Coup Attempt in Venezuela has Failed
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Analysis of Undecideds Suggests Biden’s Support May be Exaggerated
Peter Lackowski
Eyewitness in Venezuela: a 14-year Perspective
Karl Grossman
Can Jerry Nadler Take Down Trump?
Howie Hawkins
Does the Climate Movement Really Mean What It Says?
Gary Leupp
Bolton and the Road to the War He Wants
Jill Richardson
Climate Change was No Accident
Josh Hoxie
Debunking Myths About Wealth and Race
David Barsamian
Iran Notes
David Mattson
Social Carrying Capacity Politspeak Bamboozle
Christopher Brauchli
The Pompeo Smirk
Louis Proyect
Trotsky, Bukharin and the Eco-Modernists
Martha Burk
Will Burning at the Stake Come Next?
John W. Whitehead
The Deadly Perils of Traffic Stops in America