FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Populist Dimorphism: Trump and Sanders

Donald Trump may be a greedy bigot, but he is no hypocrite, and it is his refreshing honesty that is his most endearing characteristic*.

Trump is an incarnation of Republican populism that is completely free of the public relations superstructure of hypocrisy — those politically life-sustaining lies — that is essential for the Republican Party establishment. The “inner party” that is the Republican Party establishment is a club of heartless killers with no more concern for the Republican hoi polloi than they have for anyone else, beyond their utility as exploitable human resources. In elitist Republican calculus, the nativist masses — “the Republican base” — are useful idiots to be programmed (“brainwashed”) through electronic mass media, to fall in line into a malleable blob of people-power that pushes elitist schemes uphill.

The Donald bypasses the elitist snobbery of the Republican inner party, and speaks directly to the nativist lumpenproletariat, who are thrilled to see their demeaning aristocratic manipulators pantsed (“debagged”). The yearning nativist masses gleefully revenge themselves for their decades of slights by their vanguard, by throwing the weight of their popular support to The Donald. And The Donald, by sucking the wind out of Republican establishment sails, becalms the entire warship that is the Republican Party, and captures it. This is piracy at it finest.

A distaste for hypocrisy is popular among the masses regardless of individual political orientation. This is evident with the appearance of the two most popular contenders in the presidential contest today: Donald Trump (on the right, by the foul line) and Bernie Sanders (in left-center). As Trump so clearly explained at the Iowa State Fair on August 15, Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton (a face of the establishment under the Democratic Party nameplate), and all the other bit-player contenders are simply puppets dangled before the public’s noses by big-money string-pullers shrouded by thick curtains of corporate obfuscation. The Donald is uniquely his own string-puller, he is without hypocrisy because as his own man he is free to say, and try to do, what he wants to say and what he wants to try to do. Trump is the fairy godfather of the nativist lumpenproletariat, his words resonate with many of their hopes, and his campaign is a magical gift to them conjured solely from his own deep pockets.

Bernie Sanders is Trump’s polar opposite, he is the man of the (non-trumpian type) people in this campaign. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign raised $15 million between its launch in late April and July 2nd, 400,000 donations came from about 250,000 individual donors, the average donation was $33.51, and 99% of donations were under $250. Both Trump and Sanders are advocates of campaign finance reform, pure full-spectrum populism.

The other contenders in the presidential qualifying rounds are each the face-end of a big-money establishment string; many strings, same establishment. Remember the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court: the more money you have, the bigger the votes you get to buy. So, Trump the voter gets to buy his own private presidential candidate: himself. Trump’s vote-investing power is on par with the aggregate of 250,000 vote-investors for Bernie Sanders. Trump’s presidential campaign is his own wholly-owned subsidiary, while Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign is a publicly-traded enterprise with over 400,000 shares of common stock.

Trump, as the presidential contender, doesn’t owe anybody anything, and he acts that way. Sanders, as the presidential contender, owes everything to many, many people, and he acts that way. What is appealing about both Trump and Sanders is that neither is a favored tool of the establishment. They each have their flaws, the gravity of which depends on your particular preferences regarding politics and personality. But, as one of my mentors used to say so long ago: “In a land without sheep, a goat is a prized possession.”

* Donald Trump: ‘Jeb Bush is a puppet to his donors‘ Published on Aug 15, 2015.
(Republican front-runner Donald Trump told reporters outside the Iowa State Fair that as a former political donor-turned-candidate, he knows how the presidential campaign finance “system” works better than anyone.)
More articles by:

Manuel Garcia, Jr, once a physicist, is now a lazy househusband who writes out his analyses of physical or societal problems or interactions. He can be reached at mangogarcia@att.net

Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization
David Yearsley
Bollocks to Brexit: the Plumber Sings
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail