FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Populist Dimorphism: Trump and Sanders

by

Donald Trump may be a greedy bigot, but he is no hypocrite, and it is his refreshing honesty that is his most endearing characteristic*.

Trump is an incarnation of Republican populism that is completely free of the public relations superstructure of hypocrisy — those politically life-sustaining lies — that is essential for the Republican Party establishment. The “inner party” that is the Republican Party establishment is a club of heartless killers with no more concern for the Republican hoi polloi than they have for anyone else, beyond their utility as exploitable human resources. In elitist Republican calculus, the nativist masses — “the Republican base” — are useful idiots to be programmed (“brainwashed”) through electronic mass media, to fall in line into a malleable blob of people-power that pushes elitist schemes uphill.

The Donald bypasses the elitist snobbery of the Republican inner party, and speaks directly to the nativist lumpenproletariat, who are thrilled to see their demeaning aristocratic manipulators pantsed (“debagged”). The yearning nativist masses gleefully revenge themselves for their decades of slights by their vanguard, by throwing the weight of their popular support to The Donald. And The Donald, by sucking the wind out of Republican establishment sails, becalms the entire warship that is the Republican Party, and captures it. This is piracy at it finest.

A distaste for hypocrisy is popular among the masses regardless of individual political orientation. This is evident with the appearance of the two most popular contenders in the presidential contest today: Donald Trump (on the right, by the foul line) and Bernie Sanders (in left-center). As Trump so clearly explained at the Iowa State Fair on August 15, Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton (a face of the establishment under the Democratic Party nameplate), and all the other bit-player contenders are simply puppets dangled before the public’s noses by big-money string-pullers shrouded by thick curtains of corporate obfuscation. The Donald is uniquely his own string-puller, he is without hypocrisy because as his own man he is free to say, and try to do, what he wants to say and what he wants to try to do. Trump is the fairy godfather of the nativist lumpenproletariat, his words resonate with many of their hopes, and his campaign is a magical gift to them conjured solely from his own deep pockets.

Bernie Sanders is Trump’s polar opposite, he is the man of the (non-trumpian type) people in this campaign. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign raised $15 million between its launch in late April and July 2nd, 400,000 donations came from about 250,000 individual donors, the average donation was $33.51, and 99% of donations were under $250. Both Trump and Sanders are advocates of campaign finance reform, pure full-spectrum populism.

The other contenders in the presidential qualifying rounds are each the face-end of a big-money establishment string; many strings, same establishment. Remember the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court: the more money you have, the bigger the votes you get to buy. So, Trump the voter gets to buy his own private presidential candidate: himself. Trump’s vote-investing power is on par with the aggregate of 250,000 vote-investors for Bernie Sanders. Trump’s presidential campaign is his own wholly-owned subsidiary, while Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign is a publicly-traded enterprise with over 400,000 shares of common stock.

Trump, as the presidential contender, doesn’t owe anybody anything, and he acts that way. Sanders, as the presidential contender, owes everything to many, many people, and he acts that way. What is appealing about both Trump and Sanders is that neither is a favored tool of the establishment. They each have their flaws, the gravity of which depends on your particular preferences regarding politics and personality. But, as one of my mentors used to say so long ago: “In a land without sheep, a goat is a prized possession.”

* Donald Trump: ‘Jeb Bush is a puppet to his donors‘ Published on Aug 15, 2015.
(Republican front-runner Donald Trump told reporters outside the Iowa State Fair that as a former political donor-turned-candidate, he knows how the presidential campaign finance “system” works better than anyone.)
More articles by:

Manuel Garcia, Jr, once a physicist, is now a lazy househusband who writes out his analyses of physical or societal problems or interactions. He can be reached at mangogarcia@att.net

February 21, 2018
Ajamu Baraka
Venezuela: Revenge of the Mad-Dog Empire
Edward Hunt
Treating North Korea Rough
Binoy Kampmark
Meddling for Empire: the CIA Comes Clean
Ron Jacobs
Stamping Out Hunger
Ammar Kourany – Martha Myers
So, You Think You Are My Partner? International NGOs and National NGOs, Costs of Asymmetrical Relationships
Michael Welton
1980s: From Star Wars to the End of the Cold War
Judith Deutsch
Finkelstein’s on Gaza: Who or What Has a Right to Exist? 
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
War Preparations on Venezuela as Election Nears
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Military Realities
Steve Early
Refinery Safety Campaign Frays Blue-Green Alliance
Ali Mohsin
Muslims Face Increasing Discrimination, State Surveillance Under Trump
Julian Vigo
UK Mass Digital Surveillance Regime Ruled Illegal
Peter Crowley
Revisiting ‘Make America Great Again’
Andrew Stewart
Black Panther: Afrofuturism Gets a Superb Film, Marvel Grows Up and I Don’t Know How to Review It
CounterPunch News Service
A Call to Celebrate 2018 as the Year of William Edward Burghardt Du Bois by the Saturday Free School
February 20, 2018
Nick Pemberton
The Gun Violence the Media Shows Us and the State Violence They Don’t
John Eskow
Sympathy for the Drivel: On the Vocabulary of President Nitwit
John Steppling
Trump, Putin, and Nikolas Cruz Walk Into a Bar…
John W. Whitehead
America’s Cult of Violence Turns Deadly
Ishmael Reed
Charles F. Harris: He Popularized Black History
Will Podmore
Paying the Price: the TUC and Brexit
George Burchett
Plumpes Denken: Crude thinking
Binoy Kampmark
The Caring Profession: Peacekeeping, Blue Helmets and Sexual Abuse
Lawrence Wittner
The Trump Administration’s War on Workers
David Swanson
The Question of Sanctions: South Africa and Palestine
Walter Clemens
Murderers in High Places
Dean Baker
How Does the Washington Post Know that Trump’s Plan Really “Aims” to Pump $1.5 Trillion Into Infrastructure Projects?
February 19, 2018
Rob Urie
Mueller, Russia and Oil Politics
Richard Moser
Mueller the Politician
Robert Hunziker
There Is No Time Left
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela Decides to Hold Presidential Elections, the Opposition Chooses to Boycott Democracy
Daniel Warner
Parkland Florida: Revisiting Michael Fields
Sheldon Richman
‘Peace Through Strength’ is a Racket
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Taking on the Pentagon
Patrick Cockburn
People Care More About the OXFAM Scandal Than the Cholera Epidemic
Ted Rall
On Gun Violence and Control, a Political Gordian Knot
Binoy Kampmark
Making Mugs of Voters: Mueller’s Russia Indictments
Dave Lindorff
Mass Killers Abetted by Nutjobs
Myles Hoenig
A Response to David Axelrod
Colin Todhunter
The Royal Society and the GMO-Agrochemical Sector
Cesar Chelala
A Student’s Message to Politicians about the Florida Massacre
Weekend Edition
February 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
American Carnage
Paul Street
Michael Wolff, Class Rule, and the Madness of King Don
Andrew Levine
Had Hillary Won: What Now?
David Rosen
Donald Trump’s Pathetic Sex Life
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail