FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Battle Over BDS

While Netanyahu’s agents lobby Congress in an all out effort to overturn the Iran nuclear deal, Israeli strategists have opened a second front: an escalating propaganda war to derail BDS.

Inspired by the overthrow of apartheid in South Africa, BDS is a global movement that seeks to end Israel’s longstanding impunity for its continuing ethnic cleansing, colonization, racial discrimination and military occupation—international crimes that have denied Palestinians their fundamental rights of freedom, equality and self-determination.

The BDS movement began on July 9, 2005, when a majority of Palestinian civil society organizations called upon people of conscience all over the world to launch broad boycotts against Israeli and other companies that profit from the violation of Palestinian rights; to divest from corporations that are complicit in such violations; and to demand sanctions against Israel for its criminal behavior. Intended beneficiaries were and are Palestinians in Israel, Palestinians under military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza and Palestinian refugees wherever they reside.  The movement puts forward three specific objectives:

* End the occupation and dismantle the Wall;

* Recognize the fundamental rights of Arab/Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and

* Respect the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes (as stipulated in UN Resolution 194).

The increasing success of BDS, especially on American campuses and within U.S. protestant denominations, has alarmed Israeli officials and supporters.  In June, two U.S. billionaires (Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban) funded a new organization headed by David Brog, former executive director of Christians United for Israel (CUFI).  Called Campus Maccabees, the group has a mandate to blunt campus BDS activities by branding them as anti-Semitism.

The inspiration for the campaign appears to come from The Reut Institute, an Israeli think tank based in Tel Aviv that describes itself as a “non-partisan non-profit strategy group.” In its June 2015 “Update and Overview” entitled “Contending with BDS and the Assault on Israel’s Legitimacy,” Reut dismisses out of hand the avowed BDS targets described above.  Instead, the document portrays BDS as a movement for the “delegitimization of Israel” and calls it a “strategic threat with potentially existential implications.”  It claims that delegitimization is “about challenging Israel’s very existence and not about correcting its policies.”  It concludes that BDS is “a modern day version of anti-Semitism, directed against the nationhood of Jews.”  On what facts are these allegations based?  The paper doesn’t say.

The “Update” document goes on to include such undocumented claims as the following:

* The BDS movement is pitted “against any political progress with the Palestinians.”

* “While BDS boycotts settlements, it is actually against any form of Israeli withdrawal from the settlements….”

* “BDS frontloads criticism of Israel’s policies and backloads its desire for Israel’s implosion.”

Even more outlandish is Reut’s allegation that “singling out the Jewish state is de-facto fundamentally anti-Semitic, and will eventually result in targeting Jews for being Jewish.”

In outlining a strategy for fighting BDS, Reut claims that the BDS supporters brand “Israel and Jews” as oppressors and frame Palestinians as powerless victims of “Israel and the Jews.”  Yet there is nothing in the published BDS documents that links the oppression of Palestinians to any specific religious or ethnic group.

Not surprisingly, popular outrage against Israeli violence sometimes does ignite latent anti-Semitism.  It may also motivate some Jew-haters to applaud BDS and other activities intended to bring Israel to account.  However, anti-Semitism has no role in BDS or other NGO activities that oppose Israeli policies and practices regarding Palestinians.

In BDS, one searches in vain for an attack on Jews.  The movement targets the violations of human rights by the Israeli government, not the state itself or its predominately Jewish citizens.  Contrary to the government’s official hasbara (public diplomacy), the movement has never argued for the “delegitimization of Israel” nor condemned Jews as Jews.

Despite its delegitimization and anti-Semitism charges, the Reut paper concludes with a significant and positive recommendation for “winning against BDS.  It states:

“A consistent and credible commitment of the government of Israel to ending control over the Palestinian population and to the integration and equality for Israel’s Arab citizens is essential for keeping BDS at bay.”

When that happens, perhaps BDS will also have won.

More articles by:

L. Michael Hager is cofounder and former Director General, International Development Law Organization, Rome.

Weekend Edition
August 17, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Daniel Wolff
The Aretha Dialogue
Nick Pemberton
Donald Trump and the Rise of Patriotism 
Joseph Natoli
First Amendment Rights and the Court of Popular Opinion
Andrew Levine
Midterms 2018: What’s There to Hope For?
Robert Hunziker
Hothouse Earth
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Running Out of Fools
Ajamu Baraka
Opposing Bipartisan Warmongering is Defending Human Rights of the Poor and Working Class
Paul Street
Corporate Media: the Enemy of the People
David Macaray
Trump and the Sex Tape
CJ Hopkins
Where Have All the Nazis Gone?
Daniel Falcone
The Future of NATO: an Interview With Richard Falk
Cesar Chelala
The Historic Responsibility of the Catholic Church
Ron Jacobs
The Barbarism of US Immigration Policy
Kenneth Surin
In Shanghai
William Camacaro - Frederick B. Mills
The Military Option Against Venezuela in the “Year of the Americas”
Nancy Kurshan
The Whole World Was Watching: Chicago ’68, Revisited
Robert Fantina
Yemeni and Palestinian Children
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Orcas and Other-Than-Human Grief
Shoshana Fine – Thomas Lindemann
Migrants Deaths: European Democracies and the Right to Not Protect?
Paul Edwards
Totally Irrusianal
Thomas Knapp
Murphy’s Law: Big Tech Must Serve as Censorship Subcontractors
Mark Ashwill
More Demons Unleashed After Fulbright University Vietnam Official Drops Rhetorical Bombshells
Ralph Nader
Going Fundamental Eludes Congressional Progressives
Hans-Armin Ohlmann
My Longest Day: How World War II Ended for My Family
Matthew Funke
The Nordic Countries Aren’t Socialist
Daniel Warner
Tiger Woods, Donald Trump and Crime and Punishment
Dave Lindorff
Mainstream Media Hypocrisy on Display
Jeff Cohen
Democrats Gather in Chicago: Elite Party or Party of the People?
Victor Grossman
Stand Up With New Hope in Germany?
Christopher Brauchli
A Family Affair
Jill Richardson
Profiting From Poison
Patrick Bobilin
Moving the Margins
Alison Barros
Dear White American
Celia Bottger
If Ireland Can Reject Fossil Fuels, Your Town Can Too
Ian Scott Horst
Less Voting, More Revolution
Peter Certo
Trump Snubbed McCain, Then the Media Snubbed the Rest of Us
Dan Ritzman
Drilling ANWR: One of Our Last Links to the Wild World is in Danger
Brandon Do
The World and Palestine, Palestine and the World
Chris Wright
An Updated and Improved Marxism
Daryan Rezazad
Iran and the Doomsday Machine
Patrick Bond
Africa’s Pioneering Marxist Political Economist, Samir Amin (1931-2018)
Louis Proyect
Memoir From the Underground
Binoy Kampmark
Meaningless Titles and Liveable Cities: Melbourne Loses to Vienna
Andrew Stewart
Blackkklansman: Spike Lee Delivers a Masterpiece
Elizabeth Lennard
Alan Chadwick in the Budding Grove: Story Summary for a Documentary Film
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail