Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Please Support CounterPunch’s Annual Fund Drive
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We only ask you once a year, but when we ask we mean it. So, please, help as much as you can. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. All contributions are tax-deductible.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Battle Over BDS

While Netanyahu’s agents lobby Congress in an all out effort to overturn the Iran nuclear deal, Israeli strategists have opened a second front: an escalating propaganda war to derail BDS.

Inspired by the overthrow of apartheid in South Africa, BDS is a global movement that seeks to end Israel’s longstanding impunity for its continuing ethnic cleansing, colonization, racial discrimination and military occupation—international crimes that have denied Palestinians their fundamental rights of freedom, equality and self-determination.

The BDS movement began on July 9, 2005, when a majority of Palestinian civil society organizations called upon people of conscience all over the world to launch broad boycotts against Israeli and other companies that profit from the violation of Palestinian rights; to divest from corporations that are complicit in such violations; and to demand sanctions against Israel for its criminal behavior. Intended beneficiaries were and are Palestinians in Israel, Palestinians under military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza and Palestinian refugees wherever they reside.  The movement puts forward three specific objectives:

* End the occupation and dismantle the Wall;

* Recognize the fundamental rights of Arab/Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and

* Respect the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes (as stipulated in UN Resolution 194).

The increasing success of BDS, especially on American campuses and within U.S. protestant denominations, has alarmed Israeli officials and supporters.  In June, two U.S. billionaires (Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban) funded a new organization headed by David Brog, former executive director of Christians United for Israel (CUFI).  Called Campus Maccabees, the group has a mandate to blunt campus BDS activities by branding them as anti-Semitism.

The inspiration for the campaign appears to come from The Reut Institute, an Israeli think tank based in Tel Aviv that describes itself as a “non-partisan non-profit strategy group.” In its June 2015 “Update and Overview” entitled “Contending with BDS and the Assault on Israel’s Legitimacy,” Reut dismisses out of hand the avowed BDS targets described above.  Instead, the document portrays BDS as a movement for the “delegitimization of Israel” and calls it a “strategic threat with potentially existential implications.”  It claims that delegitimization is “about challenging Israel’s very existence and not about correcting its policies.”  It concludes that BDS is “a modern day version of anti-Semitism, directed against the nationhood of Jews.”  On what facts are these allegations based?  The paper doesn’t say.

The “Update” document goes on to include such undocumented claims as the following:

* The BDS movement is pitted “against any political progress with the Palestinians.”

* “While BDS boycotts settlements, it is actually against any form of Israeli withdrawal from the settlements….”

* “BDS frontloads criticism of Israel’s policies and backloads its desire for Israel’s implosion.”

Even more outlandish is Reut’s allegation that “singling out the Jewish state is de-facto fundamentally anti-Semitic, and will eventually result in targeting Jews for being Jewish.”

In outlining a strategy for fighting BDS, Reut claims that the BDS supporters brand “Israel and Jews” as oppressors and frame Palestinians as powerless victims of “Israel and the Jews.”  Yet there is nothing in the published BDS documents that links the oppression of Palestinians to any specific religious or ethnic group.

Not surprisingly, popular outrage against Israeli violence sometimes does ignite latent anti-Semitism.  It may also motivate some Jew-haters to applaud BDS and other activities intended to bring Israel to account.  However, anti-Semitism has no role in BDS or other NGO activities that oppose Israeli policies and practices regarding Palestinians.

In BDS, one searches in vain for an attack on Jews.  The movement targets the violations of human rights by the Israeli government, not the state itself or its predominately Jewish citizens.  Contrary to the government’s official hasbara (public diplomacy), the movement has never argued for the “delegitimization of Israel” nor condemned Jews as Jews.

Despite its delegitimization and anti-Semitism charges, the Reut paper concludes with a significant and positive recommendation for “winning against BDS.  It states:

“A consistent and credible commitment of the government of Israel to ending control over the Palestinian population and to the integration and equality for Israel’s Arab citizens is essential for keeping BDS at bay.”

When that happens, perhaps BDS will also have won.

More articles by:

L. Michael Hager is cofounder and former Director General, International Development Law Organization, Rome.

October 18, 2018
Erik Molvar
The Ten Big Lies of Traditional Western Politics
Jeffrey St. Clair
Lockheed and Loaded: How the Maker of Junk Fighters Like the F-22 and F-35 Came to Have Full-Spectrum Dominance Over the Defense Industry
Lawrence Davidson
Israel’s “Psychological Obstacles to Peace”
Brian Platt – Brynn Roth
Black-Eyed Kids and Other Nightmares From the Suburbs
John W. Whitehead
You Want to Make America Great Again? Start by Making America Free Again
Zhivko Illeieff
Why Can’t the Democrats Reach the Millennials?
Steve Kelly
Quiet, Please! The Latest Threat to the Big Wild
Manuel García, Jr.
The Inner Dimensions of Socialist Revolution
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ Over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Adam Parsons
A Global People’s Bailout for the Coming Crash
Binoy Kampmark
The Tyranny of Fashion: Shredding Banksy
Dean Baker
How Big is Big? Trump, the NYT and Foreign Aid
Vern Loomis
The Boofing of America
October 17, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
When Saudi Arabia’s Credibility is Damaged, So is America’s
John Steppling
Before the Law
Frank Stricker
Wages Rising? 
James McEnteer
Larry Summers Trips Out
Muhammad Othman
What You Can Do About the Saudi Atrocities in Yemen
Binoy Kampmark
Agents of Chaos: Trump, the Federal Reserve and Andrew Jackson
David N. Smith
George Orwell’s Message in a Bottle
Karen J. Greenberg
Justice Derailed: From Gitmo to Kavanaugh
John Feffer
Why is the Radical Right Still Winning?
Dan Corjescu
Green Tsunami in Bavaria?
Rohullah Naderi
Why Afghan Girls Are Out of School?
George Ochenski
You Have to Give Respect to Get Any, Mr. Trump
Cesar Chelala
Is China Winning the War for Africa?
Mel Gurtov
Getting Away with Murder
W. T. Whitney
Colombian Lawyer Diego Martinez Needs Solidarity Now
Dean Baker
Nothing to Brag About: Scott Walker’s Economic Record in Wisconsin:
October 16, 2018
Gregory Elich
Diplomatic Deadlock: Can U.S.-North Korea Diplomacy Survive Maximum Pressure?
Rob Seimetz
Talking About Death While In Decadence
Kent Paterson
Fifty Years of Mexican October
Robert Fantina
Trump, Iran and Sanctions
Greg Macdougall
Indigenous Suicide in Canada
Kenneth Surin
On Reading the Diaries of Tony Benn, Britain’s Greatest Labour Politician
Andrew Bacevich
Unsolicited Advice for an Undeclared Presidential Candidate: a Letter to Elizabeth Warren
Thomas Knapp
Facebook Meddles in the 2018 Midterm Elections
Muhammad Othman
Khashoggi and Demetracopoulos
Gerry Brown
Lies, Damn Lies & Statistics: How the US Weaponizes Them to Accuse  China of Debt Trap Diplomacy
Christian Ingo Lenz Dunker – Peter Lehman
The Brazilian Presidential Elections and “The Rules of The Game”
Robert Fisk
What a Forgotten Shipwreck in the Irish Sea Can Tell Us About Brexit
Martin Billheimer
Here Cochise Everywhere
David Swanson
Humanitarian Bombs
Dean Baker
The Federal Reserve is Not a Church
October 15, 2018
Rob Urie
Climate Crisis is Upon Us
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail