FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Hypocrisy, Obama-Style

That 1776 Declaration of Independence from Britain’s King George by the United States of America has been echoed by many US Presidents, and Mr Obama reiterated the sentiments by saying that “We believe in human dignity — that every person is created equal.”  He also said in Europe last year that  “we believe in democracy — with elections that are free and fair; and independent judiciaries and opposition parties; civil society and uncensored information.”

The Declaration is an inspiring document.  If the world had embraced its tenets we would be living in paradise.  But mankind is a defective species and the Earth is now a place which generations of humans have allowed and even encouraged to become a confrontational swamp infested by malevolent unprincipled savages whose justification for their brutal actions rests in noisily-claimed belief in a supreme spiritual being of the Islamic persuasion.

Opposing the barbarians of the so-called “Islamic State” stands most of the world,  including a group of countries whose justification for their actions also rests in avowed belief in a divinity.  These opponents of the fanatics of Islamic State are the religion-based dictatorial monarchies of the Persian Gulf whose immense riches stem from the geological accident that underneath their lands lie vast quantities of oil and gas without which the world would fall into even greater turmoil.

The rulers of these countries are born of dynasties in which enormous wealth and supreme power are not earned by toil or even achieved by war.  They are in no way accountable to their subjects, but in some fashion are held to be answerable to the same divine being who is used by Islamic fascists to justify their brutality. The emirs, kings and sultans of Arabia regard religion as a tool — indeed a weapon — with which they can ensure that their vassals remain subservient.

There is no possibility that the peoples of these countries could enjoy liberty in anything approaching the manner enjoyed by citizens of the United States whose Independence Declaration rightly holds that “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [such as ‘Liberty’], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government . . .”

But there is no support in Washington for alteration or abolition of the Gulf’s absolute Monarchs who deny Liberty to their feudal serfs.

The US State Department records that Saudi Arabia’s “citizens lack the right and legal means to change their government” while there are “pervasive restrictions on universal rights such as freedom of expression . . .  freedom of assembly, association, movement, and religion; and a lack of equal rights for women . . . ” It is barely credible in the year 2015 that  “[Saudi] women under the age of 45 . . .  require a male guardian’s consent to travel abroad” and are forbidden to drive a car in their own country.

The State Department begins its observations on Human rights in Saudi Arabia by observing that  “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a monarchy ruled by [the] King . . .  who is both head of state and head of government. The government bases its legitimacy on its interpretation of sharia (Islamic law) and the 1992 Basic Law, which specifies that the rulers of the country shall be male descendants of the founder.”

In Saudi Arabia it is illegal to publicly practise any religion other than Islam.  There isn’t a single Christian church or synagogue or Buddhist temple or any other non-Islamic place of worship in the entire Kingdom.

President Obama declared on January 15, 2015 that “promoting religious freedom has always been a key objective of my Administration’s foreign policy” — but he is selective about achieving that admirable goal because his own State Department is precise in pronouncing that “freedom of religion is neither recognized nor protected under the law” in Saudi Arabia.  Ten days after his pious declaration Mr Obama was in India when news came of the death of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah.  So Mr Obama instantly cut short his visit and rushed to Riyadh and was cordially greeted by the new unelected monarch with whom the democratically-elected President “held an hour-long meeting in which they discussed a range of issues including the campaign against Islamic State.”

The “range of issues” did not include freedom of religion, which is not supported by the savages of Islamic State anymore than it is by that loyal ally of the United States, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, whose government is noted by the State Department as indulging in “torture and other abuses.”

Saudi Arabia and Islamic State regard Islamic Law as fundamental and both carry out ritual beheading in the name of religion.  The State Department notes that in Saudi Arabia  “several individuals [were executed] during the year for crimes such as . . . sorcery.”  They both punish people by copping their hands off in public

In November last year the UK’s Guardian reported that “the American ambassador in Beirut said he was deeply concerned about the “paralysis of Lebanon’s political institutions” and called for new elections to be held as soon as possible. This prompted a wry comment from the blogger known as the Angry Arab that “I would like the US ambassador in Saudi Arabia to call for elections ‘as soon as possible’.”

There could be no answer from Washington to that observation (which would merit a thousand lashes for Mr Angry Arab were he so ill-advised as to go to Saudi Arabia) — anymore than there is justification for President Obama’s selective stance on gay and transgender policies around the world.

A year ago Mr Obama declared that “We believe in human dignity, that every person is created equal” which was an admirable announcement of principle.   And when he was interviewed on NBC’s Tonight Show about Russia he declared that “I’ve been very clear that when you are discriminating on the basis of race, religion, gender or sexual orientation, you are violating the basic morality that I think should transcend every country. And I have no patience for countries that try to treat gays or lesbians or transgender persons in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them.”

But Mr Obama’s patience seems to extend indefinitely to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in which, as his State Department notes “under sharia [law] as interpreted in the country, consensual same-sex sexual conduct is punishable by death or flogging, depending on the perceived seriousness of the case.”  For example,  “the Medina Criminal Court sentenced a 24-year old man to three years in prison and 450 lashes for soliciting sex with other men using Twitter.”  But Mr Obama didn’t appear on the Tonight Show to criticize Saudi Arabia for “discriminating on the basis of . . . sexual orientation,” or to encourage King Salman to have “elections that are free and fair.”

There’s a word for his performance.  Plainly and simply,  Mr Obama is a hypocrite.

More articles by:

Brian Cloughley writes about foreign policy and military affairs. He lives in Voutenay sur Cure, France.

Weekend Edition
November 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jonah Raskin
A California Jew in a Time of Anti-Semitism
Andrew Levine
Whither the Melting Pot?
Joshua Frank
Climate Change and Wildfires: The New Western Travesty
Nick Pemberton
The Revolution’s Here, Please Excuse Me While I Laugh
T.J. Coles
Israel Cannot Use Violent Self-Defense While Occupying Gaza
Rob Urie
Nuclear Weapons are a Nightmare Made in America
Paul Street
Barack von Obamenburg, Herr Donald, and Big Capitalist Hypocrisy: On How Fascism Happens
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fire is Sweeping Our Very Streets Today
Aidan O'Brien
Ireland’s New President, Other European Fools and the Abyss 
Pete Dolack
“Winners” in Amazon Sweepstakes Sure to be the Losers
Richard Eskow
Amazon, Go Home! Billions for Working People, But Not One Cent For Tribute
Ramzy Baroud
In Breach of Human Rights, Netanyahu Supports the Death Penalty against Palestinians
Brian Terrell
Ending the War in Yemen- Congressional Resolution is Not Enough!
John Laforge
Woolsey Fire Burns Toxic Santa Susana Reactor Site
Ralph Nader
The War Over Words: Republicans Easily Defeat the Democrats
M. G. Piety
Reading Plato in the Time of the Oligarchs
Rafael Correa
Ecuador’s Soft Coup and Political Persecution
Brian Cloughley
Aid Projects Can Work, But Not “Head-Smacking Stupid Ones”
David Swanson
A Tale of Two Marines
Robert Fantina
Democrats and the Mid-Term Elections
Joseph Flatley
The Fascist Creep: How Conspiracy Theories and an Unhinged President Created an Anti-Semitic Terrorist
Joseph Nevins
Twitter: Fast Track to the Id
William Hawes
Baselines for Activism: Brecht’s Stance, the New Science, and Planting Seeds
Bob Wing
Toward Racial Justice and a Third Reconstruction
Ron Jacobs
Hunter S. Thompson: Chronicling the Republic’s Fall
Oscar Gonzalez
Stan Lee and a Barrio Kid
Jack Rasmus
Election 2018 and the Unraveling of America
Sam Pizzigati
The Democrats Won Big, But Will They Go Bold?
Yves Engler
Canada and Saudi Arabia: Friends or Enemies?
Cesar Chelala
Can El Paso be a Model for Healing?
Mike Ferner
The Tragically Misnamed Paris Peace Conference
Barry Lando
Trump’s Enablers: Appalling Parallels
Jasmine Aguilera
Beto’s Lasting Legacy
Ariel Dorfman
The Boy Who Taught Me About War and Peace
Yves Engler
Ottawa, Yemen and Guardian
Michael Winship
This Was No Vote Accident
Binoy Kampmark
The Disgruntled Former Prime Minister
Tracey L. Rogers
Dear White Women, There May be Hope for You After All
Faisal Khan
Is Dubai Really a Destination of Choice?
Arnold August
The Importance of Néstor García Iturbe, Cuban Intellectual
James Munson
An Indecisive War To End All Wars, I Mean the Midterm Elections
Nyla Ali Khan
Women as Repositories of Communal Values and Cultural Traditions
Thomas Knapp
Scott Gottlieb’s Nicotine Nazism Will Kill Kids, Not Save Them
Dan Bacher
Judge Orders Moratorium on Offshore Fracking in Federal Waters off California
Christopher Brauchli
When Depravity Wins
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail