FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Hypocrisy, Obama-Style

That 1776 Declaration of Independence from Britain’s King George by the United States of America has been echoed by many US Presidents, and Mr Obama reiterated the sentiments by saying that “We believe in human dignity — that every person is created equal.”  He also said in Europe last year that  “we believe in democracy — with elections that are free and fair; and independent judiciaries and opposition parties; civil society and uncensored information.”

The Declaration is an inspiring document.  If the world had embraced its tenets we would be living in paradise.  But mankind is a defective species and the Earth is now a place which generations of humans have allowed and even encouraged to become a confrontational swamp infested by malevolent unprincipled savages whose justification for their brutal actions rests in noisily-claimed belief in a supreme spiritual being of the Islamic persuasion.

Opposing the barbarians of the so-called “Islamic State” stands most of the world,  including a group of countries whose justification for their actions also rests in avowed belief in a divinity.  These opponents of the fanatics of Islamic State are the religion-based dictatorial monarchies of the Persian Gulf whose immense riches stem from the geological accident that underneath their lands lie vast quantities of oil and gas without which the world would fall into even greater turmoil.

The rulers of these countries are born of dynasties in which enormous wealth and supreme power are not earned by toil or even achieved by war.  They are in no way accountable to their subjects, but in some fashion are held to be answerable to the same divine being who is used by Islamic fascists to justify their brutality. The emirs, kings and sultans of Arabia regard religion as a tool — indeed a weapon — with which they can ensure that their vassals remain subservient.

There is no possibility that the peoples of these countries could enjoy liberty in anything approaching the manner enjoyed by citizens of the United States whose Independence Declaration rightly holds that “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [such as ‘Liberty’], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government . . .”

But there is no support in Washington for alteration or abolition of the Gulf’s absolute Monarchs who deny Liberty to their feudal serfs.

The US State Department records that Saudi Arabia’s “citizens lack the right and legal means to change their government” while there are “pervasive restrictions on universal rights such as freedom of expression . . .  freedom of assembly, association, movement, and religion; and a lack of equal rights for women . . . ” It is barely credible in the year 2015 that  “[Saudi] women under the age of 45 . . .  require a male guardian’s consent to travel abroad” and are forbidden to drive a car in their own country.

The State Department begins its observations on Human rights in Saudi Arabia by observing that  “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a monarchy ruled by [the] King . . .  who is both head of state and head of government. The government bases its legitimacy on its interpretation of sharia (Islamic law) and the 1992 Basic Law, which specifies that the rulers of the country shall be male descendants of the founder.”

In Saudi Arabia it is illegal to publicly practise any religion other than Islam.  There isn’t a single Christian church or synagogue or Buddhist temple or any other non-Islamic place of worship in the entire Kingdom.

President Obama declared on January 15, 2015 that “promoting religious freedom has always been a key objective of my Administration’s foreign policy” — but he is selective about achieving that admirable goal because his own State Department is precise in pronouncing that “freedom of religion is neither recognized nor protected under the law” in Saudi Arabia.  Ten days after his pious declaration Mr Obama was in India when news came of the death of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah.  So Mr Obama instantly cut short his visit and rushed to Riyadh and was cordially greeted by the new unelected monarch with whom the democratically-elected President “held an hour-long meeting in which they discussed a range of issues including the campaign against Islamic State.”

The “range of issues” did not include freedom of religion, which is not supported by the savages of Islamic State anymore than it is by that loyal ally of the United States, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, whose government is noted by the State Department as indulging in “torture and other abuses.”

Saudi Arabia and Islamic State regard Islamic Law as fundamental and both carry out ritual beheading in the name of religion.  The State Department notes that in Saudi Arabia  “several individuals [were executed] during the year for crimes such as . . . sorcery.”  They both punish people by copping their hands off in public

In November last year the UK’s Guardian reported that “the American ambassador in Beirut said he was deeply concerned about the “paralysis of Lebanon’s political institutions” and called for new elections to be held as soon as possible. This prompted a wry comment from the blogger known as the Angry Arab that “I would like the US ambassador in Saudi Arabia to call for elections ‘as soon as possible’.”

There could be no answer from Washington to that observation (which would merit a thousand lashes for Mr Angry Arab were he so ill-advised as to go to Saudi Arabia) — anymore than there is justification for President Obama’s selective stance on gay and transgender policies around the world.

A year ago Mr Obama declared that “We believe in human dignity, that every person is created equal” which was an admirable announcement of principle.   And when he was interviewed on NBC’s Tonight Show about Russia he declared that “I’ve been very clear that when you are discriminating on the basis of race, religion, gender or sexual orientation, you are violating the basic morality that I think should transcend every country. And I have no patience for countries that try to treat gays or lesbians or transgender persons in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them.”

But Mr Obama’s patience seems to extend indefinitely to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in which, as his State Department notes “under sharia [law] as interpreted in the country, consensual same-sex sexual conduct is punishable by death or flogging, depending on the perceived seriousness of the case.”  For example,  “the Medina Criminal Court sentenced a 24-year old man to three years in prison and 450 lashes for soliciting sex with other men using Twitter.”  But Mr Obama didn’t appear on the Tonight Show to criticize Saudi Arabia for “discriminating on the basis of . . . sexual orientation,” or to encourage King Salman to have “elections that are free and fair.”

There’s a word for his performance.  Plainly and simply,  Mr Obama is a hypocrite.

More articles by:

Brian Cloughley writes about foreign policy and military affairs. He lives in Voutenay sur Cure, France.

July 19, 2018
Rajai R. Masri
The West’s Potential Symbiotic Contributions to Freeing a Closed Muslim Mind
Jennifer Matsui
The Blue Pill Presidency
Ryan LaMothe
The Moral and Spiritual Bankruptcy of White Evangelicals
Paul Tritschler
Negative Capability: a Force for Change?
Patrick Bond
State of the BRICS Class Struggle: ‘Social Dialogue’ Reform Frustrations
Rev. William Alberts
A Well-Kept United Methodist Church Secret
Raouf Halaby
Joseph Harsch, Robert Fisk, Franklin Lamb: Three of the Very Best
George Ochenski
He Speaks From Experience: Max Baucus on “Squandered Leadership”
Ted Rall
Right Now, It Looks Like Trump Will Win in 2020
David Swanson
The Intelligence Community Is Neither
Andrew Moss
Chaos or Community in Immigration Policy
Kim Scipes
Where Do We Go From Here? How Do We Get There?
July 18, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
Politics and Psychiatry: the Cost of the Trauma Cover-Up
Frank Stricker
The Crummy Good Economy and the New Serfdom
Linda Ford
Red Fawn Fallis and the Felony of Being Attacked by Cops
David Mattson
Entrusting Grizzlies to a Basket of Deplorables?
Stephen F. Eisenman
Want Gun Control? Arm the Left (It Worked Before)
CJ Hopkins
Trump’s Treasonous Traitor Summit or: How Liberals Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the New McCarthyism
Patrick Bond
State of the BRICS Class Struggle: Repression, Austerity and Worker Militancy
Dan Corjescu
The USA and Russia: Two Sides of the Same Criminal Corporate Coin
The Hudson Report
How Argentina Got the Biggest Loan in the History of the IMF
Kenn Orphan
You Call This Treason?
Max Parry
Ukraine’s Anti-Roma Pogroms Ignored as Russia is Blamed for Global Far Right Resurgence
Ed Meek
Acts of Resistance
July 17, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Trump & The Big Bad Bugs
Robert Hunziker
Trump Kills Science, Nature Strikes Back
John Grant
The Politics of Cruelty
Kenneth Surin
Calculated Buffoonery: Trump in the UK
Binoy Kampmark
Helsinki Theatrics: Trump Meets Putin
Patrick Bond
BRICS From Above, Seen Critically From Below
Jim Kavanagh
Fighting Fake Stories: The New Yorker, Israel and Obama
Daniel Falcone
Chomsky on the Trump NATO Ruse
W. T. Whitney
Oil Underground in Neuquén, Argentina – and a New US Military Base There
Doug Rawlings
Ken Burns’ “The Vietnam War” was Nominated for an Emmy, Does It Deserve It?
Rajan Menon
The United States of Inequality
Thomas Knapp
Have Mueller and Rosenstein Finally Gone Too Far?
Cesar Chelala
An Insatiable Salesman
Dean Baker
Truth, Trump and the Washington Post
Mel Gurtov
Human Rights Trumped
Binoy Kampmark
Putin’s Football Gambit: How the World Cup Paid Off
July 16, 2018
Sheldon Richman
Trump Turns to Gaza as Middle East Deal of the Century Collapses
Charles Pierson
Kirstjen Nielsen Just Wants to Protect You
Brett Wilkins
The Lydda Death March and the Israeli State of Denial
Patrick Cockburn
Trump Knows That the US Can Exercise More Power in a UK Weakened by Brexit
Robert Fisk
The Fisherman of Sarajevo Told Tales Past Wars and Wars to Come
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail