FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Go Set the Record Straight: Harper Lee’s New Novel, Cui Bono?

I have not read Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman and will not be reviewing it in my Friday book column. There are simply too many questionable details about the novel that have unsettled me and left me dubious about the entire production.

First, why was the book suddenly “discovered” if it has been in Lee’s bank vault all those years? (There is now word that there may still be another book, yet to be published, suggesting the birth of an entire Mockingbird cottage industry.)

Second, since Lee’s sister, Alice, was against the publication of the book, how does it happen that the book has been published after her recent death?

Third, since Lee is old and infirm—she is 89 years old and barely able to see or hear—how can she supposedly have made so many comments concerning the manuscript that has just been published?

Fourth—and this is my major question—who stands to benefit financially by the publication of the novel? Lee, certainly, doesn’t need the money; royalties on To Kill a Mockingbird, we are told, still add up to several million dollars a year. Will the additional money enhance the quality of her life in the gosetwatchmannursing home where she resides?

Fifth—and this is my speculation, now that reviewers have revealed that Atticus Finch as depicted in Go Set a Watchman is a racist—what does this fact reveal about Lee herself, given that the original novel was submitted to J. P. Lippincott, rejected, and several years later morphed into To Kill a Mockingbird? My speculation is prompted by an article in The Wall Street Journal on Friday (July 17th) which states that “data miners” have concluded that Go Set a Watchman is almost totally Lee’s own writing but that To Kill a Mockingbird is not. According to the data miners’ linguistic analysis, Mockingbird was heavily edited (or rewritten) by someone—Lee’s editor at Lippincott?—and that “Writing and rewriting ‘Mockingbird’ kept the author and her editor [Tay Hohoff] locked in a creative struggle.” Is it possible that Hohoff altered the racist Finch so that he became the beloved character of Mockingbird that so many people admire—ergo, to the extent that many readers do not intend to have their admiration compromised by reading the just-released novel? Was it Lee’s editor who replaced the bigoted Atticus with the more benign character?

Finally, how much money do the two beneficiaries—Tonja Carter, Lee’s lawyer/agent, and HarperCollins (her publisher) stand to make from the publication of Go Set a Watchman?

Follow the money.

More articles by:

Charles R. Larson is Emeritus Professor of Literature at American University, in Washington, D.C. Email = clarson@american.edu. Twitter @LarsonChuck.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

April 23, 2019
Peter Belmont
The Monroe Doctrine is Back, and as the Latest US Attack on Cuba Shows, Its Purpose is to Serve the Neoliberal Order
David Schultz
The Mueller Report: Trump Too Inept to Obstruct Justice
Geoff Beckman
Crazy Uncle Joe and the Can’t We All Just Get Along Democrats
Medea Benjamin
Activists Protect DC Venezuelan Embassy from US-supported Coup
Patrick Cockburn
What Revolutionaries in the Middle East Have Learned Since the Arab Spring
Jim Goodman
Don’t Fall for the Hype of Free Trade Agreements
Lance Olsen
Climate and Forests: Land Managers Must Adapt, and Conservationists, Too
William Minter
The Coming Ebola Epidemic
Tony McKenna
Stephen King’s IT: a 2019 Retrospective
David Swanson
Pentagon Claims 1,100 High Schools Bar Recruiters; Peace Activists Offer $1,000 Award If Any Such School Can Be Found
Gary Olson
A Few Comments on the recent PBS Series: Reconstruction: America After the Civil War
April 22, 2019
Melvin Goodman
The NYTs Tries to Rehabilitate Bloody Gina Haspel
Robert Fisk
After ISIS, a Divided Iraq, Wounded and Grief-Stricken
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange as Neuroses
John Laforge
Chernobyl’s Deadly Effects Estimates Vary
Kenneth Surin
Mueller Time? Not for Now
Cesar Chelala
Yemen: The Triumph of Barbarism
Kerron Ó Luain
What the “White Irish Slaves” Meme Tells Us About Identity Politics
Andy Piascik
Grocery Store Workers Take on Billion Dollar Multinational
Seiji Yamada – Gregory G. Maskarinec
Health as a Human Right: No Migrants Need Apply
Howard Lisnoff
Loose Bullets and Loose Cannons
Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada
Dreaming in Miami
Graham Peebles
Consuming Stuff: The Polluting World of Fashion
Robert Dodge
Earth Day: Our Planet in Peril
Weekend Edition
April 19, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
What Will It Take For Trump to Get His Due?
Roy Eidelson
Is the American Psychological Association Addicted to Militarism and War?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Time is Blind, Man is Stupid
Joshua Frank
Top 20 Mueller Report “Findings”
Rob Urie
Why Russiagate Will Never Go Away
Paul Street
Stephen Moore Gets Something Right: It’s Capitalism vs. Democracy
Russell Mokhiber
Why Boeing and Its Executives Should be Prosecuted for Manslaughter
T.J. Coles
The Battle for Latin America: How the U.S. Helped Destroy the “Pink Tide”
Ron Jacobs
Ho Chi Minh City: Nguyen Thai Binh Street
Dean Baker
Fun Fictions in Economics
David Rosen
Trump’s One-Dimensional Gender Identity
Kenn Orphan
Notre Dame: We Have Always Belonged to Her
Robert Hunziker
The Blue Ocean Event and Collapsing Ecosystems
Theodore C. Van Alst, Jr.
Paddy Wagon
Brett Wilkins
Jimmy Carter: US ‘Most Warlike Nation in History of the World’
John W. Whitehead
From Jesus Christ to Julian Assange: When Dissidents Become Enemies of the State
Nick Pemberton
To Never Forget or Never Remember
Stephen Cooper
My Unforgettable College Stabbings
Louis Proyect
A Leftist Rejoinder to the “Capitalist Miracle”
Louisa Willcox
Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic and the Need for a New Approach to Managing Wildlife
Brian Cloughley
Britain Shakes a Futile Fist and Germany Behaves Sensibly
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail