FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Go Set the Record Straight: Harper Lee’s New Novel, Cui Bono?

I have not read Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman and will not be reviewing it in my Friday book column. There are simply too many questionable details about the novel that have unsettled me and left me dubious about the entire production.

First, why was the book suddenly “discovered” if it has been in Lee’s bank vault all those years? (There is now word that there may still be another book, yet to be published, suggesting the birth of an entire Mockingbird cottage industry.)

Second, since Lee’s sister, Alice, was against the publication of the book, how does it happen that the book has been published after her recent death?

Third, since Lee is old and infirm—she is 89 years old and barely able to see or hear—how can she supposedly have made so many comments concerning the manuscript that has just been published?

Fourth—and this is my major question—who stands to benefit financially by the publication of the novel? Lee, certainly, doesn’t need the money; royalties on To Kill a Mockingbird, we are told, still add up to several million dollars a year. Will the additional money enhance the quality of her life in the gosetwatchmannursing home where she resides?

Fifth—and this is my speculation, now that reviewers have revealed that Atticus Finch as depicted in Go Set a Watchman is a racist—what does this fact reveal about Lee herself, given that the original novel was submitted to J. P. Lippincott, rejected, and several years later morphed into To Kill a Mockingbird? My speculation is prompted by an article in The Wall Street Journal on Friday (July 17th) which states that “data miners” have concluded that Go Set a Watchman is almost totally Lee’s own writing but that To Kill a Mockingbird is not. According to the data miners’ linguistic analysis, Mockingbird was heavily edited (or rewritten) by someone—Lee’s editor at Lippincott?—and that “Writing and rewriting ‘Mockingbird’ kept the author and her editor [Tay Hohoff] locked in a creative struggle.” Is it possible that Hohoff altered the racist Finch so that he became the beloved character of Mockingbird that so many people admire—ergo, to the extent that many readers do not intend to have their admiration compromised by reading the just-released novel? Was it Lee’s editor who replaced the bigoted Atticus with the more benign character?

Finally, how much money do the two beneficiaries—Tonja Carter, Lee’s lawyer/agent, and HarperCollins (her publisher) stand to make from the publication of Go Set a Watchman?

Follow the money.

More articles by:

Charles R. Larson is Emeritus Professor of Literature at American University, in Washington, D.C. Email = clarson@american.edu. Twitter @LarsonChuck.

November 19, 2018
David Rosen
Amazon Deal: New York Taxpayers Fund World Biggest Sex-Toy Retailer
Sheldon Richman
Art of the Smear: the Israel Lobby Busted
Chad Hanson
Why Trump is Wrong About the California Wildfires
Dean Baker
Will Progressives Ever Think About How We Structure Markets, Instead of Accepting them as Given?
Robert Fisk
We Remember the Great War, While Palestinians Live It
Dave Lindorff
Pelosi’s Deceptive Plan: Blocking any Tax Rise Could Rule Out Medicare-for-All and Bolstering Social Security
Rick Baum
What Can We Expect From the Democrat “Alternative” in California?
Thomas Scott Tucker
Trump, World War I and the Lessons of Poetry
John W. Whitehead
Red Flag Gun Laws
Newton Finn
On Earth, as in Heaven: the Utopianism of Edward Bellamy
Robert Fantina
Shithole Countries: Made in the USA
René Voss
Have Your Say about Ranching in Our Point Reyes National Seashore
Weekend Edition
November 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jonah Raskin
A California Jew in a Time of Anti-Semitism
Andrew Levine
Whither the Melting Pot?
Joshua Frank
Climate Change and Wildfires: The New Western Travesty
Nick Pemberton
The Revolution’s Here, Please Excuse Me While I Laugh
T.J. Coles
Israel Cannot Use Violent Self-Defense While Occupying Gaza
Rob Urie
Nuclear Weapons are a Nightmare Made in America
Paul Street
Barack von Obamenburg, Herr Donald, and Big Capitalist Hypocrisy: On How Fascism Happens
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fire is Sweeping Our Very Streets Today
Aidan O'Brien
Ireland’s New President, Other European Fools and the Abyss 
Pete Dolack
“Winners” in Amazon Sweepstakes Sure to be the Losers
Richard Eskow
Amazon, Go Home! Billions for Working People, But Not One Cent For Tribute
Ramzy Baroud
In Breach of Human Rights, Netanyahu Supports the Death Penalty against Palestinians
Brian Terrell
Ending the War in Yemen- Congressional Resolution is Not Enough!
John Laforge
Woolsey Fire Burns Toxic Santa Susana Reactor Site
Ralph Nader
The War Over Words: Republicans Easily Defeat the Democrats
M. G. Piety
Reading Plato in the Time of the Oligarchs
Rafael Correa
Ecuador’s Soft Coup and Political Persecution
Brian Cloughley
Aid Projects Can Work, But Not “Head-Smacking Stupid Ones”
David Swanson
A Tale of Two Marines
Robert Fantina
Democrats and the Mid-Term Elections
Joseph Flatley
The Fascist Creep: How Conspiracy Theories and an Unhinged President Created an Anti-Semitic Terrorist
Joseph Natoli
Twitter: Fast Track to the Id
William Hawes
Baselines for Activism: Brecht’s Stance, the New Science, and Planting Seeds
Bob Wing
Toward Racial Justice and a Third Reconstruction
Ron Jacobs
Hunter S. Thompson: Chronicling the Republic’s Fall
Oscar Gonzalez
Stan Lee and a Barrio Kid
Jack Rasmus
Election 2018 and the Unraveling of America
Sam Pizzigati
The Democrats Won Big, But Will They Go Bold?
Yves Engler
Canada and Saudi Arabia: Friends or Enemies?
Cesar Chelala
Can El Paso be a Model for Healing?
Mike Ferner
The Tragically Misnamed Paris Peace Conference
Barry Lando
Trump’s Enablers: Appalling Parallels
Ariel Dorfman
The Boy Who Taught Me About War and Peace
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail