FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Go Set the Record Straight: Harper Lee’s New Novel, Cui Bono?

I have not read Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman and will not be reviewing it in my Friday book column. There are simply too many questionable details about the novel that have unsettled me and left me dubious about the entire production.

First, why was the book suddenly “discovered” if it has been in Lee’s bank vault all those years? (There is now word that there may still be another book, yet to be published, suggesting the birth of an entire Mockingbird cottage industry.)

Second, since Lee’s sister, Alice, was against the publication of the book, how does it happen that the book has been published after her recent death?

Third, since Lee is old and infirm—she is 89 years old and barely able to see or hear—how can she supposedly have made so many comments concerning the manuscript that has just been published?

Fourth—and this is my major question—who stands to benefit financially by the publication of the novel? Lee, certainly, doesn’t need the money; royalties on To Kill a Mockingbird, we are told, still add up to several million dollars a year. Will the additional money enhance the quality of her life in the gosetwatchmannursing home where she resides?

Fifth—and this is my speculation, now that reviewers have revealed that Atticus Finch as depicted in Go Set a Watchman is a racist—what does this fact reveal about Lee herself, given that the original novel was submitted to J. P. Lippincott, rejected, and several years later morphed into To Kill a Mockingbird? My speculation is prompted by an article in The Wall Street Journal on Friday (July 17th) which states that “data miners” have concluded that Go Set a Watchman is almost totally Lee’s own writing but that To Kill a Mockingbird is not. According to the data miners’ linguistic analysis, Mockingbird was heavily edited (or rewritten) by someone—Lee’s editor at Lippincott?—and that “Writing and rewriting ‘Mockingbird’ kept the author and her editor [Tay Hohoff] locked in a creative struggle.” Is it possible that Hohoff altered the racist Finch so that he became the beloved character of Mockingbird that so many people admire—ergo, to the extent that many readers do not intend to have their admiration compromised by reading the just-released novel? Was it Lee’s editor who replaced the bigoted Atticus with the more benign character?

Finally, how much money do the two beneficiaries—Tonja Carter, Lee’s lawyer/agent, and HarperCollins (her publisher) stand to make from the publication of Go Set a Watchman?

Follow the money.

More articles by:

Charles R. Larson is Emeritus Professor of Literature at American University, in Washington, D.C. Email = clarson@american.edu. Twitter @LarsonChuck.

Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled Again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail