FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

When Republicans Rebel Against the Supreme Court

Although social conservatives are licking their wounds after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage in all states, the loss of “traditional marriage” has not silenced them into remission. In fact, a new civil war has ascended: The fight for religious freedom.

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has issued, no commanded, that social conservatives rise up as Black Americans did in the sixties. Like Martin Luther King Jr., Huckabee will lead the parishioners of Christian theology, enlightening America to the path of moral righteousness again.

In dissent, Huckabee stated, “I don’t think a lot of pastors and Christian schools are going to have a choice,” because you “…either are going to follow God, their conscience and what they truly believe is what the scripture teaches them, or they will follow civil law.” Sounds like civil disobedience, disobedience that gay members and advocates were chided by the political right for, as they protested for equal rights. Contradictions aside, conservatives on are on a mission to clear society of secularists’ sin.

Before President Obama was elected, thirty-seven states passed laws that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman. For homosexuals committed in monogamous and loving relationships, the perception of bans on same-sex marriage was deemed as discrimination. Imagine being denied the right to an estate, medical decisions, visitation, and tax benefits because the state controlled the definition of marriage, essentially ensuring control of your personal affairs.

For years we sat idle as the government dictated rights between consenting adults, adults who believed in the conservative principle of family and economic stability. For years, society was idle as the fourteenth amendment was violated by rites. How was this discrimination against the gay community different from issues of discrimination which led to the lawsuit in Loving v. Virginia and one hundred years of Jim Crow laws?

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal remains firm against gay marriage, and vehemently supports religious freedom laws. In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jindal fortified his reason for signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Law, writing, “Conservatism faces many challenges in today’s America. Hollywood and the media elite are hostile to our values and they tip the scales to our liberal opponents at every opportunity. Yet the left has lost repeatedly in state elections all over America…”

Keep in mind, only 30 percent of eligible votes participated in the 2014 election. Voter participation tends to be higher in presidential elections. In fact, polling has showed that the voters tilt to the left. Additionally, more people are registered as independent than conservative or liberal. The GOP should not remiss that Republicans won the 2010 election but still lost the 2012 presidential election. It would be wise for Republicans to consider the 2016 election will dovetail a robust margin of millennials, and millennials overwhelming disapprove of RFRA legislation and disapprove of opposition to same-sex marriage.

On social issues, progressives are winning. Sixty percent of Americans support the Supreme Court ruling, especially millennials. Millennials are committed to inclusiveness. They have no toleration for exclusive behaviors. If Republicans want a chance at winning the White House in 2016, they must get on board with the Supreme Court decision. This does not require a disregard for faith, personal beliefs, or religious tradition. Many would attest religious bodies should not be forced to disregard their doctrine and rights.

The tide of religious marriage did not change because of judicial tyranny, but because of the people. The calls for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage are not the correct course of action. Parishioners of a particular theology have to learn to separate God’s law from government law. Demanding the Constitution to abide to your religion is not what the Founding Fathers wanted.

Religious marriage remains in the hands of religious bodies. The Supreme Court did not rule on the religious matter of marriage but the civil right. Unfortunately, anger has blinded this. Honestly, it would be wise for Republicans to listen to Sen. Lindsay Graham, who issued the party should respect the Supreme Court’s ruling.

When we ask government to grant our rites over rights, not only are we asking the government embrace discrimination, but we open the door to allowing the government to control our religious doctrine and place of worship. Essentially we allow government to be our God. Europeans came to America to escape a government mandated church. Please conservatives, I beg of you to, protect your place of worship not discrimination.

More articles by:

Quiana Fulton is a writer and culture critic. She has a bachelors in political science. Contact her via https://about.me/quianafulton.

Weekend Edition
February 22, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Timothy M. Gill
Why is the Venezuelan Government Rejecting U.S. Food Supplies?
John Pilger
The War on Venezuela is Built on Lies
Andrew Levine
Ilhan Omar Owes No Apologies, Apologies Are Owed Her
Jeffrey St. Clair
That Magic Feeling: the Strange Mystique of Bernie Sanders
David Rosen
Will Venezuela Crisis Split Democrats?
Nick Pemberton
Donald Trump’s National Emergency Is The Exact Same As Barack Obama’s National Emergency
Paul Street
Buried Alive: The Story of Chicago Police State Racism
Rob Seimetz
Imagined Communities and Omitting Carbon Emissions: Shifting the Discussion On Climate Change
Ramzy Baroud
Russian Mediation: The Critical Messages of the Hamas-Fatah Talks in Moscow
Michael Welton
Dreaming Their Sweet Dreams: a Peace to End Peace
Robert Hunziker
Global Warming’s Monster Awakens
Huma Yasin
Chris Christie Spins a Story, Once Again
Ron Jacobs
Twenty-First Century Indian Wars
Robert Fantina
The U.S. and Venezuela: a Long History of Hostility
Lance Olsen
Climate and Money: a Tale of Two Accounts
Louis Proyect
El Chapo and the Path Taken
Fred Gardner
“She’s Willie Brown’s Protogé!” The Rise of Kamala Harris
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Biomass is Not “Green”: an Interview With Josh Schlossberg
John Feffer
Answering Attacks on the Green New Deal
W. T. Whitney
US Racism and Imperialism Fuel Turbulence in Haiti
Kim Ives
How Trump’s Attacks on Venezuela Sparked a Revolution in Haiti
Mike Ferner
What War Films Never Show You
Lawrence Wittner
Should the U.S. Government Abide by the International Law It Has Created and Claims to Uphold?
James Graham
A Slow Motion Striptease in France
Dave Lindorff
Could Sanders 2.0 Win It All, Getting the Democratic Nomination and Defeating Trump?
Jill Richardson
Take It From Me, Addiction Doesn’t Start at the Border
Yves Engler
Canada and the Venezuela Coup Attempt
Tracey L. Rogers
We Need a New Standard for When Politicians Should Step Down
Gary Leupp
The Sounds of Silence
Dan Bacher
Appeals Court Rejects Big Oil’s Lawsuit Against L.A. Youth Groups, City of Los Angeles
Robert Koehler
Are You White, Black or Human?
Ralph Nader
What are Torts? They’re Everywhere!
Cesar Chelala
The Blue Angel and JFK: One Night in Camelot
Sarah Schulz
Immigrants Aren’t the Emergency, Naked Capitalism Is
James Campbell
In the Arctic Refuge, a Life Force Hangs in the Balance
Matthew Stevenson
Pacific Odyssey: Corregidor’s Iconography of Empire
Jonah Raskin
The Muckraking Novelist Dashiell Hammett: A Red Literary Harvest
Kim C. Domenico
Revolutionary Art and the Redemption of the Local
Paul Buhle
Life and Crime in Blue Collar Rhode Island
Eugene Schulman
J’Accuse!
Nicky Reid
Zionists are the Most Precious Snowflakes
Jim Goodman
The Green New Deal Outlines the Change Society Needs
Thomas Knapp
Judicial Secrecy: Where Justice Goes to Die
February 21, 2019
Nick Pemberton
Israel, Venezuela and Nationalism In The Neoliberal Era
Chris Orlet
The Bill and Melinda Gates’ Fair Taxation Scaremongering Tour
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail