FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

When Republicans Rebel Against the Supreme Court

Although social conservatives are licking their wounds after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage in all states, the loss of “traditional marriage” has not silenced them into remission. In fact, a new civil war has ascended: The fight for religious freedom.

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has issued, no commanded, that social conservatives rise up as Black Americans did in the sixties. Like Martin Luther King Jr., Huckabee will lead the parishioners of Christian theology, enlightening America to the path of moral righteousness again.

In dissent, Huckabee stated, “I don’t think a lot of pastors and Christian schools are going to have a choice,” because you “…either are going to follow God, their conscience and what they truly believe is what the scripture teaches them, or they will follow civil law.” Sounds like civil disobedience, disobedience that gay members and advocates were chided by the political right for, as they protested for equal rights. Contradictions aside, conservatives on are on a mission to clear society of secularists’ sin.

Before President Obama was elected, thirty-seven states passed laws that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman. For homosexuals committed in monogamous and loving relationships, the perception of bans on same-sex marriage was deemed as discrimination. Imagine being denied the right to an estate, medical decisions, visitation, and tax benefits because the state controlled the definition of marriage, essentially ensuring control of your personal affairs.

For years we sat idle as the government dictated rights between consenting adults, adults who believed in the conservative principle of family and economic stability. For years, society was idle as the fourteenth amendment was violated by rites. How was this discrimination against the gay community different from issues of discrimination which led to the lawsuit in Loving v. Virginia and one hundred years of Jim Crow laws?

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal remains firm against gay marriage, and vehemently supports religious freedom laws. In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jindal fortified his reason for signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Law, writing, “Conservatism faces many challenges in today’s America. Hollywood and the media elite are hostile to our values and they tip the scales to our liberal opponents at every opportunity. Yet the left has lost repeatedly in state elections all over America…”

Keep in mind, only 30 percent of eligible votes participated in the 2014 election. Voter participation tends to be higher in presidential elections. In fact, polling has showed that the voters tilt to the left. Additionally, more people are registered as independent than conservative or liberal. The GOP should not remiss that Republicans won the 2010 election but still lost the 2012 presidential election. It would be wise for Republicans to consider the 2016 election will dovetail a robust margin of millennials, and millennials overwhelming disapprove of RFRA legislation and disapprove of opposition to same-sex marriage.

On social issues, progressives are winning. Sixty percent of Americans support the Supreme Court ruling, especially millennials. Millennials are committed to inclusiveness. They have no toleration for exclusive behaviors. If Republicans want a chance at winning the White House in 2016, they must get on board with the Supreme Court decision. This does not require a disregard for faith, personal beliefs, or religious tradition. Many would attest religious bodies should not be forced to disregard their doctrine and rights.

The tide of religious marriage did not change because of judicial tyranny, but because of the people. The calls for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage are not the correct course of action. Parishioners of a particular theology have to learn to separate God’s law from government law. Demanding the Constitution to abide to your religion is not what the Founding Fathers wanted.

Religious marriage remains in the hands of religious bodies. The Supreme Court did not rule on the religious matter of marriage but the civil right. Unfortunately, anger has blinded this. Honestly, it would be wise for Republicans to listen to Sen. Lindsay Graham, who issued the party should respect the Supreme Court’s ruling.

When we ask government to grant our rites over rights, not only are we asking the government embrace discrimination, but we open the door to allowing the government to control our religious doctrine and place of worship. Essentially we allow government to be our God. Europeans came to America to escape a government mandated church. Please conservatives, I beg of you to, protect your place of worship not discrimination.

More articles by:

Quiana Fulton is a writer and culture critic. She has a bachelors in political science. Contact her via https://about.me/quianafulton.

June 18, 2018
Paul Street
Denuclearize the United States? An Unthinkable Thought
John Pilger
Bring Julian Assange Home
Conn Hallinan
The Spanish Labyrinth
Patrick Cockburn
Attacking Hodeidah is a Deliberate Act of Cruelty by the Trump Administration
Gary Leupp
Trump Gives Bibi Whatever He Wants
Thomas Knapp
Child Abductions: A Conversation It’s Hard to Believe We’re Even Having
Robert Fisk
I Spoke to Palestinians Who Still Hold the Keys to Homes They Fled Decades Ago – Many are Still Determined to Return
Steve Early
Requiem for a Steelworker: Mon Valley Memories of Oil Can Eddie
Jim Scheff
Protect Our National Forests From an Increase in Logging
Adam Parsons
Reclaiming the UN’s Radical Vision of Global Economic Justice
Dean Baker
Manufacturing Production Falls in May and No One Notices
Laura Flanders
Bottom-Up Wins in Virginia’s Primaries
Binoy Kampmark
The Anguish for Lost Buildings: Embers and Death at the Victoria Park Hotel
Weekend Edition
June 15, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Dan Kovalik
The US & Nicaragua: a Case Study in Historical Amnesia & Blindness
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Yellow Journalism and the New Cold War
Charles Pierson
The Day the US Became an Empire
Jonathan Cook
How the Corporate Media Enslave Us to a World of Illusions
Ajamu Baraka
North Korea Issue is Not De-nuclearization But De-Colonization
Andrew Levine
Midterms Coming: Antinomy Ahead
Louisa Willcox
New Information on 2017 Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Deaths Should Nix Trophy Hunting in Core Habitat
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Singapore Fling
Ron Jacobs
What’s So Bad About Peace, Man?
Robert Hunziker
State of the Climate – It’s Alarming!
L. Michael Hager
Acts and Omissions: The NYT’s Flawed Coverage of the Gaza Protest
Dave Lindorff
However Tenuous and Whatever His Motives, Trump’s Summit Agreement with Kim is Praiseworthy
Robert Fantina
Palestine, the United Nations and the Right of Return
Brian Cloughley
Sabre-Rattling With Russia
Chris Wright
To Be or Not to Be? That’s the Question
David Rosen
Why Do Establishment Feminists Hate Sex Workers?
Victor Grossman
A Key Congress in Leipzig
John Eskow
“It’s All Kinderspiel!” Trump, MSNBC, and the 24/7 Horseshit Roundelay
Paul Buhle
The Russians are Coming!
Joyce Nelson
The NED’s Useful Idiots
Lindsay Koshgarian
Trump’s Giving Diplomacy a Chance. His Critics Should, Too
Louis Proyect
American Nativism: From the Chinese Exclusion Act to Trump
Stan Malinowitz
On the Elections in Colombia
Camilo Mejia
Open Letter to Amnesty International on Nicaragua From a Former Amnesty International Prisoner of Conscience
David Krieger
An Assessment of the Trump-Kim Singapore Summit
Jonah Raskin
Cannabis in California: a Report From Sacramento
Josh Hoxie
Just How Rich Are the Ultra Rich?
CJ Hopkins
Awaiting the Putin-Nazi Apocalypse
Mona Younis
We’re the Wealthiest Country on Earth, But Over 40 Percent of Us Live in or Near Poverty
Dean Baker
Not Everything Trump Says on Trade is Wrong
James Munson
Trading Places: the Other 1% and the .001% Who Won’t Save Them
Rivera Sun
Stop Crony Capitalism: Protect the Net!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail