FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

When Republicans Rebel Against the Supreme Court

Although social conservatives are licking their wounds after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of same-sex marriage in all states, the loss of “traditional marriage” has not silenced them into remission. In fact, a new civil war has ascended: The fight for religious freedom.

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has issued, no commanded, that social conservatives rise up as Black Americans did in the sixties. Like Martin Luther King Jr., Huckabee will lead the parishioners of Christian theology, enlightening America to the path of moral righteousness again.

In dissent, Huckabee stated, “I don’t think a lot of pastors and Christian schools are going to have a choice,” because you “…either are going to follow God, their conscience and what they truly believe is what the scripture teaches them, or they will follow civil law.” Sounds like civil disobedience, disobedience that gay members and advocates were chided by the political right for, as they protested for equal rights. Contradictions aside, conservatives on are on a mission to clear society of secularists’ sin.

Before President Obama was elected, thirty-seven states passed laws that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman. For homosexuals committed in monogamous and loving relationships, the perception of bans on same-sex marriage was deemed as discrimination. Imagine being denied the right to an estate, medical decisions, visitation, and tax benefits because the state controlled the definition of marriage, essentially ensuring control of your personal affairs.

For years we sat idle as the government dictated rights between consenting adults, adults who believed in the conservative principle of family and economic stability. For years, society was idle as the fourteenth amendment was violated by rites. How was this discrimination against the gay community different from issues of discrimination which led to the lawsuit in Loving v. Virginia and one hundred years of Jim Crow laws?

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal remains firm against gay marriage, and vehemently supports religious freedom laws. In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jindal fortified his reason for signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Law, writing, “Conservatism faces many challenges in today’s America. Hollywood and the media elite are hostile to our values and they tip the scales to our liberal opponents at every opportunity. Yet the left has lost repeatedly in state elections all over America…”

Keep in mind, only 30 percent of eligible votes participated in the 2014 election. Voter participation tends to be higher in presidential elections. In fact, polling has showed that the voters tilt to the left. Additionally, more people are registered as independent than conservative or liberal. The GOP should not remiss that Republicans won the 2010 election but still lost the 2012 presidential election. It would be wise for Republicans to consider the 2016 election will dovetail a robust margin of millennials, and millennials overwhelming disapprove of RFRA legislation and disapprove of opposition to same-sex marriage.

On social issues, progressives are winning. Sixty percent of Americans support the Supreme Court ruling, especially millennials. Millennials are committed to inclusiveness. They have no toleration for exclusive behaviors. If Republicans want a chance at winning the White House in 2016, they must get on board with the Supreme Court decision. This does not require a disregard for faith, personal beliefs, or religious tradition. Many would attest religious bodies should not be forced to disregard their doctrine and rights.

The tide of religious marriage did not change because of judicial tyranny, but because of the people. The calls for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage are not the correct course of action. Parishioners of a particular theology have to learn to separate God’s law from government law. Demanding the Constitution to abide to your religion is not what the Founding Fathers wanted.

Religious marriage remains in the hands of religious bodies. The Supreme Court did not rule on the religious matter of marriage but the civil right. Unfortunately, anger has blinded this. Honestly, it would be wise for Republicans to listen to Sen. Lindsay Graham, who issued the party should respect the Supreme Court’s ruling.

When we ask government to grant our rites over rights, not only are we asking the government embrace discrimination, but we open the door to allowing the government to control our religious doctrine and place of worship. Essentially we allow government to be our God. Europeans came to America to escape a government mandated church. Please conservatives, I beg of you to, protect your place of worship not discrimination.

More articles by:

Quiana Fulton is a writer and culture critic. She has a bachelors in political science. Contact her via https://about.me/quianafulton.

August 16, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
“Don’t Be Stupid, Be a Smarty”: Why Anti-Authoritarian Doctors Are So Rare
W. T. Whitney
New Facebook Alliance Endangers Access to News about Latin America
Sam Husseini
The Trump-Media Logrolling
Ramzy Baroud
Mission Accomplished: Why Solidarity Boats to Gaza Succeed Despite Failing to Break the Siege
Larry Atkins
Why Parkland Students, Not Trump, Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize
William Hartung
Donald Trump, Gunrunner for Hire
Yves Engler
Will Trudeau Stand Up to Mohammad bin Salman?
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Morality Tales in US Public Life?
Vijay Prashad
Samir Amin: Death of a Marxist
Binoy Kampmark
Boris Johnson and the Exploding Burka
Eric Toussaint
Nicaragua: The Evolution of the Government of President Daniel Ortega Since 2007 
Adolf Alzuphar
Days of Sagebrush, Nights of Jasmine in LA
Robert J. Burrowes
A Last Ditch Strategy to Fight for Human Survival
August 15, 2018
Jason Hirthler
Russiagate and the Men with Glass Eyes
Paul Street
Omarosa’s Book Tour vs. Forty More Murdered Yemeni Children
Charles Pierson
Is Bankruptcy in Your Future?
George Ochenski
The Absolute Futility of ‘Global Dominance’ in the 21st Century
Gary Olson
Are We Governed by Secondary Psychopaths
Fred Guerin
On News, Fake News and Donald Trump
Arshad Khan
A Rip Van Winkle President Sleeps as Proof of Man’s Hand in Climate Change Multiplies and Disasters Strike
P. Sainath
The Unsung Heroism of Hausabai
Georgina Downs
Landmark Glyphosate Cancer Ruling Sets a Precedent for All Those Affected by Crop Poisons
Rev. William Alberts
United We Kneel, Divided We Stand
Chris Gilbert
How to Reactivate Chavismo
Kim C. Domenico
A Coffeehouse Hallucination: The Anti-American Dream Dream
August 14, 2018
Daniel Falcone
On Taking on the Mobilized Capitalist Class in Elections: an Interview With Noam Chomsky
Karl Grossman
Turning Space Into a War Zone
Jonah Raskin
“Fuck Wine Grapes, Fuck Wines”: the Coming Napafication of the World
Manuel García, Jr.
Climate Change Bites Big Business
Alberto Zuppi - Cesar Chelala
Argentina at a Crossroads
Chris Wright
On “Bullshit Jobs”
Rosita A. Sweetman
Dear Jorge: On the Pope’s Visit to Ireland
Binoy Kampmark
Authoritarian Revocations: Australia, Terrorism and Citizenship
Sara Johnson
The Incredible Benefits of Sagebrush and Juniper in the West
Martin Billheimer
White & Red Aunts, Capital Gains and Anarchy
Walter Clemens
Enough Already! Donald J. Trump Resignation Speech
August 13, 2018
Michael Colby
Migrant Injustice: Ben & Jerry’s Farmworker Exploitation
John Davis
California: Waging War on Wildfire
Alex Strauss
Chasing Shadows: Socialism Won’t Go Away Because It is Capitalism’s Antithesis 
Kathy Kelly
U.S. is Complicit in Child Slaughter in Yemen
Fran Shor
The Distemper of White Spite
Chad Hanson
We Know How to Protect Homes From Wildfires. Logging Isn’t the Way to Do It
Faisal Khan
Nawaz Sharif: Has Pakistan’s Houdini Finally Met his End?
Binoy Kampmark
Trump Versus Journalism: the Travails of Fourth Estate
Wim Laven
Honestly Looking at Family Values
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail