FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

San Francisco Immigrants Mourn and Organize

Over 100 immigrant rights’ supporters assembled on the steps of San Francisco’s City Hall on Tues., July 14. It was a different kind of political event. There were no banners, no list of demands and no loud passionate speeches.

Not on this day.

Instead, activists held white carnations in their hands and sang ballads of love and compassion in hushed, low tones. It was a time to express their profound collective sadness over the senseless murder on July 6 of thirty-two year old San Francisco resident Kathryn Steinle.

Her tragic death in the arms of her father made dramatic headlines across the country and ignited an explosive anti-immigrant firestorm after it was disclosed that the alleged shooter, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, was convicted of seven felonies and had continuously reentered the U.S. after being deported five times.

Right-wing pundits had a field day, scoring inflammatory political points after the emotionally charged, horrific incident.

For example, Fox News showman Bill O’Reilly is seeking one million signatures demanding national legislation that would impose a mandatory five-year sentence on anyone who crosses the border after being deported.

O’Reilly is not alone. The stampede calling for harsher immigration controls is bipartisan.

San Francisco’s Democratic mayor, Ed Lee, California’s two Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, and Democratic presidential hopeful Hilary Clinton, all criticized local Sheriff Mirkarimi for not keeping Lopez-Sanchez locked up as requested by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

All in all, the wretched murder of an innocent young woman posed a formidable challenge to the genuine, heart-felt convictions of immigrant rights activists.

But, from what I observed, amidst all the finger-pointing and blame being cast about all over town and across the country, the quiet dignity and respectful tones of the messengers standing on those city hall steps made their appeal even more compelling:

“Do not let the deranged actions of one person tar millions of undocumented residents nor dissuade us from upholding constitutional protections and public safety at the same time and for all of us.”

What is Sanctuary

Sanctuary is really just short-hand for due process rights extended to everyone. In fact, the relevant legislation passed in 2013 by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is aptly termed the “Due Process for All Ordinance.”

It is a continuation of city policies that began in 1989 extending constitutional protections to all residents just as the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights clearly applies to all those living in the country, even those allegedly here illegally.

Not so very controversial it would seem. But, adhering to ICE “detention requests” as in the case of Lopez-Sanchez, is, indeed, very controversial.

As a matter of fact, around 17,000 of ICE “holds” are ignored by municipalities each year according to government statistics, and, for good reason.

First of all, ICE “detention requests” have no legal standing. They are not “probable cause” warrants issued by a judge allowing searches and seizures.

On the contrary, they are more like administrative notices issued by an ICE agent who checks a box on a detention request form before sending it out to local authorities around the country.

According to numerous constitutional experts, it’s simply not legal for police authorities to hold anyone, regardless of their immigration status, based on a simple request from an ICE agent.

As stipulated by the Fourth Amendment, there are due process rights protecting the individual against the superior power of the state to search and seizure of your person and property.

That is, to hold any person in America against their will, there has to be legal justification subject to judicial review. This is basic.

Founder of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center and University of San Francisco law professor Bill Hing told me, “it’s not that difficult.” Obtaining a warrant “is something all law-enforcement agencies know how to do.”

But ICE prefers to circumvent the legal process in order to engage in massive “round-up sweeps” in communities, schools and workplaces – a policy that has split hundreds of thousands of families apart and sown social chaos and division.

For example, with their record 400,000 deportations in 2011, ICE claims the number is too large to follow cumbersome constitutional guarantees.

Nonetheless, adding credibility to those questioning the constitutionality of warrantless detention requests, the U.S. Supreme Court itself emphasized in 2011 that “[d]etaining individuals solely to verify their immigration status would raise constitutional concerns.”

In the last several years, a number of federal courts on both coasts agreed.

As a result of mounting legal challenges to ICE practices, the number of jurisdictions across the nation that have stopped processing ICE “hold” requests now exceeds 300.

In addition to constitutional matters, Prof. Hing raised with me his other grave concerns about the wholesale roundup of residents deemed to be “illegal.”

Hing said fears of ICE “sweeps” drives immigrants underground and “into the shadows.” As a result, their lack of trust for authorities and fear of deportation means they do not report crimes, whether they are a victim or a witness.

Thus, Hing emphasized, public safety for everyone is compromised.

Probably the main reason hundreds of communities in the U.S. instruct their police officers to refrain from inquiring about a person’s immigration status is precisely to encourage the reporting of crime by the millions of undocumented residents who otherwise would fear reprisals.

Facts Matter

Despite all evidence to the contrary, Sheriff Mirkarmini is still receiving undeserved blistering criticism for the release of Lopez-Sanchez.

According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), this should not be controversial – as stated previously, multiple federal courts have found constitutional defects with ICE’s detainer practices.

And, as  Mirkarmini stated, Sanchez’s felony convictions for nonviolent drug offenses and re-entering the country illegally did not “meet the threshold of the local law that would require us” to detain him for federal pick up.

In fact, ICE wanted San Francisco to hold Lopez-Sanchez for a minor marijuana possession charge that was twenty years old. Predictably, the city’s district attorney dropped the case.

Once this happened, there was no legal basis to detain him.

In support of the Sheriff, the ACLU stated that if ICE had presented a judicial order authorizing detention, San Francisco could legally have kept Lopez-Sanchez in custody —and it would have done so, under its policies.

But ICE didn’t do that.

Don’t Tread on Me (Them)

As Prof. Hing said to the immigrant rights activists at city hall, the heart-breaking loss of Ms. Steinle cannot be retrieved but we can seek recovery from the root causes of crime by fighting for more economic support for poorer communities and for more mental health funding.

The latter was a reference to conjecture by some who have observed Lopez-Sanchez’s numerous interviews and public statements since his arrest that he may very well be suffering from a mental illness.

In any case, Hing concluded, “only justice for all will ultimately keep us safe.”

More articles by:

Carl Finamore is Machinist Lodge 1781 delegate, San Francisco Labor Council, AFL-CIO. He can be reached at local1781@yahoo.com

July 09, 2020
Richard D. Wolff
COVID-19 Exposes the Weakness of a Major Theory Used to Justify Capitalism
Ahrar Ahmad
Racism in America: Police Choke-Holds Are Not the Issue
Timothy M. Gill
Electoral Interventions: a Suspiciously Naïve View of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World
Daniel Falcone
Cold War with China and the Thucydides Trap: a Conversation with Richard Falk
Daniel Beaumont
Shrink-Wrapped: Plastic Pollution and the Greatest Economic System Jesus Ever Devised
Prabir Purkayastha
The World Can Show How Pharma Monopolies Aren’t the Only Way to Fight COVID-19
Gary Leupp
“Pinning Down Putin” Biden, the Democrats and the Next War
Howard Lisnoff
The Long Goodbye to Organized Religion
Cesar Chelala
The Dangers of Persecuting Doctors
Mike Garrity – Erik Molvar
Back on the List: A Big Win for Yellowtone Grizzlies and the Endangered Species Act, a Big Loss for Trump and Its Enemies
Purusottam Thakur
With Rhyme and Reasons: Rap Songs for COVID Migrants
Binoy Kampmark
Spiked Concerns: The Melbourne Coronavirus Lockdown
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela is on a Path to Make Colonialism Obsolete
George Ochenski
Where are Our Political Leaders When We Really Need Them?
Dean Baker
Is it Impossible to Envision a World Without Patent Monopolies?
William A. Cohn
Lead the Way: a Call to Youth
July 08, 2020
Laura Carlsen
Lopez Obrador’s Visit to Trump is a Betrayal of the U.S. and Mexican People
Melvin Goodman
Afghanistan: What is to be Done?
Thomas Klikauer – Norman Simms
The End of the American Newspaper
Sonali Kolhatkar
The Merits of Medicare for All Have Been Proven by This Pandemic
David Rosen
It’s Now Ghislaine Maxwell’s Turn
Nicolas J S Davies
Key U.S. Ally Indicted for Organ Trade Murder Scheme
Bob Lord
Welcome to Hectobillionaire Land
Laura Flanders
The Great American Lie
John Kendall Hawkins
Van Gogh’s Literary Influences
Marc Norton
Reopening vs. Lockdown is a False Dichotomy
Joel Schlosberg
“All the Credit He Gave Us:” Time to Drop Hamilton’s Economics
CounterPunch News Service
Tribes Defeat Trump Administration and NRA in 9th Circuit on Sacred Grizzly Bear Appeal
John Feffer
The US is Now the Global Public Health Emergency
Nick Licata
Three Books on the 2020 Presidential Election and Their Relevance to the Black Live Matter Protests
Elliot Sperber
The Breonna Taylor Bridge
July 07, 2020
Richard Eskow
The War on Logic: Contradictions and Absurdities in the House’s Military Spending Bill
Daniel Beaumont
Gimme Shelter: the Brief And Strange History of CHOP (AKA CHAZ)
Richard C. Gross
Trump’s War
Patrick Cockburn
Trump’s Racism May be Blatant, But the Culture He Defends Comes Out of the Civil War and Goes Well Beyond Racial Division
Andrew Stewart
Can We Compare the George Floyd Protests to the Vietnam War Protests? Maybe, But the Analogy is Imperfect
Walden Bello
The Racist Underpinnings of the American Way of War
Nyla Ali Khan
Fallacious Arguments Employed to Justify the Revocation of Jammu and Kashmir’s Autonomy and Its Bifurcation
Don Fitz
A Statue of Hatuey
Dean Baker
Unemployment Benefits Should Depend on the Pandemic
Ramzy Baroud – Romana Rubeo
Will the ICC Investigation Bring Justice for Palestine?
Sam Pizzigati
Social Distancing for Mega-Million Fun and Profit
Dave Lindorff
Private: Why the High Dudgeon over Alleged Russian Bounties for Taliban Slaying of US Troops
George Wuerthner
Of Fire and Fish
Binoy Kampmark
Killing Koalas: the Promise of Extinction Down Under
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail