FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

God, Australia’s Border Force and Medical Ethics

“It’s a gag law. It seems to me it contradicts The Hippocratic Oath of medicos not to be able to report on the welfare of their patients. It’s unbelievable in the 21st century.”

– Nicholas O’Dwyer, Sydney Morning Herald, Jul 11, 2015.

It seemed that the border Stasi had gone back into business. There were the uniforms. There were the militarised personnel. This was Australia’s new Border Protection Force, established under the Border Force Act. It merges a range of departments connected with customs, border protection and immigration. Its targets are not an invasive force armed to the teeth, or clandestine criminals operating with impunity. Their targets constitute, rather, men, women and children fleeing areas afflicted by indigence and war.

It even came with a blessing from the Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, who had momentarily forgotten that fine line between church and state. Onward, these Christian soldiers were to march, to do a Christian’s bidding against the enemy.

The Border Protection Act has a few prominent nasties targeting those who wish to disclose details of the gulag system that has taken shape on Manus Island and Nauru. Abuse of detainees, if disclosed for broader discussion, can land the discloser in prison for up to 2 years. There is a lightly worded proviso to this: that nurses and doctors can, in certain cases, disclose material, albeit with the gracious consent of the Australian Border Force.

The thrust of the provisions lie in not disclosing what constitutes “protected information,” thereby cutting off channels of discussion connected to offshore detention camps. This has been the Abbott government’s crowning motivation: to identify, restrict and eliminate, to the greatest extent possible, discussion about camp conditions, and the entire anti-asylum policy at sea.

Given the absence of adequate child protection frameworks; a general lack of protections for detainees; and Canberra’s continuing defiance of key provisions of the Refugee Convention, the BFA proves entirely consistent. The teeth in the legislation lies in granting considerable discretion to the immigration department secretary, first on what constitutes that protected information and secondly, who it can be applied to.

Disconcertingly, even the ministers don’t seem to understand where the whistleblowing protections fit. Immigration Minister Peter Dutton claims that Australia’s meek Public Interest Disclosure Act would provide exemptions, provided, naturally, that these were made via the “appropriate channels”. (The nub here is always appropriateness.)

The newly appointed Australian Border Force commissioner, who did the rounds on national television looking like dated soft furnishings, came up with that trusty canard on protecting national security and Australia’s sacred sovereignty. “This is about the leaking of classified information that can compromise operational security or our sovereignty,” suggested Roman Quaedvlieg, “it’s not about people having a right to be outspoken in the community about a range of things” (Sydney Morning Herald, Jul 11).

Even Richard Marles, the Shadow Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and crossbencher complicit in the passage of the BFA, had grand delusions that whistleblower protections would still apply across the entire public service (Q&A, Jul 6).

Even Greg Sheridan of The Australian, never exactly a bosom friend of transparent policy, would concede on the ABC that, “Protected information and a designated person cannot go public in the normal course of things under whistleblower legislation.”

Health and humanitarian workers have expressed their concerns, and their defiance, in an open letter to Abbott. “We have advocated, and will continue to advocate, for the health of those for whom we have a duty of care, despite the threats of imprisonment, because standing by and watching sub-standard harmful care, child abuse and gross violations of human rights is not ethically justifiable.”

There have also been rallies by doctors against the BFA, fearing the creeping hands of totalitarianism. On Saturday, medics gathered before Sydney Town Hall keen to emphasise how the Act’s provisions flew in the face of basic medical ethics. The organiser of that event, the University of Sydney’s Maria Fiatarone Singh, put forth a question that officials in Canberra have struggled to answer: “How does reporting that a child has been raped by a guard or exchanged sexual favours for food threaten national security?”

The whole point, more relevantly, is that the entire system of detention is premised on punishment and deterrence. Its entire argot is based on the fiction of humanitarian salvation, while inwardly, cruelty is its medium. By all means, attempt to come to Australia, but this is what you get: conditions rife with sexual abuse, psychiatric distress and desperation. And camp guards essentially acting with impunity.

Prominent figures such as Dr. Peter Young, the chief psychiatrist responsible for the care of asylum seekers for three years via International Health and Medical Services, spoke last year about an “inherently toxic” environment that had been engendered by a system calculated to cause mental degradation. There is little doubt that Australia’s new border force will be very interested in keeping such views under wraps, punitively or otherwise.

More articles by:

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

April 26, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
As Trump Berates Iran, His Options are Limited
Daniel Warner
From May 1968 to May 2018: Politics and Student Strikes
Simone Chun – Kevin Martin
Diplomacy in Korea and the Hope It Inspires
George Wuerthner
The Attack on Wilderness From Environmentalists
CJ Hopkins
The League of Assad-Loving Conspiracy Theorists
Richard Schuberth
“MeToo” and the Liberation of Sex
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Sacred Assemblies in Baghdad
Dean Baker
Exonerating Bad Economic Policy for Trump’s Win
Vern Loomis
The 17 Gun Salute
Gary Leupp
What It Means When the U.S. President Conspicuously and Publicly Removes a Speck of Dandruff from the French President’s Lapel
Robby Sherwin
The Hat
April 25, 2018
Stanley L. Cohen
Selective Outrage
Dan Kovalik
The Empire Turns Its Sights on Nicaragua – Again!
Joseph Essertier
The Abductees of Japan and Korea
Ramzy Baroud
The Ghost of Herut: Einstein on Israel, 70 Years Ago
W. T. Whitney
Imprisoned FARC Leader Faces Extradition: Still No Peace in Colombia
Manuel E. Yepe
Washington’s Attack on Syria Was a Mockery of the World
John White
My Silent Pain for Toronto and the World
Dean Baker
Bad Projections: the Federal Reserve, the IMF and Unemployment
David Schultz
Why Donald Trump Should Not be Allowed to Pardon Michael Cohen, His Friends, or Family Members
Mel Gurtov
Will Abe Shinzo “Make Japan Great Again”?
Binoy Kampmark
Enoch Powell: Blood Speeches and Anniversaries
Frank Scott
Weapons and Walls
April 24, 2018
Carl Boggs
Russia and the War Party
William A. Cohn
Carnage Unleashed: the Pentagon and the AUMF
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
The Racist Culture of Canadian Hockey
María Julia Bertomeu
On Angers, Disgusts and Nauseas
Nick Pemberton
How To Buy A Seat In Congress 101
Ron Jacobs
Resisting the Military-Now More Than Ever
Paul Bentley
A Velvet Revolution Turns Bloody? Ten Dead in Toronto
Sonali Kolhatkar
The Left, Syria and Fake News
Manuel E. Yepe
The Confirmation of Democracy in Cuba
Peter Montgomery
Christian Nationalism: Good for Politicians, Bad for America and the World
Ted Rall
Bad Drones
Jill Richardson
The Latest Attack on Food Stamps
Andrew Stewart
What Kind of Unionism is This?
Ellen Brown
Fox in the Hen House: Why Interest Rates Are Rising
April 23, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
In Middle East Wars It Pays to be Skeptical
Thomas Knapp
Just When You Thought “Russiagate” Couldn’t Get Any Sillier …
Gregory Barrett
The Moral Mask
Robert Hunziker
Chemical Madness!
David Swanson
Senator Tim Kaine’s Brief Run-In With the Law
Dave Lindorff
Starbucks Has a Racism Problem
Uri Avnery
The Great Day
Nyla Ali Khan
Girls Reduced to Being Repositories of Communal and Religious Identities in Kashmir
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail