FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Obama on the TPP: Beckoning Us to the Graveyard

“We have to make sure America writes the rules of the global economy and we should do it today while our economy is in a position of global strength. If we don’t write the rules for trade around the world, guess what, China will. And they’ll write those rules in a way that gives Chinese workers and Chinese businesses the upper hand.”

— Barack Obama on the Trans-Pacific Partnership in a Speech at Nike Factory in Oregon, May 8, 2015

Those very few words of Obama’s, his most widely circulated PR effort to garner support for the TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership) and thoroughly representative of the thinking of our imperial elite, are so revealing, so wrong and so dangerous on so many levels that one scarcely knows where to begin. In fact they carry the seeds of our destruction.   And they are focused on China.

First, the arrogance and hegemonic intent of the statement is astonishing even though it has become routine for the U.S. elite. What gives the United States, a country of 300 million on the opposite side of the vast Pacific, the right to determine the rules of trade for East Asia, which includes China, a country of 1.3 billion people? The U.S. can no longer assert that privilege based on its economic power since its gross GDP, measured in Purchasing Power Parity is now, according to the IMF, second to China’s.

Clear evidence of the relative power of the Chinese and American economies was the world’s reaction to China’s launch of the badly needed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to provide development funds for Asia and beyond.   The level of funding necessary for such development has long been denied by the U.S.- dominated World Bank and IMF.   U.S. allies, even the UK and Israel, stumbled over one another to join the AIIB, despite the bullying of the U.S. to stop them, leaving the U.S. and its cat’s paw in East Asia, Japan, out in the cold. More amazingly, the U.S. thinks it can write the rules of trade for China and East Asia! Given the new economic realities, that day is past. Indeed, Obama, perhaps unwittingly in his desperation to sell the measure by frightening us into acceptance of it, acknowledges this fact. What else can he mean when he says, “we should do it (pass TPP) today while our economy is in a position of global strength.” What is he saying implicitly about the situation tomorrow?

Second, there is a win-lose mentality run rampant in Obama’s words – and this is the most frightening part of his statement. Simply put, we Americans write the rules for our benefit and to the detriment of others – or others write the rules to the same end for them. This is no longer a viable view of the world. For where does that view end? It ends in conflict and then domination and submission – the struggle, economic and otherwise, of each against all. In the 21st Century and beyond, with a world rife with high tech weapons of unimaginable power, such conflict will produce untold suffering and death for billions if not the end of the human race as we know it. Simply banning the supply of such weapons will not be enough, because they can always be recreated. There is no permanent technical fix, only a temporary one – no matter what the nuke abolitionists might like to think.

This view is quite the opposite from the outlook of the Chinese, which is tirelessly about creating win-win situations. Not win-lose. Not, “You are either for us or against us.” But “Win-win.” Read China Daily, as you should for some sense of balance, or any of the outlets from China, and you will find the win-win philosophy ever present. The Chinese are clearly onto something here. In that direction lies the possibility (not the guarantee but the possibility) of peace, prosperity and development for the planet. In the direction pointed to by Obama and the US imperial elite lies what we have witnessed throughout the Middle East and North Africa and now, since the U.S.-instigated coup, in Ukraine. The people of East Asia, including Japan, should be wary of the U.S. siren call to make one or another of them the “co-winner” in the region. In fact Obama’s call to write the rules (of trade or anything else) should be a warning to the people of East Asia and elsewhere. The conclusion for them is that if the U.S. decides it must write the rules to contain them or put them down, then eventually so it will be. By that very statement the U.S. forfeits its claim to leadership in the world. By that very statement the U.S. is telling the world that every nation is dispensable except this one.

Third, rarely mentioned in the objections to TPP among U.S. progressives is its role as an instrument of imperial domination. True, as these folks say, the TPP is not meant to help U.S. workers, as Obama would have us believe. True, it is a corporate giveaway. True it is a secret and therefore very anti-democratic agreement. On this last score there should be no doubt. Members of Congress get to see at least some aspects of the TPP as it is being written. But they may not bring aides or experts with them as they view the deep dark secrets of the agreement. They may not take notes or make copies of the text. They may not reveal its contents to the public. And so we the people are totally excluded from any knowledge of what lies in the TPP. Nothing could be farther from the democracy or transparency that the imperial elite likes to claim as its hallmark.  In contrast one can be certain that the rich and powerful, whether Nike executives or the international banksters, know all they need to about the TPP and have extraordinary influence over it. But such considerations are all about us Americans and our local rulers. Such considerations leave out the questions of war and peace and the reality of U.S. Empire, a phrase that rarely passes the lips of our mainstream progressives.

Yes, let us work to stop the TPP. But let us be aware that this battle is not simply about a few more goodies for Americans. The TPP is in fact one more step on the road to Armageddon, which the U.S. seems to be paving with some measure of desperation and panic.

John V. Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

More articles by:

John V. Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar@gmail.com

August 06, 2020
H. Bruce Franklin
How the Fascists Won World War II
Robert Jacobs – Ran Zwigenberg
The American Narrative of Hiroshima is a Statue that Must be Toppled
Howie Hawkins - Madelyn Hoffman
Reverse the New Nuclear Arms Race
Brian Kelly
Ireland and Slavery: Debating the ‘Irish Slaves Myth’
Talli Nauman
Native Americans Win Historic Victories in U.S. High Court Rulings
David Mattson
“Man Attacks Grizzly” and Other Leading Bleeding Stories
Jack Rasmus
US GDP Collapses and Economic Rebound Fades
John Kendall Hawkins
Suffrage: The Myth of Sisterphus
George Ochenski
An Unbelievably Disastrous State of Affairs
George Wuerthner
Trouble in Paradise Valley
Binoy Kampmark
State of Pandemic Disaster: Melbourne Moves to Stage Four
Howard Lisnoff
The ACLU Has Never Done a Damn Thing for Me
Priyanka Singh – Sujeet Singh
Time to Empower the Invisibles: India Awaits a Mental Health Revolution
CounterPunch News Service
Conservationists to Federal Agencies: Restore Protections for Imperiled Wildlife in the Flathead National Forest
August 05, 2020
Roy Eidelson
Black Lives Matter: Resisting the Propaganda of Status Quo Defenders
Melvin Goodman
The Department of Homeland Security: the Ideal Authoritarian Tool
Paul Street
Misleaders at a Funeral: Bill Clinton and Barack Obama Eulogizing Racial Justice in the Name of John Lewis
Seiji Yamada
Hiroshima, Technique, and Bioweapons
Vijay Prashad
How Trump Managed to Lead the World with the Worst Response to the COVID Pandemic
Richard C. Gross
Trump’s Alternative
Jonas Ecke
The Worst Hunger Season Yet to Come: Global Moral Failure in the Time of Covid-19
Rafiq Kathwari
The Battle for Kashmir
Kenneth Surin
Malaysia’s Arch-Kleptocrat is Found Guilty
Medea Benjamin - Nicolas J. S. Davies
U.S. Cold War China Policy Will Isolate the U.S, Not China
Lee Camp
Why Housing Is a Human Right
Sam Pizzigati
For Egalitarians, a Sudden Sense of Possibility
Jonathan Cook
Can Israelis Broaden Their Protests Beyond Netanyahu?
Thomas Knapp
Ten Years After Lieberman’s “Internet Kill Switch,” the War on Freedom Rages On
Binoy Kampmark
Staying on Message: Australia, the US and the AUSMIN Talks
Elliot Sperber
The View From Saturn 
August 04, 2020
John Pilger
Another Hiroshima is Coming…Unless We Stop It Now
Dave Lindorff
Unsung Heroes of Los Alamos: Rethinking Manhattan Project Spies and the Cold War
Kenneth Good
Escalating State Repression and Covid-19: Their Impact on the Poor in Kenya
Dean Baker
We Need an Economic Survival Package Not Another Stimulus
David Rosen
Globalization and the End of the American Dream
John Feffer
The Pandemic Reveals a Europe More United Than the United States
Patrick Cockburn
The Government’s Failed Track-and-Trace System is a Disaster for England
Ramzy Baroud
‘Optimism of the Will’: Palestinian Freedom is Possible Now
CounterPunch News Service
Statement From Yale Faculty on Hydroxychloroquine and Its Use in COVID-19
Manuel García, Jr.
Ocean Heat: From the Tropics to the Poles
Sonali Kolhatkar
Why the Idea of Jobless Benefits Scares the Conservative Mind
Greta Anderson
Framing Wolves in New Mexico?
Binoy Kampmark
Pulling Out of Germany: Trump Adjusts the Military Furniture
Shawn Fremstad – Nicole Rodgers
COVID Stimulus Checks Shouldn’t Penalize One-Parent Households
Adam Shah
The 1 Percent’s Attack on Unemployment Benefits is a Sign of Our Broken Democracy
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail