FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Selling the TransPacific Partnership

It is extraordinary how little information is getting out to the general public, both in print and electronic media, concerning the content and dire implications of President Obama’s push for fast- track Congressional approval of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Accord.

Granted that Congressional discussions on TPP are held in a secretive and mysterious manner. However, significant facts have been culled from leaked, undocumented sources that provide valuable insight into the content of TPP . Given its global impact, TPP promises to be the largest free trade agreement in history.

Currently twelve nations will become signatories to the Pact: US, EU, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Peru, Chile, Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico and Vietnam. Proponents of TPP make the same claims proffered in previous trade pacts (NAFTA). The promise made is it will boost economic growth and ensure that America’s exports will go to the most vigorous and fastest growing economies in the world.

What is unspoken by these free trade propagandists is that previous trade arrangements, (NAFTA) (WTO) and (GATT) produced massive trade deficits, job losses and an increased downward spiral of living standards. Devastating agricultural losses impacted many countries; Mexico being the most harmed.

This new so-called “Economic Consensus” trade model will not only reproduce previous economic calamities but will extend special privilege and protection for those very businesses which ultimately outsource American jobs.

Past history demonstrates that under NAFTA unsustainable assurances were made: that it would prevent damage to the environment, protect workers from unsafe conditions, and provide consumer protection for safe food, drugs and other products.

Instead of promoting economic prosperity for all, these accords will serve to enrich wealthier nations and corporations and create worsening poverty in the Third World. So what resulted was the exact opposite when these safeguards were opposed or eliminated.

TPP, like NAFTA, will also undermine democratic procedures by transferring decision-making from the public sphere into the hands of a small group of unaccountable wealthy elites. TPP will become an instrument that minimizes democracy. Contained in these arguments is the time-worn and abiding caveat that whomever controls capital and labor have deep-seated interests to protect.

One becomes perplexed at the enumeration of these convictions. In the Clinton years, Americans were promised “good paying American jobs.” Past history of these lies should immediately arouse suspicions of TPP.

It has been estimated, as an example, that under NAFTA, 700,000 jobs were outsourced. During the 90’s the world was made safe for billionaires. Numerous examples exist of the unaccountable power of corporations to block nations who would regulate such activities. This led to misery for poorer nations.

TPP is not just about trade. The corpus of TPP lies in the chapter that deals with Intellectual Property Rights (IP) which covers patents, trademarks, and copyrights. IP would potentially create unprecedented assaults on freedom of speech and individuals right to read, write and publish.

According to President Obama, unlike all previous inequities in past trade agreements, nations like the US who participate in TPP, “would have a level playing field for job creation and job protection, plus the eradication of child labor. There would be rules governing minimum wage and laws governing maximum hours of labor. Additionally environmental standards would be raised.

The idea permeating all these free trade pacts is an insistence on conflating democracy and free markets. It serves as a purposeful ideological strategy. Arguably, the primary architect of this construct of unfettered markets is Milton Friedman. His book, DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM became de rigor in American economic political thought with respect to free markets and individual freedom. Friedman’s political theory argues for a value-free social science and, consequently, a value-free economic system. Friedman’s vaulted ideological paradigm consists of a demand that government withdraw from its regulatory commitments so capitalism can organize the economic activity of society without political interference or coercion. This thinking encourages rational individuals to pursue from the market those goods that best serve their individual self-interests.

True individual freedom of choice in the market will be guaranteed when nation states begin to decentralize their welfare activities. Only then will individual freedom be advanced. However, coercion in capitalism occurs when individuals choose not to be in a market-driven society. Moreover, Friedman does not factor in his thesis the ethical and moral claims of equality and justice. This is an ideological system that punishes individuals who choose not to enter market relations and prevents them from opting out of the system imprisoning them.

A new political approach is needed to challenge capitalist hegemony and the new political consensus. It becomes necessary to agitate for public policies that will meet the social needs of populations. Modern information technology can become an invaluable mechanism to demonstrate the many social pathologies produced by unaccountable corporate power. It is hoped that a new global awakening will occur to provoke opposition to market tyranny.

Andrew Raposa is Professor Emeritus at Massachusetts State University in Westfield Westfield.

 

More articles by:

Andrew Raposa is Professor Emeritus at Massachusetts State University in Westfield Westfield.

September 25, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Fact-Finding Labour’s “Anti-Semitism” Crisis
Charles Pierson
Destroying Yemen as Humanely as Possible
James Rothenberg
Why Not Socialism?
Patrick Cockburn
How Putin Came Out on Top in Syria
John Grant
“Awesome Uncontrollable Male Passion” Meets Its Match
Guy Horton
Burma: Complicity With Evil?
Steve Stallone
Jujitsu Comms
William Blum
Bombing Libya: the Origins of Europe’s Immigration Crisis
John Feffer
There’s a New Crash Coming
Martha Pskowski
“The Emergency Isn’t Over”: the Homeless Commemorate a Year Since the Mexico City Earthquake
Fred Baumgarten
Ten Ways of Looking at Civility
Dean Baker
The Great Financial Crisis: Bernanke and the Bubble
Binoy Kampmark
Parasitic and Irrelevant: The University Vice Chancellor
September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will There Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail