• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

CounterPunch needs you. piggybank-icon You need us. The cost of keeping the site alive and running is growing fast, as more and more readers visit. We want you to stick around, but it eats up bandwidth and costs us a bundle. Help us reach our modest goal (we are half way there!) so we can keep CounterPunch going. Donate today!
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Did the CIA Really Get a “Bum Rap” on Torture?

Last week, David Cole, the Hon. George J. Mitchell Professor in Law and Public Policy at Georgetown University Law Center, the co-chairman of the Constitution Project’s Liberty and Security Committee, and the Nation’s legal affairs correspondent, concluded that the CIA got a “bum rap” from the Senate intelligence committee’s report on torture and abuse.  As a result, he wrote an exculpatory brief for the CIA in the New York Times.  Cole believed he was justified in doing so because he had finally read the entire report and concluded that the CIA “was treated unfairly.”

Well, I’ve also read the report, and I am shocked by what Cole doesn’t deign to mention in his article.  Nowhere does Cole mention that the torture and abuse was sadistic; that it began before the Department of Justice sanctioned certain measures; and that it incorporated measures that were never permitted by the so-called Torture Memoranda.  It is noteworthy that even the leading co-author of the memoranda, John Yoo, another legal scholar, believes that those individuals who conducted sadistic measures could be indicted.

Nowhere does Cole mention some of the more bizarre and unconscionable aspects of CIA’s torture and abuse such as “rectal feeding” and “rectal hydration” that involved a “pureed” blend of hummus and raisins that was “rectally infused.”  The CIA justified these techniques as “medically necessary,” which was the kind of lie that Cole likes to pretend was not part of the CIA’s modus operandi.  And nowhere does Professor Cole note that these sadistic techniques were performed on totally innocent victims, who were known to be innocent by many at the CIA.  It is believed that nearly 25% of the victims were totally innocent, which created no problem for Vice President Dick Cheney but should have bothered the first recipient of the ACLU’s prize for contributions on civil liberties in 2013.

Nowhere does Cole mention the CIA operatives in the field who wanted to call a halt to some of the torture and abuse in CIA’s secret prisons, particularly when they found prisoners who were both “compliant and cooperative.”  As a result, Cole ignores the high-level operatives such as Rodriquez who ordered the field operatives to stop making “sweeping statements” about compliance in their cable traffic.  The fact that 85% of the interrogation group consisted of contractors points to the fact that many Agency operatives refused to take part in the sadistic interrogations.

And nowhere does Cole mention CIA director John Brennan, one of President Obama’s “patriots,” who said that “The president told us to do it, and we did what we were told,” which should have a neat Nuremberg ring to a constitutional scholar.  By not mentioning Brennan, there is no need of course to mention the CIA director’s lies to then chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) who produced this important document.

The most bizarre aspect of Cole’s apologia is that half of it is devoted to making the CIA’s case that torture worked, presumably because such well known dissemblers as former directors George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden as well as former deputy directors John McLaughlin and Steve Kappes said that it did.  I’m impressed with the fact that the CIA worked so hard to redact those parts of the report that actually established the sources of important intelligence, which had nothing to do with torture, and thus demonstrated that torture was not only sadistic but gratuitous.  Cole believes that Senator Feinstein should have acknowledged that torture by foreign intelligence services of rendered victims could have produced intelligence.  Actually, Cole should acknowledge that rendering suspects for torture is a serious violation of law.

Finally, Cole concludes that it was a mistake of “moral principle” for the Senate intelligence committee to focus on the role of the CIA.  Does he really mean that the agency that selected the victims; decided on their guilt; conducted the sadistic measures; and misinformed the White House and the Department of Justice should not be held accountable.  Cole’s a civil rights lawyer; he should be thankful that the CIA’s Office of the Inspector General preserved important documents and that the Senate intelligence committee eventually did the job that it was created for in the 1970s following the crimes of the Vietnam era.

Fortunately, there  is an appropriate punishment for Professor Cole who seems to be morally obtuse on these crimes.  He should be forced to watch the 92 torture tapes that recorded the sadistic techniques used by the CIA.  Fortunately for Cole, however, these tapes were destroyed by Jose Rodriquez, the director of interrogations, who faced no punishment for defying orders from the White House to protect the tapes.  Rodriquez claimed that he had to destroy the tapes to protect the identity of the torturers.  Well, even the torturers in Hollywood’s Zero Dark Thirty were hooded.  There has never been a time in modern history when torturers weren’t hooded.  Professor Cole’s metaphoric hood on the role of the CIA is more difficult to understand.

Melvin A. Goodman is senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and professor of government at Johns Hopkins University.  He is the author of “The Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA;” “National Insecurity: The Cost of American Militarism;” and the forthcoming “The Path to Dissent: A Whistleblower at the CIA” (City Lights Publishers, 2015).  Goodman is a contributing editor for national security issues at CounterPunch.org.

More articles by:

Melvin A. Goodman is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and a professor of government at Johns Hopkins University.  A former CIA analyst, Goodman is the author of Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA and National Insecurity: The Cost of American Militarism. and A Whistleblower at the CIA. His forthcoming book is American Carnage: Donald Trump’s War on Intelligence” (City Lights Publishers, 2019).  Goodman is the national security columnist for counterpunch.org.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

May 22, 2019
T.J. Coles
Vicious Cycle: The Pentagon Creates Tech Giants and Then Buys their Services
Thomas Knapp
A US War on Iran Would be Evil, Stupid, and Self-Damaging
Johnny Hazard
Down in Juárez
Mark Ashwill
Albright & Powell to Speak at Major International Education Conference: What Were They Thinking?
Binoy Kampmark
The Victory of Small Visions: Morrison Retains Power in Australia
Laura Flanders
Can It Happen Here?
Dean Baker
The Money in the Trump/Kushner Middle East Peace Plan
Manuel Perez-Rocha – Jen Moore
How Mining Companies Use Excessive Legal Powers to Gamble with Latin American Lives
George Ochenski
Playing Politics With Coal Plants
Ted Rall
Why Joe Biden is the Least Electable Democrat
May 21, 2019
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Locked in a Cold War Time Warp
Roger Harris
Venezuela: Amnesty International in Service of Empire
Patrick Cockburn
Trump is Making the Same Mistakes in the Middle East the US Always Makes
Robert Hunziker
Custer’s Last Stand Meets Global Warming
Lance Olsen
Renewable Energy: the Switch From Drill, Baby, Drill to Mine, Baby, Mine
Dean Baker
Ady Barkan, the Fed and the Liberal Funder Industry
Manuel E. Yepe
Maduro Gives Trump a Lesson in Ethics and Morality
Jan Oberg
Trump’s Iran Trap
David D’Amato
What is Anarchism?
Nicky Reid
Trump’s War In Venezuela Could Be Che’s Revenge
Elliot Sperber
Springtime in New York
May 20, 2019
Richard Greeman
The Yellow Vests of France: Six Months of Struggle
Manuel García, Jr.
Abortion: White Panic Over Demographic Dilution?
Robert Fisk
From the Middle East to Northern Ireland, Western States are All Too Happy to Avoid Culpability for War Crimes
Tom Clifford
From the Gulf of Tonkin to the Persian Gulf
Chandra Muzaffar
Targeting Iran
Valerie Reynoso
The Violent History of the Venezuelan Opposition
Howard Lisnoff
They’re Just About Ready to Destroy Roe v. Wade
Eileen Appelbaum
Private Equity is a Driving Force Behind Devious Surprise Billings
Binoy Kampmark
Bob Hawke: Misunderstood in Memoriam
J.P. Linstroth
End of an era for ETA?: May Basque Peace Continue
Weekend Edition
May 17, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Melvin Goodman
Trump and the Middle East: a Long Record of Personal Failure
Joan Roelofs
“Get Your Endangered Species Off My Bombing Range!”
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Slouching Towards Tehran
Paul Street
It’s Even More Terrible Than You Thought
Rob Urie
Grabby Joe and the Problem of Environmental Decline
Ajamu Baraka
2020 Elections: It’s Militarism and the Military Budget Stupid!
Andrew Levine
Springtime for Biden and Democrats
Richard Moser
The Interlocking Crises: War and Climate Chaos
Ron Jacobs
Uncle Sam Needs Our Help Again?
Eric Draitser
Elizabeth Warren Was Smart to Tell FOX to Go to Hell
Peter Bolton
The Washington Post’s “Cartel of the Suns” Theory is the Latest Desperate Excuse for Why the Coup Attempt in Venezuela has Failed
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Analysis of Undecideds Suggests Biden’s Support May be Exaggerated
Peter Lackowski
Eyewitness in Venezuela: a 14-year Perspective
Karl Grossman
Can Jerry Nadler Take Down Trump?
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail