• Monthly
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $other
  • use PayPal

Support Our Annual Fund Drive!fund-drive-progress-thermometer

We only shake our readers down two times a year, but when we ask we mean it. So, please, help as much as you can. All contributions are tax-deductible.
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

ISIS Redraws the Map of the Middle East

The recent beheadings of 21 Coptic Christians by the Islamic State (IS) has drawn worldwide condemnation and led the Egyptian military to launch air strikes in Libya.  The beheadings are part of a self-conscious form of political spectacle, one intended to garner worldwide media attention – which it did.  The violent actions were also intended to rally support for the organization’s goal of establishing a caliphate, an orthodox Islamic state controlled by a single political and religious leader and governed under Sharia law.

Equally critical to its campaign, and too-often unappreciated by media pundits, IS seeks to redraw the traditional borders of what was once known as the Levant.  This is a geographic territory little mentioned today, but since Old Testament days has been a war zone of contesting armies and belief systems.  Among these confrontations were the Christian Crusades, eight campaigns that dragged on from 1095 to 1272 AD; some say it lasted until 1798.

National borders are not fixed, divinely established and eternal.  Rather, they are political constructs, revealing more of the dynamics of political power then the identity of those so governed.  No better example of this is the U.S., in which any number of tactics was used to both extend and preserve the nation’s borders.  These efforts include outright theft (land of Native peoples), purchase (Louisiana territory), war (with Mexico), subversion (seizure of Hawaii) and civil war (to stop the South from succeeding).

IS is aggressively pursuing a campaign to reverse traditional notions of territoriality, particularly that established by European colonialists following World War I and the breakup of the Ottoman Empire.  Is the Islamic State’s violent challenge to existing boarders of Middle East countries a negative rebellion against globalization?

* * *

The word “Levant” derives from the French term, lever, “to rise,” and refers to the direction of the rising sun from the perspective of the eastern Mediterranean of ancient Greece and Rome.  It is synonymous with “Mashriq,” referring to “the east” or “the sunrise.”

The Levant roughly extends 400 miles north from the Taurus Mountains to the Arabian Desert at the south, and across some 70 to 100 miles east from the Mediterranean Sea into the Zagros Mountains of Upper Mesopotamia.  Some insist that it includes Jordan, Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Cyprus and part of southern Turkey, but not the Caucasus Mountains or the Arabian Peninsula.  In Biblical times, the Levant’s southern part – what’s known as Syria today — was called Canaan.

In June 2014, IS released a video, “Breaking of the Borders,” following its capture of the frontier crossing between northern Syria and Iraq.  The victory was a stepping-stone to its capture of Mosul, Iraq’s largest northern city, and which it still controls.  “This is not the first border we will break, we will break other borders,” proclaimed the video’s narrator.

“I say to the Islamic Ummah [community],” the speaker adds:  “Now we are in Iraq.  Allah, glorified and exalted … smashed these borders, the borders of Sykes-Picot, and now the Muslim can enter Iraq without a passport.”

The reference to “the borders of Sykes-Picot” recalls a secret deal concocted by Great Britain and France in May 1916 to carve up the Ottoman Empire in anticipation of victory in the Great War.  During the war, the Ottomans allied with Germany and the Central Powers against Britain, France, Russia and the U.S.  With war’s end, the victors took out their knives and carved up a territory dating from 1299.

Six centuries of pre-modern rule came to an end and with it a new geopolitical order came to power. The deal, cut by Sir Mark Sykes (Britain) and Francois Georges Picot (France), established spheres of influence for the European great powers.  The deal was rooted in the negotiators’ desire to secure control over the principle 20th century energy source, oil.  France claimed Syria; Britain got the southern part of Syria covering parts of Mesopotamia (what would become Iraq, Lebanon and parts of Palestine); and an international zone included parts of Palestine.  The boundaries established by the deal remain more-or-less in place today.

* * *

The 2007 movie, Charlie Wilson’s War, starring Tom Hanks, makes merry the CIA’s adventures in Afghanistan in the early-‘80s.  It wonderfully recalls the good-old days of the last great battle of the Cold War and how ever-clever U.S. politicians and undercover operatives fueled a local insurgency that contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union.  The movie makes insurgency great fun.

As evident from the experience of Osama bin Laden, many Islamic warriors got their start collaborating with U.S. interests in Afghanistan.  The U.S. invasion of Iraq planted the seed from which IS evolved as both a political and military entity.   In 2002, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian and leader of Tawhid wa al-Jihad (Organization of Monotheism and Jihad), established al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI).  Following Zarqawi’s death in 2006, AQI morphed into Islamic State in Iraq (ISI).  In April 2013, ISI, with a military presence in Iraq and Syria, was rebranded the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS).  The Islamic State (IS) was decreed in June 2014.

IS seeks to overturn the Great Powers’ division of the Levant, thus reshaping traditional national territories into a religious-political caliphate.  It has a military and political presence in Syria and Iraq; it is creeping into Lebanon and now Libya (involving the murder of Christian Egyptians).  IS even promises to “free Palestine.”

IS is but one of the insurgent movements challenging European colonists’ notions of the nation state set up by Sykes-Picot or other such schemes.

The European Union (EU) suggests one failed approach.  It was established in 1957 to facilitate the economic, social and cultural integration – symbolized by the euro and open boarders — of individual countries.  It originally consisted of six countries and, today, involves 28 countries and over 500 million people.  Since it’s founding, there’ve been calls for the EU to become a “United States of Europe,” with individual countries becoming analogous to U.S. states.  However, with the rise of rightwing movements in the France, the UK and other countries as well as Greece’s possible exit, a further reconfiguration of Europe seems unlikely.

The Kurds suggest an alternative transnational political identity.  Based in a well-run and strongly militarized area of northern Iraq, it could well emerge as an independent nation state if (as many hypothesize) Iraq breaks up.  More troubling, it could then serve as an anchor state aligned with Kurdish separatists in Turkey, a NATO state.

An IS off-shoot, “AfPak,” is spearheading a campaign to create what it calls Islamic State of Khorasan.  It covers a region spanning Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as parts of Iran, Central Asia, India, and Bangladesh.  (The border between Pakistan and India was established in 1947 under what is known as the “Radcliffe Line,” laid out by yet another British colonialist, Sir Cyril Radcliffe.)

Boko Haram, which means “Western education is forbidden,” is terrorizing northern Nigeria.  An Islamic fundamentalist group, it has engaged in beheadings, mass killings and the kidnapping of schoolgirl.  It originally sought to unite Anglophone Nigeria with its Francophone neighbor Niger, which has a larger Muslims population.  It is extending its terrifying tentacles into Niger, Cameroonian and Chad.

The aggressive violence of Islamic fundamentalists in the Levant and Nigeria are reactionary responses to a profoundly destabilized world order.  They represent a rejection of what is understood in the West as “civilization,” of secularism, science, democracy, arts, gender equality and sexual pleasure.  They are the latest – last? — battles of patriarchy.

David Rosen can be reached at drosennyc@verizon.net; check out www.DavidRosenWrites.com.

 

More articles by:

David Rosen is the author of Sex, Sin & Subversion:  The Transformation of 1950s New York’s Forbidden into America’s New Normal (Skyhorse, 2015).  He can be reached at drosennyc@verizon.net; check out www.DavidRosenWrites.com.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
October 11, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Becky Grant
CounterPunch in Peril?
Anthony DiMaggio
Fake News in Trump’s America
Andrew Levine
Trump’s End Days
Jeffrey St. Clair
High Plains Grifter: the Life and Crimes of George W. Bush
Patrick Cockburn
Kurdish Fighters Always Feared Trump Would be a Treacherous Ally
Paul Street
On the TrumpenLeft and False Equivalence
Dave Lindorff
Sure Trump is ‘Betraying the Kurds!’ But What’s New about That?
Rob Urie
Democrats Impeach Joe Biden, Fiddle as the Planet Burns
Sam Pizzigati
Inequality is Literally Killing Us
Jill Richardson
What Life on the Margins Feels Like
Mitchell Zimmerman
IMPOTUS: Droit de seigneur at Mar-a-Lago
Robert Hunziker
Methane SOS
Lawrence Davidson
Donald Trump, the Christian Warrior
William Hartung – Mandy Smithburger
The Pentagon is Pledging to Reform Itself, Again. It Won’t.
Richard Moser
The Empire Is Running Out of War Stories. Or is it? Will American Exceptionalism Rise Again?
Roger Harris
Why Trump is Facing Impeachment
Doug Lummis
Everything Going Wrong in Okinawa
Ramzy Baroud
Administrative Torture: Free Heba al-Labadi, a Jordanian Citizen in Israeli Prison
Christopher Ketcham
Ode to the Drums of Ginger Baker
W. T. Whitney
Upcoming Elections Represent Testing Time for Bolivia’s Socialist Government
Louis Proyect
Building Soldier Resistance Under the Shadows of Fascism
Mark Ashwill
Reflections on General Giap and the End of an Era in Vietnam
Gabriel Leão
Killing the Messengers: Rising Violence Against Journalists and Indigenous Leaders Defending the Amazon
Graham Peebles
Climate Change: All Talk No Action
Arthur Hoyle
The Meaning of Donald Trump
Dean Baker
Those Quaint Corporate Scandals in Japan
Laura Santina
Take Their Feet Off Our Necks
Julian Vigo
The New Workers’ Revolution is Afoot
Robert Koehler
The Rights of Nature
Dan Bacher
New Report Reveals Oil Waste in CA Aquifers
David Swanson
Trump’s Opponents Have Him Beat . . . When It Comes to Incompetence
Ben Debney
Liberals, Class and the Joker Complex
Brian Wakamo
Paying College Athletes: California Takes on the NCAA
Theo Wuest
Don’t Leave Equality to the Supreme Court
Jesse Jackson
To His Wealthy Donors, Trump is the Grifter
Mairead Maguire
Pathways to Peace
George Wuerthner
Logging Wild and Scenic River Corridors in the Name of Reducing Wildfires is a Really Bad Idea
Tracey L. Rogers
We Can’t Hug Away Injustice
Mike Garrity
How the Alliance for the Wild Rockies Stopped Trump From Bulldozing Cabinet-Yaak and Selkirk Grizzly Bears into Extinction
Lawrence Wittner
Why Are Americans So Confused About the Meaning of “Democratic Socialism”?
Nicky Reid
Climate Cthulhu: A Post-Modern Horror Story
Seth Sandronsky
A Sacramento King’s Ransom: Local Tax Dollars and the Owner’s Wealth
Susan Block
Cougar 2020?
David Yearsley
Mother Mallard’s Little Boy Grows Up
Elliot Sperber
Taking Out Columbus
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail