Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. A generous donor is matching all donations of $100 or more! So please donate now to double your punch!

Making Movements Matter

Recently, many people, including critical theorist, Judith Butler, have weighed in on the important political distinctions between #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter. As an author who has recently had an article with the title “All Lives Matter” circulate (see CounterPunch, for example), I feel it is incumbent on me to also weigh in on what I view to be significant political issues — or really a sensibility — here.  Black lives, brown lives, women’s lives, poor lives, all lives: what’s at stake here?

When I wrote my piece about “Class, Race, Gender, and U.S. Policing” that sought to reveal how important intersectional analysis is for our current political moment, I sought a term that would embody the inclusive spirit foundational to intersectional–class, race, gender/sexuality– analysis.  I was disheartened at the time that many men I know were debating how racism interacted with capitalism to create the current policing apparatus–yet they, shockingly, failed to mention heteropatriarchy!  For that moment, “All Lives Matter” seemed to fit that inclusive feminist spirit well, as the words advance the idea that no group’s experience of oppression should be sacrificed (“all the women are white, all the blacks are men…”) as we build an anti-policing movement.  Citing the Abner Louima and Marissa Alexander cases, I sought to indicate that gender/ sexuality analysis is essential to the policing apparatus’ operations, figuring that actual case studies are the most helpful for adding concrete substance to more abstract intersectional assertions.

Not a big user of Twitter, I quickly realized that #AllLivesMatter was being used to usurp a focus on the anti-black racism constitutive of today’s political moment, with the best analysis offered by Alicia Garza. I should’ve guessed so much and sought a different title for expressing my feminist sentiments. #AllLivesMatter is widely viewed as a racist white effort to erase or diminish the obvious historic and contemporary conditions that specifically and uniquely target black people.  The exhausted hashtag has been exposed as an effort to deny racial specificity and erase black experiences.  Yet, we still need to hone our ability to connect and analyze intersecting oppressions as we move forward in the anti-policing movement.  How do we balance the particular (group identity) and the universal (broader agenda) tensions inherent in mass movement organizing?

When I teach U.S. social movement history, I always run into the same problem as a new generation of students and activists are introduced to the contributions of and problems faced by past mass movements.  I approach the framing of the movements with my ideal intersectional model in mind (anti-capitalist/imperialist/racist, feminist/womanist, queer) but, in reality, there is no singular mass movement we can point to that practically embodies the all-inclusive spirit perfectly. (There are tendencies and organizations we can point to, with Combahee River Collective being a common historic example.)  This realization of the challenges inherent in mass movement development of the ideal all-inclusive intersectional spirit led me to question whether this was practically possible when we consider what movements are and how people become mobilized to participate in them. When I first encountered this problem, I turned to Patricia Hill Collins for guidance.  Author of the groundbreaking Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, which utilized standpoint theory to develop a specific black feminist standpoint, Collins’ work taught me how history shapes the uniquely intersectional lives of American black women (although her work was criticized for erasing queer, poor, and non-U.S. black women immigrants’ experiences). Collins’ first book, and her second book, Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice, helped me think through how movement inclusivity is both a righteous and perhaps impossible task that we should nonetheless persistently pursue.

Karl Marx’s notion of the proletarian standpoint implied that the proletariat was unique and historically situated in relationship to the means of production to overthrow capitalism.  The academic feminist theoretical adaptation of the standpoint concept has developed in many directions, with some directions proving more fruitful than others, and I have adapted the concept under the most general definition — “a unique group identity based on a shared experience” — precisely because I feel the concept can be quite useful in the mass movement organizing and analysis context.  In fact, never have I found the concept more useful than in its application to the anti-black racism of police brutality.  I was teaching a feminist theory college course years ago in Long Island when four police officers were acquitted for Amadou Diallo’s murder.  My classroom near Garden City, Long Island, replicated locally segregated neighborhood demographics.  My black students sided squarely with Diallo and called for police convictions, while most white students sided with police officers, even citing the experiences of family members in the NYPD. Far from excusing my white students for having such backwards views, I was able to situate their racism in their own histories and experiences by using the idea of a “white standpoint”: when historical forces and material reinforcements are considered, racism grows more, not less, entrenched and daunting.

Back then, given the views I had witnessed among white people regarding policing, I wouldn’t have guessed a mass, multi-racial, anti-policing movement would be possible in the U.S.  But it’s here, and now we face the challenges of crafting a movement that matters, one that is: educated on and mobilized around the specificities of institutionalized anti-black racism; connected to other pro-immigrant/ anti-racist/ anti-deportation (#BrownLivesMatter) struggles; inclusive of women’s issues and gender/ sexuality analysis; and tied to the labor movement and anti-capitalist politics. My adaptation of the standpoint concept assumes people are always moved or mobilized from within their own viewpoints and experiences–for better and for worse.  (For example, despite my individual feminist intention when writing the “Class, Race, Gender and U.S. Policing” article, my usage of #AllLivesMatter to capture my article’s spirit of gender/ sexuality inclusivity  unfortunately contributed to the ill-spirited circulation of an exhausted anti-black hashtag.)   That, for a variety of reasons, enough people identify excessive militarized and murderous policing as their issue speaks volumes to the promises of this historic moment.  But it also delivers the ultimate challenge: how do we address the fact that mobilized groups will inevitably move (against the police, in this case) from their own viewpoints and experiences?

White activist movement roles remain a central concern, as the knee-jerk impulses for epistemic centrality and organizational control are not easy impulses to shake.  The diminishment of heteropatriarchy’s structural centrality in the policing apparatus is also no easy impulse to shake.  Finally, those who see the current murderous policing state as a matter of misguided policy and not capitalist business as usual present serious problems in the mass movement context.

Centralizing the specificity of black lives, while upholding the general refusal of the policing apparatus that affects so many lives, is the spirit that will make this anti-policing movement really matter.

Michelle Renee Matisons, Ph.D., can be reached at

More articles by:

Michelle Renee Matisons, Ph.D. can be reached at

Weekend Edition
October 19, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jason Hirthler
The Pieties of the Liberal Class
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Day in My Life at CounterPunch
Paul Street
“Male Energy,” Authoritarian Whiteness and Creeping Fascism in the Age of Trump
Nick Pemberton
Reflections on Chomsky’s Voting Strategy: Why The Democratic Party Can’t Be Saved
John Davis
The Last History of the United States
Yigal Bronner
The Road to Khan al-Akhmar
Robert Hunziker
The Negan Syndrome
Andrew Levine
Democrats Ahead: Progressives Beware
Rannie Amiri
There is No “Proxy War” in Yemen
David Rosen
America’s Lost Souls: the 21st Century Lumpen-Proletariat?
Joseph Natoli
The Age of Misrepresentations
Ron Jacobs
History Is Not Kind
John Laforge
White House Radiation: Weakened Regulations Would Save Industry Billions
Ramzy Baroud
The UN ‘Sheriff’: Nikki Haley Elevated Israel, Damaged US Standing
Robert Fantina
Trump, Human Rights and the Middle East
Anthony Pahnke – Jim Goodman
NAFTA 2.0 Will Help Corporations More Than Farmers
Jill Richardson
Identity Crisis: Elizabeth Warren’s Claims Cherokee Heritage
Sam Husseini
The Most Strategic Midterm Race: Elder Challenges Hoyer
Maria Foscarinis – John Tharp
The Criminalization of Homelessness
Robert Fisk
The Story of the Armenian Legion: a Dark Tale of Anger and Revenge
Jacques R. Pauwels
Dinner With Marx in the House of the Swan
Dave Lindorff
US ‘Outrage’ over Slaying of US Residents Depends on the Nation Responsible
Ricardo Vaz
How Many Yemenis is a DC Pundit Worth?
Elliot Sperber
Build More Gardens, Phase out Cars
Chris Gilbert
In the Wake of Nepal’s Incomplete Revolution: Dispatch by a Far-Flung Bolivarian 
Muhammad Othman
Let Us Bray
Gerry Brown
Are Chinese Municipal $6 Trillion (40 Trillion Yuan) Hidden Debts Posing Titanic Risks?
Rev. William Alberts
Judge Kavanaugh’s Defenders Doth Protest Too Much
Ralph Nader
Unmasking Phony Values Campaigns by the Corporatists
Victor Grossman
A Big Rally and a Bavarian Vote
James Bovard
Groped at the Airport: Congress Must End TSA’s Sexual Assaults on Women
Jeff Roby
Florida After Hurricane Michael: the Sad State of the Unheeded Planner
Wim Laven
Intentional or Incompetence—Voter Suppression Where We Live
Bradley Kaye
The Policy of Policing
Wim Laven
The Catholic Church Fails Sexual Abuse Victims
Kevin Cashman
One Year After Hurricane Maria: Employment in Puerto Rico is Down by 26,000
Dr. Hakim Young
Nonviolent Afghans Bring a Breath of Fresh Air
Karl Grossman
Irving Like vs. Big Nuke
Dan Corjescu
The New Politics of Climate Change
John Carter
The Plight of the Pyrenees: the Abandoned Guard Dogs of the West
Ted Rall
Brett Kavanaugh and the Politics of Emotion-Shaming
Graham Peebles
Sharing is Key to a New Economic and Democratic Order
Ed Rampell
The Advocates
Louis Proyect
The Education Business
David Yearsley
Shock-and-Awe Inside Oracle Arena