Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Please Support CounterPunch’s Annual Fund Drive
We don’t run corporate ads. We don’t shake our readers down for money every month or every quarter like some other sites out there. We only ask you once a year, but when we ask we mean it. So, please, help as much as you can. We provide our site for free to all, but the bandwidth we pay to do so doesn’t come cheap. All contributions are tax-deductible.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Rethinking Solidarity with Cuba

President Obama recently announced changed U.S. policies toward Cuba. He gets high marks for defying an entrenched, hardline political opposition. Euphoria, however, is brief. Cuban suffering is recalled that could have been avoided, if only he or his predecessors had taken steps earlier.

Obama announced the release of the last three anti-terrorist “Cuban Five” prisoners. He indicated diplomatic relations with Cuba would be restored and travel restrictions eased. Obama invited Congress to begin dismantling the U.S. economic blockade. He spoke of preparations to drop Cuba from the U.S. list of terrorist-sponsoring nations. U.S. banking, credit card, and communications services would be available in Cuba.

Cuba’s victory was clear. All Cuban Five prisoners are home now. The Cuban people outlasted strong-arm policies that caused immense grief. The Cuban Five triumphed; their dignity, revolutionary fervor, and optimism never wavered.

Now the New York Times celebrates dissident bloggers in Cuba, Cuba’s supposedly grim economic prognosis, and the prospect of market forces prevailing in Cuba. The U.S. media remains silent on history that matters: anti-Cuban terror attacks, injustices visited upon the Cuban Five, half a century of suffering at U.S. hands, and Cuba’s socialist achievements.

What’s ahead now for Cuba solidarity activists in the United States? They will agitate for Congress to legislate the economic blockade out of existence. They will weigh in against money and bureaucracy earmarked for destabilization in Cuban society, also pressure Obama to use his full executive authority to modify embargo regulations. Residual travel restrictions would be first in line. They will demand that the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 go. It privileges Cuban immigrants, has always been a travesty, and now is an anachronism. They’ll press their government to return control of Guantanamo land and sea to Cuba.

What about the long term when, according to the official script, the U.S. government no longer plays the bully? Force, including brute force, has led to outcomes so misbegotten as to draw people into the struggle concerned primarily about fairness, international law, basic human rights, and/or morality. They may or may not have been socialists.

Henceforth under toned-down U.S. intervention, money, consumer goods, and wheeler-dealers would be flooding the island. Transgressions – targets for outrage – may be hiding. Some solidarity activists may fade away.

The proportion of holdovers identifying with socialism and/or anti-imperialism would rise in such circumstances. They would bring talk and analysis to solidarity work. A battle of ideas would ensue as free-wheeling self-aggrandizement contends with notions of justice, dignity, and societal planning.

Combatants in a battle of ideas ought to have in mind a model of what they want. Many U.S. progressives are accustomed to taking lessons from Cuba’s socialist project. The idea of an alternative reality, a society dedicated to justice for all, becomes an essential tool as they confront crisis-ridden U.S. capitalism. That would be Cuba. Surely they will seek to reciprocate Cuba’s gift of mentoring by strengthening solidarity.

Cuba provides yet another model. Cuban national hero José Martí was Cuba’s penultimate teacher on waging a battle of ideas. For him, as he organized and propagandized for Cuba’s second War for Independence (1895-1898), the battle of ideas was about preparation.

Martí showed how participants shape, restructure, and teach both values and purposes – ideology, some would say. They study ongoing political and social developments and unite, organize, and recruit.

Martí’s modus operandi was evident as he analyzed two gatherings held in Washington: an international congress in 1889 at which the U.S. government proposed a continent-wide commercial union and a multi-nation conference in 1891 staged for promotion of a regional common currency. Martí attended that session as Uruguay’s representative and reported on both for Latin American newspapers.

As Martí observed, “This is a powerful country (the USA), full of products it cannot sell, and determined to extend its sway over Latin America …The time has arrived for Spanish America to declare her second independence.” (La Nacion, Buenos Aires, Nov. 2, 1889)

To a friend:  “In regard to our land (Cuba) … There’s a darker plan … which is the wickedness of forcing the island into war, of precipitating war in order to have a pretext for intervening  and in the role of mediator and guarantor, staying there.” (Source: Luis Toledo Sande, “Cesto de Llamas”)

Reporting for La Nación March 31, 1890, Martí writes that “when the Argentinian delegate Sáenz Pena, in challenging the commercial union, concluded his speech with the phrase ‘Let America be for all humanity,’ they all stood up in appreciation, understanding what was left unsaid. That phrase is our banner and a barrier to the union.”   The “America” referred to was Martí’s “Our America” — all land south of the Rio Grande.

Martí sets the stage for contemporary “free trade” agreements and for Cuba’s second War for Independence. The last quotation anticipates the words “Homeland is Humanity” displayed at Havana’s Jose Martí International Airport. It speaks of Cuban doctors in Sierra Leone fighting Ebola and Cuba’s crucial role in projecting Latin American integration.

So Cuba solidarity activists in the United States looking for a job description in a time of uncertainty would do well to sit at Cuba’s feet. Shared, Cuba’s almost two-century-long experience of resisting U.S. presumption and haughtiness will come in handy.

“The road ahead, says Ricardo Alarcon, former president of the Cuban National Assembly and close observer of U.S. affairs, will be long and will set new challenges for the solidarity movement and also for Cuba.” If under altered circumstances that movement does weaken through departures, those participants leaning toward socialism will look ahead toward building their own movement in order to refurbish Cuban solidarity with new activists and ideas from that quarter.

W.T. Whitney Jr. is a retired pediatrician and political journalist living in Maine.

 

 

More articles by:

W.T. Whitney Jr. is a retired pediatrician and political journalist living in Maine.

October 17, 2018
Patrick Cockburn
When Saudi Arabia’s Credibility is Damaged, So is America’s
John Steppling
Before the Law
Frank Stricker
Wages Rising? 
James McEnteer
Larry Summers Trips Out
Muhammad Othman
What You Can Do About the Saudi Atrocities in Yemen
Binoy Kampmark
Agents of Chaos: Trump, the Federal Reserve and Andrew Jackson
Karen J. Greenberg
Justice Derailed: From Gitmo to Kavanaugh
John Feffer
Why is the Radical Right Still Winning?
Dan Corjescu
Green Tsunami in Bavaria?
Rohullah Naderi
Why Afghan Girls Are Out of School?
George Ochenski
You Have to Give Respect to Get Any, Mr. Trump
Cesar Chelala
Is China Winning the War for Africa?
Mel Gurtov
Getting Away with Murder
W. T. Whitney
Colombian Lawyer Diego Martinez Needs Solidarity Now
Dean Baker
Nothing to Brag About: Scott Walker’s Economic Record in Wisconsin:
October 16, 2018
Gregory Elich
Diplomatic Deadlock: Can U.S.-North Korea Diplomacy Survive Maximum Pressure?
Rob Seimetz
Talking About Death While In Decadence
Kent Paterson
Fifty Years of Mexican October
Robert Fantina
Trump, Iran and Sanctions
Greg Macdougall
Indigenous Suicide in Canada
Kenneth Surin
On Reading the Diaries of Tony Benn, Britain’s Greatest Labour Politician
Andrew Bacevich
Unsolicited Advice for an Undeclared Presidential Candidate: a Letter to Elizabeth Warren
Thomas Knapp
Facebook Meddles in the 2018 Midterm Elections
Muhammad Othman
Khashoggi and Demetracopoulos
Gerry Brown
Lies, Damn Lies & Statistics: How the US Weaponizes Them to Accuse  China of Debt Trap Diplomacy
Christian Ingo Lenz Dunker – Peter Lehman
The Brazilian Presidential Elections and “The Rules of The Game”
Robert Fisk
What a Forgotten Shipwreck in the Irish Sea Can Tell Us About Brexit
Martin Billheimer
Here Cochise Everywhere
David Swanson
Humanitarian Bombs
Dean Baker
The Federal Reserve is Not a Church
October 15, 2018
Rob Urie
Climate Crisis is Upon Us
Conn Hallinan
Syria’s Chessboard
Patrick Cockburn
The Saudi Atrocities in Yemen are a Worse Story Than the Disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi
Sheldon Richman
Trump’s Middle East Delusions Persist
Justin T. McPhee
Uberrima Fides? Witness K, East Timor and the Economy of Espionage
Tom Gill
Spain’s Left Turn?
Jeff Cohen
Few Democrats Offer Alternatives to War-Weary Voters
Dean Baker
Corporate Debt Scares
Gary Leupp
The Khashoggi Affair and and the Anti-Iran Axis
Russell Mokhiber
Sarah Chayes Calls on West Virginians to Write In No More Manchins
Clark T. Scott
Acclimated Behaviorisms
Kary Love
Evolution of Religion
Colin Todhunter
From GM Potatoes to Glyphosate: Regulatory Delinquency and Toxic Agriculture
Binoy Kampmark
Evacuating Nauru: Médecins Sans Frontières and Australia’s Refugee Dilemma
Marvin Kitman
The Kitman Plan for Peace in the Middle East: Two Proposals
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail