FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Why Deradicalization is Not the Answer

Speaking at a National Security Symposium organized by the Valparaiso University Law Review last month, Thomas Durkin and David Nevin, lawyers for Guantanamo detainees, said that until we understand the motivation of those who use violence, we will not be able to curb the recruitment.

Thousands of Westerners have heeded the terrorist call over the past few years.  Christianne Boudreau, the mother of Canadian Damian Clairmont (who died for ISIS earlier this year), wants to do something.

She is not alone. Sgt. Renu Dash, of the RCMP public engagement team, says that one of the signs of radicalization is that “their understanding of geopolitics is not what we would say is the standard.”  In fact, Western governments, law enforcement agencies and various community groups hope to identify and nip the problem in the bud.  Such efforts (aimed at families and communities) are well intentioned and necessary if done properly as part of a comprehensive effort. But as experts such as John Horgan, director of the Center for Terrorism and Security Studies at the University of Massachusetts, point out, deradicalization initiatives could be counterproductive if ill conceived.  He told Rolling Stone last year, “The idea that radicalization causes terrorism is perhaps the greatest myth alive today in terrorism research.”

Indeed, radical ideas are not crimes.  Imagine a world without Gandhi, MLK or Mandela.

Horgan, a criminal psychologist, and others argue that too many programs are “poorly conceptualized” and fail to see the critical distinction between merely harboring radical views and the adoption of violence as a strategy. It is highly idiosyncratic and involves the complex interaction of various personal, social, economic, political and ideological factors.  Sometimes, mental illness may also be in the mix (as suggested by the mother of the Ottawa shooter Michael Zehaf-Bibeau).  In fact, a few “radicals” that I have counseled were diagnosed Schizophrenics.

The process and reasons for violence are idiosyncratic, circumstance driven and sometimes even opportunistic. How to prevent the shift to violence will be elusive until the why is given more attention without caving in to political correctness or blind patriotism. Belittling and minimizing the role played by hawkish Western foreign policies and draconian anti-terror initiatives on radicalization as well as Muslim defensiveness and denial are of equal concern. At the same time, blunt generalizations and reductionism hurt more than help.

Violent radicalization must be confronted without undermining social cohesion, violating human rights and deviating from core democratic ideals.

Many studies including those carried out by the Chicago Project on Security and Terrorism and the Triangle Center on Terrorism at Duke University confirm that most violent radicals are motivated by a cause as opposed to religion and see it as a military tool.  Indeed, most have a poor understanding of Islam, but are empathetic to the plight of the oppressed. That said, extremist ideas (including viewing people as believers and unbelievers) combined with resentment and a victim narrative can provide the cognitive opening that can be exploited by violent preachers who provide the chapter and verse to justify “heroically” responding to injustices.

The community is best positioned and equipped to tackle cognitive radicalization.  Since 9/11 it has repeatedly condemned violence in the strongest of terms and recently even came out with “United Against Terrorism.”

However, more needs to be done to challenge some of the existing violent  narratives.  Imams must be more pro-active in undermining some of the teachings in classical texts glorifying violence and martyrdom, by emphasizing the ethical/peaceful vision of the Quran. This can only be done by deconstructing and contextualizing the violent rhetoric in some of the teachings and interpretations adopted uncritically by too many. Any government involvement will be counterproductive.

Before others get too smug, violence is not just a Muslim problem. In fact, non-Muslim terrorism has claimed more victims in North America since 9/11. The worship of guns, guts and glory and its reinforcement in popular culture truly have long term human consequences. Indeed, after noting that the Ottawa shooter, Michael Zehalf-Bibeau, spent hours playing violent video games, his mother Ms. Susan Bibeau wrote “I doubt he watched much islamic propaganda…”

Within the community, the deprogramming efforts will have some effect (with the young, those who have not been coopted yet and those disillusioned), but they will fail to stymy the resort to violence among the already converted (who will discount such Imams as “soft” or “liberal”).  Moreover, these efforts risk coming off as minimizing the legitimate grievances (domestic and foreign) and undermining their anger by treating it as irrational or a cognitive state that can be brainwashed out of them. This will only backfire. It will certainly not help in cutting the fuse to violence.

In contrast, disengagement, which focuses on dissuading radicals from terror tactics through attitudinal change has more promise.  In fact, Hogan’s interviews with former extremists found that “while almost all of the interviewees could be described as disengaged, not a single one of them could be said to be “deradicalized.”

Disengagement does not require a disavowal of radical beliefs and acceptance of western values. Moreover, acknowledging and striving to change the violent and discriminatory policies (foreign and domestic) and validating their beliefs, facilitates disengagement from violence. Such openings for dialogue and interaction outside their circles can be used to help divert their energies toward peaceful and constructive ways to challenge the establishment.  In addition to supporting a cause, other big motivators are group identity, belonging and standing up for your “core” group. As the American Psychological Associations notes, the existing body of research into political and group dynamics (including gangs) provides fertile material in this regard. These studies must be mined to help us address how to deal with motivation and to convince such people to disengage from violence.

Faisal Kutty is an assistant professor and director of the International LL.M. Program at Valparaiso University Law School in Indiana. He is also an adjunct professor at Osgoode Hall Law School of York University in Toronto.

More articles by:

Faisal Kutty, is an associate professor of law and director of the International LL.M. Program at Valparaiso University Law School and an adjunct professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. He is also a co-founder of KSM Law for which he serves as counsel. He blogs at the Huffington Post and his academic articles are archived at SSRN.

September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
Jeff Ballinger
Nike and Colin Kaepernick: Fronting the Bigots’ Team
David Rosen
Why Stop at Roe? How “Settled Law” Can be Overturned
Gary Olson
Pope Francis and the Battle Over Cultural Terrain
Nick Pemberton
Donald The Victim: A Product of Post-9/11 America
Ramzy Baroud
The Veiled Danger of the ‘Dead’ Oslo Accords
Kevin Martin
U.S. Support for the Bombing of Yemen to Continue
Robert Fisk
A Murder in Aleppo
Robert Hunziker
The Elite World Order in Jitters
Ben Dangl
After 9/11: The Staggering Economic and Human Cost of the War on Terror
Charles Pierson
Invade The Hague! Bolton vs. the ICC
Robert Fantina
Trump and Palestine
Daniel Warner
Hubris on and Off the Court
John Kendall Hawkins
Boning Up on Eternal Recurrence, Kubrick-style: “2001,” Revisited
Haydar Khan
Set Theory of the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail