FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Problem with ‘Recognizing’ Palestine

by

The latest move by Britain and France to ‘recognize’ Palestine is another fabrication by the two colonial powers that perpetuates the travesty of justice in relation to Palestine committed by the same two – the Nakba of the Palestinian people.

Following Sweden’s unexpected decision to ‘recognize’ Palestine that followed with the typical staunch intimidation attempts and protest by Israel and the United States over the decision1, Britain and France have decided to navigate in the same direction in terms of ‘recognition’ of Palestine. It is without a doubt that public opinion has shifted and continues to shift with respect to the question of Palestine, especially exacerbated by the disturbing savagery of Israel’s incremental genocide demonstrated during Operation Protective Edge. However, the whole issue of ‘recognition’ of Palestine especially by Britain and France who have seized this opportunity prompted by Sweden has a deeper and more profound long term affect due to its shortsightedness as well as the diverting essence behind ‘recognition’ and its relation to the sacredness of public opinion and historical narrative.

Over two decades after the Nakba-the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians that occurred in 1948 which included the destruction of 531 villages, massacres such as Deir Yassin and mass rapes of the population2, Golda Meir- fourth prime minister of Israel at the time stated “it was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country away from them: they did not exist.”3 The logic of denial is one out of many logics of a settler colonial state fuelled by the Doctrine of Discovery, whereby the historical narrative presented to international public opinion and future generations is that Palestine was “discovered” as it was ‘a land with no people for a people without a land.’ This logic through which Palestine and Palestinians are perceived continues to date from similar statements as Golda Meir made by former United States Republican candidate Newt Gingrich who claims that Palestinians are an “invented” people.4 It is precisely this logic of denial and Doctrine of Discovery that is embedded in the decisions in relation to the basis of ‘recognizing’ Palestine. ‘Recognizing’ Palestine and Palestinians means that they did not exist before, meaning that they were discovered only recently; after Operation Protective Edge and therefore the “discovery” of Palestine is the basis of the recognition which reinforces Israel’s historical narrative that there was no Palestine or Palestinians prior to their established state; reinforcing a continued Nakba in the name of justice and peace. Furthermore, recognizing Palestine and the Palestinians means Palestine only exists within the 1967 borders that are in actuality evaporating and disappearing as we speak due to the continued colonization and land seizures. Furthermore, what does this recognition mean for the Palestinians of 1948? Have they disappeared or should we consider them non-existent? Considering them non-existent or disappeared means that we are also considering the root of Palestine in the same way which also means that if there are no roots, then Palestine is being “discovered” which includes roots as a result of this synchronic as opposed to diachronic thinking; thereby defeating the purpose and reinforcing the colonial dynamics in relation to this context.

The reality is there is nothing to discover about Palestine and the Palestinians, as Palestinians know who they are and why they are here. The Zionist movement’s foundation knows whether they like it or not that Palestine was not discovered and rather already existed as outlined in the Zionist colonization framework within the Basle Program at the First Zionist Congress in 18975; thereby simultaneously needing to in actuality discover methods of conduct for the erasure of Palestine and the Palestinians for the Zionists to exist and legitimize their historical narrative that has corrupted international public opinion; explaining why they have demanded their right to exist from the Palestinians during the Oslo Accords; and now demanding to be recognized as a ‘Jewish’ State. Palestine and Palestinians do not want recognition for their “discovery” because they were never “discovered” in the first place. What Palestinians want and trying to fight for is recovery as opposed to discovery. It is about recovering from the historical and continuous attempts of erasing Palestine and the Palestinians; their history, culture and way of life which continues to date with the Judaisation of the land.6 In fact, existence in these circumstances since the Nakba both historical and contemporary7 has been our resistance signifying and reinforcing the fact that there is nothing to discover as our existence surpassed any genocidal campaign to demonstrate otherwise; latest being the steadfastness of Hamas in resisting and standing up against our erasure.

Given the above mentioned information, the British and French ought to discover that Israel is a terrorist settler colonial state, guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity and built on the past and present continuum of colonization and oppression of the Palestinians through the Nakba. They ought to discover that the ideological regime embedded in the state apparatus of the State of Israel is fuelled by Zionism; a racist political ideology illegal under international law as per United Nations Resolution 3379; a resolution later abrogated by the United States. They ought to discover that ‘recognizing’ Palestine and the Palestinians is reinforcing the Nakba, the collusion to the incremental genocide and most importantly the enabling of a warped historical narrative; part of the Zionist strategy also known as “memorycide.”

If the British and French want to recognize anything in relation to Palestine; they can begin with recognizing their responsibility and be held accountable for giving birth to the problem in the first place starting with Napoleon’s presence in the region from 1799 and then by the British 30 years later until their withdrawal from the region in 1947 which included the handing of the matter to the United Nations that same year.8 Furthermore, the British and French should recognize and be held responsible and accountable for the aftermath of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, a secret agreement between the British and French in relation to splitting the Middle East region post World War I that placed historic Palestine under the British Mandate. Last but not least, the British in particular ought to recognize their responsibility and be held accountable for the Balfour Declaration of 1917 which officially promised the land of Palestine- held by them post Sykes-Picot Agreement- to the Zionist movement. Most importantly, as a result of the said facts; the said powers have to acknowledge, take responsibility and accountability for the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians in 1948; which has continued to this day through the various bureaucratic and military means. This is the true recognition of Palestine and the Palestinians- recognizing the Nakba and its consequences as opposed to it’s omittance from any process towards justice and peace.

Once this true recognition of Palestine and the Palestinians is adhered to, the process of going from discovery to recovery starts with recovering justice and the rule of law beginning with the reparations process in the form of restitution including the right of return of the Palestinians to the land. It is about recovering the annexed and colonized lands and properties that continues to date as I write while the British and French are busy ‘recognizing.’ It is about recovering the well being and lives of those affected, perished, or been victimized by the criminality of Israel all these years and continue to, with criminal adventures like Operation Protective Edge.

During the United Nations General Assembly Meeting held on November 13th 1974, former Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat stated in his speech: “Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter’s gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand.”- The British and French were clearly not listening. It is time that they do.

Ahmad Moussa is a Palestinian-Canadian writer and Visiting Professor at the University of Duhok, in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Notes

1 http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/10/israel-protests-over-sweden-palestine-plan-2014106133337653319.html

2 https://www.scribd.com/doc/36703781/Ilan-Pappe-The-Ethnic-Cleansing-of-Palestine-full-copy

3 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/09/201391282358965793.html

4 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/dec/10/palestinians-invented-people-newt-gingrich

5 http://www.azm.org/basel-program-1897/

6 http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/10/jerusalem-simmering-over-judaisation-plan-2014101364013133843.html

7 http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/05/al-nakba-not-over-2014515121133472960.html

8 http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/specialseries/2013/05/20135612348774619.html

More articles by:

Ahmad Moussa is a Palestinian-Canadian writer, scholar and international human rights activist. 

Weekend Edition
February 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Richard D. Wolff
Capitalism as Obstacle to Equality and Democracy: the US Story
Paul Street
Where’s the Beef Stroganoff? Eight Sacrilegious Reflections on Russiagate
Jeffrey St. Clair
They Came, They Saw, They Tweeted
Andrew Levine
Their Meddlers and Ours
Charles Pierson
Nuclear Nonproliferation, American Style
Joseph Essertier
Why Japan’s Ultranationalists Hate the Olympic Truce
W. T. Whitney
US and Allies Look to Military Intervention in Venezuela
John Laforge
Maybe All Threats of Mass Destruction are “Mentally Deranged”
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: an American Reckoning
David Rosen
For Some Reason, Being White Still Matters
Robert Fantina
Nikki Haley: the U.S. Embarrassment at the United Nations
Joyce Nelson
Why Mueller’s Indictments Are Hugely Important
Joshua Frank
Pearl Jam, Will You Help Stop Sen. Tester From Destroying Montana’s Public Lands?
Dana E. Abizaid
The Attack on Historical Perspective
Conn Hallinan
Immigration and the Italian Elections
George Ochenski
The Great Danger of Anthropocentricity
Pete Dolack
China Can’t Save Capitalism from Environmental Destruction
Joseph Natoli
Broken Lives
Manuel García, Jr.
Why Did Russia Vote For Trump?
Geoff Dutton
One Regime to Rule Them All
Torkil Lauesen – Gabriel Kuhn
Radical Theory and Academia: a Thorny Relationship
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: The Work of Persuasion
Thomas Klikauer
Umberto Eco and Germany’s New Fascism
George Burchett
La Folie Des Grandeurs
Howard Lisnoff
Minister of War
Eileen Appelbaum
Why Trump’s Plan Won’t Solve the Problems of America’s Crumbling Infrastructure
Ramzy Baroud
More Than a Fight over Couscous: Why the Palestinian Narrative Must Be Embraced
Jill Richardson
Mass Shootings Shouldn’t Be the Only Time We Talk About Mental Illness
Jessicah Pierre
Racism is Killing African American Mothers
Steve Horn
Wyoming Now Third State to Propose ALEC Bill Cracking Down on Pipeline Protests
David Griscom
When ‘Fake News’ is Good For Business
Barton Kunstler
Brainwashed Nation
Griffin Bird
I’m an Eagle Scout and I Don’t Want Pipelines in My Wilderness
Edward Curtin
The Coming Wars to End All Wars
Missy Comley Beattie
Message To New Activists
Jonah Raskin
Literary Hubbub in Sonoma: Novel about Mrs. Jack London Roils the Faithful
Binoy Kampmark
Frontiersman of the Internet: John Perry Barlow
Chelli Stanley
The Mirrors of Palestine
James McEnteer
How Brexit Won World War Two
Ralph Nader
Absorbing the Irresistible Consumer Reports Magazine
Cesar Chelala
A Word I Shouldn’t Use
Louis Proyect
Marx at the Movies
Osha Neumann
A White Guy Watches “The Black Panther”
Douglas Valentine
The Real Man’s Ten Commandments
Stephen Cooper
Rebel Talk with Nattali Rize: the Interview
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail