FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Negotiations, Rhetoric and Israel’s Lies

As Israel violates the conditions of the current cease-fire, and Palestine adheres to its part of the bargain, Prime Murder Benjamin Netanyahu continues to proclaim that he will not negotiate with Palestine due to that government’s recent unification. The Palestinian Authority and Hamas, after several years of operating independently, have settled their major differences. Israel will not negotiate, it says, because Hamas’ charter calls for the destruction of Israel. The irony of this is perhaps lost on members of the corrupt U.S. governance body, generally known as Congress, the president and the judiciary.

Hamas, with no army, navy or air force, can call for the end of the world if it wants to; it is in no position, as it cobbles together ineffective rockets from the few items Israel allows to be imported to the Gaza Strip, or the fewer that can be smuggled in, to cause anything more than minor inconvenience to Israel, a fact that was proven during Israel’s recent bombardment of the Gaza Strip. Israel, on the other hand, which claims it wants a two-state solution, has worked for generations toward the gradual annihilation of Palestine. Israel was only established by theft, with United Nations complicity, of 55% of Palestinian land and the violent displacement of at least 750,000 Palestinians. With ever-increasing settlement activity, condemned as illegal by the United Nations and even by Israel’s favorite, unlimited checkbook, the United States, Palestinian land in the West Bank has shrunken to a fraction of what it was prior to the 1967 war.

In the Gaza Strip, blockaded by land, sea and air by Israel, the ‘security’ border is ever growing in size, squeezing the nearly 2,000,000 Palestinians who live there into a 223 square mile area. This is a population density of nearly 10,000 people per square mile.  Compare this to New Jersey, the most densely populated state in the U.S., where there are 1,200 people per square mile.

So what is Mr. Netanyahu’s real hesitancy to achieve a two-state solution which, under the circumstances, is the best that Palestinians can hope for? In January, the Prime Murder said that he does not “intend to remove a single settlement… displace a single Israeli.” This complete flouting of international law should signal to the U.S., and the rest of the world, that Israel is not a reasonable negotiating partner. However, since Israel’s belligerency and disdain of international law has been common for generations, it is unlikely that the money-clouded eyes of the U.S. will be opened now. After all, what are human rights when campaign contributions from the Israeli lobby flow so freely?

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who has been complicit with much of Israel’s criminal activity over the years, spoke forcefully to the United Nations a week ago. Among other things, he accused Israel of genocide. Said he: “In this year, proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly as the International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian people, Israel has chosen to make it a year of a new war of genocide perpetrated against the Palestinian people.”

The reaction to this powerful speech, in which Mr. Abbas outlined Palestinian goals, Israeli lies and crimes, and a proposal for moving forward, was, in some circles, just what is to be expected. The U.S. called it ‘offensive’. This is not surprising, from the nation that timidly criticized Israel for bombing a United Nations refugee center. The sight of bloodied bodies of babies, toddlers and others, ripped to shreds by U.S-provided, Israeli bombs, apparently isn’t all that ‘offensive’ in the eyes of a racist, greedy government. It’s quite a vicious circle: the Israeli lobby buys Congress and the President; they, in turn, send money and arms to Israel, which uses those armaments to kill innocent Palestinians. The U.S. justifies this, in the name of Israel’s ‘national security’, and, as a reward, the Israeli lobby donates more money to Congressional and presidential campaigns, and those candidates, when elected or re-elected, send more money and arms to Israel. And so it goes.

One wonders how Israel’s national security is threated by a nation it occupies, and that has no army, navy or air force. It must be puzzling for U.S. officials to understand why pictures of dead children, including infants, do not cause the world to breathe a sigh of relief, knowing that dangerous terrorists have been killed. Somehow, when people who are not bought and paid for by the Israeli lobby, see such pictures, all they see are dead children. All they feel is heartbreak for the loss, compassion for the grieving loved ones that may have somehow survived, and, eventually, anger at the perpetrators of these horrendous crimes.

When four children were targeted and killed on a Gaza beach, there was some muted, international outcry. But now they are forgotten, simply casualties of war, and Palestinian casualties at that, which makes them less to be considered, less to be grieved, than had they been Israeli. Had four Israeli children been intentionally targeted on a beach by Palestinians, the world, led by the United States, would demand an inquiry, would condemn Palestine as savage and bloodthirsty, and would assure that someone, anyone, paid for the crime. Israel wasted no time demolishing the homes of the suspects in the murder of three men living illegally in the West Bank; this was done without any trial. Yet those accused of torturing to death a Palestinian youth in revenge continue to live in their comfortable homes; after all, it was ‘only’ a Palestinian who died.

Can a clearer example of racism be presented? Police in Ferguson, Missouri, murder a youth simply because he is black, and the perpetrator is placed on ‘administrative leave’. People in Israel commit the horrific murder of a young boy, killed simply because he is Palestinian, and the government does nothing. Is there a difference here? This writer is unable to see it.

Mr. Abbas was uncharacteristically strong in his speech. Included were these words:  “It is impossible, and I repeat – it is impossible – to return to the cycle of negotiations that failed to deal with the substance of the matter and the fundamental question. There is neither credibility nor seriousness in negotiations in which Israel predetermines the results via its settlement activities and the occupation’s brutality. There is no meaning or value in negotiations for which the agreed objective is not ending the Israeli occupation and achieving the independence of the State of Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital on the entire Palestinian Territory occupied in the 1967 war. And, there is no value in negotiations which are not linked to a firm timetable for the implementation of this goal.”

Finally, a clear and obvious fact, which the U.S. government is forever trying to evade, was spoken to the world body. Negotiations, as this writer has said before, can only occur between two parties, each of which has something the other wants, and which it must surrender to get what it wants. Israel, through its continued “settlement activities and the occupation’s brutality’, as Mr. Abbas said earlier in his speech, “…did not miss the opportunity to undermine the chance for peace.”

Mr. Abbas clearly identified what the world already knows, but what the U.S. tries to avoid: “The future proposed by the Israeli government for the Palestinian people is at best isolated ghettos for Palestinians on fragmented lands, without borders and without sovereignty over its airspace, water and natural resources, which will be under the subjugation of the racist settlers and army of occupation, and at worst will be a most abhorrent form of Apartheid.”

It is long past time for the brutal occupation of Palestine by Israel to end. The United Nations should do now what it should have done years ago, and demand an end to the occupation and blockade, both of which it has said for years are illegal. By deploying a ‘peacekeeping’ force along Israel’s border with Palestine, vulnerable little Israel would be protected from big, bad Palestine. The U.N. should prevent any U.S. involvement in this; the peacekeeping force should not include U.S. soldiers, and the U.S. should have no role in ending the occupation and blockade. The U.S. is hardly an objective outsider; it is all but owned by Israel, so can only concern itself with Israel’s interests. And its dismal record of human rights abuses can hardly bode well for a just settlement for Palestine.

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Dill Press).

 

 

 

 

More articles by:

January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
Vijay Prashad
5.5 Million Women Build Their Wall
Nicky Reid
Lessons From Rojava
Ted Rall
Here is the Progressive Agenda
Robert Koehler
A Green Future is One Without War
Gary Leupp
The Chickens Come Home to Roost….in Northern Syria
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: “The Country Is Watching”
Sam Gordon
Who Are Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionists?
Weekend Edition
January 11, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Richard Moser
Neoliberalism: Free Market Fundamentalism or Corporate Power?
Paul Street
Bordering on Fascism: Scholars Reflect on Dangerous Times
Joseph Majerle III – Matthew Stevenson
Who or What Brought Down Dag Hammarskjöld?
Jeffrey St. Clair - Joshua Frank
How Tre Arrow Became America’s Most Wanted Environmental “Terrorist”
Andrew Levine
Dealbreakers: The Democrats, Trump and His Wall
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail