FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

More Blowback in the Offing

U.S. foreign policy is a shambles, driven mostly by increasingly divisive and vituperative special-interest domestic politics that are merely the flickering shadows of what my friend Mike Lofgren calls the Deep State.  The mad rush to expand NATO and start a new cold war with Russia is a case in point.  It would be a mistake to think that rush ends with Ukraine.  There are, for example, ambitions in Congress to include Moldova, a tiny poor country wedged between Ukraine and Romania, about which most Americans know nothing.

Located between the eastern Carpathian Mountains and the River Dniester, the contemporary borders of Moldova, like the borders of Ukraine, are a complex legacy of history, including most recently: (1) the fall of empires in WWI; (2) the deal between Hitler and Stalin to divide up parts of eastern Europe (i.e., the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, August 1939) which precipitated the German and Soviet invasions of Poland; (3) the rearrangement of Eastern Europe by the Soviet Union, after it emerged victoriously from the carnage of WWII; and (4) the chaos following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Delving deeper into history, modern Moldova includes parts of the old provincial regions of Bukovina, Bessarabia, and Moldavia, each of which also had a long, ethnically-complex history. (Wikipedia provides an easily accessible if mind-numbing introduction to these histories.)  Today, these regions are divided among Romania, Ukraine, and Moldova.  Almost three-quarters of Moldavians, however, are ethnically or culturally linked to Romania, now a member of NATO and the EU.  One important exception is the impoverished eastern Russophile region known as Transnistria, a thin strip of land along the East Bank of the River Dniester, which became part of the Russian Empire in 1792.  Today, Transnistria is squeezed between Moldavia and Ukraine, but most of its people want to maintain their close ties to Russia.  After a short civil war in 1992, Transnistria, while technically part of Moldova, became quasi-independent of Moldova, and since then has been patrolled by Russian peacekeepers.

But, as the map below suggests, there is little Russia can do in terms of direct power projection to protect Transnistria, should, with NATO’s blessing, Moldova move to occupy it;  or, in the less likely event that Ukraine moves to occupy it.   (After all, the River Dniester is the western border of the Ukrainian steppe.)

spinneygraf

Therein lies the potential powder keg:  Geographical facts may tempt aggressive NATO expansionists and neo-con anti-Russia elements in the U.S to push a weak and overwhelmed President into doing something really stupid; perhaps believing that “reuniting” Transnistria with Moldova offers a free ride to humiliate Putin, or to poke him in the eye for his cautious, albeit increasingly effective, maneuvers to stymy U.S. ambitions to move Ukraine into the NATO/EU orbit.

This opinion piece summarizes this powder keg from a Russian point of view — which, of course, may be biased.  But one should never dismiss the opposing point of view of an adversary as being irrelevant to the evolution of a future course of events.  While Putin may not be able to protect Transnistria, it does not follow that he does not have other options for countering yet another U.S. provocation — e.g., Putin might shrug off the increasingly hollow threat of more sanctions, and use his control of gas supplies to drive a wedge between the United States and the EU, particularly with regards to the EU’s dominant country, Germany, where a recent poll sponsored by the German Marshall Fund suggests that President Obama’s declining favorability ratings may now be shifting into free-fall — declining from 87% in 2010 to 76% in 2013, then plunging to 56% in 2014.

Franklin “Chuck” Spinney is a former military analyst for the Pentagon and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press. He be reached at chuck_spinney@mac.com

More articles by:

Franklin “Chuck” Spinney is a former military analyst for the Pentagon and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press. He be reached at chuck_spinney@mac.com

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550
Weekend Edition
February 21, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Anthony DiMaggio
Election Con 2020: Exposing Trump’s Deception on the Opioid Epidemic
Joshua Frank
Bloomberg is a Climate Change Con Man
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Billion Dollar Babies
Paul Street
More Real-Time Reflections from Your Friendly South Loop Marxist
Jonathan Latham
Extensive Chemical Safety Fraud Uncovered at German Testing Laboratory
Ramzy Baroud
‘The Donald Trump I know’: Abbas’ UN Speech and the Breakdown of Palestinian Politics
Martha Rosenberg
A Trump Sentence Commutation Attorneys Generals Liked
Ted Rall
Bernie Should Own the Socialist Label
Louis Proyect
Encountering Malcolm X
Kathleen Wallace
The Debate Question That Really Mattered
Jonathan Cook
UN List of Firms Aiding Israel’s Settlements was Dead on Arrival
George Wuerthner
‘Extremists,’ Not Collaborators, Have Kept Wilderness Whole
Colin Todhunter
Apocalypse Now! Insects, Pesticide and a Public Health Crisis  
Stephen Reyna
A Paradoxical Colonel: He Doesn’t Know What He is Talking About, Because He Knows What He is Talking About.
Evaggelos Vallianatos
A New Solar Power Deal From California
Richard Moser
One Winning Way to Build the Peace Movement and One Losing Way
Laiken Jordahl
Trump’s Wall is Destroying the Environment We Worked to Protect
Walden Bello
Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
Jefferson Morley
On JFK, Tulsi Gabbard Keeps Very Respectable Company
Vijay Prashad
Standing Up for Left Literature: In India, It Can Cost You Your Life
Gary Leupp
Bloomberg Versus Bernie: The Upcoming Battle?
Richard Klin
Loss Leaders
Gaither Stewart
Roma: How Romans Differ From Europeans
Kerron Ó Luain
The Soviet Century
Mike Garrity
We Can Fireproof Homes But Not Forests
Fred Baumgarten
Gaslighting Bernie and His Supporters
Joseph Essertier
Our First Amendment or Our Empire, But Not Both
Peter Linebaugh
A Story for the Anthropocene
Danny Sjursen
Where Have You Gone Smedley Butler?
Dave Lindorff
What’s a Social Democratic Political Program Really Mean?
Jill Richardson
A Broken Promise to Teachers and Nonprofit Workers
Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission for Julian Assange
Wade Sikorski
Oil or Food? Notes From a Farmer Who Doesn’t Think Pipelines are Worth It
Christopher Brauchli
The Politics of Vengeance
Hilary Moore – James Tracy
No Fascist USA! Lessons From a History of Anti-Klan Organizing
Linn Washington Jr.
Ridiculing MLK’s Historic Garden State ‘Firsts’
L. Michael Hager
Evaluating the Democratic Candidates: the Importance of Integrity
Jim Goodman
Bloomberg Won’t, as They Say, Play Well in Peoria, But Then Neither Should Trump
Olivia Alperstein
We Need to Treat Nuclear War Like the Emergency It Is
Eleanor Eagan
As the Primary Race Heats Up, Candidates Forget Principled Campaign Finance Stands
Jesse Jackson
Kerner Report Set Standard for What a Serious Presidential Candidate Should Champion
ADRIAN KUZMINSKI
Home Sweet Home: District Campaign Financing
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
The Latest BLM Hoodwinkery: “Fuel Breaks” in the Great Basin
Wendell Griffen
Grace and Gullibility
Cesar Chelala
Brazil’s Bolsonaro Says No to Democracy
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail