FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Obama the Negative

As the Democratic Convention begins, President Barack Obama seems a shadow, an incumbent who, while he will be hoping that Mitt the Invisible stays back in the polls, is fighting for his political life in the White House.

Negativity is a symptom of the unimaginative mind.  It is clear that the Obama campaign has, for some months, decided to attack Mitt Romney rather than extol the virtues of its own position. Obama has been playing the man, badgering Romney into releasing tax returns and encouraging advertisements with limp conviction. “Makes you wonder if some years he’s paid any taxes at all.”  Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid has decided to throw combustible fuel on the fire, suggesting that Romney has managed to bypass the tax man for 10 years, a claim that comes close in calibre to assertions made by the birthers about Obama. (Imagine a contest where one candidate waves his birth certificate while the other, in retort, waves his tax returns.)

The GOP has made a sustained campaign at dirtying the Obama brand, which was not a difficult thing to do given the claims made by the President under four years ago.  Taking journeys to the stratosphere without the necessary equipment is never wise, but 2008 was a catharsis that distorted expectations.  As Ryan Lizza observed in the New Yorker, “Obama promised to transcend forty years of demographic and ideological trends and reshape Washington politics.”  High claims indeed.  A closer look at Obama the political animal would have revealed few surprises – it was bound to come. Presidential politics alters, reshapes, and tinkers with its subjects.  Men of substance fast become men of straw.  Election campaigns might be studded with poetic stanzas, but governing can be dull prose indeed.

Obama, no longer keen on idealistic mettle, is back to his true lobbying self, pushing hard and attempting to shovel an abundance of dirt on his opponent.  Senior campaign strategist David Axelrod is unconvincing in justifying the negative approach.  “If we were passive in the face of this onslaught we are facing, our folks would be unhappy.  There are a few on our side who are counselling us to sit idly by” (NYT, Jul 28). Hence, such feeble attempts as Romney singing “America the Beautiful” before an outsourcing bonanza, and tags of an aloof, distant “Richie Rich”.

There is no need to sit idly by at all.  A campaign that focuses on the necessity of various economic measures, a bailout strategy, of policies that, whilst not being galloping job producers, did prevent job losses, would be appropriate.  One takes such measures to avoid calamity, though how to prove that it worked is never an easy task. If Obama wishes to be more boisterous to the hawks, he can always claim that under his presidency, drone warfare has vastly expanded, with a promise of greater expansion in the future. Liberals can be savage too.

On both sides of the political fence, negative strategists have proliferated like bacteria.  As a piece in Time (Aug 20) tritely observes, “Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are high-minded and policy-oriented; the campaigns they are presiding over are not.” The “scorched-earth” election victory is a familiar outcome and experts such as Larry McCarthy, author of the Willy Horton advertisement that railroaded Michael Dukakis’ campaign in 1988, are in vogue.

The existence of super PACs, or political action committees, and the whirl of social media make resorting to “hopeless” negativity irresistible.  (On the former, Obama’s super PAC, Priorities USA Action raised $10 million in August.)  Remaining buoyant and optimistic during a twenty four hour news cycle is a tall order when muck is just around the corner.  Character, presuming a political candidate has one, is there to be assassinated and every swill bucket shall have its fill.

“Hope for change” has not been so much hope as “less change”.  While an administration run by Mitt the craftily invisible is an unpalatable prospect, the messages from Obama have assumed a machine-like quality.  What we are seeing before us is an attempt, less to emphasise achievement and promise, than emphasise terrifying alternatives.  A doomsday narrative here takes the stance that Romney is Bush incarnate, a creature who will assume the worst features of that nefarious administration.  Trucking in fear, however, is always a dangerous ploy.  Its currency is volatile and, in the end, cheap.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne.  Email:bkampmark@gmail.com

COMING IN SEPTEMBER

A Special Memorial Issue of CounterPunch

Featuring recollections of Alexander Cockburn from Jeffrey St. Clair, Peter Linebaugh, Paul Craig Roberts, Noam Chomsky, Perry Anderson, Dennis Kucinich, Michael Neumann, Susannah Hecht, P. Sainath, Ben Tripp, Alison Weir, James Ridgeway, JoAnn Wypijewski, John Strausbaugh, Pierre Sprey, Conn Hallinan, James Wolcott, Laura Flanders, Ken Silverstein, Tariq Ali and many others …

Subscribe to CounterPunch Today to Reserve Your Copy

More articles by:

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

August 16, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
“Don’t Be Stupid, Be a Smarty”: Why Anti-Authoritarian Doctors Are So Rare
W. T. Whitney
New Facebook Alliance Endangers Access to News about Latin America
Sam Husseini
The Trump-Media Logrolling
Ramzy Baroud
Mission Accomplished: Why Solidarity Boats to Gaza Succeed Despite Failing to Break the Siege
Larry Atkins
Why Parkland Students, Not Trump, Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize
William Hartung
Donald Trump, Gunrunner for Hire
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Morality Tales in US Public Life?
Yves Engler
Will Trudeau Stand Up to Mohammad bin Salman?
Vijay Prashad
Samir Amin: Death of a Marxist
Binoy Kampmark
Boris Johnson and the Exploding Burka
Eric Toussaint
Nicaragua: The Evolution of the Government of President Daniel Ortega Since 2007 
Adolf Alzuphar
Days of Sagebrush, Nights of Jasmine in LA
Robert J. Burrowes
A Last Ditch Strategy to Fight for Human Survival
August 15, 2018
Jason Hirthler
Russiagate and the Men with Glass Eyes
Paul Street
Omarosa’s Book Tour vs. Forty More Murdered Yemeni Children
Charles Pierson
Is Bankruptcy in Your Future?
George Ochenski
The Absolute Futility of ‘Global Dominance’ in the 21st Century
Gary Olson
Are We Governed by Secondary Psychopaths
Fred Guerin
On News, Fake News and Donald Trump
Arshad Khan
A Rip Van Winkle President Sleeps as Proof of Man’s Hand in Climate Change Multiplies and Disasters Strike
P. Sainath
The Unsung Heroism of Hausabai
Georgina Downs
Landmark Glyphosate Cancer Ruling Sets a Precedent for All Those Affected by Crop Poisons
Rev. William Alberts
United We Kneel, Divided We Stand
Chris Gilbert
How to Reactivate Chavismo
Kim C. Domenico
A Coffeehouse Hallucination: The Anti-American Dream Dream
August 14, 2018
Daniel Falcone
On Taking on the Mobilized Capitalist Class in Elections: an Interview With Noam Chomsky
Karl Grossman
Turning Space Into a War Zone
Jonah Raskin
“Fuck Wine Grapes, Fuck Wines”: the Coming Napafication of the World
Manuel García, Jr.
Climate Change Bites Big Business
Alberto Zuppi - Cesar Chelala
Argentina at a Crossroads
Chris Wright
On “Bullshit Jobs”
Rosita A. Sweetman
Dear Jorge: On the Pope’s Visit to Ireland
Binoy Kampmark
Authoritarian Revocations: Australia, Terrorism and Citizenship
Sara Johnson
The Incredible Benefits of Sagebrush and Juniper in the West
Martin Billheimer
White & Red Aunts, Capital Gains and Anarchy
Walter Clemens
Enough Already! Donald J. Trump Resignation Speech
August 13, 2018
Michael Colby
Migrant Injustice: Ben & Jerry’s Farmworker Exploitation
John Davis
California: Waging War on Wildfire
Alex Strauss
Chasing Shadows: Socialism Won’t Go Away Because It is Capitalism’s Antithesis 
Kathy Kelly
U.S. is Complicit in Child Slaughter in Yemen
Fran Shor
The Distemper of White Spite
Chad Hanson
We Know How to Protect Homes From Wildfires. Logging Isn’t the Way to Do It
Faisal Khan
Nawaz Sharif: Has Pakistan’s Houdini Finally Met his End?
Binoy Kampmark
Trump Versus Journalism: the Travails of Fourth Estate
Wim Laven
Honestly Looking at Family Values
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail