FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

The Drums of War Pump Up the Volume

Rumors of war and echoes of 2003 are once again proliferating in the press.  From left organs like CounterPunch to the Jerusalem Post and the New York Times, stories about Israeli intentions against Tehran and US/Europe plans for Syria continue to pepper newspaper pages.

I hope I’m wrong, but it might be prudent to begin mobilizing against a potential war in the Middle East again. The ongoing civil war in Syria (which Washington and other capitols are just itching to get into) and the upswing in threats against Iran from Tel Aviv makes this time crucial.  Furthermore, the upcoming US election means that military action could be as close as November no matter who wins the White House.

In recent months there has been a flurry of bills, all of them designed to isolate Iran (and the current Syrian regime) in the name of regional security and democracy.   When Washington addresses regional security in the Middle East, what is really meant is Israel’s security.  When Washington says it wants democracy in the Middle East, it means that Washington wants easy access to the Middle East’s energy resources and its markets.  Since the inception of Israel, Washington has been convinced that the best way to achieve this is by supporting Israel and its expansionist blueprint.  Indeed, one of the aforementioned bills currently in committee in the Congress is known as the United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012.  One more tie that binds the Washington and Tel Aviv together in their unholy arrangement, this bill would expand the role for Israel within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), including an enhanced presence at NATO headquarters and exercises.

Like Ron Paul (who occasionally has some useful insights about the US Empire) said on May 10, 2012 to the members of the House of Representatives, “This bill’s real intent seems to be more saber-rattling against Iran and Syria, and it undermines U.S. diplomatic efforts by making clear that the U.S. is not an honest broker seeking peace for the Middle East. The bill calls for the United States to significantly increase our provision of sophisticated weaponry to Israel, and states that it is to be U.S. policy to “help Israel preserve its qualitative military edge” in the region.  While I absolutely believe that Israel–and any other nation–should be free to determine for itself what is necessary for its national security, I do not believe that those decisions should be underwritten by U.S. taxpayers and backed up by the U.S. military.”

Unlike the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the almost complete opposition to that war on the left side of the political spectrum, there are some left leaning individuals willing to support NATO intervention in Syria and even in Iran. This shortsighted and ultimately naive stance accepts the humanitarian interventionist lingo of the warmongers at face value and believes that the capitols of the interventionists have no ulterior motives.  In short, they seem to believe that the only reason why the US and its allies are arming some Syrian rebels, providing them with intelligence, and have placed an armada in the seas surrounding Iran and Syria, is because they believe in the right of the Syrian people to self-determination.   The current desire of NATO to intervene in Syria has only so much to do with the Assad regime’s brutality.  After all, the US rendition program took advantage of that brutality for years in its efforts to extract information from suspects it had captured.  The underlying (and actual) reason Washington wants to intervene is because Syria is in the way of Washington (and Tel Aviv’s) plans for the region.  This has been the case for decades.  The current civil war provides those interested in intervention for imperial reasons a humanitarian cover. Given the history of Europe and the US in the region, especially in regards to these two nations, believing this lie goes beyond naiveté.  Indeed, it requires an almost complete denial of historical fact.  For supposed anti-imperialists to support any intervention by imperialist forces automatically renders their anti-imperialism moot.

For those of us who have not given up our anti-imperialism, it is at least time to refresh our email lists and bookmarks in regards to the ongoing threat of war in the Middle East.  It would be even better if a movement developed similar to the 2002-2003 movement against war in Iraq. Learning from that movement requires that antiwar organizers organize those who might vote for Obama, but should not allow his political party to become involved.  Doing so risks once again rendering the movement ineffective should Obama win re-election since the Democratic establishment would divert the movement like it has in the past.   In addition, it would do little to enhance the understanding that Washington’s wars are not specific to a political party, but to the economic system that drives the nation.  A recent bit of news regarding Iraq provides a bit of insight regarding that economy:  “Oil production in the country has been slowly but steadily climbing since the end of the war as the Iraqi government and partners such as Exxon Mobil, BP, Chevron and Total work to repair existing fields and hunt for new sources.”  In other words, the US invasion and occupation of Iraq may have destroyed a generation of Iraqis, but the oil profits are starting to come in, so all is well.  If one knows the history of Iran, they will understand that this is one of Washington’s hopes for that nation, too.

So, what can be done?  There are a few organizations opposed to war against Iran with an infrastructure in place.  These include the Iran Pledge of Resistance, the Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran, and Stop War on Iran.  In addition, groups that were instrumental in organizing national protests against the war in Iraq are also running campaigns opposed to an attack on Iran.  These two groups, United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) and the International Action Center (IAC), have been at odds in the past because of their political differences, but will hopefully work together should Iran be attacked.  As far as the threat of direct NATO intervention (including “no-fly” zones) in Syria is concerned, only the International Action Center and the United National Antiwar Committee (UNAC) have issued clear statements opposing such action.  In addition, the UNAC has also issued a call for local groups and individuals to take to the streets should there be a military intervention in either Iran or Syria.

The time to act is nigh.

Ron Jacobs is the author of The Way the Wind Blew: a History of the Weather Underground and Short Order Frame Up. Jacobs’ essay on Big Bill Broonzy is featured in CounterPunch’s collection on music, art and sex, Serpents in the Garden. His collection of essays and other musings titled Tripping Through the American Night is now available and his new novel is The Co-Conspirator’s Tale. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press.  He can be reached at: ronj1955@gmail.com.

 

 

More articles by:

Ron Jacobs is the author of Daydream Sunset: Sixties Counterculture in the Seventies published by CounterPunch Books. His latest offering is a pamphlet titled Capitalism: Is the Problem.  He lives in Vermont. He can be reached at: ronj1955@gmail.com.

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

June 17, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
The Dark Side of Brexit: Britain’s Ethnic Minorities Are Facing More and More Violence
Linn Washington Jr.
Remember the Vincennes? The US’s Long History of Provoking Iran
Geoff Dutton
Where the Wild Things Were: Abbey’s Road Revisited
Nick Licata
Did a Coverup of Who Caused Flint Michigan’s Contaminated Water Continue During Its Investigation? 
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange and the Scales of Justice: Exceptions, Extraditions and Politics
John Feffer
Democracy Faces a Global Crisis
Louisa Willcox
Revamping Grizzly Bear Recovery
Stephen Cooper
“Wheel! Of! Fortune!” (A Vegas Story)
Daniel Warner
Let Us Laugh Together, On Principle
Brian Cloughley
Trump Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Weekend Edition
June 14, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Michael Hudson
Trump’s Trade Threats are Really Cold War 2.0
Bruce E. Levine
Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry
Jason Hirthler
Mainstream 101: Supporting Imperialism, Suppressing Socialism
T.J. Coles
How Much Do Humans Pollute? A Breakdown of Industrial, Vehicular and Household C02 Emissions
Andrew Levine
Whither The Trump Paradox?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: In the Land of 10,000 Talkers, All With Broken Tongues
Pete Dolack
Look to U.S. Executive Suites, Not Beijing, For Why Production is Moved
Paul Street
It Can’t Happen Here: From Buzz Windrip and Doremus Jessup to Donald Trump and MSNBC
Rob Urie
Capitalism Versus Democracy
Richard Moser
The Climate Counter-Offensive: Secrecy, Deception and Disarming the Green New Deal
Naman Habtom-Desta
Up in the Air: the Fallacy of Aerial Campaigns
Ramzy Baroud
Kushner as a Colonial Administrator: Let’s Talk About the ‘Israeli Model’
Mark Hand
Residents of Toxic W.Va. Town Keep Hope Alive
John Kendall Hawkins
Alias Anything You Please: a Lifetime of Dylan
Linn Washington Jr.
Bigots in Blue: Philadelphia Police Department is a Home For Hate
David Macaray
UAW Faces Its Moment of Truth
Brian Cloughley
Trump’s Washington Detests the Belt and Road Initiative
Horace G. Campbell
Edward Seaga and the Institutionalization of Thuggery, Violence and Dehumanization in Jamaica
Graham Peebles
Zero Waste: The Global Plastics Crisis
Michael Schwalbe
Oppose Inequality, Not Cops
Ron Jacobs
Scott Noble’s History of Resistance
Olivia Alperstein
The Climate Crisis is Also a Health Emergency
David Rosen
Time to Break Up the 21st Century Tech Trusts
George Wuerthner
The Highest Use of Public Forests: Carbon Storage
Ralph Nader
It is Time to Rediscover Print Newspapers
Nick Licata
How SDS Imploded: an Inside Account
Rachel Smolker – Anne Peterman
The GE American Chestnut: Restoration of a Beloved Species or Trojan Horse for Tree Biotechnology?
Sam Pizzigati
Can Society Survive Without Empathy?
Manuel E. Yepe
China and Russia in Strategic Alliance
Patrick Walker
Green New Deal “Climate Kids” Should Hijack the Impeachment Conversation
Colin Todhunter
Encouraging Illegal Planting of Bt Brinjal in India
Robert Koehler
The Armed Bureaucracy
David Swanson
Anyone Who’d Rather Not be Shot Should Read this Book
Jonathan Power
To St. Petersburg With Love
Marc Levy
How to Tell a Joke in Combat
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail