When Anonymous Money Speaks…

Secrecy and a free, democratic government don’t mix.

–Harry S. Truman, Merle Miller, Plain Speaking

The mark of a great politician is the ability to change his/her mind.  Mitch McConnell is a great politician.  (So is Mitt Romney but that is a subject for another day.)  Mitch McConnell’s acknowledgement that he has been wrong for more than 20 years was made without reference to his earlier positions.  It was made when he gave a speech to the American Enterprise Institute on June 15th.  It showed how a mature and thoughtful senator had come to see the error of his earlier ways.  It all had to do with a piece of legislation introduced in 2010 convolutedly known as “Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act” or in a less tortured form, the “Disclose Act.”

The Act would require groups that are self-identified as “social welfare organizations” that spend $10,000 or more on election related ads, to report the expenditures and would require the groups to disclose the names of donors who give them more than $10,000.  As matters now stand, donors can anonymously give unlimited amounts to those organizations that, in turn, buy advertising that pertains to the campaigns but is not coordinated with them. Had it not been for Mr. McConnell’s speech you would have thought he would enthusiastically support such legislation.

The Disclose Act was, in some respects, not unlike a bill he and Senator Harry Reid, co-sponsored in 1989.  That bill, according to an editorial in the Lexington-Herald Ledger, “would have required disclosure of independent groups or individuals who intended to spend more than $25,000 promoting or attacking a candidate.”  According to the paper’s editorial that was only one of many times Mr. McConnell spoke out in favor of openness in campaigns.  In 1990, the editorial said, he “pledged to introduce a bill that would require full disclosure of donors to multi-candidate political-action committees.”  In 1996 he supported public disclosure of all election-related spending by independent groups and contributions to political parties.  He wrote a piece for the paper in which he said, “Public disclosure of campaign contributions and spending should be expedited so voters can judge for themselves what is appropriate.”

Based on the foregoing it was a foregone conclusion that Mr. Mitchell would enthusiastically support, at a bare minimum, the provisions of the Act that says “super PACS” must disclose the identity of any donors who contribute more than $10,000 to them and also says any group that spends $10,000 or more on election ads must report that expenditure to the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours.   That provision sounds remarkably like the 1989 bill Mr. Mitchell co-sponsored with Harry Reid.

Mr. McConnell is now a different person and, as a result, his views are different.  He now believes that secrecy is what makes a democracy work.  Openness flies in the face of the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech.  People who are forced to be identified when they exercise their right to free speech may be afraid to speak, he believes.   He thinks that a person who wants to contribute $10 million to a super-PAC in order to get his speech out to the public should be able to do so secretly so as to avoid being criticized.   Mr. McConnell does not think he has changed his position for political expediency.

In his speech to the American Enterprise Institute Mr. McConnell discussed the threat to the 1st Amendment that was posed by the Disclose Act but said:  “Throughout my career I, too, have consistently called for full and timely disclosure of all contributions to candidates and parties.”  What he made plain, however, was that people who want to contribute to social welfare organizations that participate in the campaign through ads they run are entitled to remain anonymous.  Asked about Justice Scalia’s comment in a recent case that  “Requiring people to stand up in public for their political acts fosters civic courage, without which democracy is doomed,” Mr. McConnell said he disagreed with Justice Scalia.   He said that the names of those contributing to campaigns or candidates must be disclosed but of those who contribute through the backdoor by giving to super-PACS, he does not think civic courage should be required.  He said: “I don’t think regular citizens should have to experience any courage at all to participate in the national debate.  I don’t think it ought to be required of regular citizens as a precondition of their involvement in civic discourse.”

In support of his position he quoted Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes who said:  “The best test of truth is the power of the thought itself to get accepted in the competition of the market and the best defense of this truth is still found in the sweeping command that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.”  Justice Holmes did not suggest that anonymous speech was the best test of truth.  Mr. McConnell believes it is.  Mr. McConnell  is no Justice Holmes.

Christopher Brauchli can be emailed at brauchli.56@post.harvard.edu. For political commentary see his web page at http://humanraceandothersports.com

More articles by:

December 13, 2018
John Davis
What World Do We Seek?
Subhankar Banerjee
Biological Annihilation: a Planet in Loss Mode
Lawrence Davidson
What the Attack on Marc Lamont Hill Tells Us
James McEnteer
Ramzy Baroud
The Real Face of Justin Trudeau: Are Palestinians Canada’s new Jews?
Dean Baker
Pelosi Would Sabotage the Progressive Agenda With a Pay-Go Rule
Elliot Sperber
Understanding the Yellow Vests Movement through Basic Color Theory 
Rivera Sun
The End of the NRA? Business Magazines Tell Activists: The Strategy is Working
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Historic Opportunity to Transform Trade
George Ochenski
Trump Trashes Sage Grouse Protections in Another cCollaboration Failure
December 12, 2018
Arshad Khan
War, Anniversaries and Lessons Never Learned
Paul Street
Blacking Out the Yellow Vests on Cable News: Corporate Media Doing its Job
Kenneth Surin
The Brexit Shambles Rambles On
David Schultz
Stacking the Deck Against Democracy in Wisconsin
Steve Early
The Housing Affordability Crisis and What Millennials Can do About It
George Ochenski
Collaboration Failure: Trump Trashes Sage Grouse Protections
Rob Seimetz
Bringing a Life Into a Dying World: A Letter From a Father to His Unborn Son
Michael Howard
PETA and the ‘S’-Word
John Kendall Hawkins
Good Panopt, Bad Panopt: Does It Make A Difference?
Kim C. Domenico
Redeeming Utopia: a Meditation On An Essay by Ursula LeGuin
Binoy Kampmark
Exhuming Franco: Spain’s Immemorial Divisions
Democratizing Money
Laura Finley
Congress Must Reauthorize VAWA
December 11, 2018
Eric Draitser
AFRICOM: A Neocolonial Occupation Force?
Sheldon Richman
War Over Ukraine?
Louis Proyect
Why World War II, Not the New Deal, Ended the Great Depression
Howard Lisnoff
Police Violence and Mass Policing in the U.S.
Mark Ashwill
A “Patriotic” Education Study Abroad Program in Viet Nam: God Bless America, Right or Wrong!
Laura Flanders
HUD Official to Move into Public Housing?
Nino Pagliccia
Resistance is Not Terrorism
Matthew Johnson
See No Evil, See No Good: The Truth Is Not Black and White
Maria Paez Victor
How Reuters Slandered Venezuela’s Social Benefits Card
December 10, 2018
Jacques R. Pauwels
Foreign Interventions in Revolutionary Russia
Richard Klin
The Disasters of War
Katie Fite
Rebranding Bundy
Gary Olson
A Few Thoughts on Politics and Personal Identity
Patrick Cockburn
Brexit Britain’s Crisis of Self-Confidence Will Only End in Tears and Rising Nationalism
Andrew Moss
Undocumented Citizen
Dean Baker
Trump and China: Going With Patent Holders Against Workers
Lawrence Wittner
Reviving the Nuclear Disarmament Movement: a Practical Proposal
Dan Siegel
Thoughts on the 2018 Elections and Beyond
Thomas Knapp
Election 2020: I Can Smell the Dumpster Fires Already
Weekend Edition
December 07, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Steve Hendricks
What If We Just Buy Off Big Fossil Fuel? A Novel Plan to Mitigate the Climate Calamity
Jeffrey St. Clair
Cancer as Weapon: Poppy Bush’s Radioactive War on Iraq
Paul Street
The McCain and Bush Death Tours: Establishment Rituals in How to be a Proper Ruler