FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Facebook and the 100 Billion

Investors that shoot for IPO allocations needn’t worry that a high stock price overvalues the company if they are confident they can find a ‘greater fool’ willing to pay more.

Wall Street Journal, May 21, 2012.

With cult-like projections, Mark Zuckerberg’s face was beamed across a screen at Hacker Square.  Facebook was, after all, having its heralded float as a public company, though the occasion could not cease but be a social event of some magnitude.  That, and the fact of its founder’s marriage, which received the usual empty adulation that such a network facilitates.

The shares in the company’s shares finished at $38.37, though at one point stocks were trading at $42 a share.  The value of the company is now $104 billion. That value places Facebook, in terms of the corporate giant stakes, in the 24th position in the US.  The pundits did end up with egg on their beaming faces, predicting rises of 5 to 10 percent, though this was based on the oversubscribing of the IPO by 25 times, notably in the Asian tranche (Business Spectator, May 19).  Behind the scenes, however, underwriters had to step in after an initially promising rise which touched 11 percent.  Morgan Stanley managed to keep the stock price above $38 by tapping its emergency reserve, and the bean counters are claiming that the performance was a disappointing one.

The question then is whether such a value is not just a touch exaggerated, something which might be said of the entire social media experiment.  Social media remains a treacherous form of investment, highly competitive, and entirely liquid.  The fall of MySpace suggested an automatic obsolescence – in time, hidden shallows will be exposed.  Once the bang goes off, the whimper and ultimate end will set in.

With Facebook, we are in a curious situation of producing what we consume in one act.  The Facebook generation is self-serving, self-referencing and self-contained, all interiorised by means of updates, connections, invitations.  There, the virtual and ‘actual’ mingle.  This is Zuckerberg’s cult of false intimacy, though one can hardly claim his own earnings to have been false.

Its value, like its functionality, is fictitious or better still, virtual.  The same argument might be made about company values in general, but Facebook combines this in neat fashion.  While it would be too extreme to call it, as some have, a ‘juvenile business’ model, the pressure to maintain its enormous value will be monumental.  Zuckerberg’s own value – a princely sum of $19 billion – suggests that he would not be averse to the challenge.  And challenges they shall be.

One of those lies in the world of advertising.  Companies such as GM feel that the AdSense run by Google is more efficient.  It is also worth noting that GM is entirely absent from Facebook’s list of customers (Business Spectator, May 19).  Its base of users has grown astronomically, but that has not kept pace with the advertising feature of the business.  The way users employ Facebook is also a problem of sorts, notably in the realm of mobile usage (Crikey, May 18).  A huge revenue base is essentially going untapped.

The hunt for more revenue, however, will bring the company into conflict with a world of privacy it seeks to both undermine and preserve.  Facebook ventures into inner worlds of intimacy, however genuine they might seem.  Users surrender details to Facebook as if it were a Mephistophelian bargain, though they are told that those details can be controlled in terms of access.  That very data, however, is the premise that the company might use to assist advertisers to sharpen their focus.

Besides, Zuckerberg has shown that privacy is a moot point for him, a mutable formality.  His antics in hacking the website of the Harvard University’s student newspaper when he was 19 suggest a certain mania at work.  That mania has paid off even if it wasn’t as spectacular as market analysts would have it.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

More articles by:

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail