FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Killing Kids for Freedom

by BRIAN CLOUGHLEY

“I want to make sure that people understand: actually, drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties [in Pakistan]. For the most part they have been very precise precision strikes against Al Qaeda and their affiliates.”

President Obama,  January 31, 2012

The bureau counted 260 strikes [in Pakistan] by Predator and Reaper drones since President Obama took office, and it said that 282 to 535 civilians had been “credibly reported” killed in those attacks, including more than 60 children. American officials said that the number was much too high, though they acknowledged that at least several dozen civilians had been killed inadvertently in strikes aimed at militant suspects.

New York Times, February 5, 2012

I can say that the types of operations . . .  that the US has been involved in, in the counter-terrorism realm, that nearly for the past year there hasn’t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities that we’ve been able to develop.

President Obama’s counter-terrorism adviser, John Brennan, June 29, 2011

Although US officials declare that the number of civilians reported by independent sources as having been killed in Pakistan by Obama’s drone missiles is “much too high”, they don’t say what their own assessed figure might be.  They claim that only “several dozen” have died.  And the President of the United States says that several dozen is not a ‘huge number’ of dead innocents. Either these people don’t know the figures or they don’t care about them. What’s five dozen dead kids, after all?  Are they important?   Of course not.   So tap the mouse, flick the switch, hit the keys, because it’s all in the best interests of  “compressing the kill chain” that the soaring drones roam and reap their harvest in blood.  And get this, and get it good — all these missile strikes that kill people are against “militant suspects.”

Got it?  —   “I suspect you are a militant, therefore I am going to kill you.”

There is no requirement to legally identify a suspected enemy of the United States before firing a missile at him.  Whether people in the sights of drone cameras live or die is determined by a nimble-fingered mafia of robo-cowboys playing assassination video games. To use a cliché, they embody police, judge, jury and executioner in a court of no appeal. They can grant life or decide to deny its continuance.  They are the ultimate Terminators, accountable to the laws of neither gods nor man when they deal out death.   In modern civilization, the United States of America, a proudly democratic country, employs professional exterminators who need not heed rules that have been developed over centuries to try to make our planet a better place.

Most drone killings are inflicted by ‘Hellfire’ missiles whose new versions have warheads “designed to inflict greater damage in multi-room structures, compared to the Hellfire’s standard or blast-fragmentation warheads . . .  When the explosive detonates, the aluminum mixture is dispersed and rapidly burns. The resultant sustained high pressure is extremely effective against enemy personnel and structures.”  It also kills kids, of course, and lots of other people who don’t deserve to be exterminated by Hellfire missiles.

There is no doubt that the death of some, even many, people at the finger-prod of the techno-dweebs has rid the world of some evil characters. The very first person killed by a drone in Pakistan was a man called Nek Mohammad Wazir in June 2004.  He was an evil person, no doubt about that, because he had killed without remorse, and deserved to die.  But in the following eight years of the missile blitz, lots of other people have died, hundreds of whom had not committed any crime.

It has been difficult for independent observers to identify beyond doubt the number of women, children and other innocents who have been killed by the cold-eyed controllers in the US Air Force Base in Creech, Nevada. These divine dealers of death can see exactly who they are about to exterminate because the imagery of the drones’ systems is superb.  They can see the crinkle of a cheek, the thrust of a lip, the furrow of a brow,  such is their amazing technology.  And after they’ve killed their victims, the cameras linger on the scene to do what we used to call a BDA — a bomb damage assessment — an armchair reckoning of exactly how much carnage was wreaked by their high pressure blast fragmentation.

And their slaughter for freedom results in this sort of thing:

Twenty one people were killed, including three women and six children including Syed Wali Shah [aged seven] in an attack on a madrassa linked to Siraj Haqqani. Five houses were destroyed, and no rescue was attempted because of the continuing presence of drones. The father of dead child Syed Wali Shah later told photographer Noor Bekhram: “We had no idea of what was happening or why. We heard a blast at around 2.30 in the morning, and then part of a missile hit our house in the courtyard where the whole family was sleeping.”

“No rescue was attempted because of the continuing presence of drones” because the control cowboys keep looking at the scene of their butchery through the cameras that stay circling above the scene of their attack, and if anyone attempts to enter the area to try to help kids who are bleeding to death, then they get zapped to shreds, too.

Seven year-old Syed was one of sixty kids killed, so far, by the CIA’s Air Force executioners from Nevada, and his murder can be shrugged off by Obama’s comfortable claim that “drones have not caused a huge number of civilian casualties.”  Sure:  there hasn’t been a “huge number”.  How nice for you, Mr President, to be able to sleep well at night, knowing your orders have resulted in the death of only a few dozen innocent kids.

When an innocent American boy, Trayvon Martin was killed by a gun-happy vigilante in Florida in March, Obama said

When I think about this boy, I think about my own kids. I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this . . . Obviously, this is a tragedy. I can only imagine what these parents are going through. All of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how something like this has happened.

What about some soul searching and figuring concerning the USAF/CIA killing of seven year-old Syed Shah in Pakistan? That was a tragedy, too. Trayvon Martin was suspected of being up to no good, carrying candies in a menacing manner, and he was shot dead. But Syed Shah wasn’t suspected of doing anything at all when he was killed by one of Obama’s drones:  he was only seven years old and was asleep when the drone-meisters made sure he would never wake up.

Mr Obama declared “My main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon. All of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves.”  Certainly it’s important to take killing kids seriously.  So why doesn’t Obama send a message to the parents of Syed Shah?  Of course he couldn’t send a message to Syed’s mom because his drone killed her, too.  But Syed’s dad survived, and maybe he’d like to hear from the President who has such compassion for kids.

But he won’t hear a word, because his son  died in one of Obama’s  “precise precision strikes against al-Qaeda and their affiliates.” The drones will continue to deal out hellfire, and kids will continue to die.

Brian Cloughley’s website is www.beecluff.com

 

More articles by:

Brian Cloughley writes about foreign policy and military affairs. He lives in Voutenay sur Cure, France.

Weekend Edition
February 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Richard D. Wolff
Capitalism as Obstacle to Equality and Democracy: the US Story
Paul Street
Where’s the Beef Stroganoff? Eight Sacrilegious Reflections on Russiagate
Jeffrey St. Clair
They Came, They Saw, They Tweeted
Andrew Levine
Their Meddlers and Ours
Charles Pierson
Nuclear Nonproliferation, American Style
Joseph Essertier
Why Japan’s Ultranationalists Hate the Olympic Truce
W. T. Whitney
US and Allies Look to Military Intervention in Venezuela
John Laforge
Maybe All Threats of Mass Destruction are “Mentally Deranged”
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: an American Reckoning
David Rosen
For Some Reason, Being White Still Matters
Robert Fantina
Nikki Haley: the U.S. Embarrassment at the United Nations
Joyce Nelson
Why Mueller’s Indictments Are Hugely Important
Joshua Frank
Pearl Jam, Will You Help Stop Sen. Tester From Destroying Montana’s Public Lands?
Dana E. Abizaid
The Attack on Historical Perspective
Conn Hallinan
Immigration and the Italian Elections
George Ochenski
The Great Danger of Anthropocentricity
Pete Dolack
China Can’t Save Capitalism from Environmental Destruction
Joseph Natoli
Broken Lives
Manuel García, Jr.
Why Did Russia Vote For Trump?
Geoff Dutton
One Regime to Rule Them All
Torkil Lauesen – Gabriel Kuhn
Radical Theory and Academia: a Thorny Relationship
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: The Work of Persuasion
Thomas Klikauer
Umberto Eco and Germany’s New Fascism
George Burchett
La Folie Des Grandeurs
Howard Lisnoff
Minister of War
Eileen Appelbaum
Why Trump’s Plan Won’t Solve the Problems of America’s Crumbling Infrastructure
Ramzy Baroud
More Than a Fight over Couscous: Why the Palestinian Narrative Must Be Embraced
Jill Richardson
Mass Shootings Shouldn’t Be the Only Time We Talk About Mental Illness
Jessicah Pierre
Racism is Killing African American Mothers
Steve Horn
Wyoming Now Third State to Propose ALEC Bill Cracking Down on Pipeline Protests
David Griscom
When ‘Fake News’ is Good For Business
Barton Kunstler
Brainwashed Nation
Griffin Bird
I’m an Eagle Scout and I Don’t Want Pipelines in My Wilderness
Edward Curtin
The Coming Wars to End All Wars
Missy Comley Beattie
Message To New Activists
Jonah Raskin
Literary Hubbub in Sonoma: Novel about Mrs. Jack London Roils the Faithful
Binoy Kampmark
Frontiersman of the Internet: John Perry Barlow
Chelli Stanley
The Mirrors of Palestine
James McEnteer
How Brexit Won World War Two
Ralph Nader
Absorbing the Irresistible Consumer Reports Magazine
Cesar Chelala
A Word I Shouldn’t Use
Louis Proyect
Marx at the Movies
Osha Neumann
A White Guy Watches “The Black Panther”
Stephen Cooper
Rebel Talk with Nattali Rize: the Interview
David Yearsley
Market Music
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail