FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The War on Women

A nation’s progress should be measured as much by its advancement of human rights as by its accumulation and equitable distribution of wealth.

Though conditioned on gender, race and property, we were the first nation on earth to embrace the fundamental principle of democracy.  Had we remained as we were at our founding we would likely have dissolved as a nation but we changed.  We progressed.  We answered the challenges of human evolution.

With the adoption of a constitution replacing the Articles of Confederation, we announced to the world that we were one nation, united in principle and purpose.  We became a union with a strong federal government that could defend our borders and guarantee the rights of our citizens enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

We reformed our democracy by empowering the people to elect not only our representatives in the lower house but also our senators in the upper chamber of congress.  We expanded our franchise by eliminating property as a condition of voting.  We survived a bloody civil war, abolishing slavery and eventually welcoming all races to the full rights of citizenship.

We enfranchised women.

Last among all our major advancements toward a more perfect democratic union and a more civilized society, we gave women the right to vote.

The Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965), as well as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), went a long way toward assuring that the rights promised to racial minorities would be delivered by force of law.  The Civil Rights Act was expanded at the last moment to include women but the Equal Rights Amendment, which would have banned all forms of sexual discrimination, failed.

Now a majority of our citizenry, women were last to receive the vote and have never been granted full equality under the law of the land.

It is against this backdrop of neglect and abuse that the full-throttle assault on women’s rights must be viewed.  When the birth control pill was approved for use in 1957, the liberating effect it had on women cannot be understated.  Until then sexually active women who did not want to become pregnant had to convince male partners to wear a condom or relied on the notoriously ineffective rhythm method.  As a result, women commonly experienced unwanted pregnancies.  Until Roe v. Wade (1973) those women had no legal recourse in a majority of states but to give birth to an unwanted child.  Many chose illegal and unsafe options, backroom abortions, rusty coat hangers in seedy hotels.  Many died and many were permanently scarred.

Today over 100 million women use the pill worldwide, including twelve million American women, and a woman’s right to choose abortion in the case of unwanted pregnancy is the law of the land.

These were hard won and important victories in the battle for women’s rights and in the case of abortion women have had to work equally hard to hold on to them.

Now, it is not only the right to choose abortion that has come under fire but also the right to use oral contraception.  The latest tactic in the war on women is the attempt, invariably led by old white men, to define life at inception.  These laws, unwittingly or not, would outlaw the use of birth control pills as well as banning abortion.

It is a blatant attempt to circumvent Roe v. Wade and one that will be tested by the law.  Unfortunately, the Supreme Court as it is presently constituted shows no proclivity to uphold the rights of women unless those women are corporate representatives.

The Catholic Church recently entered the battle by claiming that provisions in the new health insurance law violated the separation of church and state by requiring Catholic institutions to cover contraception.  They are putting the cart before the horse.  The first amendment does not empower churches to control their follower’s lives or restrict their employees’ choices.  The practice of religion is an individual right and individuals can choose whether or not they wish to follow the church’s teaching.

The Virginia legislature declared their own war on women by passing a law that will require women who want abortions to be subject to trans-vaginal ultrasound imaging.  Under this unconscionable legislation, a woman could be raped once by a deviant misfit and raped again by agents of the Virginia government.  We can have no doubt that the insertion of an ultrasound device into a woman’s vagina against her will by force of threat or intimidation is a sexual assault.

The first time a woman is subjected to this procedure, every member of the Virginia legislature who voted for this bill and the governor who signed it into law should be arrested and tried for conspiracy to commit rape.

Do we really want to go back to a time when a woman’s body and her most intimate decisions are controlled by men or government agents?  Do we really want to return to backroom abortions?  Do we really want an explosion of unwanted pregnancies and unwanted children?

This is a war on women and women’s rights.  It is an attempt to set women back more than half a century.  It is an attempt to impose the religious dictums of a very small minority on the backs of the majority of our citizens.

This war is aimed at women but it affects us all.  It affects our nation.  If we allow this backward morality to victimize women, the nation as a whole will fail in its responsibility to protect the rights of all, including those without power or representation.

Women do have power but their representation in government appears to be on the decline.  It is unthinkable that this kind of war could be waged if women had anything resembling proportionate representation.

This is a war against all of us who believe in human rights.  This is a fight for the soul of our nation.  This is a fight to keep us moving forward to a greater realization of the American ideal.  This is a fight against those who wish to push us backward.

This is a war we must not and cannot lose.

See:  “State-Sanctioned Rape:  Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound Laws in Virginia, Texas and Iowa” by Andy Kopsa, February 15, 2012, www.rhrealitycheck.org

Jack Random is the author of Jazzman Chronicles (Crow Dog Press) and Ghost Dance Insurrection (Dry Bones Press.)

More articles by:

Jack Random is the author of Jazzman Chronicles (Crow Dog Press) and Ghost Dance Insurrection (Dry Bones Press.)

Weekend Edition
May 25, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Melvin Goodman
A Major Win for Trump’s War Cabinet
Andrew Levine
Could Anything Cause the GOP to Dump Trump?
Pete Tucker
Is the Washington Post Soft on Amazon?
Conn Hallinan
Iran: Sanctions & War
Jeffrey St. Clair
Out of Space: John McCain, Telescopes and the Desecration of Mount Graham
John Laforge
Senate Puts CIA Back on Torture Track
David Rosen
Santa Fe High School Shooting: an Incel Killing?
Gary Leupp
Pompeo’s Iran Speech and the 21 Demands
Jonathan Power
Bang, Bang to Trump
Robert Fisk
You Can’t Commit Genocide Without the Help of Local People
Brian Cloughley
Washington’s Provocations in the South China Sea
Louis Proyect
Requiem for a Mountain Lion
Robert Fantina
The U.S. and Israel: a Match Made in Hell
Kevin Martin
The Libya Model: It’s Not Always All About Trump
Susie Day
Trump, the NYPD and the People We Call “Animals”
Pepe Escobar
How Iran Will Respond to Trump
Sarah Anderson
When CEO’s Earn 5,000 Times as Much as a Company’s Workers
Ralph Nader
Audit the Outlaw Military Budget Draining America’s Necessities
Chris Wright
The Significance of Karl Marx
David Schultz
Indict or Not: the Choice Mueller May Have to Make and Which is Worse for Trump
George Payne
The NFL Moves to Silence Voices of Dissent
Razan Azzarkani
America’s Treatment of Palestinians Has Grown Horrendously Cruel
Katalina Khoury
The Need to Evaluate the Human Constructs Enabling Palestinian Genocide
George Ochenski
Tillerson, the Truth and Ryan Zinke’s Interior Department
Jill Richardson
Our Immigration Debate Needs a Lot More Humanity
Martha Rosenberg
Once Again a Slaughterhouse Raid Turns Up Abuses
Judith Deutsch
Pension Systems and the Deadly Hand of the Market
Shamus Cooke
Oregon’s Poor People’s Campaign and DSA Partner Against State Democrats
Thomas Barker
Only a Mass Struggle From Below Can End the Bloodshed in Palestine
Binoy Kampmark
Australia’s China Syndrome
Missy Comley Beattie
Say “I Love You”
Ron Jacobs
A Photographic Revenge
Saurav Sarkar
War and Moral Injury
Clark T. Scott
The Shell Game and “The Bank Dick”
Seth Sandronsky
The State of Worker Safety in America
Thomas Knapp
Making Gridlock Great Again
Manuel E. Yepe
The US Will Have to Ask for Forgiveness
Laura Finley
Stop Blaming Women and Girls for Men’s Violence Against Them
Rob Okun
Raising Boys to Love and Care, Not to Kill
Christopher Brauchli
What Conflicts of Interest?
Winslow Myers
Real Security
George Wuerthner
Happy Talk About Weeds
Abel Cohen
Give the People What They Want: Shame
David Yearsley
King Arthur in Berlin
Douglas Valentine
Memorial Day
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail