Bullfighting in Quito


Every year during Fiestas de Quito, celebrations commemorating the founding of the city in 1534, there are nine days of bullfighting at the Plaza de Toros in the northern part of the city.  A public outcry led by animal rights groups resulted in a law this year imposing referenda on killing in the ring.  The legislation demands each municipality in Ecuador resolve the question: “Regarding the prohibition on killing animals in spectacles, do you agree that, in the municipality where you live, the spectacles that have as purpose the killing of the animal should be banned?”  Many municipalities have outlawed the practice of killing in the ring, but some, such as nearby Ambato, have voted to continue the tradition.

Unlike the recent law in Catalonia that bans bullfighting completely, Quito has hitched itself to legislation that satisfies no one, least of all the animal it is purported to protect.  After a half hour of public torment the bull is maneuvered out of the ring and some time later is killed behind closed doors.  This increases the bull’s suffering because he must wait in pain.

Bullfighting arouses strong opinions.  For some it is barbaric and should be eliminated.  Others say it’s an art form demonstrating courage, skill and elegance in the face of deadly brute force.  Some go further, imparting to bullfighting basic verities of existence, inner truths about our nature, bloodlust elevated to the realm of the transcendent, the mystical.  Watching the bullfight we watch the history of our race in its elemental form, including the ritual of sacrifice.

Quito’s sad compromise gives us the worst of all possible worlds and mirrors a dilemma of contemporary life.  We want to believe in the mythology of progress, that ours is a developing moral sense on a steady upward trajectory.  Killing the bull in private, removing it from “spectacles that have as purpose the killing of the animal,” reinforces this illusion.  In eliminating the spectacle we eliminate one more of our moral shortcomings.  We are a kinder, gentler species, moving inexorably beyond our brutish origins.

The turnout at Quito’s Plaza de Toros is testimony to this dilemma.  The stands are two-thirds filled and the normal full-throated participation is muted and at times even confused.  The ritual of violence, cruelty, grace and courage demands the fulfillment that Ecuador’s law so clumsily denies, the spectacle of public killing.  Instead the ritual becomes a sort of strange prurient absurdity, a blood exercise in hypocrisy.  It assigns that part of our nature we wish to deny to the day’s proliferating rooms of secrets, cleansing our view but disturbing our sleep.

Ecuador’s bullfighting legislation is the little man in an antiseptic room in front of a computer screen firing drone missiles at faceless people thousands of miles away.  It is the carefully groomed technocrat making decisions ruining the lives of millions.  It is the shining face of government with its soothing, hopeful words.

Our dilemma is that we can’t decide.  As a result we degrade ourselves with foolish excursions and blind effort, hoping for success.  This leads to half-baked compromises and solutions, like Ecuador’s law, leaving us confused and stunted, in the realm of nightmare.  Those who think they are liberated or superior delude themselves.  The bull is tortured and robbed of its life in darkness.  The bullfighter is stripped of dignity and purpose.  An ancient ritual loses its meaning.  The spectator is rendered dumb.  At least in bullfighting answer is clear:  ban it completely or allow it to continue in its full sanguinary splendor.  If only the solution to our own dilemma was so simple.

RICHARD WARD lives in New Mexico. He can be reached at:r.ward47@gmail.com


More articles by:

Richard Ward divides his time between New Mexico and Ecuador. He can be reached at: r.ward47@gmail.com.

September 24, 2018
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
Jonathan Cook
Palestine: The Testbed for Trump’s Plan to Tear up the Rules-Based International Order
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Chickenhawks Have Finally Come Back Home to Roost!
David Rosen
As the Capitalist World Turns: From Empire to Imperialism to Globalization?
Jonah Raskin
Green Capitalism Rears Its Head at Global Climate Action Summit
James Munson
On Climate, the Centrists are the Deplorables
Robert Hunziker
Is Paris 2015 Already Underwater?
Arshad Khan
Will Their Ever be Justice for Rohingya Muslims?
Jill Richardson
Why Women Don’t Report Sexual Assault
Dave Clennon
A Victory for Historical Accuracy and the Peace Movement: Not One Emmy for Ken Burns and “The Vietnam War”
W. T. Whitney
US Harasses Cuba Amid Mysterious Circumstances
Nathan Kalman-Lamb
Things That Make Sports Fans Uncomfortable
George Capaccio
Iran: “Snapping Back” Sanctions and the Threat of War
Kenneth Surin
Brexit is Coming, But Which Will It Be?
Louis Proyect
Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9”: Entertaining Film, Crappy Politics
Ramzy Baroud
Why Israel Demolishes: Khan Al-Ahmar as Representation of Greater Genocide
Ben Dangl
The Zapatistas’ Dignified Rage: Revolutionary Theories and Anticapitalist Dreams of Subcommandante Marcos
Ron Jacobs
Faith, Madness, or Death
Bill Glahn
Crime Comes Knocking
Terry Heaton
Pat Robertson’s Hurricane “Miracle”
Dave Lindorff
In Montgomery County PA, It’s Often a Jury of White People
Louis Yako
From Citizens to Customers: the Corporate Customer Service Culture in America 
William Boardman
The Shame of Dianne Feinstein, the Courage of Christine Blasey Ford 
Ernie Niemi
Logging and Climate Change: Oregon is Appalachia and Timber is Our Coal
Jessicah Pierre
Nike Says “Believe in Something,” But Can It Sacrifice Something, Too?
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
Weaponized Dreams? The Curious Case of Robert Moss
Olivia Alperstein
An Environmental 9/11: the EPA’s Gutting of Methane Regulations
Ted Rall
Why Christine Ford vs. Brett Kavanaugh is a Train Wreck You Can’t Look Away From
Lauren Regan
The Day the Valves Turned: Defending the Pipeline Protesters
Ralph Nader
Questions, Questions Where are the Answers?
Binoy Kampmark
Deplatforming Germaine Greer
Raouf Halaby
It Should Not Be A He Said She Said Verdict
Robert Koehler
The Accusation That Wouldn’t Go Away
Jim Hightower
Amazon is Making Workers Tweet About How Great It is to Work There
Robby Sherwin
Rabbi, Rabbi, Where For Art Thou Rabbi?
Vern Loomis
Has Something Evil This Way Come?
Steve Baggarly
Disarm Trident Walk Ends in Georgia
Graham Peebles
Priorities of the Time: Peace
Michael Doliner
The Department of Demonization