FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

A Disgusting Lovefest

When Israeli Prime  Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the U.S. Congress in a joint session on May 24 it gave the right-wing extremist Israeli leader 29 standing ovations?four more than it even gave Barack Obama in his State of the Union address earlier this year.

It was a disgusting love fest, devoid of any understanding of reality or appreciation of U.S. interests in the region. Despite the numerous lies and distortions that filled the speech, members of Congress were racing one another to stand, smile, and declare their loyalty to the Zionist state.

The extensive record of over six decades of successive Israeli governments enforcing institutionalized discrimination and exclusion against its minority Arab citizens as well as the entrenched policies of the military occupation against four million Palestinians are well documented. Netanyahu’s claim of free access to holy places to all for the first time in the history of Jerusalem is not only contradicted by the historical record, but also by his own country’s continuous restrictions against the non-Jewish faithful.

The significance of Netanyahu’s congressional speech is that it served as the final nail in the coffin of the so-called two-state solution. He paid lip service to the establishment of a Palestinian state that lacked all the conditions of a viable state including sovereignty, independence, controlled borders, contiguity, and economic viability.

He called for an unconditional return to negotiations while pre-determining all the final status issues, including a reversal of prior agreements: No to Arab rights in East Jerusalem. No to withdrawal to 1967 borders. No to dismantling illegal settlements or removal of colonists from Palestinian territories. No to the right of return of the Palestinian refugee, a right enshrined in international law and U.N. resolutions since 1949. No to sovereignty or security to the Palestinians?insisting instead on demilitarized Bantustans and permanent deployment of Israeli forces along the Jordan valley.

In his speech earlier in the week, Obama did not deviate much from Netanyahu’s positions. He declared that all peoples in the Middle East deserve support against their brutal dictators?except for the Palestinians, whose tormentor is Israel. All people deserve to live in freedom, democracy, and dignity, and have their will respected by the world, except for the Palestinians?if they elect representatives who are hostile to Israel’s interests, they should be punished and made to pay a heavy price by the U.S. and the international community.

Obama further lectured the Palestinians on not delegitimizing a state that is based on ethnic, racial, and religious superiority, echoing Netanyahu’s call for the victims of Zionism to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, thus not only prejudicing the rights of the Palestinian Diaspora but also trampling over the rights of all non-Jewish Arabs in Israel itself.

How would Obama have reacted to a call for a “White State” for “the white people” in apartheid South Africa? In fact, he opposed such a preposterous proposition and delegitimized its proponents during his youth in the 1980s.

But if anything, the spring of Arab revolutions has shown that the Arab youth have regained the initiative. Israel can no longer dictate to a few Arab autocrats to impose its will on the region. Obama was correct to observe that time is not on the side of Israel. But his positions favoring the Zionist state will not promote the cause of peace or the two-state solution.

As many American and Israeli experts including Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein, John Mearsheimer, Cheryl Rosenberg, and Ilan Pappe have pointed out, the main obstacle to a fair settlement in the Middle East has been the U.S. policies in the region. In particular, they point to aggressive policies favoring Israel and antagonistic attitudes towards the Arab populations advanced by the U.S. Congress, which is greatly influenced by the Israeli lobby.

As people in the Middle East are liberated from the yoke of repression and dictatorship, and as they begin to enjoy the fruits of freedom and democracy, they will demand an end to the injustice and occupation inflicted on the Palestinians for decades. The U.S. policies towards the conflict are being exposed for what they really are: policies favoring Israeli violence, occupation, brutality, dispossession, and humiliation of Palestinians.

The weapons that kill Palestinians are made in the U.S. and paid for by the U.S. treasury. The funds that build the settlements that dispossess the Palestinians, and aid the settlers that daily brutalize them are sent by America. The vetoes that shield Israel from any enforcement of international law or condemnation of its war crimes and illegal acts are American. In short, the entity that perpetuates the suffering of the Palestinians and aids and abets the Israeli crimes perpetrated against them is the U.S. led and cheered on by the U.S. Congress.

Since 1967, American taxpayers have provided over $178 Billion in direct military and economic aid to Israel plus tens of billions of dollars of unpaid loans, ultimately forgiven by Congress, to settle American Jewish colonists and Russian Jews in Palestinian lands. During the same period the U.S. has cast 42 vetoes in the United Nations Security Council to shield Israel from adhering to international law or to cover its war crimes. Successive administrations, Republican and Democrat alike, have given Israel the most advanced weaponry in American’s arsenal- some even denied to its NATO allies, including some that have been internationally prohibited.

Thus, in due course, the masses in the Arab streets will turn their anger towards the U.S, the enabler of Israel; the source of so much suffering in their neighborhood. As many of these mass movements have employed non-violence as a strategy to achieve their goals, they will also demand that the U.S. change its policies and behavior towards them if it truly seeks friendly relations as it proclaims.

According to the U.S-Arab business council, by next year, U.S. trade with the Arab world will surpass $100 billion, affecting more than one million American jobs. Moreover, about a quarter of U.S. energy consumption comes from the Middle East. Hundreds of billions of dollars of Arab funds are invested in U.S. treasury bonds as well as the private sector.

If the true popular will is expressed by the Arab masses then a serious Boycott-Divestment-Sanction (BDS) will be directed towards the U.S. causing financial havoc in Wall Street as well as economic dislocation in Main Street. All members of Congress who support Israel will be declared enemies of peace, led by those who applaud Israeli prime ministers and vote to prolong the suffering and humiliation of the Palestinian people. They will not be welcome to set foot in any Arab or Muslim capital, since, according to international law, those who aid and abet war criminals are themselves war criminals.

Only when such a worldwide comprehensive BDS movement against the U.S. is launched will the Congress ultimately change course, as it is forced to listen to the American electorate, which would demand answers and call for just policies from their elected officials, many of whom have sold out their country’s ideals for special interests.

It is high time that Obama and Congress recall the words of George Washington, who in his farewell address warned his countrymen and women against establishing an unhealthy relationship with a foreign country when he said, “A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitati?ng the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participat?ion in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justificat?ion.”

The prophecy of the first president can only be averted by universal strong BDS action to sober up the U.S. Congress drunk from the coffers of the Israeli lobby.

Esam Al-Amin can be reached at alamin1919@gmail.com

 

More articles by:

January 17, 2019
Stan Cox
That Green Growth at the Heart of the Green New Deal? It’s Malignant
David Schultz
Trump vs the Constitution: Why He Cannot Invoke the Emergencies Act to Build a Wall
Paul Cochrane
Europe’s Strategic Humanitarian Aid: Yemen vs. Syria
Tom Clifford
China: An Ancient Country, Getting Older
Greg Grandin
How Not to Build a “Great, Great Wall”
Ted Rall
Our Pointless, Very American Culture of Shame
John G. Russell
Just Another Brick in the Wall of Lies
Patrick Walker
Referendum 2020: A Green New Deal vs. Racist, Classist Climate Genocide
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
Uniting for a Green New Deal
Matt Johnson
The Wall Already Exists — In Our Hearts and Minds
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Flailing will get More Desperate and More Dangerous
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Three
January 16, 2019
Patrick Bond
Jim Yong Kim’s Mixed Messages to the World Bank and the World
John Grant
Joe Biden, Crime Fighter from Hell
Alvaro Huerta
Brief History Notes on Mexican Immigration to the U.S.
Kenneth Surin
A Great Speaker of the UK’s House of Commons
Elizabeth Henderson
Why Sustainable Agriculture Should Support a Green New Deal
Binoy Kampmark
Trump, Bolton and the Syrian Confusion
Jeff Mackler
Trump’s Syria Exit Tweet Provokes Washington Panic
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Long Can Nepal Blame Others for Its Woes?
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: When Just One Man Says, “No”
Cesar Chelala
Violence Against Women: A Pandemic No Longer Hidden
Kim C. Domenico
To Make a Vineyard of the Curse: Fate, Fatalism and Freedom
Dave Lindorff
Criminalizing BDS Trashes Free Speech & Association
Thomas Knapp
Now More Than Ever, It’s Clear the FBI Must Go
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: The Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party: Part Two
Edward Curtin
A Gentrified Little Town Goes to Pot
January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail