FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Abascal’s Testimony Damages Posada’s Defense

All afternoon, the defense tried to convince the jury that one of the prosecution’s key witnesses, Gilberto Abascal, cannot be trusted. Attorney Arturo Hernández needs to impeach Abascal’s credibility, because his testimony against Luis Posada Carriles is devastating.

This morning, Abascal testified that the Santrina arrived in Miami at 10:30 a.m. one day in March 2005 from Isla Mujeres, Mexico, with Luis Posada Carriles aboard. He said that Posada did not leave the boat until it reached its final destination in Miami, where Abascal personally saw him get off the yacht and board a speedboat to traverse the Miami River, which crosses the city from west to east.

Irritated with Arturo Hernández’s brutal cross-examination, Abascal told Posada’s attorney, “You know that I’m telling the truth”, emphasizing with his voice, “YOU DO KNOW IT.” Hernández´ face flushed, upon hearing this unexpected emotional retort from Abascal. I don’t know whether he blushed from anger or embarrassment.

We came to pick up Posada

Abascal’s testimony today buttressed his previous declarations. He was allowed to go into areas that, for legal reasons, the judge had disallowed yesterday. For example, Abascal testified that upon the Santrina’s arrival at Isla Mujeres, the boat’s owner, Santiago Álvarez, called the entire crew together in the boat’s dining room and told them: “Now I can tell you why we came to Isla Mujeres. We came to pick up Posada Carriles.”

“I was angry with Santiago Álvarez, when I heard that, because he’d deceived me,” said Abascal. The prosecutor who questioned Abascal asked him who had been on the Santrina when the boat arrived in Miami. Abascal didn’t hesitate. “Santiago Álvarez, Osvaldo Mitat, Rubén López Castro, Pepín Pujol, Luis Posada Carriles and me.”

The weather was very bad between Isla Mujeres and Miami. Posada Carriles became seasick, said Abascal. With a pen in hand, the witness drew on a map for the jury the route the Santrina took from Isla Mujeres to Miami. While listening to Abascal, the jury looked at him attentively, hypnotized by his narrative. Seated on his chair, Posada Carriles picked up a pen and began to write in a notebook.

They heard Abascal describe in detail how the Santrina navigated into the Miami River with Posada Carriles aboard. Santiago Álvarez “gave the order to Rubén López Castro to take Posada in a speedboat to one of the restaurants on the river,” said the witness. He explained that “Álvarez’s son, Santiaguito, would be there waiting for him. Then I saw Luis Posada Carriles get into a speedboat with Rubén López Castro and head for a restaurant.”

Some in the audience laughed when they heard Abascal state that Rubén López Castro returned to the Santrina shortly thereafter and said, “Oh my god, the chief of police was there in the restaurant, eating!” The situation is ironic. An international fugitive with 73 murder charges pending against him for the explosion of a passenger airliner, the mastermind of a terrorist campaign against Cuba, sneaks into the United States illegally and immediately finds himself in a restaurant with the city’s police chief . . . and yet nothing happens! Miami is surreal.

Collision with the truth

During his opening presentation to the jury the first day of the trial, Arturo Hernández promised he would put on evidence that Posada Carriles had never boarded the Santrina, although he did meet with the crew in Isla Mujeres in March of 2005. Hernández´ theory of the case is that Santiago Álvarez went on the sea voyage to Mexico to hand Posada Carriles $10,000, so that he could hire a coyote that would help him cross the Rio Grande illegally into the United States, near the Mexican border town of Matamoros.

Hernández told the jury two weeks ago that after getting the 10 grand from Santiago Alvarez in Isla Mujeres, “Posada returned to Guatemala with Ernesto Abreu. There he hired a coyote who brought him to the United States in a pickup truck.”

But Attorney Hernández’s novella collided with the truth this morning. “Santiago Álvarez told those of us who’d traveled on the Santrina that if the FBI or the government asked, we should say that we went to Isla Mujeres to deliver $10,000 to Posada Carriles and that we had left him there and that he had returned to Guatemala to hire a coyote,” Abascal testified today.

During several interviews with Immigration officials, Posada Carriles also repeated the fanciful tale about his road trip from Guatemala to Houston. Last week we listened to the recordings in which Posada said that in Houston he took a Greyhound bus to Miami. He also identified a ticket from the Houston-Miami bus dated March 26, 2005, and said that it had cost him approximately $100.

But today Abascal testified that it was Santiago Álvarez who had the idea to buy a Greyhound ticket in Houston. “Álvarez told us that he had sent López Castro to Houston to buy a Greyhound ticket in order to produce it later and say that it was Posada who’d purchased it and used it for his trip to Miami.” They evidently had everything prepared and thought that the compromising clues would disappear with the story concocted by Santiago Álvarez.

Why did Posada Carriles lie? Why did he say that he crossed the border with a coyote, instead of telling the truth; that he entered on the Santrina with Santiago Álvarez, Osvaldo Mitat, Pepín Pujol, Rubén López Castro and Gilberto Abascal? What difference did it make? A lot.

It’s illegal to help a person enter the United States without a visa, however the penalties are enhanced if the human contraband is a terrorist. Posada Carriles´friends on the Santrina could get as much as 30 years in prison for secreting him into the country. That’s why he Posada lied. He wanted to protect his friends, and that’s why Santiago Álvarez and the rest of the crew conspired to cover-up the real details of the Santrina trip.

Posada’s only concern

Gilberto Abascal’s statements show that the only real worry aboard the Santrina in March 2005 was the interview that Posada had given Ann Louise Bardach not how to deceive Immigration. They had planned that very well. Their true concerns had to do with the interview that he had given Ann Louise Bardach, a journalist from The New York Times, in June 1998. Posada bragged to her that he was the mastermind of the bombings in Havana. One of the bombs killed Fabio di Celmo, a young Italian, in the Copacabana Hotel on September 4, 1997. Abascal told the jury today, “I heard Santiago Alvarez tell Posada: ‘what’s going to hurt you is what you told the journalist’.”

Grateful to his friends who had smuggled him into Miami, Posada gave each of them one of his paintings, said Abascal. “I lent mine to the girlfriend I had at the time, and “she later told me that she threw it away. I could never get it back.”

Posada’s Strategy

Posada’s defense strategy consists of discrediting Abascal, showing the jury that he’s a liar, mentally ill and a spy. The cross-examination was fierce. Hernández asked him about the false statements that he had previously made on his federal tax returns, and the false statements about his income in connection with his divorce. Abascal admitted having made mistakes, but he firmly insisted that he’s telling the truth about how Luis Posada Carriles entered the United States.

His testimony was coherent and firm. He even scolded Hernández on several occasions: “Ask me questions, but don’t try to confuse me,” he told him. “Please lower the tone of your voice. I’m not being disrespectful to you.”

The jury’s impatience

The jury began to grow impatient. Hernández, for instance, took the whole afternoon to establish that Abascal had sworn to tell the truth about his income yet made false declarations. The prosecutor interrupted the cross-examination several times in order to consult with Judge Cardone privately. Some members of the jury expressed their annoyance. They looked at one another, some raised their eyes toward the ceiling, others consulted their wristwatches impatiently, and one of the seven women on the panel sighed loudly.

The jury will decide this case, not the judge. These jurors have jobs, families and commitments. They don’t like the idea of spending several weeks stuck in court, especially if they think that the lawyers don’t respect their time. Too many delays and interruptions in a trial militate against an impartial decision.

Tomorrow we’ll continue at 8:30 in the morning. Hernández will summarize his cross-examination and will probably concentrate on the accusation that he made a few days ago: that Abascal is a “spy for the Cuban government.” We shall see.

José Pertierra practices law in Washington, DC. He represents the government of Venezuela in the case to extradite Luis Posada Carriles.

Translated by Manuel Talens and Machetera. They are members of Tlaxcala, the international network of translators for linguistic diversity.

Source: http://www.cubadebate.cu/autores/jose-pertierra/2011/01/26/diario-el-paso-abascal-creible-desmantela-linea-defensa/

 

 

More articles by:

José Pertierra is an attorney in Washington, DC.

September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
Kenn Orphan
The Power of the Anthropocene
Paul Cox – Stan Cox
Puerto Rico’s Unnatural Disaster Rolls on Into Year Two
Rajan Menon
Yemen’s Descent Into Hell: a Saudi-American War of Terror
Russell Mokhiber
Nick Brana Says Dems Will Again Deny Sanders Presidential Nomination
Nicholas Levis
Three Lessons of Occupy Wall Street, With a Fair Dose of Memory
Steve Martinot
The Constitutionality of Homeless Encampments
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
The Aftershocks of the Economic Collapse Are Still Being Felt
Jesse Jackson
By Enforcing Climate Change Denial, Trump Puts Us All in Peril
George Wuerthner
Coyote Killing is Counter Productive
Mel Gurtov
On Dealing with China
Dean Baker
How to Reduce Corruption in Medicine: Remove the Money
September 19, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
When Bernie Sold Out His Hero, Anti-Authoritarians Paid
Lawrence Davidson
Political Fragmentation on the Homefront
George Ochenski
How’s That “Chinese Hoax” Treating You, Mr. President?
Cesar Chelala
The Afghan Morass
Chris Wright
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Howard Lisnoff
The Beat Goes On Against Protest in Saudi Arabia
Nomi Prins 
The Donald in Wonderland: Down the Financial Rabbit Hole With Trump
Jack Rasmus
On the 10th Anniversary of Lehman Brothers 2008: Can ‘IT’ Happen Again?
Richard Schuberth
Make Them Suffer Too
Geoff Beckman
Kavanaugh in Extremis
Jonathan Engel
Rather Than Mining in Irreplaceable Wilderness, Why Can’t We Mine Landfills?
Binoy Kampmark
Needled Strawberries: Food Terrorism Down Under
Michael McCaffrey
A Curious Case of Mysterious Attacks, Microwave Weapons and Media Manipulation
Elliot Sperber
Eating the Constitution
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail