FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Is the Vermont Health Plan Single Payer?

The Governor of Vermont calls it single payer.

The Harvard professor who came up with it calls it single payer.

But single payer activist Dr. Margaret Flowers says it’s not single payer.

Flowers is with Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP).

And many other doctor members of PNHP agree with her.

They are challenging the proposal put forth by Harvard Professor William Hsiao.

Flowers says that if single payer means anything, it means everyone in one insurance pool.

Everybody in.

Nobody out.

In Vermont, 25 percent of the people are covered by Medicaid.

And 18 percent of the people are covered by Medicare.

So, under Hsiao’s proposal, 43 percent of the population of Vermont would not be in the newly created insurance pool.

In an telephone interview on Sunday, we asked Hsiao why he didn’t include Medicare and Medicaid recipients in his proposed insurance pool.

At first he said that it would have been too expensive and too complicated to include every Medicaid and Medicare recipient into a single payer pool.

“Most of the Medicaid eligibles have better benefits than what we are proposing,” Hsiao said. “Medicaid eligibles have everything covered, including dental, nursing home, and they don’t have to pay much co-insurance or co-payment. Some only pay $5.”

“To create a benefits package of that generous level would cost a great deal of money. What we designed for Vermont cannot save that much money initially.”

“Medicare is much more complicated. Medicare benefits are not as rich.”

“Medicare has two groups. One group is dual eligibles. They are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. They have very rich benefits – because of Medicaid.”

“Also, many Medicare eligibles have employer retirement plans providing a supplementary wrap around.”

“Another group is buying their own supplementary insurance – Medigap.”

“Plus, in our soundings around Vermont, many Medicare beneficiaries say – please don’t touch our benefits. They are worried about anybody touching their benefits. They are very suspicious. They think you are going to take something away from them.”

But after going around the too complicated and too expensive explanations for a few minutes, we hit upon a more fundamental reason Hsiao carved out Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries.

To include the 43 percent of the population in Vermont covered by Medicare and Medicaid, you would need a legislative waiver – an act of Congress.

Hsiao’s proposal requires waivers – but only what he calls administrative waivers.

“The President can grant the waivers necessary to allow our proposal to go forward,” Hsiao said. “We don’t have to go to Congress.”

But to include Medicaid and Medicare recipients in a single pool in Vermont – that would require an act of Congress.

Would Hsiao have included everyone in one pool had it required only an administrative waiver and not an act of Congress?

“Probably most likely I would have done it,” Hsiao said.

Flowers says that Vermont should create a true single payer system and then put pressure on Congress to allow the states to pass it into law.

“Congressman Dennis Kucinich’s amendment passed the House last year and the Wyden Scott bill has bipartisan support in the Senate,” Flowers said. “Both would allow the states to pass single payer and include every resident – including Medicare and Medicaid recipients.”

Flowers supports something closer to Hsiao’s option one – a single payer administered by a public entity.

But under Hsiao’s recommended option three, the administrator would most likely be Blue Cross Blue Shield – which currently controls 75 percent of the state’s health insurance business.

“There are concerns about hiring Blue Cross to be the administrator,” Flowers says. “They have an incentive to make things more complex. Instead, there should be a public administrator.”

Flowers is also critical of Hsiao’s proposed funding mechanism – which is a payroll tax.

“It’s a regressive way to pay for it,” Flowers said. “It excludes people making money off of investment income only. It’s not really that difficult to say to people – for those people who earn their money off of investments and don’t have to work – they have to contribute too.”

Hsiao says that such a system would be too complicated.

“It would be a very much more complicated financing system,” Hsiao said.

“You can figure that out,” Hsiao said. “But then you have to ask – who are these people? Most of them are in the Medicare population. Then you want to tax them differently than the people who are currently working. You can imagine how complicated that would be – just for people to understand that.”

And then Hsiao pauses.

And says – “since you are interested in single payer, let me just say – let not the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

Flowers says that exactly what we heard last year from President Obama when he was pushing the equivalent of Romney care – don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

“That line is used over and over again in this situation,”Flowers said. “And what they say is the good is not. It’s similar to what happened last year.”

“So far what we see in Vermont is not single payer,” Flowers says. “There is still an opportunity to push for it be single payer. And that’s what we think we should be doing at this point. Hsiao’s proposal lacks key features of single payer. It’s not universal. It’s not a single risk pool. It’s not comprehensive in terms of benefits. And all medically necessary care is not covered.”

As for Hsiao, he’s pleased that Vermont’s Governor Peter Shumlin is fast tracking the legislation.

Shumlin has said that he will introduce his legislation this week.

Hsiao says he’s working closely with Shumlin to draft that legislation.

“They are working with us as to what are the essential parts of our recommendations that will produce the savings, that will give universal coverage, that will provide uniform benefits to everyone, and the payment systems,” Hsiao said.

“I’m very pleased that the Governor made a public commitment to draft legislation so fast,” Hsiao said.

As for the insurance industry, Hsiao predicts flatly that “the insurance industry will be opposed.”

But a strong grassroots movement, led by the Vermont Workers Center, is on the ground ready to defend single payer.

James Haslam of the Center says his forces will be pushing for Hsiao’s option one.

“We have come a long way,” Haslam said. “It’s amazing how far we have come to create the political will to do something. Now our struggle is what that something is going to be.”

Haslam echoes much of Flowers’ criticism of Hsiao’s preferred option three.

“We would want everyone in one system,” Haslam said. “Income tax is a whole lot more equitable than a payroll tax. And payroll is better than people paying premiums. We would probably be best served with a mix.”

RUSSELL MOKHIBER edits Single Payer Action.

 

 

More articles by:

Russell Mokhiber is the editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter..

December 11, 2018
Eric Draitser
AFRICOM: A Neocolonial Occupation Force?
Sheldon Richman
War Over Ukraine?
Louis Proyect
Why World War II, Not the New Deal, Ended the Great Depression
Howard Lisnoff
Police Violence and Mass Policing in the U.S.
Mark Ashwill
A “Patriotic” Education Study Abroad Program in Viet Nam: God Bless America, Right or Wrong!
Laura Flanders
HUD Official to Move into Public Housing?
Nino Pagliccia
Resistance is Not Terrorism
Matthew Johnson
See No Evil, See No Good: The Truth Is Not Black and White
Maria Paez Victor
How Reuters Slandered Venezuela’s Social Benefits Card
December 10, 2018
Jacques R. Pauwels
Foreign Interventions in Revolutionary Russia
Richard Klin
The Disasters of War
Katie Fite
Rebranding Bundy
Gary Olson
A Few Thoughts on Politics and Personal Identity
Patrick Cockburn
Brexit Britain’s Crisis of Self-Confidence Will Only End in Tears and Rising Nationalism
Andrew Moss
Undocumented Citizen
Dean Baker
Trump and China: Going With Patent Holders Against Workers
Lawrence Wittner
Reviving the Nuclear Disarmament Movement: a Practical Proposal
Dan Siegel
Thoughts on the 2018 Elections and Beyond
Thomas Knapp
Election 2020: I Can Smell the Dumpster Fires Already
Weekend Edition
December 07, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Steve Hendricks
What If We Just Buy Off Big Fossil Fuel? A Novel Plan to Mitigate the Climate Calamity
Jeffrey St. Clair
Cancer as Weapon: Poppy Bush’s Radioactive War on Iraq
Paul Street
The McCain and Bush Death Tours: Establishment Rituals in How to be a Proper Ruler
Jason Hirthler
Laws of the Jungle: The Free Market and the Continuity of Change
Ajamu Baraka
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights at 70: Time to De-Colonize Human Rights!
Andrew Levine
Thoughts on Strategy for a Left Opposition
Jennifer Matsui
Dead of Night Redux: A Zombie Rises, A Spook Falls
Rob Urie
Degrowth: Toward a Green Revolution
Binoy Kampmark
The Bomb that Did Not Detonate: Julian Assange, Manafort and The Guardian
Robert Hunziker
The Deathly Insect Dilemma
Robert Fisk
Spare Me the American Tears for the Murder of Jamal Khashoggi
Joseph Natoli
Tribal Justice
Ron Jacobs
Getting Pushed Off the Capitalist Cliff
Macdonald Stainsby
Unist’ot’en Camp is Under Threat in Northern Canada
Senator Tom Harkin
Questions for Vice-President Bush on Posada Carriles
W. T. Whitney
Two Years and Colombia’s Peace Agreement is in Shreds
Ron Jacobs
Getting Pushed Off the Capitalist Cliff
Ramzy Baroud
The Conspiracy Against Refugees
David Rosen
The Swamp Stinks: Trump & Washington’s Rot
Raouf Halaby
Wall-to-Wall Whitewashing
Daniel Falcone
Noam Chomsky Turns 90
Dean Baker
An Inverted Bond Yield Curve: Is a Recession Coming?
Nick Pemberton
The Case For Chuck Mertz (Not Noam Chomsky) as America’s Leading Intellectual
Ralph Nader
New Book about Ethics and Whistleblowing for Engineers Affects Us All!
Dan Kovalik
The Return of the Nicaraguan Contras, and the Rise of the Pro-Contra Left
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Exposing the Crimes of the CIAs Fair-Haired Boy, Paul Kagame, and the Rwandan Patriotic Front
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail