FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

China Plays the Euro Card

Buried on page 3 of the business section of The New York Times on January 7 was an obscure article reporting that China had committed to purchase 6 billion euro ($7.8 billion) worth of Spanish bonds.  What went unnoticed by the writer was that the economic and political consequences of such an event could be quite far reaching.

China currently has $2.7 trillion in foreign currency reserves, over $900 billion of which takes the form of U.S. Treasury debt.  For years critics of U.S. monetary policy have argued that in response to low yields on U.S. Treasury notes and the risk of a precipitous decline in the value of the dollar, China might pull the plug on its U.S. Treasury investments.  Others claim that this will never happen because the Chinese economy is so dependent on exports to the United States, which could dry up if China were to trigger a collapse of the U.S. economy by its actions.

In the meantime, the White House continues to harass China on its human rights record as well as what the U.S. claims is the inflated value of the Chinese currency, the yuan.  When China refused to allow Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo to go to Oslo to receive the prize, China was subjected to intense criticism by Washington.

In a series of recent visits to European capitals China’s executive deputy prime minister Li Keqiang promised Chinese support for European Union economies.  By pledging to buy bonds worth billions of euros and committing billions more to European based business deals, could Beijing be signaling to Washington that “enough is enough”?  By investing in European economies, China strengthens one of its other most important export markets and makes itself less dependent on the United States.

It is interesting that Spanish bonds should be the first euro-denominated government investment made by China.  Spain is arguably the most independent country in the EU.  Its prime minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, is the only leader in Europe who has the guts to stand up to Washington, Tel Aviv, and the Vatican.  The Spanish socialist government is also the most left-leaning government in Europe today.

Spain has significant strategic holdings in Latin America and Africa, two parts of the world where China would like to expand its influence in its quest for oil and other natural resources.  Playing the Spanish card was a stroke of genius by Beijing.

I believe there are two reasons why Washington has not succumbed to Israeli pressure to take out Iran’s nuclear program.  First, Russia could severely damage the European economy, if it were to cut off the supply of natural gas to Europe in retaliation.  Second, China could precipitate the collapse of the U.S. economy, if it were to walk away from U.S. Treasury bonds.  By stepping in to help bail out the European Union, China demonstrates that the threat of pulling the plug on its investments in U.S. Treasury securities is a credible one.

The only thing surprising about China’s move on Europe is that it didn’t happen sooner.  But the message from Beijing to Washington is loud and clear, “Don’t mess with us, or Iran.”

THOMAS H. NAYLOR is a professor emeritus of economics at Duke University. He is the co-author of Downsizing the U.S.A. and The Abandoned Generation: Rethinking Higher Education and co-founder of the Middlebury Institute.

 

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail