FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Slaves of the Constitution

After their victory in November, Republican leaders piously promised to govern “according to the Constitution.”

Many of us wondered what that could possibly mean. Daily resolutions in favor of having three branches of government and a bicameral legislature? The Constitution is a document that lays out the structure of the American government, not a guide to action. A representative who pledges to vote according to the Constitution is like a football coach whose strategy for the big game is to read and re-read the rulebook.

Sure enough, as the GOP takes leadership this week of the House, one of their first acts of business is to read the Constitution aloud on Thursday. I imagine this will stop seeming like such a great idea at around the two hour mark, when CSPAN cameras catch representatives dozing through stirring lines such as, “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.”

The truth is, most of the Constitution is about as inspiring as the minutes of a local PTA meeting ? if right before the report from the bake sale committee was a resolution extending the international slave trade for 20 years.

Yet the Tea Party types talk about truly understanding the Constitution with an intensity that I can only compare to my feelings about the Smiths when I was fifteen years old. Like today’s conservatives, I was frightened and angry and I thought the world sucked. I knew things would be better if everyone would just sit on my bed and just?like?listen.

One reason conservatives are so rapturous about something so boring may be that they are thinking of a totally different document. That’s what you have to conclude after reading the preamble of the Constitution Party, a nutty group with close connections with Kentucky’s newly elected senator Rand Paul. The preamble states that the Constitution “established a Republic rooted in Biblical law” and that America “was founded on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

If these guys are right then Jesus must be pissed because he’s not given credit even once in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any of the Amendments. On the other hand, this would explain our government’s brutal lack of support for storm victims from New Orleans to Pakistan; after all, Biblical law is pretty tolerant toward the occasional apocalyptic flood.

The more a right wing politician talks about the Constitution, the less likely he’s actually referring to anything in the Constitution. It’s just another cultural codeword meant to conjure up a time when men were men, youth had respect, and there was no such thing as a Black president.

But opposition to Obama has merely added a new twist to the long-standing conservative silliness that the Constitution prohibits all measures not foreseen and approved by its authors ? otherwise known as “progress.” Social Security, Medicare, and the Civil Rights Acts were all opposed in their times as unconstitutional intrusions by the federal government into areas best handled by the states.

For some reason conservatives view state capitals as idyllic paragons of popular democracy while to the rest of us they’re just places where politicians live after they’re elected and before they’re sent to jail or busted for having an affair.

This “strict construction” of the Constitution made some sense when it was first written and We the White People were mostly small farmers who had fought a revolution to create their own independent communities, free from a tyrannical government.

But today’s pseudo-libertarians are led by business owners and professionals whose lives are far from self-sufficient – unless Sara Palin feeds and clothes her family exclusively with hunted moose. They only oppose those laws that limit their ability to exploit their workers or the environment that we all must share. At the same time, they’re all for any government intervention that can help such exploitation ? from ICE raids to anti-strike injunctions to publicly funded cleanups of privately-made oil spills.

And you can bet that the new rebels in Congress aren’t planning to take on the real government tyranny of the ever-expanding Wars on Drugs, Immigrants, and Terror. In fact, when it comes to these aspects of the state that are actually Orwellian, their main complaint is that the government isn’t playing dirty enough ? because it’s too wedded to the Constitution!

Sarah Palin isn’t part of the House’s incoming class ? that would take too much time away from promoting herself ? but she did beautifully demonstrate her comrades’ love-hate relationship with the Constitution in a speech earlier this year:

Our vision for America is anchored in time-tested truths: Government that governs least governs best. That the Constitution provides the path to a more perfect union? it’s the constitution! By the way it’s within our own borders and the homeland that we should feel safe and not condone any violence. That makes me want to say, in these volatile times when we are a nation at war is when we need a commander in chief, not a constitutional law professor?”

To Palin and her friends, there is no contradiction here; the Constitution is for us, not them. And those two categories aren’t just defined by what side of the border you’re on. For Rand Paul, “us” are business owners who shouldn’t have been forced by the 1964 Civil Rights Act to have to serve African Americans, who obviously fall into the category of “them.”

At the end of the day, the true Tea Party plan is to preserve the minority’s sacred Constitutional right to it’s wealth by cutting the majority’s benefits and services to the bone. The Democrats will meekly follow and hope we forget that they still control the White House and Senate.

If we want to stop them we’ll have to build an opposition outside the House and Senate – in the streets. In the process, let’s reclaim this country’s revolutionary tradition for our side. We’re the ones who fight for the freedoms of religion and speech guaranteed by the First Amendment. We’re the ones organizing against an empire that denies self-government to peoples across an ocean.

The only thing the new House leadership has in common with the original Tea Party is that they don’t give a shit about polluting our waterways.

DANNY LUCIA is an activist and humorist who lives in New York City. He can be reached at dannyluciathe4th@gmail.com.

This article is based on one that originally appeared in SocialistWorker.org.

 

 

More articles by:
July 23, 2018
Thomas Mountain
Ethiopia’s Peaceful Revolution
Weekend Edition
July 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Atwood
Peace or Armageddon: Take Your Pick
Paul Street
No Liberal Rallies Yet for the Children of Yemen
Nick Pemberton
The Bipartisan War on Central and South American Women
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Are You Putin Me On?
Andrew Levine
Sovereignty: What Is It Good For? 
Brian Cloughley
The Trump/NATO Debacle and the Profit Motive
David Rosen
Trump’s Supreme Pick Escalates America’s War on Sex 
Melvin Goodman
Montenegro and the “Manchurian Candidate”
Salvador Rangel
“These Are Not Our Kids”: The Racial Capitalism of Caging Children at the Border
Matthew Stevenson
Going Home Again to Trump’s America
Louis Proyect
Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders and the Dilemmas of the Left
Patrick Cockburn
Iraqi Protests: “Bad Government, Bad Roads, Bad Weather, Bad People”
Robert Fantina
Has It Really Come to This?
Russell Mokhiber
Kristin Lawless on the Corporate Takeover of the American Kitchen
John W. Whitehead
It’s All Fake: Reality TV That Masquerades as American Politics
Patrick Bobilin
In Your Period Piece, I Would be the Help
Ramzy Baroud
The Massacre of Inn Din: How Rohingya Are Lynched and Held Responsible
Robert Fisk
How Weapons Made in Bosnia Fueled Syria’s Bleak Civil War
Gary Leupp
Trump’s Helsinki Press Conference and Public Disgrace
Josh Hoxie
Our Missing $10 Trillion
Martha Rosenberg
Pharma “Screening” Is a Ploy to Seize More Patients
Basav Sen
Brett Kavanaugh Would be a Disaster for the Climate
David Lau
The Origins of Local AFT 4400: a Profile of Julie Olsen Edwards
Rohullah Naderi
The Elusive Pursuit of Peace by Afghanistan
Binoy Kampmark
Shaking Establishments: The Ocasio-Cortez Effect
John Laforge
18 Protesters Cut Into German Air Base to Protest US Nuclear Weapons Deployment
Christopher Brauchli
Trump and the Swedish Question
Chia-Chia Wang
Local Police Shouldn’t Collaborate With ICE
Paul Lyons
YouTube’s Content ID – A Case Study
Jill Richardson
Soon You Won’t be Able to Use Food Stamps at Farmers’ Markets, But That’s Not the Half of It
Kevin MacKay
Climate Change is Proving Worse Than We Imagined, So Why Aren’t We Confronting its Root Cause?
Thomas Knapp
Elections: More than Half of Americans Believe Fairy Tales are Real
Ralph Nader
Warner Slack—Doctor for the People Forever
Lee Ballinger
Soccer, Baseball and Immigration
Louis Yako
Celebrating the Wounds of Exile with Poetry
Ron Jacobs
Working Class Fiction—Not Just Surplus Value
Perry Hoberman
You Can’t Vote Out Fascism… You Have to Drive It From Power!
Robert Koehler
Guns and Racism, on the Rocks
Nyla Ali Khan
Kashmir: Implementation with Integrity and Will to Resolve
Justin Anderson
Elon Musk vs. the Media
Graham Peebles
A Time of Hope for Ethiopia
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Homophobia in the Service of Anti-Trumpism is Still Homophobic (Even When it’s the New York Times)
Martin Billheimer
Childhood, Ferocious Sleep
David Yearsley
The Glories of the Grammophone
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail