Pakistan vs. Pakistan

It is a fake fight for the soul of Pakistan. This happens whenever there is a high-profile murder. Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab province, was shot down by his security guard; 26 bullets were pumped into him while the others in the posse looked on. Mumtaz Hussain Qadri did not attempt to escape; he raised his hands and confessed that he was opposed to Taseer’s liberal stance on the country’s blasphemy laws against the minorities.

No one is now talking about how in a Muslim majority nation mosques are targeted or Shia doctors have been killed. It won’t fall into the secular pattern that is sought to be upheld. Following a westernised prototype, the country is now being divided into good Pakistanis and bad Pakistanis. The good ones are those who have the luxury to stand and stare. Salman Taseer’s death is a political one, not a religious one. It is the political establishment that could not contain fundamentalist forces, that plays with them when it suits the powers, that has not managed to make any changes in its laws. And specific to this case, Qadri had earlier been removed from duty as he was a security risk. So, what was he doing there?

Taseer, contrary to the prevalent view, was not going against the tide. He, in fact, took a populist position. As in most countries of the subcontinent, while religious fanatics dictate the social behaviour of the masses, it is the divine right of kings that continues to prevail. This coterie, in the present case a dynastic one propped up by contemporary noblemen like Taseer, afford themselves the luxury of a liberal pantomime. For the most part they are unconcerned about what the fundamentalists do. Their supporters in the media salons rarely raise their voices against what the Taliban does to its own women and men. This is not their world, their Pakistan. The extent of their superficiality is evident when they use a starlet who appears on an Indian reality show, not to speak about applauding a fashion show that was held as a courageous protest against the mullahs, or a politician who talks about seeking pardon for a Christian woman as the secular and aware face of Pakistan.

In the enthusiasm to find the right people, they even forget recent history. Benazir Bhutto was killed in 2007; no one still knows who did it. There has never been a reference to any fundamentalist group. However, like vultures, they are now swooping down on a comparison. Said the aide to President Asif Ali Zardari: “He (Taseer) was the most courageous voice after Benazir Bhutto on the rights of women and religious minorities.”

What has the Pakistan People’s Party done to ensure these rights? It was Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto who divided the country in several ways. No wonder he was the hero to people like Taseer. I recall meeting a Leftist who said that almost everyone in college and student politics at the time was enamoured of the senior Bhutto; it was the aura of the much-touted liberal Pakistan with its made-to-order anarchists. The country was coming into its own, having got rid of its Bengali segment. It could now play one region against another. The picture of a Muslim country was slowly turning yellow in a tattered frame. The PPP decided that the creamy layer will live like royalty, away from the shackles of religious bigotry, but not topple the frame. It was a smart tactic and it continues.

The sepia frame of the Islamic republic is what constitutes the other Pakistan in the minds of the good Pakistanis. Those who do not follow religion in word or deed or spirit are ready to quote some holy verses to beat up the clerics with. It is a rather dark comedy. They don’t see it this way. They are in Gothic mode. Yet, most tributes to Salman Taseer have mentioned how he loved the good life and did not care about social mores. A few hundred kilometres from where he lived people are tortured due to the same social mores.

The Indian media, hungry for another angle, finds in this sharp set a pan-Asian identity they are comfortable with; these are the people they can invite for panel discussions, follow on Twitter and Facebook. It is the acceptability factor, not the secular one, for Indians are in no position to discuss how to treat minorities given our not-so-honourable record.

Also, rather ignorant of the different dynamics, many have compared his death to that of Indira Gandhi. There is talk about a backlash and the Talibanisation of Punjab. This is the core problem. It is Pakistanis who are creating fissures within their own country. The now-beleaguered hero of the region, Nawaz Sharif, had the support of Saudi Arabia. The armed forces with their own religious fervour are largely Punjabi. Where is the need to reinvent new demons when they exist already?

Salman Taseer’s assassination may have extracted a huge price for his family, but it will benefit his party, including its leader who has cases of corruption against him. This is one Pakistan. The other is an imagined one that changes each time this clique clicks its heels to attend to another stereotype. The killer, we are told as though it is crucial, had a beard and the victim was coming out of a posh restaurant in Islamabad when he was shot dead.

The real Pakistan lies somewhere in between living through several deaths.

FARZANA VERSEY is the Mumbai-based author of ‘A Journey Interrupted: Being Indian in Pakistan’. She can be reached at http://farzana-versey.blogspot.com/



More articles by:

Farzana Versey can be reached at Cross Connections

Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
April 19, 2018
Ramzy Baroud
Media Cover-up: Shielding Israel is a Matter of Policy