FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Will Hezbollah Support the Right to Work for Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon?

by FRANKLIN LAMB

Beirut

The current relationship between the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon and Hezbollah is not as clear cut as often assumed, despite the frequent and inspiring brotherly words of Hezbollah’s leadership and the fact that the Party enjoys the support of more than 90 per cent of the camp refugees, none of whom can vote.  What this means is that the willingness of the Lebanese Resistance  to  spend its domestic political capital to legislate  the right work to work for Palestinian refugees is not settled as of mid-May 2010.

The Hezbollah-PLO  historical connection is  well known in Lebanon.  If Grand Ayatollah Imam Sayyed Ruhollah Mousavi Khomeini was the omnipresent but unseen father at the birth of the Party of God (whose very name he approved), the Beirut-headquartered Palestine Liberation Organization was in some ways the infant organization’s  nurturing and occasionally  doting ‘uncle.’  This familial relationship weakened, but did not collapse after  the  PLO’s  leadership and local power base were gutted in the summer of 1982.

The out of country lectures of Imam Khomeini and  various Shia scholars who matriculated  at Najaf and Qom and who often referenced  the  680 c.e. Ashura passion play of Karbala, were supplemented by  lectures from pro-Palestinian  Shia clerics including the pro-Palestinian  Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Huseein Fadlallah,( an admirer but not an avid follower of Khomeini)  Abass Mousawi,  and Raghad Harb among others.  All  inspired Lebanon’s  youth to follow the examples of  the Karbala Ashura heroes Ali, Hussein, Abbas and Zeinab  in order to work for and achieve  justice for Palestine.  A frequent theme was and remains: Every day is Ashura, and every land is Karbala.  In the same Lebanese neighborhoods  the  PLO supplemented the idealists education with teachings of the likes of Franz Fanon, Mao, Vo Nguyen Giap  and Che Guevara.  The Palestinians added contemporary  examples of  Karbala-type sacrifices and steadfastness of  scores of martyrs. In important aspects  both movements melded into  a common Resistance cause.

Arafat’s frequent clarion  following the  June 1967  war that  “every Arab  and Muslim must pledge to fight until “martyrdom” linked the PLO in the minds of many Shia, with Kabala and later Hezbollah.

PLO Aid to the Islamic Resistance

Six years before the 1979 Islamic Revolution ousted the US-UK installed pretender to the   Peacock Throne, via Operation Ajax on August 19, 1953, and nine years before Hezbollah was founded, the PLO supported, trained and helped arm elements of the Khomeini inspired movement inside Lebanon. On the orders of Yassir Arafat and his deputy, Khalil al Wazir (Abu Jihad) large quantities of  weapons were gifted or sold cheap  to Islamist groups, the only conditions being that the fighters were pledged  to resist Israeli aggression and their PLO weapons  were not to be used against Lebanese civilians or each other. Events would soon demonstrate that some of these loosely configured groups, including  the Farsi accented  “foreigners” seen increasingly around Shatila and Burj al Barjeneh  refugees camps and Dahiyeh, were indeed serious about resisting Israeli aggression.

Today in South Beirut, the Bekaa Valley and south Lebanon plenty of  veterans of various groups operating in the 1970’s and early 1980’s vividly recall receiving help from the  secular PLO resistance with its tolerance for a wide spectrum of  religious views as well as the godless. One former fighter, now a Hamra Street lawyer in Beirut, told this observer just this week that the PLO taught the ABC’s of resistance tactics to Hezbollah. “We taught them a lot.  But they also learned much from our many errors and that learning helped make them a formidable organization today.” The PLO respected the seriousness, discipline and honesty of the young men arriving in Lebanon and welcomed them.

One well known example of the  PLO-Hezbollah  symbiosis  and deepening relationship in this period was  Hezbollah’s  military leader  Imad Mughniyeh  from the  southern Shia village of Tair Dibb. Imad joined the PLO at age 13 and by  18  distinguished himself  at the  June 1982 battle of Khaldeh south of Beirut’s airport.  One friend of Imad’s recently recalled that the young Fateh member was fighting side by side with  Islamic resistance fighters who joined the  battle against the Israeli forces advancing on West Beirut.  He also served as a  body guard for Lebanon’s senior Shia cleric, Mohamad Hussein Fadlallah as well as  PLO leaders Yassir Arafat, Abu Jihad and Abu Iyad,  as part of his  Fatah’s Force 17 duties.

Regarding the PLO assistance to Islamic fighters in the summer of 1982,mentioned above, it was Mughniyeh who was put in charge of  weapons distribution. ( On August 18, 1982 the late American journalist/researcher Janet Stevens was given 250 brand new Chinese-made plastic handled AK-47’s wrapped in grease and heavy plastic.  She enlisted this observer and two others for a 2 a.m. burial project in the then vacant lot next to the Commodore Hotel to hide them, she presciently advised us, from Israeli forces that she was sure  would find an excuse to enter West Beirut. Not until the hotel expanded and dug up the vacant lot around 1992 for a new swimming pool, were the weapons discovered.)

When Imad Mughineh was assassinated, (widely thought to have been by Israel aided by its Syrian spies) he  received the title: “Leader of the Two Victories” given to him by Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah,  the reference being to his leadership in both  the May 2000 and the July 2006  victories against Israel.  Today,  this epithet  and Imad’s  photo hangs in every Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon illustrating the respect of both communities.

PLO/Shia tensions in South Lebanon

Lebanon’s Shia population, oppressed  for hundreds of years  by the Ottoman Empire, by colonial powers including France  as well as by fellow Lebanese, supported the Palestinians and initially welcomed those arriving at their door steps during the 1948 Nakba.

Palestinian-Shia relations were bound to deteriorate following the Cairo Agreement in 1969, when Yasser Arafat, the new chairman of the PLO, and General Emile Bustani, the commander of the Lebanese military, signed a deal  allowing the PLO free reign in South Lebanon. The Lebanese government was opposed to the agreement but this same weak government was pressured by the Arab League and Gamal Abdul Nasser, for the failure of the Arab regimes during the 1967 war, a fight Lebanon sat out. The Cairo Agreement  “legitimized” the PLO’s presence in Lebanon and granted it the right to carry out guerrilla attacks against Israel at will from Lebanese territory.

The Shia-PLO relationship worsened rapidly between  July 1981 and  June  1982  as the PLO increased its heavy arms  in South Lebanon  from 80 cannon and rocket launchers to 250 and beefed up its forces to 6,000 (of its  approximate 18,000 of whom about 5,000 were alleged to be foreign mercenaries from such countries as Libya, Iraq, India, Sri Lanka, Chad and Mozambique.) During  this period some commanders allowed their troops to run roughshod over the local  population and naturally sympathies  for Palestinian refugees due  both to Israeli reprisals and PLO abuse  eroded fast and have not been fully restored.  PLO crimes against the southern population ran the gamut from ‘property requisitions’ to thefts, extortions, plundering of villages, arbitrary  arrests and  killings.  While officially condemned by its leadership, the  PLO did not do enough to stop it.  By the late 1970’s some Shia, including the newly established Amal militia organized armed resistance against the PLO ‘occupation’.

To this day, some in South Lebanon bitterly mention three modern day occupations of their villages following half a millennium of discrimination and marginalization by the Ottomans and French among others. These more recent occupations  include the PLO from the early 1970’s until 1982, the Israeli army  from  March 14,1978  until  May 24, 2000 and  their financed  and micro-managed right wing surrogates, the “Southern Lebanese Army (SLA) from May 1976 until May 24, 2000 still fester.

Local political pressures on Hezbollah

Some in and out of Parliament are  suggesting that if Hezbollah publicly pushes  Palestinian civil rights legislation, especially the  most urgent right to work , the party which is currently  having good success broadening its popular base within the Sunni and Christians communities, could lose some  support and especially  among its  south Lebanon Shia base. A new rival Shia party,  the  Lebanese Option Gathering ( LOG)   led by Ahmad  Assad, son of the former Speaker of Parliament is challenging Hezbollah in at least one of its three base areas.   It was  LOG that during the 2009 Parliamentary election publicly boasted being funded by Saudi Arabia and paid voters handsomely with what it claimed was  a wink and nod from the American government. The  Ahmad Assad  organization is stepping up its criticism of Hezbollah for neglecting the needs of South Lebanon. Since some Shia  oppose the right to work for Palestinian refugees who make up a significant minority in the Southern Shia where jobs are even more  scarce  than in the Beirut  area, some political analysts see this issue as a lose-lose for Hezbollah.

One sympathetic Member of Parliament allied with Hezbollah explained during a meeting with representatives of the Palestine Civil Right Campaign in early May:

“Hezbollah is in a tough spot on this essential issue. If Hezbollah backs the right to work for Palestinian refugees it risks losing some of its Shia, Sunni and Christian supporters.  If it  doesn’t back the right to work Hezbollah arguably  makes a mockery out of its claimed raison e’tre.  How can it lead the fight for justice in Palestine while its  literal next door neighbors wallow in disgusting  open sewer camps with no chance to earn a living and live in dignity. What would its hard earned and  much valued credibility amount to?”

Others point out that since Palestinians cannot now and will never vote in Lebanon, backing a civil rights law is a political black hole for Hezbollah.
Weakening this argument a bit, both Hezbollah and the PLO leaders acknowledge individual Palestinian crimes against the  Shia in the South Lebanon confrontational zone. Both sides agree that the  PLO  Beirut leadership should have done more to stop  individual abuses during the 1974-1982 period. Hezbollah members also acknowledge that since the late 1960’s virtually all militia in Lebanon had individuals who abused the civilian population and the Party appears able to let bygones be bygones. One party member reminded this observer that the PLO helped Hezbollah during its bloody intra Shia battles with Amal and it was Hezbollah’s then Secretary-General Abass Mousawi who refused to join the Amal 1985-87 Palestinian

Camp wars and if fact helped end them by intervening with Syria.
To add to Hezbollah’s  political problems on this issue, longtime  Palestinian nemesis Samir Geagea (“I was born with my views on Palestinians!”, he  jokingly told one interviewer recently) and the Lebanese Forces have been  making a  significant political comeback since his July 2005 release from prison, including  in this month’s municipal elections. “Geagea’s  Christians” are cutting  into Amin Gemayel’s Phalange Party and his other  Christian rival  Michel Aoun’s  Free Patriotic Movement.   This could be part of the reason why  Aoun, a key Hezbollah ally, when asked about granting civil rights to Palestinian refugees,  squints, gets red faced and starts badmouthing the idea and reminds his audience, that “there are 500,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon and our country is going to implode, Ya Allah.”  Actually, General Aoun inflates the true figure which is close to 250,000  Palestinian refugees remaining in Lebanon although 423,000 are registered with UNWRA.

Hezbollah is expected to add to its public endorsements of civil rights for Palestinian refugees in Lebanon by declaring soon exactly what it intends to do in Parliament. It is said to be studying  the various proposals and quietly discussing  the issue with a wide range of parties, Palestinian factions and local and international NGO’s.  Some political analysts in Lebanon believe as Hezbollah goes on the right to work for Palestinian refugees  so goes Parliament.  The consequences of its decision will be major for  Lebanon’s refugees, the region and the National Lebanese Resistance.

FRANKLIN LAMB is doing research in Lebanon and volunteers with the Palestine Civil Rights Campaign.  He can be reached at fplamb@palestinecivilrightscampaign.org.

WORDS THAT STICK

 

More articles by:

Franklin Lamb volunteers with the Lebanon, France, and USA based Meals for Syrian Refugee Children Lebanon (MSRCL) which seeks to provide hot nutritional meals to Syrian and other refugee children in Lebanon. http://mealsforsyrianrefugeechildrenlebanon.com. He is reachable c/o fplamb@gmail.com.

Weekend Edition
February 23, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Richard D. Wolff
Capitalism as Obstacle to Equality and Democracy: the US Story
Paul Street
Where’s the Beef Stroganoff? Eight Sacrilegious Reflections on Russiagate
Jeffrey St. Clair
They Came, They Saw, They Tweeted
Andrew Levine
Their Meddlers and Ours
Charles Pierson
Nuclear Nonproliferation, American Style
Joseph Essertier
Why Japan’s Ultranationalists Hate the Olympic Truce
W. T. Whitney
US and Allies Look to Military Intervention in Venezuela
John Laforge
Maybe All Threats of Mass Destruction are “Mentally Deranged”
Matthew Stevenson
Why Vietnam Still Matters: an American Reckoning
David Rosen
For Some Reason, Being White Still Matters
Robert Fantina
Nikki Haley: the U.S. Embarrassment at the United Nations
Joyce Nelson
Why Mueller’s Indictments Are Hugely Important
Joshua Frank
Pearl Jam, Will You Help Stop Sen. Tester From Destroying Montana’s Public Lands?
Dana E. Abizaid
The Attack on Historical Perspective
Conn Hallinan
Immigration and the Italian Elections
George Ochenski
The Great Danger of Anthropocentricity
Pete Dolack
China Can’t Save Capitalism from Environmental Destruction
Joseph Natoli
Broken Lives
Manuel García, Jr.
Why Did Russia Vote For Trump?
Geoff Dutton
One Regime to Rule Them All
Torkil Lauesen – Gabriel Kuhn
Radical Theory and Academia: a Thorny Relationship
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: The Work of Persuasion
Thomas Klikauer
Umberto Eco and Germany’s New Fascism
George Burchett
La Folie Des Grandeurs
Howard Lisnoff
Minister of War
Eileen Appelbaum
Why Trump’s Plan Won’t Solve the Problems of America’s Crumbling Infrastructure
Ramzy Baroud
More Than a Fight over Couscous: Why the Palestinian Narrative Must Be Embraced
Jill Richardson
Mass Shootings Shouldn’t Be the Only Time We Talk About Mental Illness
Jessicah Pierre
Racism is Killing African American Mothers
Steve Horn
Wyoming Now Third State to Propose ALEC Bill Cracking Down on Pipeline Protests
David Griscom
When ‘Fake News’ is Good For Business
Barton Kunstler
Brainwashed Nation
Griffin Bird
I’m an Eagle Scout and I Don’t Want Pipelines in My Wilderness
Edward Curtin
The Coming Wars to End All Wars
Missy Comley Beattie
Message To New Activists
Jonah Raskin
Literary Hubbub in Sonoma: Novel about Mrs. Jack London Roils the Faithful
Binoy Kampmark
Frontiersman of the Internet: John Perry Barlow
Chelli Stanley
The Mirrors of Palestine
James McEnteer
How Brexit Won World War Two
Ralph Nader
Absorbing the Irresistible Consumer Reports Magazine
Cesar Chelala
A Word I Shouldn’t Use
Louis Proyect
Marx at the Movies
Osha Neumann
A White Guy Watches “The Black Panther”
Stephen Cooper
Rebel Talk with Nattali Rize: the Interview
David Yearsley
Market Music
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail