Sir David Omand’s Master Plan to Fight Terror

As we all know, Western forces are fighting in Afghanistan to promote democracy, eradicate poverty, ensure that Afghan girls go to school, but also to prevent drug exports and – not least – prevent the exportation of terrorism.

But hasn´t terrorism already, quite successfully, been exported to the West?  It seems definitely to have landed in Europe. But is it necessarily a product of  Afghanistan?

The bombs against Madrid´s suburban trains in 2004, the murder that same year of Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh, the suicide bombs in London in 2005 and, most recently, last December a young Somali´s attempt to kill Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, all this was effected, not by agents sent from a barely existing Al Qaeda HQ in Afghanistan but was done by young Muslim men who spent a large portion of their lives in Europe.

European experts – political scientists and police officers, invited by Magnus Ranstorp at the Swedish Defense College in Stockholm – voice in a book (Understanding Violent Radicalisation – Terrorist and Jihadist Movements in Europé, Routledge, London, 2009) their concern that terrorism has found a home in Europe and they fear young European Muslims are undergoing a process of radicalization.

In Britain, the police spy on radical imams and their mosques, bug telephones, intercept Internet traffic, knock down doors and arrest people. In a number of European countries, the special branch keeps an eye on radical Muslims. The leader of Sweden´s liberal party, Jan Björklund, is hoping high school students will spot “radical” class-mates and tell the police.

Thanks to these exercises, a number of terrorist attacks probably have  been averted, among them plans in 2006 to smuggle explosive liquids on board US-bound planes taking off from Heathrow. After that discovery security checks at European airports are even more bothersome than before.

But is traditional police work sufficient? In Magnus Ranstorp´s book, I came across interesting remarks made by Sir David Omand, until recently the British government´s Intelligence and Security Co-ordinator and indeed for a long time Tony Blair´s most trusted adviser on matters of terrorism.

Says Sir David: “The most effective weapon of the terrorists at present is their ideology.” He is convinced that, alongside necessary police legwork there will have to be a struggle about ideas.

So what kind of ideology is it that appeals to potential young terrorists in Europe? What are they being told by radical imams, what is being preached in the mosques under police surveillance?

Obviously, young European Muslims, when they turn to a more radical ideology, do not revert to some kind of fundamentalist Ur-Islam.

Among radicalized young Jihadists, religious belief has taken an existential leap. Or as Sir David puts it: “The international terrorist ideology now has a life of its own beyond the lives of the men in the cave that spawned it. Like a biological parasite, it can only live off the energy of its hosts, mutating as it spreads, into forms that can infect previously untouched groups, particularly if their natural immunity is low.” This terrorist ideology is being strengthened by Internet and Youtube, showing atrocities committed against Muslims all over the world, in Afghanistan, Kashmir, Chechnya and Gaza, not least in the prisons of Iraq.

What is now required, says Sir David Omand, is a counter-narrative. It is necessary to counteract the narrative told by terrorists and explain current conflicts in a way that will render European Muslims immune to jihadist  ideology.

So how should such a counter-narrative be presented? Initially there would have to be an explanation of the war in Afghanistan. It is, as most of us know, but European Muslims maybe don´t, a war of self-defense, authorized by the UN  Security Council immediately after 9/11, stretching the UN Charter a little bit. It has now been going on for well over eight years but with additional well-intentioned aims: promoting democracy, eradicating poverty, giving Afghan girls a chance to go to school, preventing drug exports, etcetera. The counter-narrative may also have to explain that the US and its allies in the process regrettably also kill a number of Afghan civilians.

When, in 2003, the US and Great Britain attacked Iraq, they weren´t backed up by the Security Council and in fact launched a pre-emptive war, which is definitely against the UN Charter, under the pretense Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction which turned out to be Weapons of Mass Disappearance. A bit difficult to justify, maybe, but the counter-narrative might point out that an unpleasant dictator, Saddam Hussein, was in fact toppled.

The scary exercises at Abu Ghraib prison could perhaps be blamed on ignorant US soldiers (which is what US authorities have tried to get away with). Explaining the Danish Muhammed caricatures might be a bit more tricky, but could be handled by proudly emphasizing the great European tradition of free speech which makes it practically compulsory for European opinion makers to show the Prophet with a bomb in his turban (or by Swedish artist Lars Vilks portrayed as a dog).

Producing a desirable counter-narrative seems to be a difficult job. If Sir  David Omand wishes to make Muslims living in Europe feel less exposed and less angry, I suggest the narrative should also contain some self-criticism. Why does a Muslim name immediately alert security controls at most airports in the Western world?

Who is most frequently exposed to searches in homes and on the streets of Europe? Why are primarily Muslims requested to keep an eye on everything that smacks of radicalization in their own organizations?

Why – to sum it up – does the Western world take it for granted that it is Islam as religion, as Weltanschauung, that carries the seed of terrorism? If, as Sir David Omand, the architect of Britain´s counter-terrorism strategy, suggests,   a Western counter-narrative is needed, it will first of all have to question the West’s own age-old prejudices.

BJÖRN KUMM is a journalist living in  Malmö, Sweden. He can be reached at kumm@telia.com



More articles by:
Weekend Edition
September 20, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Ismael Hossein-Zadeh
Unipolar Governance of the Multipolar World
Rob Urie
Strike for the Environment, Strike for Social Justice, Strike!
Miguel Gutierrez
El Desmadre: The Colonial Roots of Anti-Mexican Violence
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Pompeo and Circumstance
Andrew Levine
Why Democrats Really Should Not All Get Along But Sometimes Must Anyway
Louis Proyect
A Rebellion for the Wild West
T.J. Coles
A Taste of Their Own Medicine: the Politicians Who Robbed Iranians and Libyans Fear the Same for Brexit Britain
H. Bruce Franklin
How We Launched Our Forever War in the Middle East
Lee Hall
Mayor Obedience Training, From the Pet Products Industry
Louis Yako
Working in America: Paychecks for Silence
Michael D. Yates
Radical Education
Jonathan Cook
Israelis Have Shown Netanyahu the Door. Can He Inflict More Damage Before He Exits?
Valerie Reynoso
The Rising Monopoly of Monsanto-Bayer
John Steppling
American Psychopathy
Ralph Nader
25 Ways the Canadian Health Care System is Better than Obamacare for the 2020 Elections
Ramzy Baroud
Apartheid Made Official: Deal of the Century is a Ploy and Annexation is the New Reality
Vincent Emanuele
Small Town Values
John Feffer
The Threat of Bolton Has Retreated, But Not the Threat of War
David Rosen
Evangelicals, Abstinence, Abortion and the Mainstreaming of Sex
Judy Rohrer
“Make ‘America’ White Again”: White Resentment Under the Obama & Trump Presidencies
John W. Whitehead
The Police State’s Language of Force
Kathleen Wallace
Noblesse the Sleaze
Farzana Versey
Why Should Kashmiris be Indian?
Nyla Ali Khan
Why Are Modi and His Cohort Paranoid About Diversity?
Shawn Fremstad
The Official U.S. Poverty Rate is Based on a Hopelessly Out-of-Date Metric
Mel Gurtov
No War for Saudi Oil!
Robert Koehler
‘I’m Afraid You Have Humans’
David Swanson
Every Peace Group and Activist Should Join Strike DC for the Earth’s Climate
Scott Owen
In Defense of Non-violent Actions in Revolutionary Times
Jesse Jackson
Can America Break Its Gun Addiction?
Priti Gulati Cox
Sidewalk Museum of Congress: Who Says Kansas is Flat?
Mohamad Shaaf
The Current Political Crisis: Its Roots in Concentrated Capital with the Resulting Concentrated Political Power
Max Moran
Revolving Door Project Probes Thiel’s White House Connection
Arshad Khan
Unhappy India
Nick Pemberton
Norman Fucking Rockwell! and 24 Other Favorite Albums
Nicky Reid
The Bigotry of ‘Hate Speech’ and Facebook Fascism
Paul Armentano
To Make Vaping Safer, Legalize Cannabis
Jill Richardson
Punching Through Bad Headlines
Jessicah Pierre
What the Felicity Huffman Scandal Says About America
John Kendall Hawkins
Draining the Swamp, From the Beginning of Time
Julian Rose
Four Funerals and a Wedding: A Brief History of the War on Humanity
Victor Grossman
Film, Music and Elections in Germany
Charles R. Larson
Review: Ahmet Altan’s “I Will Never See the World Again”
David Yearsley
Jazz is Activism
Elliot Sperber
Captains of Industry