Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Spring Fund Drive: Keep CounterPunch Afloat
CounterPunch is a lifeboat of sanity in today’s turbulent political seas. Please make a tax-deductible donation and help us continue to fight Trump and his enablers on both sides of the aisle. Every dollar counts!
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Impotent in China

Where to begin with Obama’s Visit to China!  It was an absurdity from beginning to end, from the media coverage to serious questions like currency and human rights.  Let’s begin with the media coverage.  Cries of “censorship” went up in the Western media on Obama’s first day in China.(1)  The offense in this case was that Obama’s speech and Q&A to University students in Shanghai was “only” carried on local TV in full, with the national TV  coverage “only” showing excerpts.  (The viewers in Shanghai were remarkably few; Obama’s well-oiled routine was unable to compete with a rousing game of Mahjong or some bracing Tai Chi.) 

Now consider for a moment what the Western media is asking for here.  In the first place, the US networks did not carry Obama’s speech “only” showing a few seconds of excerpts.  But think a little more – let your mind wander far back into the distant mists of history, apparently inaccessible to the Western media:  April, 2006, to be exact.  At that time Hu Jintiao, President of China then and now, visited the US.  He too gave a speech to University Students, at Yale University – which was not carried in full on the national US networks!  Blatant censorship, of the most cunning and devious sort, without a doubt.  In fact this writer does not even recall excerpts appearing on network news. I would wager that even New Haven TV did not carry the full speech.  Nor do I recall that the U.S. government or any major news agency offered a streaming account in real time over the Internet as done in China.  Double standard anyone?  In fact no foreign visitor, not even the Prime Minister of the mother country, Israel, not even the Pope is given that privilege in the US.  Why should a US President visiting China be accorded this very unusual exposure?  What is the assumption here?  Is it that the US President is emperor of the world. The Chinese apparently do not think so nor does most of the planet, but the Western media seems to assume it.  That media looks pretty silly to anyone who gives it a moment’s thought.

Next came the fact that the Chinese students were apparently “screened,” although I do not know the evidence for that.  But has anyone considered that there are a number of reasons for such selection?  There is a growing nationalism among a segment of Chinese youth, many of whom are fed up with the condescending and hostile attitude of the US, the West and Japan toward China.  Obama was spared their questions – for better or worse.

The students were polite.  Consider again President Hu’s visit to the US.  His press conference with Bush was interrupted by the shouts of a protester from the nutty cult of Falun Gong who disrupted the proceedings.  How she gained a press pass to the proceedings remains a mystery to this day – especially since she had a record of interrupting high Chinese officials visiting abroad.   The Chinese also asked that Hu’s visit be an official state visit, and they wished for an official state dinner such as will be given to the Indian PM in the US in a few days.  Both requests were refused and the visit was only accorded the status of a “working meeting.”  In many ways Hu was not only “censored” by the standards of the Western media as applied to Obama in China – but downright “insulted.”  Are not Americans ashamed of this?

In fact I am suspicious that claims of “censorship” in China are vastly exaggerated.  On a recent visit, I went into the lobby of a hotel at which I was staying which had free wireless and a coffee shop/restaurant/bar.  Anyone could use the wireless there if he or she bought a cup of coffee or tea.  Chinese were wandering in from the street all the time.  There I searched the Internet for a number of items that I assumed would be banned – including National Review, New York Times, CounterPunch (of course), Washington Post, and many other things like “Tank Man,” Tiananmen and on and on.  I got full coverage of each of these items – including YouTube coverage of Tank Man, the lone student who stopped the tanks in Tiananmen Square in China.  So perhaps we need to examine more closely the question of censorship in China and no longer take the mainstream media’s word for it.

Human Rights.  The hectoring of the Chinese on human rights by Obama was downright comical.  I know full well that there are abuses of human rights in China, although I do not know the extent and seriousness of them.  But for Obama, the Torturer in Chief, the Commandant of extraordinary renditions, the Overseer of the CIA’s black prisons, the Suspender of habeas corpus, the Funder of the Gazan atrocities, to lecture others on such matters is the height of absurdity and hypocrisy.  And although Obama was not so foolish as to meet the Dalai Lama in person (not yet at least), how silly it is for the US to choose as a representative of human rights a theocrat who ruled over a society of serfs and oppressed women.   A fancy golden robe is not enough to cover that up.

Currency.  On the first day of Obama’s visit Fed Chief Ben Bernanke gave a talk before a large group of Wall St. “financiers,” aka banksters, covered on the front page of the NYT, in which he promised a strong dollar. (3)  A strong dollar is crucial to this criminal class, which has visited more pain than usual on the American people recently, because it is the key to their power and that of their Imperium.  They can have Bernanke print money and it has value throughout the world for this reason.   But there was quite a different message being conveyed to Main St.  All quarters of the punditry from Paul Krugman on down screamed for the Chinese to increase the value of the yuan.  Such an upgrade supposedly translates into an ability of Americans to export to China.  But a stronger yuan means a weaker dollar.

And in this double-talk there is little doubt that the decision will be made as the banksters command.  It is that simple; we all know who runs the show after the federal bailout of the banksters at the considerable expense of all others.  (And as Paul Craig Roberts also points out, the exports from China back to the US are quite often those of American-owned factories.  These American capitalists like the banksters to whom Bernanke spoke, some of them one and the same, are not going to opt for a stronger yuan and weaker dollar.)

Obama looked quite silly and weak in his Beijing appearance.  He was all bluster and PR, and the Chinese were all business.  The US President did not appear to be a serious man.  And the Western media looked worse.  Shame on them.  Shame on us for tolerating them.

JOHN V. WALSH can be reached at john.endwar@gmail.com

1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8363669.stm
This example comes from the BBC, certainly not usually considered a wooly corner of the Western media, but the very restrained, understated British variety.  Notice that the inset to this piece shows that the Chinese newspapers treated Obama well,
 2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8363260.stm
This writer’s experience is that as long as mutually beneficial economic projects can be joined, the average Chinese is able to forgive and forget the depredations visited upon China by Japan in WW2 and the US in its support of Chiang Kai-shek.   The West would do well to build upon this as Japan seems bent on doing – and soon.

3.http://www.nytimes.com/

 

More articles by:

Paul Craig Roberts is a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Roberts’ How the Economy Was Lost is now available from CounterPunch in electronic format. His latest book is The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.

May 23, 2018
Nick Pemberton
Maduro’s Win: A Bright Spot in Dark Times
Ben Debney
A Faustian Bargain with the Climate Crisis
Deepak Tripathi
A Bloody Hot Summer in Gaza: Parallels With Sharpeville, Soweto and Jallianwala Bagh
Farhang Jahanpour
Pompeo’s Outrageous Speech on Iran
Josh White
Strange Recollections of Old Labour
CJ Hopkins
The Simulation of Democracy
stclair
In Our Age of State Crimes
Dave Lindorff
The Trump White House is a Chaotic Clown Car Filled with Bozos Who Think They’re Brilliant
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Domination of West Virginia
Ty Salandy
The British Royal Wedding, Empire and Colonialism
Laura Flanders
Life or Death to the FCC?
Gary Leupp
Dawn of an Era of Mutual Indignation?
Katalina Khoury
The Notion of Patriarchal White Supremacy Vs. Womanhood
Nicole Rosmarino
The Grassroots Environmental Activist of the Year: Christine Canaly
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
“Michael Inside:” The Prison System in Ireland 
May 22, 2018
Stanley L. Cohen
Broken Dreams and Lost Lives: Israel, Gaza and the Hamas Card
Kathy Kelly
Scourging Yemen
Andrew Levine
November’s “Revolution” Will Not Be Televised
Ted Rall
#MeToo is a Cultural Workaround to a Legal Failure
Gary Leupp
Question for Discussion: Is Russia an Adversary Nation?
Binoy Kampmark
Unsettling the Summits: John Bolton’s Libya Solution
Doug Johnson
As Andrea Horwath Surges, Undecided Voters Threaten to Upend Doug Ford’s Hopes in Canada’s Most Populated Province
Kenneth Surin
Malaysia’s Surprising Election Results
Dana Cook
Canada’s ‘Superwoman’: Margot Kidder
Dean Baker
The Trade Deficit With China: Up Sharply, for Those Who Care
John Feffer
Playing Trump for Peace How the Korean Peninsula Could Become a Bright Spot in a World Gone Mad
Peter Gelderloos
Decades in Prison for Protesting Trump?
Thomas Knapp
Yes, Virginia, There is a Deep State
Andrew Stewart
What the Providence Teachers’ Union Needs for a Win
Jimmy Centeno
Mexico’s First Presidential Debate: All against One
May 21, 2018
Ron Jacobs
Gina Haspell: She’s Certainly Qualified for the Job
Uri Avnery
The Day of Shame
Amitai Ben-Abba
Israel’s New Ideology of Genocide
Patrick Cockburn
Israel is at the Height of Its Power, But the Palestinians are Still There
Frank Stricker
Can We Finally Stop Worrying About Unemployment?
Binoy Kampmark
Royal Wedding Madness
Roy Morrison
Middle East War Clouds Gather
Edward Curtin
Gina Haspel and Pinocchio From Rome
Juana Carrasco Martin
The United States is a Country Addicted to Violence
Dean Baker
Wealth Inequality: It’s Not Clear What It Means
Robert Dodge
At the Brink of Nuclear War, Who Will Lead?
Vern Loomis
If I’m Lying, I’m Dying
Valerie Reynoso
How LBJ initiated the Military Coup in the Dominican Republic
Weekend Edition
May 18, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
The Donald, Vlad, and Bibi
Robert Fisk
How Long Will We Pretend Palestinians Aren’t People?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail