Pacifica and the Barbarians Who Pay the Bills

Far be it from me to add to a tsunami of abuse, but I think its more than time to inject a little reality check into Iain Boal’s overheated Pacifica rhetoric. Apologies in advance from this “envenomed nutball”, since that is the label you must wear if you disagree with Boal’s melodramatic and self-serving lament.

No gag reflex is present here. Christopher Condon’s motion was plain and simple. It just said disclose where the programming money comes from.  Is that some kind of wild anarchist request? Has Mr. Boal never heard of “The Revolution Will Not Be Funded,” a well-regarded volume by people not usually considered “envenomed nutballs” who have some pretty sobering things to say about the risks of dependence on foundation funding for politically radical nonprofit organizations?

The recent Fox News political hack job on Van Jones should have convinced the left of the stupidity of trying to rout out 9-11 skeptics in a progressive version of red-baiting. Boal’s Eugene McCarthy impersonation wears somewhat thin in talking about a network that cut its teeth standing up to the ugliness of the American red scare. “McCarthyism – the term is used generally to describe reckless, unsubstantiated accusations, as well as demagogic attacks on the character or patriotism of political adversaries.” And that’s what we have here.  Boal’s obvious unwillingness to engage in debate on political differences with his adversaries.  It’s easier just to rout them out with half-baked rhetoric.

Pacifica came by its governance system honestly.  After an underdog lawsuit  that went all the way to California’s Attorney General to uphold the basic notion that those who pay for it own it.  The powers that be are merely the caretakers of a public trust. The Pacifica win of the late 1990’s was a victory for the seemingly quaint notion that the media operates in the public interest.  All those people who pledged their $25 or $50 for information, arts and culture they valued, had rights. They were shareholders. And a bunch of people who thought they knew better couldn’t just sell the thing right out from under with them without even asking first. Wouldn’t it be nice if all our public institutions ran that way?  No war with without the public’s consent?

Now that’s a Pacifican notion. I suppose you could call it “a surreal camel-albatross hybrid worthy of any medieval bestiary”.   There’s just one little problem. While you’re saving all those bucks and moving with lightening speed, you might find something’s missing, like one of the last mass radio transmitters in the nation not in corporate or government hands. That’s what happened to Pacifica when a misdirected e-mail came to light in July of 1999.

Boal comments about the founder of Pacifica, Lew Hill, a World War II draft resister. Let’s let Hill speak in his own words from a 1952 Report to the Listener:

“There was such a letter in the mail this morning, from a San Francisco physician. To indicate the importance of this for the substance of our weekly Report, I might add that next week at this time I plan to comment on the questions the letter raises. …The gentleman writing states that he feels KPFA’s whole program is a fine well-rounded one culturally speaking, and he wishes he could believe a large audience would stop and listen to it. But he doesn’t. And for this reason he advances specific suggestions for changes in our medium, from FM to AM, in our hours of broadcasting, in the types of our programs, in our signal power, and in our publicity procedures. He concludes by saying that he believes we at KPFA are very stubborn and set in our conviction that we are doing the job in the best way, and that he does not expect we will adopt his suggestions, but wishes us well anyway and hopes to cooperate to any extent possible in what the project is doing. Needless to say this communication is very challenging and sweeping, and also a very warming one. Next week perhaps you will join me again for a discussion of it”.

Boal speaks of a “firewall”, a term commonly used in corporately-owned mainstream media outlets to insist that, for example, the fact that General Electric owns NBC does not affect that television network’s coverage of energy issues. In this case, the “firewall” is to protec Pacifica’s operations from its own members and supporters. Quite a bit different from Hill’s 1952 declaration that he was warmed at the receipt of a letter advancing very specific suggestions for changes in the medium, hours of broadcasting, types of programs and the publicity procedures and looking forward to a challenging and sweeping discussion of it on-air.

Maybe a little challenging and sweeping discussion is a better recipe for community media than haughty contempt for the barbarians who pay the bills.

TRACY ROSENBERG is Executive Director of the Media Alliance, 1904 Franklin Street # 500 Oakland CA 94612

Iain Boal replies:

• I am happy to stand by my ascription,  “envenomed nutballs”.

• I don’t remotely claim to represent the preponderance of listeners and supporters – that’s an impertinence that I leave to the Rosenbergs of the media world. Admittedly I did surmise that listeners had something else in mind than election bills of $700,000 (a way low figure actually) when we went into the streets in 1999.

• Where do I deny that liberal foundations and the non-profit industrial complex are dodgy and capable of siphoning off revolutionary fluids? It’s mildly ironic – re Rosenberg’s  irrelevant ad hominem about my presumed ignorance of The Revolution Will Not be Funded – that I was the first person in the country to adopt the book for a university course (the week it came out from South End Press.)

• Where do I say I am opposed to transparency in funding?

• It is a grotesque misreading to suggest that the “barbarians” I’m calling out are the listeners who pay the bills. Rosenberg here reveals contempt for the intelligence of the “little guy” she purports to represent, and further insults Pacifica’s supporting audience by reducing us to corporate “shareholders”.

• It would be convenient, wouldn’t it, if it were true that my pieces were “op-eds”, and that the metastasizing of subcommittees or chem trail antidote DVD premiums or the disfranchizing of thousands of members are somehow a personal “opinion” to which I am “entitled” (thank you, Ms Rosenberg, for your tolerance.)

That said, and despite not being able to spell my name, at least Ms Rosenberg has the guts to demand that you publicly disseminate a portrait of me that those who actually know me would have to acknowledge drives to the essence of my character: a half-demented, debate-averse, self-serving, dictator-friendly, Eugene McCarthy impersonator.

I do wonder whether there is even one among these self-dealing nullities who can make sense, let alone mount a spirited defense of a governing board numbering a minimum of 122 and a maximum of 123? There are actually some lines in Rosenberg’s response that do ring out with straightforward, honest, eloquence, but they belong to…Lew Hill.


More articles by:
September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
Kenn Orphan
The Power of the Anthropocene
Paul Cox – Stan Cox
Puerto Rico’s Unnatural Disaster Rolls on Into Year Two
Rajan Menon
Yemen’s Descent Into Hell: a Saudi-American War of Terror
Russell Mokhiber
Nick Brana Says Dems Will Again Deny Sanders Presidential Nomination
Nicholas Levis
Three Lessons of Occupy Wall Street, With a Fair Dose of Memory
Steve Martinot
The Constitutionality of Homeless Encampments
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
The Aftershocks of the Economic Collapse Are Still Being Felt
Jesse Jackson
By Enforcing Climate Change Denial, Trump Puts Us All in Peril
George Wuerthner
Coyote Killing is Counter Productive
Mel Gurtov
On Dealing with China
Dean Baker
How to Reduce Corruption in Medicine: Remove the Money
September 19, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
When Bernie Sold Out His Hero, Anti-Authoritarians Paid
Lawrence Davidson
Political Fragmentation on the Homefront
George Ochenski
How’s That “Chinese Hoax” Treating You, Mr. President?
Cesar Chelala
The Afghan Morass
Chris Wright
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Howard Lisnoff
The Beat Goes On Against Protest in Saudi Arabia
Nomi Prins 
The Donald in Wonderland: Down the Financial Rabbit Hole With Trump
Jack Rasmus
On the 10th Anniversary of Lehman Brothers 2008: Can ‘IT’ Happen Again?
Richard Schuberth
Make Them Suffer Too
Geoff Beckman
Kavanaugh in Extremis
Jonathan Engel
Rather Than Mining in Irreplaceable Wilderness, Why Can’t We Mine Landfills?
Binoy Kampmark
Needled Strawberries: Food Terrorism Down Under
Michael McCaffrey
A Curious Case of Mysterious Attacks, Microwave Weapons and Media Manipulation
Elliot Sperber
Eating the Constitution
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior