By George! Austin Leads the National Recovery


It’s a wistful headline, I admit.  But it covers a considerable hope.

The Austin-Round Rock metropolitan area was nearly alone among USA cities for its ability to report year-over-year job growth in April, 2009 (up by 3,400 jobs).  And it was the only major metro area (out of 38) to report an increase in the employment rate (+0.4 percent).  To believe that this slim green shoot is the first sign of economic Springtime in America requires a bit of the Oat Willie determination to go “Onward thru the Fog.”  Which, actually, is what I intend to do.

But first a note: more notice should have been given to Odessa-Midland which, unlike Austin-Round Rock, gets split into two separate metro areas.  Odessa employment was up by 1,800 over the year, while Midland was up by 1,500.  Why these sister cities don’t get hyphenated into a single metro is curious.

Still, these Texas numbers look like boutique novelties in a warehouse of national economic crisis.  The volumes are crushingly large.  Los Angeles has lost 240,000 jobs, the New York metro area is down by 234,000.  Chicago down 190,400, Detroit down 143,400, Phoenix and Atlanta down by 129,700 and 123,600.

How all these jobs will get re-started is not easy to see.  Where are the new paradigms of labor to come from?

Stock watchers are reading reports about large dollar supplies stored up by investment managers and standing ready to flow back into a wary market of stocks and bonds as soon as things get more steady.  But the dynamic reminds me of Truman’s exhortations on fear.  Don’t things continue to fall harder the longer the investment managers wait?

In some circles one hears a constant drumbeat for buying gold, which may be a way to own something that won’t crash in value this year.  But what use is gold, really?

In the great classic of American political economy, Progress and Poverty, Henry George defines capital as that part of wealth which is put back into productive use.  He encourages a view of capital as something which enables labor to be more productive and he therefore discourages taxation on capital.

Taking a Georgist view, I would think that gold is wealth that serves very little productive purpose.  To the extent that gold is a way of holding some savings for retirement or rainy days, I don’t see how it should be valued much differently than any other form of savings.

But to the extent that gold is hoarded up as a pile of fear, doesn’t it become its own effect, pulling wealth out of productive equity investments, drying up more jobs, etc.?

From my armchair view of internet chatter, it seems to me a wise thing for policy makers to devalue the dollar in the near-term as a means of coaxing cash into markets.  But if devalued dollars simply get transmuted into gold shares, then the alchemy gets dark.

A Georgist approach to systemic reform begins with tax policy.  Capital and labor should be taxed last.  Then property values should be clearly divided between improvements and the land they rest upon.  Let the improvements also move to the back of the tax line.  This leaves land value at the head of the line for taxation.

George’s reasons for land tax could be summed up in a Kudlow motto: “tax it and you get less of it.”  But with land, there is no danger of taxation reducing the supply, there is only the promise of land monopolists unloading every acre that they are not already putting to productive purpose.

Thus, under the Georgist model, the land tax — as the only tax — could never result in an absolute decrease in land supply.  The land tax would only tend to decrease the amount of land that is held, like piles of gold, for unproductive use.  As for gold and other means of piling up unproductive wealth, I can’t see right away why a tax on such things wouldn’t hasten the development of a more productive economy for all.

George says that supply and demand are misleading terms to use when trying to understand the causes of the unemployment cycle.  Workers are not quitting their jobs because they have earned all they need.  They are not refusing to produce or to consume.  We never have all we want, and the example of Austin in April proves that we are ever willing to earn the next leg up.  So why do so many workers find themselves at massive rates closed out of productive opportunity?

The problem lies at the door of unproductive wealth, because there is still plenty of it.  Yet for some reason unproductive wealth is encouraged and allowed to pile up, even sometimes as an excuse for “real value.”  If we taxed land, unproductive wealth, and gold supplies, I wonder, wouldn’t we quickly motivate and incentivize tons of wealth into capital that would eagerly call for full employment now?

Greg Moses is editor of TexasWorker.org.  He can be reached at gmosesx@gmail.com.


More articles by:

Greg Moses writes about peace and Texas, but not always at the same time. He is author of Revolution of Conscience: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Philosophy of Nonviolence. As editor of the Texas Civil Rights Review he has written about racism faced by Black agriculturalists in Texas. He can be reached at gmosesx@gmail.com

November 14, 2019
Laura Carlsen
Mexico’s LeBaron Massacre and the War That Will Not Cease
Joe Emersberger
Oppose the Military Coup in Bolivia. Spare Us Your “Critiques”
Ron Jacobs
Trump’s Drug Deal Goes to Congress: Impeachment, Day One
Paul Edwards
Peak Hubris
Tamara Pearson
US and Corporations Key Factors Behind Most Violent Year Yet in Mexico
Jonah Raskin
Love and Death in the Age of Revolution
Robert Hunziker
Climate Confusion, Angst, and Sleeplessness
W. T. Whitney
To Confront Climate Change Humanity Needs Socialism
John Feffer
Examining Trump World’s Fantastic Claims About Ukraine
Nicky Reid
“What About the Children?” Youth Rights Before Parental Police States
Binoy Kampmark
Incinerating Logic: Bush Fires and Climate Change
John Horning
The Joshua Tree is Us
Andrew Stewart
Noel Ignatiev and the Great Divide
Cesar Chelala
Soap Operas as Teaching Tools
Chelli Stanley
In O’odham Land
November 13, 2019
Vijay Prashad
After Evo, the Lithium Question Looms Large in Bolivia
Charles Pierson
How Not to End a Forever War
Kenneth Surin
“We’ll See You on the Barricades”: Bojo Johnson’s Poundshop Churchill Imitation
Nick Alexandrov
Murder Like It’s 1495: U.S.-Backed Counterinsurgency in the Philippines
George Ochenski
Montana’s Radioactive Waste Legacy
Brian Terrell
A Doubtful Proposition: a Reflection on the Trial of the Kings Bay Plowshares 7
Nick Pemberton
Assange, Zuckerberg and Free Speech
James Bovard
The “Officer Friendly” Police Fantasy
Dean Baker
The Logic of Medical Co-Payments
Jeff Mackler
Chicago Teachers Divided Over Strike Settlement
Binoy Kampmark
The ISC Report: Russian Connections in Albion?
Norman Solomon
Biden and Bloomberg Want Uncle Sam to Defer to Uncle Scrooge
Jesse Jackson
Risking Lives in Endless Wars is Morally Wrong and a Strategic Failure
Manuel García, Jr.
Criminalated Warmongers
November 12, 2019
Nino Pagliccia
Bolivia and Venezuela: Two Countries, But Same Hybrid War
Patrick Cockburn
How Iran-Backed Forces Are Taking Over Iraq
Jonathan Cook
Israel is Silencing the Last Voices Trying to Stop Abuses Against Palestinians
Jim Kavanagh
Trump’s Syrian See-Saw: From Pullout to Pillage
Susan Babbitt
Fidel, Three Years Later
Dean Baker
A Bold Plan to Strengthen and Improve Social Security is What America Needs
Trump’s Crime Against Humanity
Victor Grossman
The Wall and General Pyrrhus
Yoko Liriano
De Facto Martial Law in the Philippines
Ana Paula Vargas – Vijay Prashad
Lula is Free: Can Socialism Be Restored?
Thomas Knapp
Explainer: No, House Democrats Aren’t Violating Trump’s Rights
Wim Laven
Serve With Honor, Honor Those Who Serve; or Support Trump?
Colin Todhunter
Agrarian Crisis and Malnutrition: GM Agriculture Is Not the Answer
Binoy Kampmark
Walls in the Head: “Ostalgia” and the Berlin Wall Three Decades Later
Akio Tanaka
Response to Pete Dolack Articles on WBAI and Pacifica
Nyla Ali Khan
Bigotry and Ideology in India and Kashmir: the Legacy of the Babri Masjid Mosque