FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

No More Recycled Military Solutions

Once again we face a leadership that knows one solution only: WAR. The Israeli government discussed for months the situation in Gaza, much like previous Israeli governments that debated numerous times, the situation in Lebanon, the first and second intifadas and in fact every single crisis Israel has faced.  Yet, at the end of the day, these wise elected officials, women included, could only think of one solution, one vision: an offensive military operation. As if they haven’t tried this type of solution in the past. What else can be done? To occupy Gaza? We have done it. To impose a blockade? We have done it. To bomb? To kill? We have already tried these methods many times. No magic solution will appear as long as Israeli governments recycle aggressive military responses.

We heard our Defence Minister Ehud Barak, asserted that “there is no one to talk to on the other side” – an all too familiar justification for choosing a military response over diplomacy.  As everyone knows, one’s enemies are always to blame. Like children in the playground, blaming each other for starting a fight, our government on hand blames the other side and on the other hand portrays itself as helpless. Its inability, or perhaps unwillingness, to find a non-militaristic solution to the situation in Gaza, is yet another testament to its lack of vision. To add insult to injury, they refuse to listen to their citizenry. The majority of the public in Israel does not think that the war in Gaza is going to bring about a lasting solution to the current crisis. Even those Israeli-Jews, who have sadly applauded the death of hundreds of Palestinians, are likely to stop their support of the carnage once the offensive begins to claim the lives of Israeli soldiers. We have experienced a similar situation two years ago, during the Israeli attack on Lebanon. Like today, those of us who opposed the military attack from its inception were subject to anger and ridicule, until the first Israel casualty.

No inquiry commission is going to bring back to life the dead on both sides. It is time to listen to the sane voices of reason now!  There are of course other solutions to this crisis, solutions that don’t involve violence and military might. There are alternatives to violence. If they are not self-evident, they must be sought after and envisioned! And history has to be taken into account as one considers such alternatives. For example, Gaza, with its refugee camps, is in itself a result of a never-ending war that started in 1948.  UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestinian refuges handles today close to 500,000 refuges in the Gaza Strip alone. These refuges are the decedents of families that were driven out of their homes not only in 1948 but also in 1952, when the Palestinian residents of Ashkelon, who by the way held Israeli citizenship, were expelled to the Gaza Strip…

You cannot put an end to injustice with military power and destruction. The Palestinians are fed up with this approach and they are not likely to sit and wait peacefully until Israel realizes that there is no military solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

If we are to find a long and lasting solution to the conflict, we need a fundamentally different approach to the current crisis. Israeli must lift the blockade and allow freedom of movement within and to and from the Gaza Strip. This includes re-opening the airport and the fishermen port, ensuring the supply of fuel and flow of electricity and in particular addressing the grave need for medical supplies. Furthermore, students should be allowed to leave the Gaza Strip and pursue their studies elsewhere and Palestinian workers should be permitted to work in Israel. This is only the beginning. We should support the establishment of a railroad service that would connect the Gaza Strip with the West Bank to allow family visits and other vital exchanges. In short, to undo some of the damage wrought about by decades of military solutions, Israel needs to demonstrate generosity. We should pursue peace with an enemy that is alive rather than dead and the sooner the better!

Dr. HANNAH SAFRAN is a founder of Women in Black. She lives in Haifa, Israel.

Translation from Hebrew: Dr. Simona Sharoni

 

 

 

 

More articles by:

February 21, 2019
Nick Pemberton
Israel, Venezuela and Nationalism In The Neoliberal Era
Chris Orlet
The Bill and Melinda Gates’ Fair Taxation Scaremongering Tour
Bruce E. Levine
“Heavy Drinking” and the NYT’s Offensive Obit on Herbert Fingarette
Lisi Krall
This Historical Moment Demands Transformation of Our Institutions. The Green New Deal Won’t Do That
Stephanie Savell
Mapping the American War on Terror: Now in 80 Countries
Daniel Warner
New York, New York: a Resounding Victory for New York Over Amazon
Russell Mokhiber
With Monsanto and Glyphosate on the Run AAAS Revokes Award to Scientists Whose Studies Led to Ban on Weedkiller in Sri Lanka and Other Countries
Jesse Jackson
Trump’s Fake National Emergency Moves America Closer to an Autocracy
Alex Campbell
Tracing the Threads in Venezuela: Humanitarian Aid
Jonah Raskin
Mitchel Cohen Takes on Global and Local Goliaths: Profile of a Lifelong Multi-Movement Organizer
Binoy Kampmark
Size Matters: the Demise of the Airbus A380
February 20, 2019
Anthony DiMaggio
Withdrawal Pains and Syrian Civil War: An Analysis of U.S. Media Discourse
Charles Pierson
When Saudi Arabia Gets the Bomb
Doug Johnson Hatlem
“Electability” is Real (Unless Married with the Junk Science of Ideological Spectrum Analysis)
Kenneth Surin
The Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Another Boondoggle in Virginia
John Feffer
The Psychology of the Wall
Dean Baker
Modern Monetary Theory and Taxing the Rich
Russell Mokhiber
Citizens Arrested Calling Out Manchin on Rockwool
George Ochenski
Unconstitutional Power Grabs
Michael T. Klare
War With China? It’s Already Under Way
Thomas Knapp
The Real Emergency Isn’t About the Wall, It’s About the Separation of Powers
Manuel García, Jr.
Two Worlds
Daniel Warner
The Martin Ennals and Victorian Prize Winners Contrast with Australia’s Policies against Human Dignity
Norman Solomon
What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives
Dan Corjescu
2020 Vision: A Strategy of Courage
Matthew Johnson
Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?
William A. Cohn
Something New and Something Old: a Story Still Being Told
Bill Martin
The Fourth Hypothesis: the Present Juncture of the Trump Clarification and the Watershed Moment on the Washington Mall
February 19, 2019
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Troublesome Possibilities: The Left and Tulsi Gabbard
Patrick Cockburn
She Didn’t Start the Fire: Why Attack the ISIS Bride?
Evaggelos Vallianatos
Literature and Theater During War: Why Euripides Still Matters
Maximilian Werner
The Night of Terror: Wyoming Game and Fish’s Latest Attempt to Close the Book on the Mark Uptain Tragedy
Conn Hallinan
Erdogan is Destined for Another Rebuke in Turkey
Nyla Ali Khan
Politics of Jammu and Kashmir: The Only Viable Way is Forward
Mark Ashwill
On the Outside Looking In: an American in Vietnam
Joyce Nelson
Sir Richard Branson’s Venezuelan-Border PR Stunt
Ron Jacobs
Day of Remembrance and the Music of Anthony Brown        
Cesar Chelala
Women’s Critical Role in Saving the Environment
February 18, 2019
Paul Street
31 Actual National Emergencies
Robert Fisk
What Happened to the Remains of Khashoggi’s Predecessor?
David Mattson
When Grizzly Bears Go Bad: Constructions of Victimhood and Blame
Julian Vigo
USMCA’s Outsourcing of Free Speech to Big Tech
George Wuerthner
How the BLM Serves the West’s Welfare Ranchers
Christopher Fons
The Crimes of Elliot Abrams
Thomas Knapp
The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail