FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Lennon Imagined

Imagine there is a Heaven.

Imagine John Lennon is in Heaven, and he is retching over this.

John Lennon’s image, and an imitation of his voice, has been exploited in a television ad to ship laptop computers to poor children all over the world.  Calculatingly altruistic, but it is sickening to watch.

I began my opposition to the commercial exploitation of The Beatles’ and Lennon’s music in TV ads almost 25 years ago.  It began in 1985 when the first commercial of that year’s Grammy awards was a Chevrolet ad using “Help”…the first time a Beatles song was used in such a manner.  I objected to The Beatles music, copyright ownership by Michael Jackson, being used in advertising that had no correlation with the intent of the song or its lyrics.

Back then, I formed a shoe-string organization called “F.A.C.E. The Music” (Fans Against Commercial Exploitation) which gathered petitions and sent letters to major advertising firms, and the major TV networks, to stop accepting advertising using Beatles music.  The NBC legal dept threatened to sue me over my alleged “harassment” of their advertising dept.  Sending them two letters, and a petition was too much for them.  I told NBC to go ahead, sue me, and make my day.  Of course, their feckless lawyers never did.

Eventually, “F.A.C.E. The Music” faded away. Over the decades I’ve become inured to Beatles songs as background music for TV ads, but now comes this….the actual image of John Lennon being used to promote a commercial product, with a voiceover saying things he never said.  This strikes me as reprehensible.

I have defended Yoko Ono many times, publicly and privately, regarding the commercial licensing of products lending themselves to John Lennon (e.g. children’s pajamas containing some of his drawings), but this time I think her permission to have John’s image advertise laptop computers has crossed an ethical line.

It’s one thing to say that John Lennon would promote peace if he were still alive, it’s another thing entirely to say he would have advocated a laptop for every child in the Third World.

Some say that this commercial will benefit children.  I don’t believe that.  It’s actual purpose is to make the computer company money.  Who knows if the computers will actually be used by children.  More than likely they will be used by adults…and who knows towards what ends.  And even should a child in the Sudan or Uruguay come to own one of these laptops, will it really be used to learn, or merely to entertain?  Wouldn’t bringing food, clean water, sanitary facilities, and vaccinations be a more worthwhile goal for poor children throughout the world than shilling a computer, no matter how “noble” they label the endeavor?

Some will say that John Lennon was Yoko Ono’s  husband, and that as head of his estate she has the right to do whatever she wants.  Well, that’s true, but as with every freedom there comes responsibility.  The misuse of Lennon’s image (figuratively and literally) is irresponsible, and not in keeping with John’s history.

The desensitization of our society by commercial advertising continues unabated.  As a Beatles and Lennon fan, I am saddened that his image is being manipulated in this way.

Marc A. Catone can be reached at marc_catone@yahoo.com

 

 

 

 

 

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
April 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Ruling Class Operatives Say the Darndest Things: On Devils Known and Not
Conn Hallinan
The Great Game Comes to Syria
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Mother of War
Andrew Levine
“How Come?” Questions
Doug Noble
A Tale of Two Atrocities: Douma and Gaza
Kenneth Surin
The Blight of Ukania
Howard Lisnoff
How James Comey Became the Strange New Hero of the Liberals
William Blum
Anti-Empire Report: Unseen Persons
Lawrence Davidson
Missiles Over Damascus
Patrick Cockburn
The Plight of the Yazidi of Afrin
Pete Dolack
Fooled Again? Trump Trade Policy Elevates Corporate Power
Stan Cox
For Climate Mobilization, Look to 1960s Vietnam Before Turning to 1940s America
William Hawes
Global Weirding
Dan Glazebrook
World War is Still in the Cards
Nick Pemberton
In Defense of Cardi B: Beyond Bourgeois PC Culture
Ishmael Reed
Hollywood’s Last Days?
Peter Certo
There Was Nothing Humanitarian About Our Strikes on Syria
Dean Baker
China’s “Currency Devaluation Game”
Ann Garrison
Why Don’t We All Vote to Commit International Crimes?
LEJ Rachell
The Baddest Black Power Artist You Never Heard Of
Lawrence Ware
All Hell Broke Out in Oklahoma
Franklin Lamb
Tehran’s Syria: Lebanon Colonization Project is Collapsing
Donny Swanson
Janus v. AFSCME: What’s It All About?
Will Podmore
Brexit and the Windrush Britons
Brian Saady
Boehner’s Marijuana Lobbying is Symptomatic of Special-Interest Problem
Julian Vigo
Google’s Delisting and Censorship of Information
Patrick Walker
Political Dynamite: Poor People’s Campaign and the Movement for a People’s Party
Fred Gardner
Medical Board to MDs: Emphasize Dangers of Marijuana
Rob Seimetz
We Must Stand In Solidarity With Eric Reid
Missy Comley Beattie
Remembering Barbara Bush
Wim Laven
Teaching Peace in a Time of Hate
Thomas Knapp
Freedom is Winning in the Encryption Arms Race
Mir Alikhan
There Won’t be Peace in Afghanistan Until There’s Peace in Kashmir
Robert Koehler
Playing War in Syria
Tamara Pearson
US Shootings: Gun Industry Killing More People Overseas
John Feffer
Trump’s Trade War is About Trump Not China
Morris Pearl
Why the Census Shouldn’t Ask About Citizenship
Ralph Nader
Bill Curry on the Move against Public Corruption
Josh Hoxie
Five Tax Myths Debunked
Leslie Mullin
Democratic Space in Adverse Times: Milestone at Haiti’s University of the Aristide Foundation
Louis Proyect
Syria and Neo-McCarthyism
Dean Baker
Finance 202 Meets Economics 101
Abel Cohen
Forget Gun Control, Try Bullet Control
Robert Fantina
“Damascus Time:” An Iranian Movie
David Yearsley
Bach and Taxes
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail