FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Lennon Imagined

Imagine there is a Heaven.

Imagine John Lennon is in Heaven, and he is retching over this.

John Lennon’s image, and an imitation of his voice, has been exploited in a television ad to ship laptop computers to poor children all over the world.  Calculatingly altruistic, but it is sickening to watch.

I began my opposition to the commercial exploitation of The Beatles’ and Lennon’s music in TV ads almost 25 years ago.  It began in 1985 when the first commercial of that year’s Grammy awards was a Chevrolet ad using “Help”…the first time a Beatles song was used in such a manner.  I objected to The Beatles music, copyright ownership by Michael Jackson, being used in advertising that had no correlation with the intent of the song or its lyrics.

Back then, I formed a shoe-string organization called “F.A.C.E. The Music” (Fans Against Commercial Exploitation) which gathered petitions and sent letters to major advertising firms, and the major TV networks, to stop accepting advertising using Beatles music.  The NBC legal dept threatened to sue me over my alleged “harassment” of their advertising dept.  Sending them two letters, and a petition was too much for them.  I told NBC to go ahead, sue me, and make my day.  Of course, their feckless lawyers never did.

Eventually, “F.A.C.E. The Music” faded away. Over the decades I’ve become inured to Beatles songs as background music for TV ads, but now comes this….the actual image of John Lennon being used to promote a commercial product, with a voiceover saying things he never said.  This strikes me as reprehensible.

I have defended Yoko Ono many times, publicly and privately, regarding the commercial licensing of products lending themselves to John Lennon (e.g. children’s pajamas containing some of his drawings), but this time I think her permission to have John’s image advertise laptop computers has crossed an ethical line.

It’s one thing to say that John Lennon would promote peace if he were still alive, it’s another thing entirely to say he would have advocated a laptop for every child in the Third World.

Some say that this commercial will benefit children.  I don’t believe that.  It’s actual purpose is to make the computer company money.  Who knows if the computers will actually be used by children.  More than likely they will be used by adults…and who knows towards what ends.  And even should a child in the Sudan or Uruguay come to own one of these laptops, will it really be used to learn, or merely to entertain?  Wouldn’t bringing food, clean water, sanitary facilities, and vaccinations be a more worthwhile goal for poor children throughout the world than shilling a computer, no matter how “noble” they label the endeavor?

Some will say that John Lennon was Yoko Ono’s  husband, and that as head of his estate she has the right to do whatever she wants.  Well, that’s true, but as with every freedom there comes responsibility.  The misuse of Lennon’s image (figuratively and literally) is irresponsible, and not in keeping with John’s history.

The desensitization of our society by commercial advertising continues unabated.  As a Beatles and Lennon fan, I am saddened that his image is being manipulated in this way.

Marc A. Catone can be reached at marc_catone@yahoo.com

 

 

 

 

 

More articles by:
September 26, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Time to Wake Up: the Neoliberal Order is Dying 
David J. Detmer
History Distorted: Sam Wineberg’s Critique of Howard Zinn
Robert Hunziker
An Unforeseen Climate Beast Awakens!
Barbara Nimri Aziz
How Many More Women Are There?
Jörg Wiegratz
The Age of Fraud: the Link Between Capitalism and Profiteering by Deception
John Kendall Hawkins
Now There’s a Wall Between Us, Something There’s Been Lost…
William Kaufman
Brett Kavanaugh’s Wayward Penis: A New Twist
Michael Welton
A Wake-Up Call to the Canadian Left
Patrick Irelan
Brett Goes to School 
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
All Wars Are Illegal, Let’s Act!
Dean Baker
Robots, China and the Failure of Economics Reporters
Matthew Johnson
Cancel Kavanaugh
Rohullah Naderi – Rustam Ali Seerat
The Option of Self-Defense for Hazaras
September 25, 2018
Kenneth Surin
Fact-Finding Labour’s “Anti-Semitism” Crisis
Charles Pierson
Destroying Yemen as Humanely as Possible
James Rothenberg
Why Not Socialism?
Patrick Cockburn
How Putin Came Out on Top in Syria
John Grant
“Awesome Uncontrollable Male Passion” Meets Its Match
Guy Horton
Burma: Complicity With Evil?
Steve Stallone
Jujitsu Comms
William Blum
Bombing Libya: the Origins of Europe’s Immigration Crisis
John Feffer
There’s a New Crash Coming
Martha Pskowski
“The Emergency Isn’t Over”: the Homeless Commemorate a Year Since the Mexico City Earthquake
Fred Baumgarten
Ten Ways of Looking at Civility
Dean Baker
The Great Financial Crisis: Bernanke and the Bubble
Binoy Kampmark
Parasitic and Irrelevant: The University Vice Chancellor
September 24, 2018
Jonathan Cook
Hiding in Plain Sight: Why We Cannot See the System Destroying Us
Gary Leupp
All the Good News (Ignored by the Trump-Obsessed Media)
Robert Fisk
I Don’t See How a Palestinian State Can Ever Happen
Barry Brown
Pot as Political Speech
Lara Merling
Puerto Rico’s Colonial Legacy and Its Continuing Economic Troubles
Patrick Cockburn
Iraq’s Prime Ministers Come and Go, But the Stalemate Remains
William Blum
The New Iraq WMD: Russian Interference in US Elections
Julian Vigo
The UK’s Snoopers’ Charter Has Been Dealt a Serious Blow
Joseph Matten
Why Did Global Economic Performance Deteriorate in the 1970s?
Zhivko Illeieff
The Millennial Label: Distinguishing Facts from Fiction
Thomas Hon Wing Polin – Gerry Brown
Xinjiang : The New Great Game
Binoy Kampmark
Casting Kavanaugh: The Trump Supreme Court Drama
Max Wilbert
Blue Angels: the Naked Face of Empire
Weekend Edition
September 21, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Hurricane Florence and 9.7 Million Pigs
Andrew Levine
Israel’s Anti-Semitism Smear Campaign
Paul Street
Laquan McDonald is Being Tried for His Own Racist Murder
Brad Evans
What Does It Mean to Celebrate International Peace Day?
Nick Pemberton
With or Without Kavanaugh, The United States Is Anti-Choice
Jim Kavanagh
“Taxpayer Money” Threatens Medicare-for-All (And Every Other Social Program)
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail