FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Krugman’s Prize

So, Paul Krugman got the Nobel Prize in economics for figuring out that, historically, industrialized capitalist countries trade heavy manufacturing goods and technology primarily with each other, rather than with economically underdeveloped countries, right? Brilliant! Well, I am no economist, but from my humble position it has always seemed clear that the major customer for US industrial goods was Europe. That the so-called 3rd and 4th worlds were primarily sources of raw materials, cheap labor, and cheaper consumer goods seemed obvious.

Somehow, the thought of exporting heavy industrial equipment, manufacturing materials or consumer durables to people with little access to electricity, who travel on mostly rough dirt roads, and live in scattered rural villages, brings to mind visions of the ridiculous. Yes, I know that over the past several decades, there have been improvements in transportation and communication as we have shipped entire US-owned industries to those developing countries, and flooded their markets with cheap, subsidized grains, etc; and that subsequently, millions of small farmers have lost their land and livelihoods, and moved into large cities where they live in scrap metal and paper huts on garbage dumps, and try to enter the US illegally in search of work. On the other hand, the cheap toys, clothes, and household items imported from less economically developed countries really helped take the sting out of the increasingly lower real wages and rising cost of living experienced by most of us American wage-workers over the past 30 years and more. But that, apparently, has not been of interest to the Nobel Prize winner, who seems only progress in this process.

And, this leaves me wondering which is more absurd—the fact that Krugman’s colleagues had their noses stuck so deeply within the pages of economic mythology that they could not see the importance of competitive trade between industrialized capitalist economies, or that Krugman thinks this has process has “led to higher wages” and improved standard of living for workers the world over! The average real wage of US workers has not increased in 30 years. During those same 30 years, the rate of profit in industrial manufacturing sector—the real economy—has also declined. As early as 1972, Citibank reported that for 5,100 of the US major corporations, the rate of profit was down and had not reached the level of the mid-1960s. International Bankers were complaining of not only a lack of investment capital, but also a lack of profitable ventures in which to invest. The sales of the steel industry had been falling since 1970, leading to a cut in domestic production. Years before that, oil producers had cut back production and refining for the US market and concentrated on the more profitable foreign markets. We saw layoffs, unemployment, cuts in economic production and expansion, a decline in sales, and falling profit rates long before the so-called “energy crisis” of the 70’s. To paraphrase our leader, President Bush, this sucker started going down a long time ago. During the decades since the 70’s we have had increasing inflation, “stagflation,” “jobless recoveries,” and one bubble and bailout after another as the wealthy gamble on the paper bull market and ignore profitability losses in the real economy. Americans might be surprised to know that, as Antonia Juhasz, leading industry critic and expert on corporations and globalization, states in her latest book, “The Tyranny of Oil”, there is more domestic drilling and production of oil going on in the US today than ever before. But it is all for export. No profitable market for it here! US oil companies, her research shows, are stockpiling and hoarding oil. They, and the banks that have bought up oil fields and pipelines, have been the biggest speculators in the oil futures market bidding up the price of oil. US oil companies are the largest internationally. How’s that for “economies of scale” with the power to influence trade?

Krugman taught his fellow economists that governments should subsidize these “key industries” to encourage “large-scale” production,” “competitive advantage,” and “lower prices (!)” The fact that large-scale industries, like industrial agriculture for example, can force small, efficient family-operated farms out of business (in both the US and Mexico) because they have easy access to financial credit, enormous government subsidies, and infrastructure not available to smaller producers, certainly does give large-scale producers a great competitive advantage. But excuse me if, from the point of view of a wage-worker, I have not really experienced the lower prices, higher standard of living, and greater diversity of products that is suppose to come from this. Hey, we used to have over 40 different types of wheat in this country. Now, thanks to large-scale industrialized agriculture, we have four or five kinds (plus a rash of wheat allergies among consumers). My very efficient farmer relatives were forced to rent their land, and finally moved into town to work in factories. Today, to have the standard of living my father was able to provide as an urban factory worker in the 1950’s—a three-bedroom house, large gardens and fruit trees, near good schools and public transportation—it takes two adults working two jobs, full-time, at least. And you can forget the clean air and clean water we took for granted back then. But I am sure that from the heights of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Krugman’s theories on world trade and prosperity shine more visibly than the real world experiences of myself and the rapidly growing number of everyday low income and unemployed wage-workers the world over. Myopia is also the name of a wealthy hunt club here in Massachusetts.

MARY LYNN CRAMER has dedicated the past twenty-five years to very-low paying “applied economics,” working as a bilingual social worker with families and children. She has degrees in economic history, economic theory and social work. She can be reached at: mllynn2@yahoo.com

 

Your Ad Here
 

 

 

 

More articles by:

Mary Lynn Cramer, MA, MSW, LICSW has degrees in the history of economic thought and clinical social work , as well as over two decades of experience as a bilingual child and family psychotherapist. For the past five years, she has been deeply involved in “economic field research” among elderly women and men dependent upon social security, Medicare, and food stamps, living in subsidized housing projects. She can be reached at: mllynn2@yahoo.com

September 19, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
When Bernie Sold Out His Hero, Anti-Authoritarians Paid
Lawrence Davidson
Political Fragmentation on the Homefront
George Ochenski
How’s That “Chinese Hoax” Treating You, Mr. President?
Cesar Chelala
The Afghan Morass
Chris Wright
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Howard Lisnoff
The Beat Goes On Against Protest in Saudi Arabia
Nomi Prins 
The Donald in Wonderland: Down the Financial Rabbit Hole With Trump
Jack Rasmus
On the 10th Anniversary of Lehman Brothers 2008: Can ‘IT’ Happen Again?
Richard Schuberth
Make Them Suffer Too
Geoff Beckman
Kavanaugh in Extremis
Jonathan Engel
Rather Than Mining in Irreplaceable Wilderness, Why Can’t We Mine Landfills?
Binoy Kampmark
Needled Strawberries: Food Terrorism Down Under
Michael McCaffrey
A Curious Case of Mysterious Attacks, Microwave Weapons and Media Manipulation
Elliot Sperber
Eating the Constitution
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
Mairead Maguire
Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era
Dean Baker
The Bank Bailout of 2008 was Unnecessary
Wim Laven
Hurricane Trump, Season 2
Yves Engler
Smearing Dimitri Lascaris
Ron Jacobs
From ROTC to Revolution and Beyond
Clark T. Scott
The Cannibals of Horsepower
Binoy Kampmark
A Traditional Right: Jimmie Åkesson and the Sweden Democrats
Laura Flanders
History Markers
Weekend Edition
September 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Carl Boggs
Obama’s Imperial Presidency
Joshua Frank
From CO2 to Methane, Trump’s Hurricane of Destruction
Jeffrey St. Clair
Maria’s Missing Dead
Andrew Levine
A Bulwark Against the Idiocy of Conservatives Like Brett Kavanaugh
T.J. Coles
Neil deGrasse Tyson: A Celebrity Salesman for the Military-Industrial-Complex
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail