FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

A Tectonic Shift in Hegemony at the G7

Between each individual and entire humanity, however, stands the Nation, with its special language and literature, with its peculiar origin and history, with its special manners and customs, laws and institutions, with the claims of all these for existence, independence, perfection, and continuance for the future, and with its separate territory; a society which, united by a thousand ties of mind and of interests, combines itself into one independent whole.

–Friedrich List

The recent volte-face of  Henry Paulson concerning taxpayers money  – flashback: Sept 23 , Senate Banking Committee  “Some said we should just stick capital in the banks, take preferred stock in the banks. That’s what you do when you have failure,” Oct 10, Press Conference “We can use the taxpayer’s money more effectively and efficiently, get more for the taxpayer’s dollar, if we develop a standardized program to buy equity in financial institutions,” Does indeed mean failure.

The Oct G7 meeting was a real kick in the teeth for the currently prevailing American System of Finance, ( i.e Federal Reserve, IMF and World Bank)  and the machinations of it’s aspirations in form of best laid scheme.  It marked a tectonic shift in terms of macroeconomics and hegemony in the financial channel of  Globalisation. European Union to America: ‘We don’t want your solution, we don’t want your money’.

Of course that wasn’t stated directly, there is a code to be complied with, and a world of discrete meaning in Diplomacy. As in:

 “We will have to coordinate internationally, but beyond that there should be room for nation-specific solutions,”
German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck

“We should not imagine that we will have a harmonised response that will be the same for everyone, quite simply because you cannot apply the same method to market situations that are different,”
French Economy Minister Christine Lagarde

“Governments need to move on from simply agreeing on a general approach”.
UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alistair Darling

One wonders how a firebrand maverick like Hugo Chavez in his ‘diplomacy’ would have put it. Words in which sulphur figured no doubt, and hygiene in a financial setting – accompanying  a  less than polite decline in suggestion of alternative – to do with sex and travel perchance?

The world, it seems, has had enough of the American Dream as has been hi –jacked by Bankers and their ilk and who seek total global dominance. An excellent recent article by Chris Floyd this newsletter summarised the consequences of such hi-jacking lucidly in terms of  how  the Political Agenda in America is shaped:

“So remember well the lessons of this new October crash: The money to make a better life, to serve the common good, has always been there. But it has been kept from you by deceit, by dogma, by greed, and by the ambition of those who have sold their souls, and betrayed their brothers and sisters, their fellow human creatures, for the sake of privilege and power.”

The portrayal of America as involving  rugged individualism of entrepreneurial spirit in the land of opportunity, the freedom and primacy of the market and taboo against even contemplation of interference by State, is no more than a cruel distortion befitting  cynical calculation of Horatio Alger like  tale as reinforcing dream; and in stark contrast to the nightmare reality of the absence of care for the  welfare of citizen in a State which represents the interest of a few as corrupt, dishonest and greedy at the expense of  the many who are loyal, honest and hard working. There has been a progressive and  deeply cynical narrowing of interests in representation in American Politics, the poor lacking any real representation, denied any real place on the agenda in the singularity of focus;  in the narrowness of money fostered world view by such as  campaign contribution and lobbying group.

This become the American Nation as travesty of constitution, and as mockery of  promise inscribed on Statue of Liberty.

Thus to the opening quote, by an Economist whom I am thankful to have had my attention brought recently, and also to the subject of hegemony in context of fuller consideration of the significance of the G7 meeting as being disputation over the meaning of ‘Nation.’ such context.

It has been contended that the Anglo-American world view rests on the shoulders of three individuals. Isaac Newton in Science, John Locke in Politics, and Adam Smith in Economics.  The  laissez- faire approach to economics is at the heart of American Politics. Evidence the outrage in many quarters at  Paulson’s Bail Out for Banks as running completely contrary to the dictates of laissez- faire as American way.  In proposing such a move there is recognition of an alternative approach – and manifestation of abject hypocrisy in form of ‘one law for the rich, another for the poor’. Not enough that the burden of taxation be raised on the back of the citizen as opposed to  from Corporation or the wealthy;  the nose of citizen must be rubbed in it – by using such taxes to further support the wealthy in protecting them from consequences of loss as moral hazard! The ruggedness of individualism extends to the callousness and monstrosity of ‘patient dumping’ where the welfare of the poor are concerned, but when wealthy individuals are involved, State intervention is required to protect welfare. No money for physical health of poor citizen, but plenty of money where the financial health of the wealthy is at risk.

It was perchance communication of such role of individual within Nation as Political Reality the American Way which bore fruition in the schism apparent at the G7 meeting. The problem is with how money shapes Nation. Do other Nations wish the American model of individuality and political reality, with it’s glaring disparities in wealth and quality of life, and prioritisation concerning need and greed? The European Nations represented at G7 answered this question negatively, and in such answer there is a change in the wind of quite some significance.

There is also potential difference in approach concerning the State taking equity in financial institution of similar significance. In the EU approach, the State will have a say, or vote, in how the company is run. It will also have a say concerning reward for top executives. In the UK, one senior corporate executive of a now State run bank has resigned.  One wonders if the State intervention model adopted by the United States will also mean a say in the running of the company?   Or indeed, concerning reward for executives. Or corporate ‘heads rolling’ on block of State as owner for that matter.

One thing is for sure, and that is that the macroeconomic channels of Finance as a means of determination of individuality within Nation, as expressive of major aspect of Globalisation, no longer quite conveys the hegemony of American vision to such extent as was intent in the best laid scheme.

I for one, rejoice in such contemplation, while hoping for improvement in the way  America treats the Individual in relation to being a Nation – as in quote from Friedrich List.

STEPHEN MARTIN can be reached at: stephenmarti@yahoo.com

 

Your Ad Here
 

 

 

 

More articles by:

Stephen Martin can be reached at: stephenmarti@yahoo.com

Weekend Edition
December 14, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
A Tale of Two Cities
Peter Linebaugh
The Significance of The Common Wind
Bruce E. Levine
The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Fathers and Sons, Bushes and Bin Ladens
Kathy Deacon
Coffee, Social Stratification and the Retail Sector in a Small Maritime Village
Nick Pemberton
Praise For America’s Second Leading Intellectual
Robert Hunziker
The Yellow Vest Insurgency – What’s Next?
Patrick Cockburn
The Yemeni Dead: Six Times Higher Than Previously Reported
Nick Alexandrov
George H. W. Bush: Another Eulogy
Brian Cloughley
Principles and Morality Versus Cash and Profit? No Contest
Michael Duggin
Climate Change and the Limits of Reason
Victor Grossman
Sighs of Relief in Germany
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Robert Fantina
What Does Beto Have Against the Palestinians?
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Sartre, Said, Chomsky and the Meaning of the Public Intellectual
Andrew Glikson
Crimes Against the Earth
Robert Fisk
The Parasitic Relationship Between Power and the American Media
Stephen Cooper
When Will Journalism Grapple With the Ethics of Interviewing Mentally Ill Arrestees?
Jill Richardson
A War on Science, Morals and Law
Ron Jacobs
A Propagandist of Privatization
Evaggelos Vallianatos
It’s Not Easy Being Greek
Nomi Prins 
The Inequality Gap on a Planet Growing More Extreme
John W. Whitehead
Know Your Rights or You Will Lose Them
David Swanson
The Abolition of War Requires New Thoughts, Words, and Actions
J.P. Linstroth
Primates Are Us
Bill Willers
The War Against Cash
Jonah Raskin
Doris Lessing: What’s There to Celebrate?
Ralph Nader
Are the New Congressional Progressives Real? Use These Yardsticks to Find Out
Binoy Kampmark
William Blum: Anti-Imperial Advocate
Medea Benjamin – Alice Slater
Green New Deal Advocates Should Address Militarism
John Feffer
Review: Season 2 of Trump Presidency
Rich Whitney
General Motors’ Factories Should Not Be Closed. They Should Be Turned Over to the Workers
Christopher Brauchli
Deported for Christmas
Kerri Kennedy
This Holiday Season, I’m Standing With Migrants
Mel Gurtov
Weaponizing Humanitarian Aid
Thomas Knapp
Lame Duck Shutdown Theater Time: Pride Goeth Before a Wall?
George Wuerthner
The Thrill Bike Threat to the Elkhorn Mountains
Nyla Ali Khan
A Woman’s Selfhood and Her Ability to Act in the Public Domain: Resilience of Nadia Murad
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
On the Killing of an Ash Tree
Graham Peebles
Britain’s Homeless Crisis
Louis Proyect
America: a Breeding Ground for Maladjustment
Steve Carlson
A Hell of a Time
Dan Corjescu
America and The Last Ship
Jeffrey St. Clair
Booked Up: the 25 Best Books of 2018
David Yearsley
Bikini by Rita, Voice by Anita
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail