FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Bums’ Rush to the Bailout

With the Bush Administration, the two leading presidential candidates, and the Congressional leadership, as well as a phalanx of Wall Street lobbyists all pushing hard for a massive transfer of taxpayer money to the coffers of banks and investment banks, the American people need to demand a halt to this bums’ rush to a bailout.

We’ve seen what happens when Congress forgoes the time-tested process of deliberative and investigative hearings and simply takes a floor vote on a Bush Administration-backed measure. First there was the October 18, 2001 resolution for use of military force against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Because there were no hearings on that measure, its loose, deliberately ambiguous wording has been used ever since by the Bush/Cheney crew as authorization for their global so-called “War” on Terror, including the claim that the president has the dictatorial power ignore treaties, US law, and bills passed by the Congress. Shortly thereafter, there was the Patriot Act, a compendium of anti-Democratic measures that had failed to win passage in Congress over the years which were cobbled together in the dead of night by Bush/Cheney zealots and passed on a voice vote the next day by a Congress too cowed to hold hearings on the measure. Then, in October 2002, there was the second authorization for use of military force resolution, this time against Iraq, which has ended up miring the US in a disastrous five-year-long war without end that has killed 4500 Americans, chewed up 40,000 more, and killed in excess of one million innocent Iraqi civilians.

Had there been serious hearings on any of these three terrible measures, there is a chance none of them would have passed, or that at least, had they been passed, they would have been reworded to tie the administration’s hands. The first AUMF could have limited military actions to attacking Al Qaeda. Period. The Patriot Act’s constitutional overrides could have been exposed early, and challenged. And the administration’s lies about the alleged threats posed by Iraq could have been challenged in public by other witnesses, plus a clear requirement could have been included that any attack on Iraq would need UN authorization.

Now Congress is being pressured to pass an equally horrific bill with no hearings. We know that 200 leading economists, including at least three Nobel Laureates, one of them former World Bank economist Joseph Stiglitz, are opposed to the bailout, saying throwing a trillion dollars at Wall Street won’t work and will be a waste of taxpayer money or worse. We know that it fails to address the root problem–the housing and mortgage crisis. We know that it could be a crippling blow to the dollar. Yet without hearings to expose this giant scam, the only ones getting through to members of Congress are Wall Street lobbyists, their pockets stuffed with campaign cash.

Citizens can’t even get past the Capitol switchboard, which is jammed with angry callers trying to get through to their representatives and senators.

The point that needs to be made is that there is no great urgency to pass a bill. The administration’s claim that the bottom will fall out of the economy and that the country will be plunged into a depression if the bill isn’t passed immediately is nonsense. The Great Depression took years to develop after the 1929 stock market crash.

The current market could collapse, and there’d be plenty of time to act to revive the national economy. Meanwhile, the credit crisis, which is serious, has been underway for months and months. It is not something that came up last week and needs to be resolved tomorrow (as if that were possible by the mere passing of a give-away bill). There is plenty of time to hold the kind of hearings that will let members of Congress, and the American public, learn about the causes of the crisis, of its impacts, and about what the various strategies are that might most effectively address it.

So the public demand should not be for passage of a “good” bailout bill. It should be for a halt to this rush to passage of any bill. The demand should be for “No Bill Without Hearings!”

So call Congress (202-225-3121, 202-224-3121 or 800-828-0498) and tell your representative and your two senators that you don’t want them railroaded. Tell them you demand hearings before legislation. And tell them, again, that you will vote against anyone who votes for the current bailout for Wall Street. (Hint: If you can’t get through, then call one of their local offices, which are listed in the blue pages of your phonebook, or go visit a local office.)

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now available in paperback edition). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

 

 

Your Ad Here
 

 

 

 

More articles by:

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, an online newspaper collective, and is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).

September 20, 2018
Michael Hudson
Wasting the Lehman Crisis: What Was Not Saved Was the Economy
John Pilger
Hold the Front Page, the Reporters are Missing
Kenn Orphan
The Power of Language in the Anthropocene
Paul Cox – Stan Cox
Puerto Rico’s Unnatural Disaster Rolls on Into Year Two
Rajan Menon
Yemen’s Descent Into Hell: a Saudi-American War of Terror
Russell Mokhiber
Nick Brana Says Dems Will Again Deny Sanders Presidential Nomination
Nicholas Levis
Three Lessons of Occupy Wall Street, With a Fair Dose of Memory
Steve Martinot
The Constitutionality of Homeless Encampments
Kevin Zeese - Margaret Flowers
The Aftershocks of the Economic Collapse Are Still Being Felt
Jesse Jackson
By Enforcing Climate Change Denial, Trump Puts Us All in Peril
George Wuerthner
Coyote Killing is Counter Productive
Mel Gurtov
On Dealing with China
Dean Baker
How to Reduce Corruption in Medicine: Remove the Money
September 19, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
When Bernie Sold Out His Hero, Anti-Authoritarians Paid
Lawrence Davidson
Political Fragmentation on the Homefront
George Ochenski
How’s That “Chinese Hoax” Treating You, Mr. President?
Cesar Chelala
The Afghan Morass
Chris Wright
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class
Howard Lisnoff
The Beat Goes On Against Protest in Saudi Arabia
Nomi Prins 
The Donald in Wonderland: Down the Financial Rabbit Hole With Trump
Jack Rasmus
On the 10th Anniversary of Lehman Brothers 2008: Can ‘IT’ Happen Again?
Richard Schuberth
Make Them Suffer Too
Geoff Beckman
Kavanaugh in Extremis
Jonathan Engel
Rather Than Mining in Irreplaceable Wilderness, Why Can’t We Mine Landfills?
Binoy Kampmark
Needled Strawberries: Food Terrorism Down Under
Michael McCaffrey
A Curious Case of Mysterious Attacks, Microwave Weapons and Media Manipulation
Elliot Sperber
Eating the Constitution
September 18, 2018
Conn Hallinan
Britain: the Anti-Semitism Debate
Tamara Pearson
Why Mexico’s Next President is No Friend of Migrants
Richard Moser
Both the Commune and Revolution
Nick Pemberton
Serena 15, Tennis Love
Binoy Kampmark
Inconvenient Realities: Climate Change and the South Pacific
Martin Billheimer
La Grand’Route: Waiting for the Bus
John Kendall Hawkins
Seymour Hersh: a Life of Adversarial Democracy at Work
Faisal Khan
Is Israel a Democracy?
John Feffer
The GOP Wants Trumpism…Without Trump
Kim Ives
The Roots of Haiti’s Movement for PetroCaribe Transparency
Dave Lindorff
We Already Have a Fake Billionaire President; Why Would We want a Real One Running in 2020?
Gerry Brown
Is China Springing Debt Traps or Throwing a Lifeline to Countries in Distress?
Pete Tucker
The Washington Post Really Wants to Stop Ben Jealous
Dean Baker
Getting It Wrong Again: Consumer Spending and the Great Recession
September 17, 2018
Melvin Goodman
What is to be Done?
Rob Urie
American Fascism
Patrick Cockburn
The Adults in the White House Trying to Save the US From Trump Are Just as Dangerous as He Is
Jeffrey St. Clair - Alexander Cockburn
The Long Fall of Bob Woodward: From Nixon’s Nemesis to Cheney’s Savior
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail