FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Rambling David Foster Wallace

by DOUGLAS VALENTINE

I hadn’t heard of David Foster Wallace prior to his suicide. I had never read anything he wrote, though among the many recent obits I read, I saw that he had written a book titled Infinite Jest. When I saw that I thought, “Ah so! A man after my own heart.” By which I meant a master of invention and device, of irony – for he was certainly referring to Hamlet’s impromptu eulogy for Yorick, whom we all know so well.

As Hamlet facetiously said while holding Yorick’s skull like a grapefruit and gazing into the empty eye sockets, “Not one now, to mock your own grinning? Quite chap-fallen?”

Any writer who would choose Infinite Jest as a title, I assumed, would appreciate Hamlet’s ironic flirtation with madness, the wry comments made to amuse himself and confuse his foes. And indeed, many reviewers say Wallace’s works are full of irony.

But as I read more and more reviews and obits, I found that Wallace, like a former Party official denouncing himself at a Stalinist show-trial, had branded irony (along with irreverence and rebellion!) as “not liberating but enfeebling.”

I immediately thought, “Is he being cute?” Such a broad generalization could never stand up and walk on its own legs. “His poor students,” I thought, as I apologized on Wallace’s behalf to all of our irreverent literary and historical revolutionary heroes and heroines.

Then I made the leap: Wallace had come to the sorry conclusion that Hamlet’s irony was his fatal character flaw. That Hamlet’s unrelenting wit scattered all those dead bodies around the stage. That Hamlet’s irony, irreverence and revolt brought about the tragedy.

Could that possibly be true? Wallace might make a case that Hamlet’s irony drove poor Ophelia to madness and suicide…but I always attributed the carnage at the end of the play to Claudius passing the poison cup to Gertrude, and that mix-up with the swords during the duel with Laertes. I thought things were going a bit slowly, but according to Hamlet’s plan, up until then.

But alas, I think Wallace came to view Hamlet (and himself) as self-emasculating. He even quotes a guy who said of the average ironist, “it is the voice of the trapped who have come to enjoy the cage.”

When I read that, I felt really bad for Wallace. Surely he knew that Hamlet also said, “If I were bound in a nutshell I would consider myself a king of infinite space.”

Wallace! If you can hear me, you could have easily have called your book Infinite Space and argued that irony is liberating.

But you made a bed of bad energy, and now you sleep in it.

Irony is enfeebling, Wallace said, because it “serves an almost exclusively negative function,” and is “singularly un-useful when it comes to constructing anything to replace the hypocrisies it debunks.”

This is another lame argument at best. To begin, how can anyone project a value judgment on irony, without context?

Without the detachment of irony, the stiff English upper-lip would have sagged into a frown of despair during the dark days of World War Two, when German bombs were raining on London. As anyone who has had his back against the wall knows full well, irony, when all else fails, represents the triumph of will over impending doom.

But Wallace made thee mistake of thinking it is hip to be square. He found irony, “the dominant mode of hip expression,” and thought that gifted ironists are “sort of wickedly funny to listen to at parties,” although it made him feel “empty” and “oppressed.”

Either he didn’t see the irony of his choice of the phrase “wickedly funny,” or something was seriously wrong with the man.

The Sad Search for Meaning in Life

Some people say Wallace was a true original, in the mold of Thomas Pynchon. Other says he was a Pynchon clone. He was certainly depressed. They say he had demons.

Hamlet was probably depressed too, maybe even manically so. Bad enough he had to deal with the recurring vision of his grisly father from hell, shuffling about in chains, demanding revenge for an unproven crime. But Hamlet is a fictional character, after all, and Shakespeare, well, did he really believe in ghosts or was he just being figurative?

And while Hamlet thought about suicide – “to be or not to be” and that entire monologue – at the end he went down fighting, to his everlasting credit.

Wallace thought of suicide too, even making a semi-public plea for help. In speaking to an audience, he resurrected yet another old cliché, saying the mind is an excellent servant but a poor master. He said that it was, like so many clichés, “lame and unexciting on the surface,” but “actually expresses a great and terrible truth.

“It is not the least bit coincidental that adults who commit suicide with firearms almost always shoot themselves in the head,” he added. “They shoot the terrible master. And the truth is that most of these suicides are actually dead long before they pull the trigger.”

I would have reminded Wallace of what my old boss, Dave Coggeshall, always used to say (ironically?) whenever my morale was low: “It’s all in the mind, don’t you know?”

Someone in my Qi Gong class said the mind is the master of the body. And I think she had a point. But telling a depressed person to cheer up is like telling someone with a broken leg to walk it off. The mind certainly can’t put a broken bone back in place.

If Wallace had a chemical imbalance, he needed Elavil, not a noose.

“It only hurts when I laugh,” Don Rickles would say.

I imagine Wallace, at the end, would argue that naming things for what they are makes for common sense and keeps us from being more stupefied than we already are. Stick to wicked is wicked and funny is funny. Don’t talk about wickedly funny. And don’t, through the power of persuasion and suggestion, equate War with Peace. Do we have a Bill of Rights or Bill of Goods?

Do we have a need for irony, irreverence and revolution?

I guess Wallace would say, don’t use slang and don’t hide your meaning in words.

I would say to him: what does hipster Bob Dylan mean when he says, “Grandpa died last week and now he’s buried in the rocks, and everybody still talks about how badly they were shocked. But me, I expected it to happen; I knew he’d lost control when he built a fire on Main Street and shot it full of holes.”?

Is Dylan deliberately confounding us? Or is it that some people just don’t get it?

Getting It

Sad to say, some people get it and some don’t.

For example, girls just want to have fun, but women are serious.

My former masseuse said, in regard to the war in Iraq, “I’m just concerned about being.”
Yeah, being and nothingness, I thought. “It’s about a lot of things,” I said.

“I’m bored,” a friend recently said, to which I replied, “Well, don’t take it out on me!”

He laughed heartily and retorted cleverly.

But when another friend said the same exact thing the very next day (do people get bored around me?), and I replied as usual, she got offended and said I was mocking her.

One friend thinks I’m a compulsive liar because I like irony. Another said to me (with the happy smile of a chess student who finally defeats his teacher) after ten years of pleasant intercourse, “You don’t always say what you mean, do you?”

Because irony isn’t just fun, it lifts us to intellectual heights – sometimes to an inkling of the essential (dual?) nature of existence. Irony is a sort of intellectual synchronicity, wickedly funny, to repeat Wallace’s cliché.

And yes, Wallace, it is perhaps best administered in small doses; but then again, as the Queen of Infinite Jest once said as she wiggled her hips, “I never trust a man who doesn’t drink, too much.”

If I had known David Wallace, I would have told him that we are small, unlike his book Infinite Jest. We are buffeted by fate, hurricanes, earthquakes, the flu, CIA detention camps, clinical depression. There is no secret law of attraction, no Holy Ghost on some universal hard drive; there are only random events and the human urge to control them.

Sometimes I slouch, sometimes I sit up straight, and all this happens while I meditate. And while I meditate about irony, I think there was something fatally sophomoric about David Wallace, like back in college when we wondered what it is that thinks about the mind.

You should have done what we did, David: laughed and gotten drunk.

DOUGLAS VALENTINE is the author of The Hotel Tacloban, the story of his father’s experiences in a Japanese POW camp in World War Two.  The Hotel Tacloban is available at Mr Valentine’s websites http://www.DouglasValentine.com and http://valentine.sb2.authorsguild.net

 

Your Ad Here
 

 

 

 

More articles by:
February 21, 2018
CounterPunch News Service
A Call to Celebrate 2018 as the Year of William Edward Burghardt Du Bois by the Saturday Free School
February 20, 2018
Nick Pemberton
The Gun Violence the Media Shows Us and the State Violence They Don’t
John Eskow
Sympathy for the Drivel: On the Vocabulary of President Nitwit
John Steppling
Trump, Putin, and Nikolas Cruz Walk Into a Bar…
John W. Whitehead
America’s Cult of Violence Turns Deadly
Ishmael Reed
Charles F. Harris: He Popularized Black History
Will Podmore
Paying the Price: the TUC and Brexit
George Burchett
Plumpes Denken: Crude thinking
Binoy Kampmark
The Caring Profession: Peacekeeping, Blue Helmets and Sexual Abuse
Lawrence Wittner
The Trump Administration’s War on Workers
David Swanson
The Question of Sanctions: South Africa and Palestine
Walter Clemens
Murderers in High Places
Dean Baker
How Does the Washington Post Know that Trump’s Plan Really “Aims” to Pump $1.5 Trillion Into Infrastructure Projects?
February 19, 2018
Rob Urie
Mueller, Russia and Oil Politics
Richard Moser
Mueller the Politician
Robert Hunziker
There Is No Time Left
Nino Pagliccia
Venezuela Decides to Hold Presidential Elections, the Opposition Chooses to Boycott Democracy
Daniel Warner
Parkland Florida: Revisiting Michael Fields
Sheldon Richman
‘Peace Through Strength’ is a Racket
Wilfred Burchett
Vietnam Will Win: Taking on the Pentagon
Patrick Cockburn
People Care More About the OXFAM Scandal Than the Cholera Epidemic
Ted Rall
On Gun Violence and Control, a Political Gordian Knot
Binoy Kampmark
Making Mugs of Voters: Mueller’s Russia Indictments
Dave Lindorff
Mass Killers Abetted by Nutjobs
Myles Hoenig
A Response to David Axelrod
Colin Todhunter
The Royal Society and the GMO-Agrochemical Sector
Cesar Chelala
A Student’s Message to Politicians about the Florida Massacre
Weekend Edition
February 16, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
American Carnage
Paul Street
Michael Wolff, Class Rule, and the Madness of King Don
Andrew Levine
Had Hillary Won: What Now?
David Rosen
Donald Trump’s Pathetic Sex Life
Susan Roberts
Are Modern Cities Sustainable?
Joyce Nelson
Canada vs. Venezuela: Have the Koch Brothers Captured Canada’s Left?
Geoff Dutton
America Loves Islamic Terrorists (Abroad): ISIS as Proxy US Mercenaries
Mike Whitney
The Obnoxious Pence Shows Why Korea Must End US Occupation
Joseph Natoli
In the Post-Truth Classroom
John Eskow
One More Slaughter, One More Piece of Evidence: Racism is a Terminal Mental Disease
John W. Whitehead
War Spending Will Bankrupt America
Robert Fantina
Guns, Violence and the United States
Dave Lindorff
Trump’s Latest Insulting Proposal: Converting SNAP into a Canned Goods Distribution Program
Robert Hunziker
Global Warming Zaps Oxygen
John Laforge
$1.74 Trillion for H-bomb Profiteers and “Fake” Cleanups
CJ Hopkins
The War on Dissent: the Specter of Divisiveness
Peter A. Coclanis
Chipotle Bell
Anders Sandström – Joona-Hermanni Mäkinen
Ways Forward for the Left
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail