FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Bandwagon Politics

I wonder. . .is anybody listening? Is anybody paying attention? Is anybody actually seeing anything? I feel like I’m calling Laurie Anderson’s home:

“Hello? Is anybody home?”

“Hi. I’m not home right now but if you wanna leave a message, just start talking at the sound of the tone.”

“Hello? This is your mother. Are you coming home?”

“Hello? Is anybody home? Well, you don’t know me but I know you. And I’ve got a message to give to you.”

Yes. That’s right. Nobody’s home. Because if they were, they’d not be jumping on the Obamarama Bandwagon. But somebody is giving them a message. Somebody they don’t know yet who knows about them.

The Left–a handy tag for people who write and who say they want change but, in fact, aren’t really into doing anything when it comes right down to it (and have probably never been on the streets in the first place)–and The Nation–a magazine of disillusioned upper middle class/upper class writers with neat ideas but still believe that you can fix a broken machine with recycled broken parts from that broken machine. Recycling with new grease? Even Robert Greenwald is supporting Obama via choosing to only bash McCain. Who really knows what the rest of the American US public is thinking, after all. . .they believe they “elected” George W. Bush–twice. In fact, they let him steal the elections; in fact, he was not elected the first time around but appointed. . .without any outrage from the plebs. It seems, though, that the Left, The Nation and the plebs are all ecstatically for Obama for President based on. . .based on speeches that say nothing, address nothing but are about hope, the last scourge left in Pandora’s box. This isn’t, however, surprising because no has no one bothered to look at Mr. Obama’s voting record.

If you look closely at Obama’s performance for “the people” you find that, well. . . he’s cynical, cynical and practical in his own interests (www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490). He plays it safe as, closer and closer to this year, he begins not voting for much of anything. That’s what “NV” stands for. That is as if to say that he’s never around. It is also of note that he whenever he votes for something, it is not passed: all of these bills are pro-people, service-oriented bills. None of them passed and so it looks like Obama is all for us but the Senate is all against us. Our hero!

But wait! There’s more! Whenever he voted “No” the bill was passed, bills that would have stripped us, “the people,” of things we’d like to have. Again, he comes out looking like our hero, for those evil Senators all voted to pass what was bad for us. . .that Obama voted “No” for.

What pops up like a cartoon Jack-in-the-box boxing glove that clobbers the clown who opens the box is that he knew what was going down; he knew what was going to pass and what was not and voted so that he’d come out looking like a wonder boy fighting for our rights. In a manner of speaking, he never loses–when he votes. And he don’t vote often (Cf. also www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18967): 40% of the 570 votes were “No Vote” votes. This may not so too bad but. . .he voted “Yes” only 44% of the time. With only 16% “No” votes, Obama comes off looking like a fairly positive guy, what some people like to call a moderate. If you just look at these numbers, he does come off looking much like he’s practicing Aristotle’s Golden Mean. Until you look deeper and then you find that he votes for himself, for looks–and he’s an adept at it, for the vast majority of America has hopped on his bandwagon, a bandwagon run by the monied elite bankrolling his rise to fame and fortune–another fact people are choosing to ignore.

Of the 251 “Yes” votes, 127 were defeated. Calculated? Well. . .although 127 “Yes” votes were affirmed, one must consider that 27 of them were no more than accepting Conference Reports and seven were nomination affirmations, including all of the guys liberals/progressives/etc. do not like–that is, all of George Bush’s suggestions. That comes out to 93 affirmative “Yes” votes. But it is the 127 defeated “Yes” votes that are important in concluding that Mr. Obama is self-interested and cynical: all were soundly defeated. Bills supporting teen pregnancy issues and equal pay and health care for veterans and surveillance/telecom immunity and Medicare/prescription drug plans and military tax cuts and minimum wage and immigration policies and union protection–gosh! Just about everything that is meaningful and helpful to–and supportive of–the people. How good he looks because he voted against a sure thing. . .and lost. My hero! (O-ooooh! Swoon.) He’s not really for gun control or women’s rights but. . .he’s kind of not against it either? Y’know? Middle of the road. A man who can’t make up his mind? Oh, no, no. He knew which way the wind was blowing and voted accordingly so he’d come off looking good. “Hey! Hey! Look at me! I’m great! I’m your man! Hey!”

His “No” votes followed the same trend: if there was a possibility of the bill passing but it was bad for the people, he voted “No.”

Only one out of 570 votes was even-steven: 47-47. Obama was never what you might call a “swing” vote.

The New York Times picked up on this voting trend in 2007 when they did an article on his voting record in the Illinois Senate: just exactly the same method he’s used in the US Senate (“It’s Not Just ‘Ayes’ and ‘Nays’: Obama’s Votes in Illinois Echo“. For further confirmation of his self-interested voting, see “Obama’s Voting Record Belies Moderate Image“.

How our elected officials vote and their trends in voting are important to us, for they tell us about their fulfilling their responsibilities to us–they are representing us, yes? Well. . .we all know this is not true, yet we continue to elect them. Why is that, I wonder. . .why do we continually (continuously?) hurt ourselves?

Obama is a tad more slick than most, a tad more machine-like than his predecessors or, it seems, contemporaries; for he only talks about his “ayes” and “nays” and never about the majority of his voting: NO VOTE. “No vote” is like saying “I don’t care.” That’s right, Obama don’t care about you all, his constitiency. . .and you’s climbing aboard de Obamarama Bandwagon without thought, without looking at the evidence. And then, in the future when he disappoints you and your chosen blindness, your preferential ignorance, you will be broken hearted and bitch, bitch, bitch. As Frank Zappa sang, “Broken hearts are for assholes.” Obama’s not hidden anything but he has engaged in the magician’s stock in trade: misdirection. And everyone seems to have bought it.

Ambrose Bierce noted that a politician is “An eel in the fundamental mud upon which the superstructure of organized society is reared”. But he also notes that a vote is “The instrument and symbol of a freeman’s power to make a fool of himself and a wreck of his country”. Highly applicable to the present situation–and many times in the past.

Casey Jones wasn’t paying attention at the controls and had a head-on collision. Killed alot more people than himself.

Obama = Hope?

And what did hope ever get you?

I am reminded of the old joke about the man sitting atop his house in a flood praying to God to save him. A log comes along and bumps up against the house but he doesn’t get on. A row boat comes by to pick him up but he turns it down because he’s praying to God and God will save him. A helicopter comes by: same result. When he dies, he goes up to heaven and shouts at God, “I believed in you! Why didn’t you save me?” And God says, “I sent you a log, a boat and a helicopter what more do you want?”

The Obamarama Bandwagon. . .just rolling along selling its snake oil to any and all–and everybody’s buying, hoping it’ll fix their ills.

Hope, the last scourge in Pandora’s box.

JAMES L. SECOR is a retired professor, a writer-playwright living out on the edge of the Gobi Desert where the skies are clear, the air fresh and the water possibly the only non-polluted water in the country: mountain run-off from the year-round snow-capped Qilian Range, which he can see from his front patio. He can be reached at znzfqlxskj@gmail.com any time night or day.

 

Your Ad Here
 

 

 

 

More articles by:

January 15, 2019
Patrick Cockburn
Refugees Are in the English Channel Because of Western Interventions in the Middle East
Howard Lisnoff
The Faux Political System by the Numbers
Lawrence Davidson
Amos Oz and the Real Israel
John W. Whitehead
Beware the Emergency State
John Laforge
Loudmouths against Nuclear Lawlessness
Myles Hoenig
Labor in the Age of Trump
Jeff Cohen
Mainstream Media Bias on 2020 Democratic Race Already in High Gear
Dean Baker
Will Paying for Kidneys Reduce the Transplant Wait List?
George Ochenski
Trump’s Wall and the Montana Senate’s Theater of the Absurd
Binoy Kampmark
Dances of Disinformation: the Partisan Politics of the Integrity Initiative
Glenn Sacks
On the Picket Lines: Los Angeles Teachers Go On Strike for First Time in 30 Years
Jonah Raskin
Love in a Cold War Climate
Andrew Stewart
The Green New Deal Must be Centered on African American and Indigenous Workers to Differentiate Itself From the Democratic Party
January 14, 2019
Kenn Orphan
The Tears of Justin Trudeau
Julia Stein
California Needs a 10-Year Green New Deal
Dean Baker
Declining Birth Rates: Is the US in Danger of Running Out of People?
Robert Fisk
The US Media has Lost One of Its Sanest Voices on Military Matters
Vijay Prashad
5.5 Million Women Build Their Wall
Nicky Reid
Lessons From Rojava
Ted Rall
Here is the Progressive Agenda
Robert Koehler
A Green Future is One Without War
Gary Leupp
The Chickens Come Home to Roost….in Northern Syria
Glenn Sacks
LA Teachers’ Strike: “The Country Is Watching”
Sam Gordon
Who Are Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionists?
Weekend Edition
January 11, 2019
Friday - Sunday
Richard Moser
Neoliberalism: Free Market Fundamentalism or Corporate Power?
Paul Street
Bordering on Fascism: Scholars Reflect on Dangerous Times
Joseph Majerle III – Matthew Stevenson
Who or What Brought Down Dag Hammarskjöld?
Jeffrey St. Clair - Joshua Frank
How Tre Arrow Became America’s Most Wanted Environmental “Terrorist”
Andrew Levine
Dealbreakers: The Democrats, Trump and His Wall
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Que Syria, Syria
Dave Lindorff
A Potentially Tectonic Event Shakes up the Mumia Abu-Jamal Case
Nick Pemberton
There Are More Important Things Than The Truth
Brian Cloughley
How Trump’s Insults and Lies are Harming America
David Rosen
Sexual Predators in the Era of Trump
Tamara Pearson
Everything the Western Mainstream Media Outlets Get Wrong When Covering Poor Countries
Richard E. Rubenstein
Trump vs. the Anti-Trumps: It’s the System That Needs Changing Not Just the Personnel
Christopher Ketcham
A Walk in the Woods, Away from the Screens
Basav Sen
Democrats Failed Their First Big Test on Climate
Lauren Smith
Nicaragua – The Irony of the NICA Act Being Signed into Law by Trump
Joseph Natoli
Will Trumpism Outlive Trump?
Olivia Alperstein
The EPA Rule Change That Could Kill Thousands
Medea Benjamin – Alice Slater
The New Congress Needs to Create a Green Planet at Peace
Caoimhghin Ó Croidheáin
Cuba: Trump Turns the Vise
Ramzy Baroud
When Bolsonaro and Netanyahu Are ‘Brothers’: Why Brazil Should Shun the Israeli Model
Mitchell Zimmerman
Government by Extortion
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail