Hamdan’s Secret

After a two-week trial—all of it closed to the public, most of it closed to the press, and a good deal of it based on statements by witnesses the prosecutors would not allow to be cross-examined or even present in court—five colonels and a Navy captain have convicted Salim Ahmed Hamdan of having been Osama bin Laden’s driver. They sentenced him to 66 months in prison, five months longer than the trial judge earlier announced he would receive as time-served.

Salim Ahmed Hamdan has been in custody since he was taken prisoner in Afghanistan in November 2001, which is 80 months ago, so 15 months of his prisoner time did not count in the time-served accounting. It no doubt counted for Hamdan and his family.

The Guantánamo trial process is one in which the accused has no right to confront accusers and witnesses. Hearsay evidence is admitted. Evidence obtained by coercion is admitted. Judges can exclude evidence obtained by methods they can’t stomach—which apparently happened in this case—but they don’t have to. Nothing close to it would be permitted in any court in the United States, though it would be adored by rulers of the worst and most brutal totalitarian systems. It is a system designed to produce convictions, not justice. It is the system favored and established by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, John Woo and their associates, who had little difficulty getting it through a compliant Congress.

The US government brought two charges against Hamdan. The military jury acquitted him of both counts of the more serious charge—that he was part of a conspiracy with al Qaeda leaders and therefore shared responsibility for the 2001 and other terror attacks, and that he conspired in 2001 to kill Americans in Afghanistan with shoulder-fired missiles.

He was convicted only of having been bin Laden’s driver, having been a member of Al Qaeda and of “knowing its goals.” This is the first time in U.S. history that a chauffeur with no demonstrable responsibility for anything except getting his boss to the place on time has been tried and convicted by a military tribunal for anything at all. Several commentators have pointed out that Hitler’s chauffeur and bodyguard— SS-Sturmbannführer (major) Erich Kempka—was held for a time as a witness in the trials of other Nazis, but was never himself charged at Nuremburg or anywhere else.

The limited verdict and the short sentence were a rebuke to the prosecutors, who asked for a sentence on the chauffeuring charge of 30 years to life, and by extension the Bush administration, which had much of its Guantánamo macho riding on this trial. Afterward, the prosecutors tried to put a good face on it by saying it was a wonderful illustration of this new system of justice at work. It was nothing of the sort. It was an abomination, a parody of justice, a judicial farce in which some people tried to act decently in spite of a structure that made that nearly impossible.

There was, apparently, no evidence that Hamdan had anything to do with the September 11 attacks or even knew anything about them until after they happened. Surely the government prosecutors knew the weakness of their case going in, and that is, presumably, why they added the chauffeuring charge two years after the initial conspiracy charges were set. Even so, why they would spend so much time and money pushing a charge they had to have known was flimsy? Perhaps they assumed that the six military jurors would be more interested in protecting their careers than in protecting their honor or serving justice. Those jurors surely knew of the ruined careers of military attorneys who had fought for the Constitutional rights of Guantánamo prisoners previously. If that was their assumption, the prosecutors blundered seriously.

Almost all the evidence against Hamdan was apparently derived from his own statements during 40 separate interrogations, some of them lasting for days. I write  “apparently” because what Hamdan said was one of the things kept secret in the name of “national security.”

That begs two questions: In secret from whom? And why?

Other than what has happened to him since he was taken prisoner and brought by the Americans to the offshore gulag in Cuba, Hamdan knows nothing his employers didn’t know as of the date of his arrest almost seven years ago. Indeed, one of the reasons the serious charges against him were thrown out was because the prosecutors couldn’t convince the jurors he knew anything of the sort.

He’s been isolated, harassed and, in all likelihood, tortured by his US captors for years. His former employers have to assume that he has by now spilled everything he knew, that he has, like Lenny Bruce’s guy on the table next to the prisoner getting the hot lead enema, even made up things to get the torturers to back off.

Salim Ahmed Hamdan has no secrets to reveal about Osama bin Laden and his associates. The only thing Salim Ahmed Hamdan knows that Osama doesn’t know is the thing you and I don’t know either: what Bush’s interrogators did to him in their closed prison on that island. The secret things Salim Ahmed Hamdan knows aren’t secrets about al Qaeda; they’re secrets about the things done by the United States government.

If you’re old enough, this may have a familiar ring to it. During and for some time after the Tet Offensive in Vietnam in 1968, the U.S. Department of Defense listed casualties among the US and its allies, but it refused to release reports on casualties suffered by the NLF. Those numbers were unambiguous: all they had to do was count the bodies on the ground. But that information, the Department of Defense said, was classified. The questions then, as now, were: classified from whom? And why? The NLF knew how many people they sent out and they knew how many came back and they were capable of subtraction, so they knew exactly what their casualties were. The only people who didn’t know were the Americans and their allies. The Defense Department wasn’t hiding the Tet tallies from our ostensible enemies but from us.

What happened to Salim Ahmed Hamdan is hardly the only thing the Bush White House has active tried to keep us from learning. It has banished photographers who let their newspapers publish photographs of dead GIs. It has banned press coverage and photography of returning coffins. It has prevented press coverage of military funerals even when the families of slain GIs wanted the press there. We still don’t know the names of the oil industry officials Vice President Cheney met with his first year in office, just before this administration formulated its oil policy. This is an administration full of secret things, things it doesn’t want you to know, to see, to hear.

Perhaps the only decent part of the farce that was the Guantánamo Gulag trial of Salim Ahmed Hamdan occurred at the very end, after the sentence had been read and just before Hamdan was taken to wherever they are going to warehouse him while they figure out what they’ll do with and to him next. He’s only got a few months to do on this sentence but the Bush administration has insisted all along that he’s a dangerous enemy combatant, a class of people it insists have virtually no legal rights who can be kept locked up as long as the US is engaged in whatever it considers a war against terror going on anywhere in the world. Will he flatten out his time in December and go home or will he be kept on ice until the US gets a president who believes in the rule of law and is willing to act accordingly?

“Mr. Hamdan,” the judge said, “I hope the day comes that you are able to return to your wife and daughters and your country.”

“Inshallah,” Hamdan replied. An interpreter translated the Arabic: “God willing.”

“Inshallah,” the judge responded.

BRUCE JACKSON edits the web journal BuffaloReport.com. His most recent books ares The Story is True: The Art and Meaning of Telling Stories (Temple University Press) and Cummins Wide: Photographs from the Arkansas Penitentiary (Center for Documentary Studies and Center Working Papers).




More articles by:

Bruce Jackson’s most recent books are Inside the Wire: Photographs from Texas and Arkansas Prison (University of Texas Press, 2013) and In This Timeless Time Living and Dying on Death Row in America (with Diane Christian, University of North Carolina Press, 2012). He is SUNY Distinguished Professor and James Agee Professor of American Culture at University at Buffalo

Weekend Edition
July 20, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Paul Atwood
Peace or Armageddon: Take Your Pick
Paul Street
No Liberal Rallies Yet for the Children of Yemen
Nick Pemberton
The Bipartisan War on Central and South American Women
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Are You Putin Me On?
Andrew Levine
Sovereignty: What Is It Good For? 
Brian Cloughley
The Trump/NATO Debacle and the Profit Motive
David Rosen
Trump’s Supreme Pick Escalates America’s War on Sex 
Melvin Goodman
Montenegro and the “Manchurian Candidate”
Salvador Rangel
“These Are Not Our Kids”: The Racial Capitalism of Caging Children at the Border
Matthew Stevenson
Going Home Again to Trump’s America
Louis Proyect
Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders and the Dilemmas of the Left
Patrick Cockburn
Iraqi Protests: “Bad Government, Bad Roads, Bad Weather, Bad People”
Robert Fantina
Has It Really Come to This?
Russell Mokhiber
Kristin Lawless on the Corporate Takeover of the American Kitchen
John W. Whitehead
It’s All Fake: Reality TV That Masquerades as American Politics
Patrick Bobilin
In Your Period Piece, I Would be the Help
Ramzy Baroud
The Massacre of Inn Din: How Rohingya Are Lynched and Held Responsible
Robert Fisk
How Weapons Made in Bosnia Fueled Syria’s Bleak Civil War
Gary Leupp
Trump’s Helsinki Press Conference and Public Disgrace
Josh Hoxie
Our Missing $10 Trillion
Martha Rosenberg
Pharma “Screening” Is a Ploy to Seize More Patients
Basav Sen
Brett Kavanaugh Would be a Disaster for the Climate
David Lau
The Origins of Local AFT 4400: a Profile of Julie Olsen Edwards
Rohullah Naderi
The Elusive Pursuit of Peace by Afghanistan
Binoy Kampmark
Shaking Establishments: The Ocasio-Cortez Effect
John Laforge
18 Protesters Cut Into German Air Base to Protest US Nuclear Weapons Deployment
Christopher Brauchli
Trump and the Swedish Question
Chia-Chia Wang
Local Police Shouldn’t Collaborate With ICE
Paul Lyons
YouTube’s Content ID – A Case Study
Jill Richardson
Soon You Won’t be Able to Use Food Stamps at Farmers’ Markets, But That’s Not the Half of It
Kevin MacKay
Climate Change is Proving Worse Than We Imagined, So Why Aren’t We Confronting its Root Cause?
Thomas Knapp
Elections: More than Half of Americans Believe Fairy Tales are Real
Ralph Nader
Warner Slack—Doctor for the People Forever
Lee Ballinger
Soccer, Baseball and Immigration
Louis Yako
Celebrating the Wounds of Exile with Poetry
Ron Jacobs
Working Class Fiction—Not Just Surplus Value
Perry Hoberman
You Can’t Vote Out Fascism… You Have to Drive It From Power!
Robert Koehler
Guns and Racism, on the Rocks
Nyla Ali Khan
Kashmir: Implementation with Integrity and Will to Resolve
Justin Anderson
Elon Musk vs. the Media
Graham Peebles
A Time of Hope for Ethiopia
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Homophobia in the Service of Anti-Trumpism is Still Homophobic (Even When it’s the New York Times)
Martin Billheimer
Childhood, Ferocious Sleep
David Yearsley
The Glories of the Grammophone
Tom Clark
Gameplanning the Patriotic Retributive Attack on Montenegro