FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

A Presidential Aptitude Examination

Our system of holding Presidential elections every four years has much to recommend it.

As soon as an individual becomes a candidate for the highest office in the land his or her background is scrutinized by the press and s/he is tested in a variety of public forums. Nevertheless, candidates are not required to take a written examination that would provide voters with important additional information regarding their aptitude for the job. We propose they be given such an examination.

The exam might be called The Presidential Aptitude Examination and it would test each candidate’s knowledge of history, economics, science and other subjects as well as her or his analytical ability and ethical judgment. In order that all candidates would have an opportunity to take the exam it would be given once every year and more often during a presidential election year.

The exam would be a multiple choice test modeled on Civil Service Examinations, Graduate Record Examinations and other standardized tests and vetted by a committee of scholars of all political persuasions. Then no candidate who refused to take the exam and have her or his scores made public would be a credible candidate for President.

No doubt the most controversial part of the Presidential Aptitude Examination would be the section that tested ethical judgment. But experts in psychometrics should have no difficulty in devising a Situational Judgment Test which would allow voters to clearly distinguish each candidates approach to ethical issues such as the right to life, gay marriage, and torture and to thereby place them on a spectrum from conservative to liberal or rank them according to whatever other scale is most important to them.

In short, the Presidential Aptitude Exam would provide voters with an objective measure by which to evaluate candidates. The New York Times quoted John McCain as declaring at a rally in Orlando, Florida on Monday, January 28 that he has “the knowledge, the background and the judgment” to take on the challenge of Islamic extremism. The Presidential Aptitude Exam would help voters determine the validity of that statement. Mitt Romney says he has a better understanding of economics than McCain. A test would enable us to determine the accuracy of that claim.

People regularly joke about George Bush’s lack of intelligence and Hillary Clinton’s lack of ethics yet millions of people voted for Bush in the last Presidential election and millions more are ready to vote for Clinton today. Of course the reason may be that voters do not accept a comedian’s characterization of a candidate as fair. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that if a clear metric existed which allowed voters to determine a candidate’s aptitude to be President of the United States we would be less likely to end up with a President who lacked the knowledge, intelligence or ethical judgment required for the job.

Paul Cantor is a professor of economics at Norwalk Community College in Connecticut

Roger Sparks is a professor of economics at Mills College in Oakland, California

 

 

 

 

 

August 16, 2018
Bruce E. Levine
“Don’t Be Stupid, Be a Smarty”: Why Anti-Authoritarian Doctors Are So Rare
W. T. Whitney
New Facebook Alliance Endangers Access to News about Latin America
Sam Husseini
The Trump-Media Logrolling
Ramzy Baroud
Mission Accomplished: Why Solidarity Boats to Gaza Succeed Despite Failing to Break the Siege
Larry Atkins
Why Parkland Students, Not Trump, Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize
William Hartung
Donald Trump, Gunrunner for Hire
Yves Engler
Will Trudeau Stand Up to Mohammad bin Salman?
Barbara Nimri Aziz
Morality Tales in US Public Life?
Vijay Prashad
Samir Amin: Death of a Marxist
Binoy Kampmark
Boris Johnson and the Exploding Burka
Eric Toussaint
Nicaragua: The Evolution of the Government of President Daniel Ortega Since 2007 
Adolf Alzuphar
Days of Sagebrush, Nights of Jasmine in LA
Robert J. Burrowes
A Last Ditch Strategy to Fight for Human Survival
August 15, 2018
Jason Hirthler
Russiagate and the Men with Glass Eyes
Paul Street
Omarosa’s Book Tour vs. Forty More Murdered Yemeni Children
Charles Pierson
Is Bankruptcy in Your Future?
George Ochenski
The Absolute Futility of ‘Global Dominance’ in the 21st Century
Gary Olson
Are We Governed by Secondary Psychopaths
Fred Guerin
On News, Fake News and Donald Trump
Arshad Khan
A Rip Van Winkle President Sleeps as Proof of Man’s Hand in Climate Change Multiplies and Disasters Strike
P. Sainath
The Unsung Heroism of Hausabai
Georgina Downs
Landmark Glyphosate Cancer Ruling Sets a Precedent for All Those Affected by Crop Poisons
Rev. William Alberts
United We Kneel, Divided We Stand
Chris Gilbert
How to Reactivate Chavismo
Kim C. Domenico
A Coffeehouse Hallucination: The Anti-American Dream Dream
August 14, 2018
Daniel Falcone
On Taking on the Mobilized Capitalist Class in Elections: an Interview With Noam Chomsky
Karl Grossman
Turning Space Into a War Zone
Jonah Raskin
“Fuck Wine Grapes, Fuck Wines”: the Coming Napafication of the World
Manuel García, Jr.
Climate Change Bites Big Business
Alberto Zuppi - Cesar Chelala
Argentina at a Crossroads
Chris Wright
On “Bullshit Jobs”
Rosita A. Sweetman
Dear Jorge: On the Pope’s Visit to Ireland
Binoy Kampmark
Authoritarian Revocations: Australia, Terrorism and Citizenship
Sara Johnson
The Incredible Benefits of Sagebrush and Juniper in the West
Martin Billheimer
White & Red Aunts, Capital Gains and Anarchy
Walter Clemens
Enough Already! Donald J. Trump Resignation Speech
August 13, 2018
Michael Colby
Migrant Injustice: Ben & Jerry’s Farmworker Exploitation
John Davis
California: Waging War on Wildfire
Alex Strauss
Chasing Shadows: Socialism Won’t Go Away Because It is Capitalism’s Antithesis 
Kathy Kelly
U.S. is Complicit in Child Slaughter in Yemen
Fran Shor
The Distemper of White Spite
Chad Hanson
We Know How to Protect Homes From Wildfires. Logging Isn’t the Way to Do It
Faisal Khan
Nawaz Sharif: Has Pakistan’s Houdini Finally Met his End?
Binoy Kampmark
Trump Versus Journalism: the Travails of Fourth Estate
Wim Laven
Honestly Looking at Family Values
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail