FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Blacks Turn Against the War

In these dark days for the peace movement, last Sunday morning brought a ray of sunshine. “Military sees big decline in black enlistees; Iraq war cited in 58% drop since 2000” ran the headline atop page one of the Boston Globe (10/7). To be precise, from 2000 to 2005, the last year for which the Pentagon provides data, Black enlistees have dropped from 41,185 to 17,399 a year. The biggest declines came in the army and marines as opposed to navy and air force enlistments; in other words the declines were in the services most likely to return you home in a box in the dead of night.

This development is very bad news for the masters of empire who, for a century, have relied heavily on scarce economic opportunities for Black youth to drive them into the armed forces. Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst at the liberal Democrat Brookings Institution laments this unsettling development: “African-Americans have been a key part of the modern military. There’s obviously been a degree where the black community in the United States has seen [military service] as culturally valuable and promoted it. That whole culture and value system (sic) is at risk in the black community. That is a big, big change. To me it portends a longer term loss of interest. It can be tough to get it back.” Mr. O’Hanlon does not seem to be rejoicing at the demise of this imperial “value system”; the rest of us should leap for joy.

Young Black men interviewed for the Globe report declared that they do not believe in the war and therefore won’t enlist. They also spoke of Hurricane Katrina, one saying: “Why should we go over there and help them (Iraqis), when the US government can’t help us over here?” Another said that the war is “unnecessary,” the same word used by Jimmy Carter, and continued: “It’s not our war. We got our own war here, just staying alive.” He then reminded the reporter that his hometown, Philadelphia, has suffered more than 200 homicides in 2007, most involving Black youth. But the military are not giving up, redoubling their recruiting effort, pumping more money and more advertising into it. But it is not working.

Key to this Black Resistance are the “influencers.” As the article says, “Adult influencers of all youths, such as parents, sports coaches, or mentors, say Iraq makes them less likely to recommend military service, according to Pentagon surveys. Of all racial groups, African-American influencers are the least likely to suggest enlistment, according to the surveys.” Now there are solid parents, making certain that their kids are not turned over to the merchants of death. As the article puts it, “They (the parents) see it from the aspect of . . . ‘I don’t care about the benefits, I don’t care about the money, I don’t care about nothing. I don’t want my child going to Iraq.'” Other parents have a lot to learn from this.

The Black Resistance to the war is poetic justice, given the racist roots of the neocon movement that spawned the war. Recall Norman Podhoretz’s tenet that a neocon is a liberal “mugged by reality.” Let’s ask ourselves what is the image of a “mugger” in many white minds, and it is all too easy to see what the neocon Podhoretz was getting at. It was not simply racism directed at Muslims and Arabs that informed the neocon project but racism directed at Blacks and Hispanics from the very first.

Much remains to be done since the Black population is still over represented in the military. As the Globe article points out: “Despite the sharp decline in enlistments, the percentage of blacks in the military still slightly exceeds that of the general population: 14.5 percent in the military, as of 2005, versus 12.8 percent in the US population. Nonetheless, recent Pentagon-sponsored surveys suggest that attitudes among military-age African-Americans may have changed for good.” The creation of non-military economic and educational opportunities for Black and other minority youth must be an essential part of the antiwar movement.

At UFPJ (United for Peace and Justice) and related antiwar meetings the lament routinely goes up that there are few (or more often zero) African Americans in attendance. And no wonder. Beneath the surface these meetings have as their agenda keeping the other war party (the Dems) in power. Do the “leaders” of UFPJ not understand that Blacks readily see through this ploy? Are these “leaders” so contemptuous of the Black community? They ask where are the African-Americans. The answer is easy. They are busy. They are working long and hard to keep their kids out of the death machine peddled by Dems as well as Republicans. They are striking at the heart of the military machine whereas the UFPJers are protecting the left wing of the bird of prey, the Democratic Party. Who are the leaders of the peace movement anyway? The attendees at those deadly boring and very PC UFPJ meetings or those Black parents keeping their kids out of the military and thus undermining the imperial machinery of death.

John V. Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar@gmail.com

 

More articles by:

John V. Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar@gmail.com

November 12, 2018
Kerron Ó Luain
Poppy Fascism and the English Education System
Conn Hallinan
Nuclear Treaties: Unwrapping Armageddon
Robert Hunziker
Tropical Trump Declares War on Amazonia
John W. Whitehead
Badge of Shame: the Government’s War on Military Veterans
Will Griffin
Military “Service” Serves the Ruling Class
John Eskow
Harold Pinter’s America: Hard Truths and Easy Targets
Rob Okun
Activists Looking Beyond Midterm Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Mid-Term Divisions: The Trump Take
Dean Baker
Short-Term Health Insurance Plans Destroy Insurance Pools
George Wuerthner
Saving the Buffalohorn/Porcupine: the Lamar Valley of the Gallatin Range
Patrick Howlett-Martin
A Note on the Paris Peace Forum
Joseph G. Ramsey
Does America Have a “Gun Problem”…Or a White Supremacy Capitalist Empire Problem?
Weekend Edition
November 09, 2018
Friday - Sunday
Louis Proyect
Why Democrats Are So Okay With Losing
Andrew Levine
What Now?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Chuck and Nancy’s House of Cards
Brian Cloughley
The Malevolent Hypocrisy of Selective Sanctions
Marc Levy
Welcome, Class of ‘70
David Archuleta Jr.
Facebook Allows Governments to Decide What to Censor
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Zika Scare: a Political and Commercial Maneuver of the Chemical Poisons Industry
Nick Pemberton
When It Comes To Stone Throwing, Democrats Live In A Glass House
Ron Jacobs
Impeach!
Lawrence Davidson
A Tale of Two Massacres
José Tirado
A World Off Balance
Jonah Raskin
Something Has Gone Very Wrong: An Interview With Ecuadoran Author Gabriela Alemán
J.P. Linstroth
Myths on Race and Invasion of the ‘Caravan Horde’
Dean Baker
Good News, the Stock Market is Plunging: Thoughts on Wealth
David Rosen
It’s Time to Decriminalize Sex Work
Dan Glazebrook
US Calls for a Yemen Ceasefire is a Cynical Piece of Political Theatre
Jérôme Duval
Forced Marriage Between Argentina and the IMF Turns into a Fiasco
Jill Richardson
Getting Past Gingrich
Dave Lindorff
Not a Blue Wave, But Perhaps a Foreshock
Martha Rosenberg
Dangerous, Expensive Drugs Aggressively Pushed? You Have These Medical Conflicts of Interest to Thank
Will Solomon
Not Much of a Wave
Nicolas J S Davies
Why Yemeni War Deaths are Five Times Higher Than You’ve Been Led to Believe
Jim Goodman
We call BS! Now, Will You Please Get Over This Partisanship?
Josh Hoxie
How Aristocracies are Born
Faisal Khan
The Weaponization of Social Media
James Munson
The Left Has Better Things to Do Than Watch Liberals Scratch Their Heads
Kenneth Culton
The Political Is Personal
Graham Peebles
Fracking in the UK
Alycee Lane
The Colonial Logic of Geoengineering’s “Last Resort”
Kevin Basl
How Veterans Changed the Military and Rebuilt the Middle Class
Thomas Knapp
Election 2018: The More Things Don’t Change, the More They Stay the Same
Gary Leupp
Europe and Secondary Iran Sanctions: Where Do We Go Now?
Saurav Sarkar
An Honest Look at Poverty in the Heartland
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail