FacebookTwitterRedditEmail

Symbolism Over Politics

So here’s the question: which was Don Imus’ bigger offense, calling the African-American women on the Rutgers basketball team nappy-headed or calling them hos? Almost all the commentary I’ve read on this now is all about the “racially charged” aspect of the comment, and the response to the “hos” part is: these girls are A students, they’re Girl Scouts, they’re musical prodigies, they’re future leaders. In other words, there are some women whom you might reasonably call hos, but not these women.

Or else the charge is that Imus’s big crime was on picking on 18, 19 and 20 year-olds, which is why Al Sharpton brought out his daughter. He wasn’t picking on someone his own size. A column in the NYT Tuesday said this was the big difference in this case, the reason that, after years of Imus and every other radio shock jock or tv jokester on the planet flinging slurs at people, this was too much. These are kids, not powerful public figures; nice, poised kids. And the coach even has a sad story of triumph over death and suffering. They are noble victims, our daughters, our mothers. How dare you call THEM hos.

But it’s all right to call Hillary Clinton a bitch and Satan, and it’s all right to call Gwen Ifil a cleaning lady, and hey, implicit, some women just are hos and bitches and cleaning ladies and they’re all at the very bottom of the heap and calling them out, pissing on them, is just what they deserve, since they’re gutter trash, the bottom class of the second class. But not these girls, these girls are “class acts”. I guess if they were called ‘big-boned hos’, maybe there’d be more focus on the woman part, but basically we’ve got so used to hearing women called bitches and hos for so long that really that’s just part of the language now. And we’ve got so used to men being called bitches, ladies, girls, girly-men when they don’t live up to some standard of macho killer achievement, that that’s normal too.

It’s been, how long?, fifteen years or so where over any radio, in any public place, you can hear endless screeds against bitches and hos. I remember being in a dressing room of a hip clothing store in New York years and years ago, trying on a T shirt, and the background music is just the most misogynistic stuff, Eminem rapping about killing his girlfriend–and I’m thinking: it is just amazing; you couldn’t get away with this kind of thing toward any other group of people. But women you really can kick around, and since the worst thing you can say to a man still is that he’s like a woman it just rolls on and on, because after all who is it who’s on the A list of shock jocks, outrageous singers, outrageous commentators. Ann Coulter is the new thing because she’s just taken on the shtick, so she can call people faggots and rag heads and call for mass killing with the best of the guys.

I’m just mystified that all of a sudden Don Imus has “crossed a line”. But the man has made a whole career of demeaning people. So has Howard Stern. So has Rush Limbaugh. The culture is absolutely saturated with humor and entertainment based on supposed outrage, but there is no outrage any more. Shock? There is no shock and not even much to laugh about. There was a time when shock worked, because there was intelligence behind it: Lennie Bruce, Richard Pryor. There was a political point to it. If you compare what those guys were doing to the world of fine art, you’d have to look back to the first guy, the Russian Malevich, who painted an all-black canvas. And then an all-white one etc. And that was in 1913 or so, and it was a hugely daring thing to do. But now what does it mean to paint an all-black canvas? It has no meaning, no shock, no daring, just imaginative exhaustion.

Compare Richard Pryor to Chris Rock: they both say fuck; they both say nigger, but the effect is totally different because the context is different and the intention is different. Chris Rock took the form but the content is completely changed, because Pryor came out of a different culture, a mass movement radical culture. On the radio, the shock jock phenomenon was the forward edge of the general exhaustion, a degraded expression of a degraded culture, a right wing culture. But it paid, so it flourished, because it also came out of a hyper-corporate culture. Now the only time it creeps up on anyone that there’s something really degraded about all this is when it’s applied to their wife, their daughter, but that’s very particular.

In general, people tune in to humiliation.

They line up to be humiliated themselves. They compete for cash on reality shows that are all about humiliation. They go on Fear Factor and eat live cockroaches. They go on The Swan to be assessed as fat and misshapen and then carved up on a surgeon’s table, on tv, and remade into “beautiful” replicants, someone’s idea of “attractive woman”. They go on Bill O’Reilly to be abused, or Imus to be tweaked or to talk all serious and flog their books between his demeaning one-liners against other people. And the put downs don’t even have to be clever anymore, don’t even have to pretend to cleverness. Look at Christopher Hitchens, the Oxford man, oh so clever, but his insults are gutter insults, spoken or written in a degraded language, and liberal outfits still invite him to come to their gatherings to soak up his abuse.

Now Imus is being dragged around the paddock and everyone feels better now he’s been canned from MSNBC, and better still if CBS fires him. A demonstration firing. But it won’t mean much. Kind of like firing Donald Rumsfeld. Sure, maybe he should be fired, but it won’t make any difference because the ground from which he sprung is still fertile. There’s a councilman in NY now who’s been on a crusade to ban ‘the n word’; he puts out this literature and he’s trying to get a law passed. What will the cops do, give people tickets if they overhear it? Who knows? So now he’s emboldened, saying this is fuel for his fire: ban this word and that word and the next word. Ban all these words and we’ll be back to decency. As if there ever was decency. So it would be illegal for an Imus to say nigger on the radio and it would be illegal to play Trick Daddy–the first a symbol of the backlash, the second a symbol of that vestige tradition of speaking a cruel truth and using a cruel word to tell it. Same word, different content. Maybe it would be illegal to call women hos too, though probably not illegal to call losing ballplayers a bunch of girls or liberal legislators a bunch of girly men. The old ladies from the NAACP who’ve been doing the protests here in front of CBS say they’re not going to stop until every degrading word is banished from the airwaves.

At the end of the day all of this seems like another triumph of symbolism over politics, whether he stays or goes. If he stays, the symbolism of apology; if he goes, the symbolism of a demonstration firing. Change will come only through changing the culture, the political culture. But it makes a little more sense as a diagnosis, I think, to say that the culture made the man. You can get rid of the man; you’re still stuck with the culture.

JoANN WYPIJEWSKI can be reached at jwyp@earthlink.net_

 

 

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
August 14, 2020
Friday - Sunday
Matthew Hoh
Lights! Camera! Kill! Hollywood, the Pentagon and Imperial Ambitions.
Joseph Grosso
Bloody Chicken: Inside the American Poultry Industry During the Time of COVID
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: It Had to be You
H. Bruce Franklin
August 12-22, 1945: Washington Starts the Korean and Vietnam Wars
Pete Dolack
Business as Usual Equals Many Extra Deaths from Global Warming
Paul Street
Whispers in the Asylum (Seven Days in August)
Richard Falk – Daniel Falcone
Predatory Capitalism and the Nuclear Threat in the Age of Trump
Paul Fitzgerald - Elizabeth Gould
‘Magical Thinking’ has Always Guided the US Role in Afghanistan
Ramzy Baroud
The Politics of War: What is Israel’s Endgame in Lebanon and Syria?
Ron Jacobs
It’s a Sick Country
Eve Ottenberg
Trump’s Plan: Gut Social Security, Bankrupt the States
Richard C. Gross
Trump’s Fake News
Jonathan Cook
How the Guardian Betrayed Not Only Corbyn But the Last Vestiges of British Democracy
Joseph Natoli
What Trump and the Republican Party Teach Us
Robert Fisk
Can Lebanon be Saved?
Brian Cloughley
Will Biden be Less Belligerent Than Trump?
Kenn Orphan
We Do Not Live in the World of Before
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Compromise & the Status Quo
Andrew Bacevich
Biden Wins, Then What?
Thomas Klikauer – Nadine Campbell
The Criminology of Global Warming
Michael Welton
Toppled Monuments and the Struggle For Symbolic Space
Prabir Purkayastha
Why 5G is the First Stage of a Tech War Between the U.S. and China
Daniel Beaumont
The Reign of Error
Adrian Treves – John Laundré
Science Does Not Support the Claims About Grizzly Hunting, Lethal Removal
David Rosen
A Moment of Social Crisis: Recalling the 1970s
Maximilian Werner
Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf: Textual Manipulations in Anti-wolf Rhetoric
Pritha Chandra
Online Education and the Struggle over Disposable Time
Robert Koehler
Learning from the Hibakushas
Seth Sandronsky
Teaching in a Pandemic: an Interview With Mercedes K. Schneider
Dean Baker
Financing Drug Development: What the Pandemic Has Taught Us
Greta Anderson
Blaming Mexican Wolves for Livestock Kills
Evaggelos Vallianatos
The Meaning of the Battle of Salamis
Mel Gurtov
The World Bank’s Poverty Illusion
Paul Gilk
The Great Question
Rev. Susan K. Williams Smith
Trump Doesn’t Want Law and Order
Martin Cherniack
Neo-conservatism: The Seductive Lure of Lying About History
Nicky Reid
Pick a Cold War, Any Cold War!
George Wuerthner
Zombie Legislation: the Latest Misguided Wildfire Bill
Lee Camp
The Execution of Elephants and Americans
Christopher Brauchli
I Read the News Today, Oh Boy…
Tony McKenna
The Truth About Prince Philip
Louis Proyect
MarxMail 2.0
Sidney Miralao
Get Military Recruiters Out of Our High Schools
Jon Hochschartner
Okra of Time
David Yearsley
Bringing Landscapes to Life: the Music of Johann Christian Bach
FacebookTwitterRedditEmail